On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Collins dacja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
After following the project for a long time, I just joined the pypy mailing
list looking to help out. I would love to help on the pypy.org
website; admittedly, I am fairly new to web design but I think I could
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded the pypy 1.5 binary (with jit) and run tests (only
sympy/core, so that it's fast) on Ubuntu Natty, 64bit:
ondrej@eagle:~/repos/sympy(master)$ bin/test sympy/core/
= test
Hi.
Sorry it took so long to review, long weekend and whatnot. The test
for x86 backend actually fails for -1.0 on 64bit. Can you
reproduce/deny?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Joe qbpro...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is a patch to allow pypy to use SQRTSD rather than calling
out to libc.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded the pypy 1.5 binary (with jit) and run tests (only
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM, p...@pocketnix.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:25:44PM -0400, Joe wrote:
I was trying to run the test file:
pypy/jit/backend/x86/test/test_rx86_64_auto_encoding.py
and was getting the following traceback:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/374129/
If you
thanks, commited!
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Matthew Woodcraft
matt...@woodcraft.me.uk wrote:
I found I needed the following patch in order to run translation with
gcc 4.6 and -march=corei7.
-M-
--- a/pypy/translator/c/gcc/trackgcroot.py
+++ b/pypy/translator/c/gcc/trackgcroot.py
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. My point was that since we dont care if they are there or not
the test should not test that they are there and fail if they are not.
So if there is an easy way to ignore them in this new test_pypy_c
framework
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:42 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 21:01 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hey all,
now that pypy's codespeak subversion usage is basically gone i'd like to
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
as we were discussing yesterday in another thread, the post-europython sprint
will be only two days long, and so we might want to have a longer one either
before or after europython.
I am considering
Hello.
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good
reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib
time (subprocesses) I don't think it's that necessary.
Besides:
* the variation between runs is too big, so we
For those interested in hardware/assembler.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
It's a good read and fills some of our gaps :)
Cheers,
fijal
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
The benchmarks game web pages now only show one language implementation for
each programming language.
Java -Xint, Tracemonkey JavaScript, LuaJIT, CPython, Iron Python, PyPy, Ruby
1.8.7 and JRuby 1.6 are no longer shown.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
The benchmarks game web pages now only show one
language implementation for each programming language.
Java -Xint, Tracemonkey JavaScript, LuaJIT, CPython
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
I guess a lot of discussions are about getting some sort of
consensus. I see this one is so you can know what we think
and that's it. Well, that comes
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Aaron DeVore aaron.dev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Joe qbpro...@gmail.com wrote:
While I spent my Saturday trying to make PyPy look better in the
language shootout, I'm leaning towards taking it out. While a
comparison between languages
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
I have another issue with ctypes numpy. This is that
C implementations are allowed to use gcc-specific hacks and
non-standard libraries (apache malloc
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
We don't get that information now at least, since those
benchmarks are badly skewed towards CPython. I know how
hard is to find out a reasonable set
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
Do you mean the program you contributed is badly
skewed towards CPython?
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/program.php?test=nbody〈=pypyid=1
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
CPython bugs - How strange that the CPython bug was
never mentioned! - maybe.
Ok. The bug was not mentioned because it takes time to
decide it's
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Leonardo Santagada santag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
So the position is that GCC is allowed to use extensions
because it's the only C implementation shown and PyPy is not,
because all Python programs
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/03/11 19:37, fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
My thoughts here are taking a very primitive step - that is run the
JVM translation and look at the generated Java - then see what needs
to be modified so that I could use
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/11 21:57, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so if Ademan tells me that he's not going to work on the
ootype-virtualref
branch, I'll try to finish the work so you can start playing with it.
Note to frank
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Romain Guillebert romain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm interested in doing the Summer of code on PyPy, from what I saw on
the mailing list and on irc, I would like to work on 2 things which
might interest you (there is no order of preference).
* Python backend
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Alex Perry alex.pe...@pamurray.com wrote:
I can't find it in the docs, but it has been alluded to in the past.
How far is the project from being able to compile a rpython module?
I'd expect that to emit a wrapper that imports ctypes and declares
calls into a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:02:25 +0100, Antonio Cuni writes:
On 23/03/11 02:36, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote
:
getting-started-dev says
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2011/3/22 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
After my last discussion about getting some multi-threading
primitives, I took a look at how locks are implemented in PyPy. PyPy
currently uses OS level
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
getting-started-dev says:
Download and install `Dot Graphviz`_ (optional if you have an internet
connection: the flowgraph viewer then connects to
codespeak.net and lets it convert the flowgraph by a graphviz
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Danilo Freitas dsurvi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all.
I'm interested in applying for GSoC this year.
