Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Derek via Ql-Users
On 19/02/2024 22:57, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: Oh well, if Peter Graf can upgrade my Q68 to v1.05 in May I might be able to do more research... Best regards, Jan Hi Jan, I can do any upgrades if you want to send the Q68 to me. Regards, Derek

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: > Oh well, if Peter Graf can upgrade my Q68 to v1.05 in May I might be > able to do more research... Please remind me prior to the QL meeting so I bring the equipment and FPGA data. As I wrote at several occasions, it turned out to make a difference on which

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users
On 19-02-2024 15:03, Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users wrote: My Q68 failed consistently with all SDHC cards I've tried here when configured for fast. It definitely did not slow down automatically when configured to fast (SMSQE 3.38) - the Q68 either crashed or failed to recognise the cards at 40MHz.

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi Which is the best version of Java to use? That would always be the latest non-beta version, which is 21 today. You can download that from. https://jdk.java.net/21/ Yes, I know, it's the jdk not the jre Wolfgang I use the version installed by the Linux Distro. On 19

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi, the reset problem under Java 21 is fixed in the version I just uploaded. Have fun! Wolfgang I'm on 21 it seems.. java --version openjdk 21.0.1 2023-10-17 Kjartan On 2024-02-19 17:10, Derek via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, All works fine with me installation of Java 11 on Linux Mint 21.2,

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread pjw via Ql-Users
On 19/02/2024 19:12, Derek via Ql-Users wrote: Which is the best version of Java to use? No idea. I was trying to download v17 from Adobe on my Windows 11 notebook but Adobe resisted all my attempts and got me to download v20, which was their latest at the time. That broke the SMSQmulator

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Derek via Ql-Users
Which is the best version of Java to use? I use the version installed by the Linux Distro. On 19 February 2024 17:16:57 GMT, pjw via Ql-Users wrote: >I have one system running on Java v17 and another running on Java v20. AFAICS >both appear to be fine (apart from some minor niggles I shant

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Fabrizio Diversi via Ql-Users
Hi, I had some problems with Java at the beginning with SMSQmulator 3.0, I sent the logs to Wolfgang then he sent me back an updated version, now all is fine. I am using it on Apple Macbook M1 with Sonoma 14.4 (Beta) and official Java release 17.0.1 LTS, I noted that since when I installed

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread pjw via Ql-Users
I have one system running on Java v17 and another running on Java v20. AFAICS both appear to be fine (apart from some minor niggles I shant bother you with). Per On 19/02/2024 18:01, Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: Hi Derek, Thanks that's good to know Regards Wolfgang Hi, All works

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi, ok that explains it. the 'stop' method was dropped from there. I'll have a fix tomorrow. Wolfgang Hi, I'm on 21 it seems.. java --version openjdk 21.0.1 2023-10-17 Kjartan ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi Derek, Thanks that's good to know Regards Wolfgang Hi, All works fine with me installation of Java 11 on Linux Mint 21.2, selecting Reset from menbar resets the emulator. Regards DerekT ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Juraj Lutter via Ql-Users
Hi, Java 17, on startup. otis@chemex ~/Downloads/SMSQmulator17300 % java -version openjdk version "17.0.9" 2023-10-17 OpenJDK Runtime Environment Homebrew (build 17.0.9+0) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Homebrew (build 17.0.9+0, mixed mode, sharing) otis@chemex ~/Downloads/SMSQmulator17300 % java -jar

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Kjartan via Ql-Users
Hi, I'm on 21 it seems.. java --version openjdk 21.0.1 2023-10-17 Kjartan On 2024-02-19 17:10, Derek via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, All works fine with me installation of Java 11 on Linux Mint 21.2, selecting Reset from menbar resets the emulator. Regards Derek On 19 February 2024 15:59:49 GMT,

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi, you get this when you start up the machine, or when you try to reset it? Wolfgang This popped up at me on startup when using OpenJDK17 from Homebrew on MacOS. Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi, are you running this on java 21? Wolfgang Hi, Another one - selecting Reset from the interface causes this: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException     at java.base/java.lang.Thread.stop(Thread.java:1667)     at

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Derek via Ql-Users
Hi, All works fine with me installation of Java 11 on Linux Mint 21.2, selecting Reset from menbar resets the emulator. Regards Derek On 19 February 2024 15:59:49 GMT, Juraj Lutter via Ql-Users wrote: > > >> On 19 Feb 2024, at 16:46, Kjartan via Ql-Users >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Another

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Juraj Lutter via Ql-Users
> On 19 Feb 2024, at 16:46, Kjartan via Ql-Users > wrote: > > Hi, > > Another one - selecting Reset from the interface causes this: This popped up at me on startup when using OpenJDK17 from Homebrew on MacOS. > > Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0"

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 3.00

2024-02-19 Thread Kjartan via Ql-Users
Hi, Another one - selecting Reset from the interface causes this: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at java.base/java.lang.Thread.stop(Thread.java:1667) at

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
> > Mind you, my Q68 has never been able to run Jan's > > Minerva port either. > > H... > > Are you coming to Germany in May? > > > Wolfgang Afraid not. Already had something else planned for both the original and revised dates. BTW, my Q68 is the v1.05 ROM loader. Given some reports of

[Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi Derek, (...) My Q68, latest ROM, hasn't managed to use a single SDHC card at the highest speed. (...) plus a couple of unbranded cards. I have no card which works with Q68 configured for fast card speed. OK, that's certainly strange. Does anybody else here have this problem? Note

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
> > Also the SD card speed is defaulting 40Mhz , which on normal SD Cards > > causes a lockup. Needs to be 20Mhz or NO in the defaults. > > Just what do you call normal SD cards? I have yet to find an SDHC card > that doesn't work with my Q68 at 40MHz. But, of course, YMMV. I'd be > interested in

[Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi Derek, (...) The Config Block values are: WIN1: QXL.WIN WIN2: SMS33Q.WIN So the Q68 may not find the WIN1 QWA container file. Fair enough - if you look at the source code, you will note that most of the changes were made there already. I now traced this problem to the program I use

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Derek via Ql-Users
Hi Great updates. One comment with regards to the Q68 update, the WIN1, WIN2 definition in the SMSQ/E config blocks, is defined as: Unfortunately, the file names in the SMSQ/E config blocks are not correct, as detailed in the Q68 Manuals. The Config Block values are: WIN1: QXL.WIN WIN2:

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread pjw via Ql-Users
Totally agree! Per On 19/02/2024 12:38, Fabrizio Diversi via Ql-Users wrote: I would like to express my thanks to Wolfgang, Marcel, Peter and all the other developers, HW and SW, who continue to give QL a future and who allow QL to be not just a retro "phenomenon". Q68, SMSQ/E, Ethernet

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39

2024-02-19 Thread Fabrizio Diversi via Ql-Users
I would like to express my thanks to Wolfgang, Marcel, Peter and all the other developers, HW and SW, who continue to give QL a future and who allow QL to be not just a retro "phenomenon". Q68, SMSQ/E, Ethernet drivers, slowly and laboriously, keep the QL connected to the future, therefore not