On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, I think we got enough +1's and no show-stopping problems (for a beta
at least). I copied it over the apache server, once the mirrors sync I'll
update the site and send the big announcement.
I was also thinki
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> So far I have working images of Debian stable, Debian unstable and
> Gentoo, plus the afore mentioned but messed up FreeBSD. As time (and
> disk space) permit I'll add some combination of Fedora, maybe one of the
> RHEL clones, SUSE, Ubuntu or whatever else strikes my fan
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, I think we got enough +1's and no show-stopping problems (for a beta
at least). I copied it over the apache server, once the mirrors sync
I'll update the site and send the big announcement.
I was also thinking it was time for a wider release, but was ho
OK, I think we got enough +1's and no show-stopping problems (for a beta
at least). I copied it over the apache server, once the mirrors sync I'll
update the site and send the big announcement.
Grisha
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now avai
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi Jim,
2005/11/16, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1 with patch
Linux gentoo 2.6.12-gentoo-r6
apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork)
python 2.4.2
gcc 3.3.6
There are 2 issues with the unit tests in Gentoo that are fixed by the
attached patch. (Just to be clear, I mean the prob
Hi Jim,
2005/11/16, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 with patch
> Linux gentoo 2.6.12-gentoo-r6
> apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork)
> python 2.4.2
> gcc 3.3.6
>
> There are 2 issues with the unit tests in Gentoo that are fixed by the
> attached patch. (Just to be clear, I mean the problems are wi
+1 with patch
Linux gentoo 2.6.12-gentoo-r6
apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork)
python 2.4.2
gcc 3.3.6
There are 2 issues with the unit tests in Gentoo that are fixed by the
attached patch. (Just to be clear, I mean the problems are with the unit
test code, not with mod_python).
First, test_global_lo
Sure enough /tmp/mp_sess.dbm was present, and owned by apache. I
removed the file and tested again with the same results. In doing so
/tmp/mp_sess.dbm was re-created and owned by the user running the test.
John M.
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> John McFarlane wrote:
>> Not sure if
+1 on SuSE Linux 9.2 (x86-64)
Best regards,
Indrek
Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
windows binary should be available shortly.
This release is similar to 3.2.4b but fixes a couple of minor issues -
MODPYTHON-87 (psp_parser), and MODPYT
+1 MacOSX 10.4.3, gcc 4.0.0 (apple), Python-2.4.2, Apache-2.0.55
cheers,
Ron
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A windows
binary should be available shortly.
This release is similar to 3.2.4b but fixes a couple of min
hehe - sorry about that, should be fixed now
Grisha
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, David Fraser wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
windows binary should be available shortly.
The windows binary for python 2.3 is borked, and contains its o
John McFarlane wrote:
Not sure if this is helpfull, but here goes...
To run test.py I did the following:
Overlay: http://thinkflat.com/files/public/?d=/ebuilds/mod_python
user# sudo emerge -a mod_python
user# tar zxvf mod_python-3.2.5b.tgz
user# cd mod_python-3.2.5b
user# ./configure --with-ap
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Being the guy who provide the Win32 binaries, I feel obliged to answer :)
Brilliant :-)
download, untar, then do (substituting your apache directory for the one
below)
cd dist
set APACHESRC="c:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2"
build_installer.bat
Note that without
Being the guy who provide the Win32 binaries, I feel obliged to answer :)
2005/11/15, David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
> > windows binary should be available shortly.
>
> I thought I'd add a note on b
Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
windows binary should be available shortly.
I thought I'd add a note on building on Windows...
Please download it, then do the usual
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make instal
Jim Gallacher wrote:
A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
windows binary should be available shortly.
The windows binary for python 2.3 is borked, and contains its own
md5sum, being only 68 bytes long.
This did raise the interesting thought of how easy it would
Not sure if this is helpfull, but here goes...
To run test.py I did the following:
Overlay: http://thinkflat.com/files/public/?d=/ebuilds/mod_python
user# sudo emerge -a mod_python
user# tar zxvf mod_python-3.2.5b.tgz
user# cd mod_python-3.2.5b
user# ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2
user#
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
I can't find the old mail about this, but Grisha suggested that this can occur
in virtual hosting environments, eg, OpenVPS.
No, no virtual hosting, jails, or other obviously unusual stuff.
>> > FreeBSD 6.0
>> > Apache 2.0.55 port built WITH_THREADS=1
>> > Python 2.4
I can't find the old mail about this, but Grisha suggested that this can occur
in virtual hosting environments, eg, OpenVPS.
Barry Pederson wrote ..
> Barry Pederson wrote:
> > I've got failures that seem to be caused by the tests themselves, but
> > with a bit of tweaking they pass.
> >
> > Free
Barry Pederson wrote:
I've got failures that seem to be caused by the tests themselves, but
with a bit of tweaking they pass.
FreeBSD 6.0
Apache 2.0.55 port built WITH_THREADS=1
Python 2.4.2
DOH! nevermind - just realized I missed this part of Jim's very clear
instructions:
-
T
H having a look at :
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#user
I'm finally not so sure we should integrate the User directive.
Wouldn't that require that the computer the test runs on has a user
named www with sufficient privileges plus that the test are started as
root ?
Reg
Thanks for the information, I'll add your patch to the test suite.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/11/15, Barry Pederson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've got failures that seem to be caused by the tests themselves, but
> with a bit of tweaking they pass.
>
> FreeBSD 6.0
> Apache 2.0.55 port built WITH_THREADS=1
I've got failures that seem to be caused by the tests themselves, but
with a bit of tweaking they pass.
FreeBSD 6.0
Apache 2.0.55 port built WITH_THREADS=1
Python 2.4.2
The error_log shows:
--
[Mon Nov 14 19:38:15 2005] [notice] mod_python: Creating 8 session
mutexes based
+1
Linux Debian 3.1 stable (sarge)
apache 2.0.54-5 (mpm-worker)
python 2.3.5
gcc 3.3.5
+1
Linux Debian unstable (sid)
apache 2.0.54-4 (mpm-prefork)
python 2.3.5
gcc 4.0.2
24 matches
Mail list logo