I'm talking to Miquel Torres about some stuff in Codespeed, but I
don't know if it could be considered as PyPy project for GSoC.
We're trying to allow Codespeed
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Hervé Coatanhay
herve.coatan...@gmail.com wrote:
After a clone of the repository, whereas i can do the following translation
with just some warnings:
python translate.py --opt=jit targetpypystandalone.py
I got an exception with that one:
python translate.py
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Massa, Harald Armin c...@ghum.de wrote:
I really, really like the new display!
And it motivated me to dig into the data ... which is a great result on its
own.
The first question for myself was hey, why is it slow on
slowspitfire, and, btw, what is
Hey Miquel.
A small feature request ;-) Can we get favicon?
Cheers,
fijal
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:10:32 +0100, Miquel Torres writes:
Hi,
I finished the changes to the speed.pypy.org home page last night, but
alas!, I didn't have time to deploy. I will do it later today and will
then
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, that would be an issue. In this case, I could probably start
with a reference counting GCas I'm not exactly sure that it's
possible to get cyclic references with immutable objects. At least not
without
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:42 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I just turned
http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/extradoc
as well as the internal pypy-z repository READ-ONLY.
Thanks to Ronny's conversion work we now have these repositories at
bitbucket.org:
Hey.
Just my 5 cents.
It would be cool if default view has a down-scaled version of
comparison against CPython. I can look anywhere for recent changes.
Also the recent changes as they're now are not very informative and I
don't use them at all. They stick around, so I don't know if they're
new
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:25:45 +0100, Jacob Hallén writes:
snip
While I am fine with dropping older revisions of just about everything in
extradoc, I wonder if it wouldn't be better better for the future to
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, hakanardo commits-nore...@bitbucket.org wrote:
Author: Hakan Ardo ha...@debian.org
Branch: jit-virtual_state
Changeset: r41714:91586ef4b9c5
Date: 2011-02-08 19:42 +0100
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/91586ef4b9c5/
Log: never retrace a loop more
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Alex Gaynor
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
Mixture of old and new style classes is not only preventing us from
doing optimizations but also hits a bad case of tradeoffs
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/3 Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com:
You should make PyPy print warnings
when it encounters mixed-type classes :)
That's not a bad idea actually. Maybe with something like some -X option?
If we use
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/02/11 13:13, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
I'm not sure about warnings module. How about
--jit warnings=1
?
That would fit with other jit options.
not really. The other jit options really belongs to the JIT engine
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 03.02.2011 11:14:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
* Use list comprehension instead of generator expression.
I hope
2011/2/2 Łukasz Ligowski orangewarr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
First of all I'd like to thank all developers for good work on PyPy ;)
I'd like to ask are there any rules of thumb to write code that PyPy JIT can
easily optimize? Or maybe which constructs are hardly optimizable by JIT so
it's better
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have any benchmarks where we are slower that don't involve longs
that'd be great, since for float operations we really should be
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2011/2/1 Tasos Vogiatzoglou tvog...@gmail.com:
Amaury,
It seems that there is a general issue with the compiler/link .
I did the translations without the _hashlib and ssl and after a while
I got the
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10rev=41510:77f94f44989aexe=3env=tannit
?
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com:
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10rev=41510:77f94f44989aexe=3env=tannit
This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com:
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10rev=41510
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Arnd Rechenburg
arnd.rechenb...@tomtom.com wrote:
Hi,
When I try to use the function PyObject_AsCharBuffer I get the following
compiler warning:
warning: passing argument 2 of 'PyObject_AsCharBuffer' from incompatible
pointer type
By using Python it
I think this explanation what sys.getsizeof does is interesting. We
might want to have it.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org
Date: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:13 PM
Subject: [issue10994] implementation details in sys module
To: fij...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Eva Maia eva_m...@sapo.pt wrote:
Hi,
It is possible through the PyPy toolchain check if a program is a
rPython program?
I know the tool Pylint (RPylint) gives an idea, but it seems to me that
this tool gives some errors that result from being a little
Great!
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Miquel Torres tob...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to announce the release of Codespeed 0.7, the version which is
now powering speed.pypy.org
The announcement has been made on
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi Amaury,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Paolo Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com
wrote:
I propose that PyPy keeps reporting the error for files opened in any
write mode
I would also think that it's better to keep
Good job!
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:13 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
I've packaged pypy in RPM form for the Fedora distribution [1] - RPM
packages are now built in the development branch targeting the next
major release (Fedora 15).
So it should now be possible for Fedora
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Miquel Torres tob...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I finally added Mercurial support to Codespeed, following Antonio's
suggestion of parsing the (templated) command line output.Thanks to
everyone that helped!
