I think the key thing is to have a consistent, simple, story for basic
> contributions.
>>
>
> Very good tl;dr :)
>
thanks.
>
> I have been following the way mercurial integrates patches and I'm quite
> impressed with the simplicity. We could get started with such a process in
> no time.
>
> h
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:59:25AM +0200, afayolle wrote:
> re: mq is dead, great. The fine manual at
> http://www.logilab.org/card/contributing needs updating since it's mq
> all over the place, and forking the patch repository from bitbucket.
I updated the fine manual. The death of mq has n
Le 22/09/2012 02:14, mbp a écrit :
I really appreciate getting quite timely reviews, and getting my patches
merged to trunk fairly quickly. That's at least as important as the
mechanics and you're getting it more right than many projects do.
I do agree it's fairly hard to know how to contribute
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:50:31AM +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 21 September 2012 21:36, Nicolas Chauvat
> wrote:
> > - Send your pull requests to python-projects@lists.logilab.org
>
> Immediate thought: I see a 'pull request' as what you create on
> bitbucket or github, and as far as I kno
On 21/09/2012 22:36, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> I tried to fix this by adding a big "How to contribute" section to
> http://www.logilab.org/project/pylint that reads:
>
> """
> How to contribute
>
> - Fork this http://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint
>
> - Send your pull requests to python-projects@lists
Hi Peter,
On 22 septembre 19:00, Peter Hammond wrote:
> If I may add another data point to this thread; about 6 months ago I
> submitted a patch to the mailing list, following what I understood
> to be the process in place at the time, documented on the web site.
> I heard nothing back from the li
On 21/09/12 09:00, afayolle wrote:
Hello,
Just a quick note, I've read
http://jakevdp.github.com/blog/2012/09/20/why-python-is-the-last/ The
article is interesting in its opinion about Python in the scientific
computation world. But I found the graph in the "Github" section very
interesting, esp
I really appreciate getting quite timely reviews, and getting my patches
merged to trunk fairly quickly. That's at least as important as the
mechanics and you're getting it more right than many projects do.
I do agree it's fairly hard to know how to contribute changes. For
instance, within one r
On 21 September 2012 21:36, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> - Send your pull requests to python-projects@lists.logilab.org
Immediate thought: I see a 'pull request' as what you create on
bitbucket or github, and as far as I know, neither let you specify a
destination email. You might want to reword it,
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:09:48AM +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> I don't think the mechanism necessarily has to be pull requests, but I
> do think there should be simple instructions for new contributors. For
> example, I made a minor contribution to logilab-astng a few months
> ago. Here's t
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:58:35 +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 21 September 2012 11:26, Adrien Di Mascio
> wrote:
> > There is an explicit ticket for pylint :
> >
> > https://www.logilab.org/ticket/103676
>
> Another thing I recall the rant pointing out: being confronted with a
> security
On 21 September 2012 11:26, Adrien Di Mascio wrote:
> There is an explicit ticket for pylint :
>
> https://www.logilab.org/ticket/103676
Another thing I recall the rant pointing out: being confronted with a
security warning by my browser is not encouraging. I understand that a
self-signed certi
Alexandre, Thomas,
On 21/09/2012 12:09, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
On 21 September 2012 09:00, afayolle wrote:
But I found the graph in the "Github" section very
interesting, especially since I'm now in the position of an external
contributor.
It's not obvious to a newcomer how to contribute. Th
On 21 September 2012 09:00, afayolle wrote:
> But I found the graph in the "Github" section very
> interesting, especially since I'm now in the position of an external
> contributor.
To add another datapoint to this: IPython also moved to Github in
Autumn 2010, and here's the number of contributo
14 matches
Mail list logo
