Le lundi 26 mai 2014 01:09:31 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
On 25/05/2014 23:22, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 11:34:59 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
declaimed the following:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked
Le dimanche 25 mai 2014 02:27:11 UTC+2, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/24/2014 3:49 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had something everybody wants and nothing else provides, the
people will come, even the legacy
Hi Roy.
On 24.5.2014. 1:57, Roy Smith wrote:
You need 19 projects to transition to Python 3.
Of those 19 projects, 17 have no direct dependencies blocking their
transition:
[...snipped...]
suds
That's a big list. A few of those we could probably work around or
replace with a different
Roy Smith, 24.05.2014 01:57:
I installed and ran caniusepython3. It tells me:
Finding and checking dependencies ...
[WARNING] rpclib not found
You need 19 projects to transition to Python 3.
Of those 19 projects, 17 have no direct dependencies blocking their
transition:
beanstalkc
On 05/24/2014 11:43 PM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Python and unicode: a buggy hobbyist toy.
Voilà. Nothing either good or bad.
I thought this was a moderated list. What exactly are the moderators doing?
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 05/24/2014 11:43 PM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Python and unicode: a buggy hobbyist toy.
Voilà. Nothing either good or bad.
I thought this was a moderated list. What exactly are the moderators doing?
It's not a
On 25/05/2014 16:21, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/24/2014 11:43 PM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Python and unicode: a buggy hobbyist toy.
Voilà. Nothing either good or bad.
I thought this was a moderated list. What exactly are the moderators
doing?
--
~Ethan~
I don't think the list is
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:51:18 PM UTC+5:30, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/24/2014 11:43 PM, jmf wrote:
Python and unicode: a buggy hobbyist toy.
Voil�. Nothing either good or bad.
I thought this was a moderated list. What exactly are the moderators doing?
Your unicode is mojibaked
In article mailman.10285.1401009964.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Ubuntu provides a (partial) Py3 port of boto.
As long as the part that's ported includes all the bits of boto we
currently need, plus all the bits of boto we haven't yet discovered we
On Sun, 25 May 2014 10:38:42 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:51:18 PM UTC+5:30, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/24/2014 11:43 PM, jmf wrote:
Python and unicode: a buggy hobbyist toy. Voil�. Nothing either
good or bad.
I thought this was a moderated list. What exactly
On 2014-05-25 18:17, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 10:38:42 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voil�. You are hereby
banished to a lonely island with python 1.5 and jmf for company :D
Nope, it's you. Ethan's post is fine. He correctly quotes JMF
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voil�.
You are hereby banished to a lonely island with python 1.5 and jmf for company
:D
1.5 I could live with. :( Surely the company would count as cruel and
unusual punishment?
--
~Ethan~
--
On 25/05/2014 19:34, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voil�.
You are hereby banished to a lonely island with python 1.5 and jmf for
company :D
1.5 I could live with. :( Surely the company would count as cruel and
unusual
On 05/25/2014 11:56 AM, Tim Chase wrote:
Thunderbird does offer the ability to change default character
encodings (Edit - Preferences - Display - Formatting tab -
Advanced...) for sending and receiving, but you have to go out of your
way to change them to something like UTF-8. On the same
On 25/05/2014 23:22, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 11:34:59 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
declaimed the following:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voil�.
You are hereby banished to a lonely island with python 1.5 and jmf
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 11:34:59 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
declaimed the following:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voil�.
You are hereby banished to a
On 05/25/2014 03:22 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 11:34:59 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
declaimed the following:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voilà.
You are hereby banished to a lonely island with python 1.5 and jmf
On 5/25/2014 6:20 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
the mailing
list and gmane group may have some spam filters in place but no real
moderation.
They *do* have spam, structure, and source filters. Please do not
mis-inform people that they post most anything to python-list without
consequence.
On Sunday 25 May 2014 18:22:11 Dennis Lee Bieber did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Sun, 25 May 2014 11:34:59 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
declaimed the following:
On 05/25/2014 10:38 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Your unicode is mojibaked Ethan! Voilï؟½.
You are hereby banished to a
Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/my-view-on-the-current-state-of-python-3
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what
On 24/05/2014 08:13, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/my-view-on-the-current-state-of-python-3
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not
blindanagram no...@nowhere.net:
Quote:
And with Python 3.4 I really have not heard anyone complain that
they wouldn't like to use Python 3 instead of Python 2.
Or the devs do not wish to listen.
Python 3 will never work.
It works for me.
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 3:29:01 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
killer module/application/library that is only available on Python3.
I think
On 2014-05-24, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Python 3 will never work.
Neither will color TV.
All that phase detection stuff and that shadow-mask thing?
And airplanes? Bah!
Completely ridiculous.
--
Grant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
blindanagram no...@nowhere.net:
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
killer module/application/library that is only
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2014, at 7:35, blindanagram no...@nowhere.net wrote:
On 24/05/2014 08:13, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 22:16:10 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
On 05/24/2014 09:03 AM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
killer module/application/library that is only
Devin Jeanpierre, 24.05.2014 18:03:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
blindanagram:
Instead of focusing on bringing legacy libraries to Python3 (for which
there never seems to be a critical need), Python3 needs a brand new
killer module/application/library that is only
Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com:
If you want to migrate to Python 3, help that library forward, rather
than trying to make some bespoke replacement you think will be a
killer app.
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had something everybody
On 24/05/2014 20:49, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com:
If you want to migrate to Python 3, help that library forward, rather
than trying to make some bespoke replacement you think will be a
killer app.
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is
On 5/24/2014 3:49 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Few people have Python 3 as an objective. What I'm saying is that if
Python 3 had something everybody wants and nothing else provides, the
people will come, even the legacy libraries will be ported then.
I cannot think of anything beyond the core
In article mailman.10254.1400876180.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
An article by Brett Cannon that I thought might be of interest
http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/my-view-on-the-current-state-of-python-3
Thanks for the pointer. I installed and
On 05/23/2014 04:57 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. I installed and ran caniusepython3. It tells
me:
[snip]
That's a big list. A few of those we could probably work around or
replace with a different module without too much pain. But, between
gevent, boto, fabric, and suds,
In article mailman.10260.1400892736.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 05/23/2014 04:57 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. I installed and ran caniusepython3. It tells
me:
[snip]
That's a big list. A few of those we could probably
34 matches
Mail list logo