I waited for today to give the awesome PyPy team
CDLL(None) (or LoadLibrary(None)) is supposed to return to you the
whole namespace (all loaded libraries). It's unsupported as far as I
can tell.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:41 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM, René Dudfield ren...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
__itemsize__ - in bytes, corresponds to item size field in the types
definition structure.
It's a field for types.
See:
http://docs.python.org/c-api/typeobj.html#tp_itemsize
Well... Those are docs for C API. It
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/12/10 12:05, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
__itemsize__ - in bytes, corresponds to item size field in the types
definition structure.
It's a field for types.
See:
http://docs.python.org/c-api/typeobj.html
Oh wow, that's really cool.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gary Robinson gary...@me.com wrote:
I thought this email could be relevant for those interested in SciPy / Numpy
on pypy. With enthought implementing a smaller core and using compatibility
layers for alternative platforms, it would
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Paolo Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:16, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi,
have you seen numpy/scipy?
Of course you are then going to hit the same problems that Ademan
tries to solve for numpy/scipy, notably how to
Not to comment on issue, but it's actually pretty good that
zope.interface C speedups don't work. They won't be speedups in pypy
case even if they did work.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Kevin Gill ke...@movieextras.ie wrote:
Hi,
I am new to PyPy.
I built pypy using...
$ python
This commit contains no tests whatsoever, it would be cooler if it did.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Bitbucket
commits-nore...@bitbucket.org wrote:
# HG changeset patch -- Bitbucket.org
# Project pypy
# URL http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/overview
# User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
Leonardo Santagada santag...@gmail.com:
why not have only 2 versions, both with the same size table and name
one spitfire_cstringio and the other spitfire_strjoin? I think it
would make things clearer.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
spitfires
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Seung Soo, sungs...@gmail.com wrote:
Antonio Cuni anto.cuni at gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
finally, it's happening .
Thanks to Ronny's work, we are going to complete the migration to mercurial
very soon.
+1
Cool.
Providing binaries through
Hey miquel, didn't we loose colors somehow?
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Miquel Torres tob...@googlemail.com wrote:
@Maciej: it doesn't make a lot of sense. Looking at this graph:
http://speed.pypy.org/comparison
Do we *really* need those functions available on RPython level?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:30 PM, ar...@codespeak.net wrote:
Author: arigo
Date: Thu Dec 9 18:30:33 2010
New Revision: 79938
Modified:
pypy/trunk/pypy/module/posix/__init__.py
pypy/trunk/pypy/module/posix/interp_posix.py
can do some stuff. I was serious about documenting why we're
slow/fast on benchmarks - that maybe we should bring down our docs to
a manageable number first :) Benchmarks descriptions are however
unlikely to change
2010/12/4 Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
re: keeping the 'why we are slower/what we could do to fix it' info up
to date -- one possibility is to make a 'why we were/what we are for
release 1.4.' Then every time you make a major release, you update
those fields as
Use:
import __builtin__
and treat it as module. __builtins__ is an ugly hack that is sometimes
a dict and sometimes a module and pypy has different corner cases.
__builtin__ will always work
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Leonardo Santagada santag...@gmail.com wrote:
(I'm guessing but) In
- Why PyPy performs better/worse than CPYthon (if known)
I'm a bit worried about keeping this up to date
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
/trunk i686-pc-linux-gnu
22275 - above cmd done 2010 Fri Dec 03 09:41 PM
$ /usr/local/cpython-2.5/bin/python -c 'import __builtin__'
benchbox-dstromberg:~/src/home-svn/backshift/trunk i686-pc-linux-gnu
22275 - above cmd done 2010 Fri Dec 03 09:41 PM
$
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Maciej
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Paolo Giarrusso, 01.12.2010 00:34:
Anyway, this does not interact with benchmarks above - Stefan, I still
don't get why you complained that pyexpat is slow by showing
benchmarks for another module, I guess I do not
Hey.
I would suggest using array module. It allocates memory in a
non-moving location and it's address can be found using buffer_info
method.
Cheers,
fijal
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:18 PM, renaud blanch rndbl...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i'm trying to make some pyopengl [0] -based code [1] run on
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/30 Paolo Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com
As a matter of fact, however, pyexpat is not involved here for PyPy,
and here (v1.4) it is still implemented through ctypes (in
lib_pypy/pyexpat.py), and not in
Hey.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Phyo Arkar phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com wrote:
i got python-magic working , after i installed without easy_install
(easy_install fail because it tried to install ctypes).
great
Now what is not working is python-lxml , which is very important for my
don't think there are any working (unless someone wrote a
pure-python one)
Cheers,
fijal
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Phyo Arkar phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com
wrote:
i got python-magic working , after i
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich Bolz, Antonio Cuni, Maciej Fijalkowski,
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc, Armin Rigo and the PyPy team
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/11/10 07:40, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Is pypy repository really a place for such files? Maybe we should keep
it somewhere else?
well, it's the memory usage of cpython when translating pypy. Why the pypy
repo
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:19 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
I guess it should just be another log category, like jit-summary.
