"windozbloz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bye Bye Billy Bob...
>
> I'm back with one more question, then I'll chill. I have scoured the news
> and net for info about Borlands KYLIX 3 and have found little technical
> info about it. Their screen shots are very imp
I've used Kylix 3 in the past, but would not consider it nowadays,
because it's realy behind the times, it can't run on the latest linux
versions and does only support Qt 2.7, while Qt4 has just been released.
I'm a C++ programmer and loved Borland C++Builder, I was disappointed by
how buggy the C+
>
> Does anyone of you have experiance with KYLIX 3 and do you think I should
> consider buying it? Thank You, I'll go oil my keyboard now.
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/
Sorry if the above came out somewhere else in the thread, did not read all.
Vlad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Jeff Epler schrieb:
> I honestly don't know why anyone would spend money for a development
> environment, no matter how fancy. I don't know why anyone would develop
> software in a language that doesn't have at least one open
> implementation.
FreePascal is OSS. I recently developed a mixed Delph
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:37:48 +1000, David Trudgett wrote:
> My advice would be to steer clear of Kylix and choose one of the other
> environments suggested to you. If you really like Pascal, fpc may be a
> possibility as someone mentioned. ...
Well - I really like Python!
But - climbing back o
"Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Good question! Wither Borland?
>
> My impression (second hand - based on no direct experience with
> Kylix!) is that Borlands wonderful Delphi product ported to Linux
> has been a dissapointment.
>
> * * * Someone with real experience on Kylix -
Thomas Bartkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:56:24 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
>> "Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re-train on a new platform,
> and re-write from scratch?
>>>
>>> What do you do when an open source project you were using gets
>>> aband
Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
> As I said, "it is not python" (Peter Hansen, please don't jump to my
> jugular...)
Hey Pete, I was joking on that one!
Here's the missing smiley ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:56:24 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> "Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> > Re-train on a new platform,
>>> > and re-write from scratch?
>>
>> What do you do when an open source project you were using gets
>> abandoned?
>
> cvs import -m "sources for orphaned projec
"Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Re-train on a new platform,
>> > and re-write from scratch?
>
> What do you do when an open source project you were using gets abandoned?
cvs import -m "sources for orphaned project"
> Hard to see much difference here.
Doing support for objec
I'd suggest you take another path:
Since we're in a python mailing list, I assume you like python, so
instead of Kylix (or Object Pascal), you could try Boo
(boo.codehaus.org) .
Boo is not python, but it is very similar.
It could be described as a statically typed version of python for the
.NET fra
"windozbloz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bye Bye Billy Bob...
>
> I'm back with one more question, then I'll chill. I have scoured the news
> and net for info about Borlands KYLIX 3 and have found little technical
> info about it. Their screen shots are very impr
> Jeff Epler wrote:
>
> > I honestly don't know why anyone would spend money for a development
> > environment, no matter how fancy. I don't knowdefinitelye would develop
> > software in a language that doesn't have at least one open
> > implementation.
It's called (ROI) Return On Investment. If
Hi Doug
Not only was Kylix a letdown, there is talk also of it being
discontinued. To be fair though, it is easy to see the difficulty for
Borland to deploy a Linux IDE of the same quality as Delphi when so much
in different Linux distributions is variable, the widget set being a prime
ex
Jeff Epler wrote:
> I honestly don't know why anyone would spend money for a development
> environment, no matter how fancy. I don't knowdefinitelye would develop
> software in a language that doesn't have at least one open
> implementation.
>
> It's a great way to get screwed when Borland goes
I honestly don't know why anyone would spend money for a development
environment, no matter how fancy. I don't know why anyone would develop
software in a language that doesn't have at least one open
implementation.
It's a great way to get screwed when Borland goes under or decides
they only want
Bye Bye Billy Bob...
I'm back with one more question, then I'll chill. I have scoured the news
and net for info about Borlands KYLIX 3 and have found little technical
info about it. Their screen shots are very impressive, similar to Visual
Basic. I have sent several emails to Borlands Sales and
17 matches
Mail list logo
