Great news, merci Régis.
IMHO it is not important to set priorities: both standards and
performances are important, for different reasons, and implementing one
will not interfere with the other - just different actors will be involved.
I'm sure both will receive higher support from PSC and QGIS com
>
>
>
> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x, they
> were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied reading the
> whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on the QGIS side.
> Anyone knows if it's still the case?
>
>
> No changes here. You j
Hi Régis,
Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help us
market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me
personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the same
level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority.
Thanks fo
Hi Régis,
My answers in the body of your email
Le 08/02/2018 à 11:25, Régis Haubourg a écrit :
Hi all,
As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3.
Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production
environment and would like to consolidate again QGIS server.
Hi all,
As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3.
Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production
environment and would like to consolidate again QGIS server.
I have some informations and questions :
# OGC certification
I got in touch with the OGC certif