Then you can get the effect you want by setting (in the shell) PYPYLOG
to jit-summary:-.
Is pypy repository really a place for such files? Maybe we should keep
it somewhere else?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:39 PM, antoc...@codespeak.net wrote:
Author: antocuni
Date: Wed Nov 24 17:39:03 2010
New Revision: 79480
Added:
pypy/trunk/pypy/jit/tool/cpython.vmrss
Log:
add the vmrss
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote: Hi Anto,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Disable jit debugging by default
Not sure it's a good idea. It's useful to see the statistics at the end of
the
run. I know that you can
the bug if you help me to help you.
- Roman
On Nov 20, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hey.
Unfortunately we don't have a full-time OS X developer and it makes it
harder for this platform to be fully spported. Is your python 32bit or
64bit? How did you build that executable
have pypy-c that doesn't work.
May be that was caused by --opt=jit on my x64 platform.
Will try to go with --opt=2 a bit later and report you the result.
- Roman
On Nov 21, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
I guess the first thing would be to build pypy svn yourself instead
Hey.
Unfortunately we don't have a full-time OS X developer and it makes it
harder for this platform to be fully spported. Is your python 32bit or
64bit? How did you build that executable?
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko
romcheg.pri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm
(part response)
2) How do I declare that an argument is const in rffi?
usually you don't
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:38 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 04:27 pm, drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sounds fine, do you feel like
Hello.
I did a bit of measurments using various techniques and
pypy-c-64bit-jit and the outcome is that after a bit of annotation,
where memory consumption is 1200M, we get:
* 31M of mmaped code blocks for assembler
* about 150M I can account for that is jit resume data
* about 150M of the rest
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Andrew Francis andrewfr_...@yahoo.com
wrote:
A few days ago, I floated this idea in the #pypy IRC channel. Why can't we
take a JITed pypy,
install the greenlet package, run it and see
Hey.
Can we make this directory 'tool' instead of 'tools' like every other
tool directory?
Cheers,
fijal
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, da...@codespeak.net wrote:
Author: david
Date: Mon Oct 25 16:45:58 2010
New Revision: 78267
Added:
The exception still can't happen though.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:32 PM, antoc...@codespeak.net wrote:
Author: antocuni
Date: Thu Oct 14 15:32:22 2010
New Revision: 77933
Modified:
pypy/branch/jitffi/pypy/jit/metainterp/test/test_optimizefficall.py
Log:
update this test too
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:37 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi all,
seems like the pypy-dev issue tracker got some spam through bot-registered
users. Unless i am mistaken there is no easy way to add a captcha in addition
to the e-mail confirmation registration and so i made the
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/10/10 23:32, fi...@codespeak.net wrote:
def transform(op):
from pypy.jit.metainterp.history import AbstractDescr
- # Rename CALL_PURE to CALL.
+ # Rename CALL_PURE and CALL_INVARIANT to CALL.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Terrence Cole
list-s...@trainedmonkeystudios.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 01:57 +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
Monday 27 September 2010 you wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 23:57 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham wrote:
Well, I am happy to see that the my interest in
Hey.
greenlet C module is quite incompatible with pypy and won't work.
However making pypy work with jit and stackless is something that
requires a bit of work only (teaching jit how to unroll the stack
mostly) and I plan to look into it in the very near future.
Cheers,
fijal
On Mon, Sep 27,
a subset of Stackless
without the scheduling? Could you explain a bit more?
Thanks.
--- On Mon, 9/27/10, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy JIT C extensions, greenlet
To: Ian P. Cooke i...@srand.net
Cc: pypy
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
While we're at it, how about splitting the translation toolchain from
pypy interpreter? I don't mean on technical merits, it can still
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amaur...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/9 Andy angelf...@yahoo.com:
Thanks Antonio.
So right now there's no way to run PyPy JIT on Linux 64 bit?
Yes there is!
Armin merged the asmgcc-64 branch yesterday.
You have to use trunk version of PyPy,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Paolo Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was curious about the interplay between type inference and separate
compilation.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 09:09, William Leslie
william.leslie@gmail.com wrote:
At the moment, the lack of separate
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Hakan Ardo ha...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org wrote:
I'm not saying that loop-invariant code motion could also have a
negative effect on large loops; I think it's a pure win, so it's
probably worth a try. I'm
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
