Afternoon Jan.
Happy New Year to you, here's hoping that 2018 is a good one.
DISA would possibly be a good one - if the original author is ok with his code
being publically available on Github, which I hope he is. Mind you, we need to
finish Multimon first. ;-)
I'll be getting back to that ver
Hi Norman,
On 31 December 2017 at 19:43, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
> Happy New Year one and all.
>
> I started pcb design a while back too. I use Fritzing and/or Kicad for
> mine. Manually routing a pcb can seriously use up a good few hours of your
> life! But
Happy New Year one and all.
I started pcb design a while back too. I use Fritzing and/or Kicad for mine.
Manually routing a pcb can seriously use up a good few hours of your life! But
it's [still] fun.
I will probably live to regret this but, let me know how/where to get the DISA
source and I
On 30/12/2017 16:10, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote:
Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday
from "industrial" programming ;)
Oh well, I'm already swamped with non-industrial work, I have so many
ideas and projects on what to do that I ha
pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote:
> Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday
> from "industrial" programming ;)
Oh well, I'm already swamped with non-industrial work, I have so many
ideas and projects on what to do that I hardly ever manage to finish
anything :-( I even starte
Thanks, Marcel. Yes, I thought you might enjoy this little holiday
from "industrial" programming ;)
BTW, no criticism was ever intended of the creators of either SMSQ/E
or DISA! Bugs are a fact of life, and not even Nature is imune (My
brain is full of them, for starters - and thats not the in
pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote:
> If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following
> - without saving your work first:
>
> 1 x% = 32000
> 2 y% = x%
> 3 z% = 1600
> 4 t = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!!
> 5 PRINT "-- Im dead!"
Nice find and, as usual, good repro, thanks. As good
Hi,
yes, that part of SMSQ/e probably hasn't been touched for ages.
Wolfgang
On 28/12/2017 13:44, Bob Spelten via Ql-Users wrote:
Op Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:43:13 +0100 schreef Wolf via Ql-Users
:
Hi,
yes that's a bug.
Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!),
causi
Op Thu, 28 Dec 2017 07:43:13 +0100 schreef Wolf via Ql-Users
:
Hi,
yes that's a bug.
Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!),
causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal
instruction error.
I've checcked that, under SMSQmulator this isn
Yup,
hence my original message...
Wolfgang
On 28/12/2017 13:16, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote:
On 28 December 2017 at 13:10, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
Hi,
ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"!
:)
In any case, if you jump to an odd location (whether strange or not even)
on a
On 28 December 2017 at 13:10, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"!
>
:)
In any case, if you jump to an odd location (whether strange or not even)
on a QL you will usually be in big trouble...
Jan.
--
*Jan Bredenbeek* | Hilversum, NL | j...@bredenb
Hi,
ok, ok, but I didn't even use the word "odd"!
Wolfgang
On 28/12/2017 13:03, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote:
On 28 December 2017 at 12:59, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
Hi,
To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which
would give rise to that exception.
He h
On 28 December 2017 at 12:59, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which
> would give rise to that exception.
He he that's a language thing :). 'Odd' in English can mean 'strange' but
also 'not even'. What I meant was the latter
Hi,
To my mind, a "jump to a strange address" is not an address error which
would give rise to that exception.
Wolfgang
On 28/12/2017 12:32, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote:
On 28 December 2017 at 07:43, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
Hi,
yes that's a bug.
Somehow the return stack gets conf
On 28 December 2017 at 07:43, Wolf via Ql-Users
wrote:
> Hi,
> yes that's a bug.
>
> Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!),
> causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal
> instruction error.
>
>
> I've checcked that, under SMSQmulator this
Hi,
yes that's a bug.
Somehow the return stack gets confused/overwitten (stack overflow!),
causing a jump to a strange address where you then will get an illegal
instruction error.
I've checcked that, under SMSQmulator this isn't due to the replacemnt
FP routines, which it isn't.
Wolfgang
Doesn't crash here
but ends up in QMon signalling an Address error ;)
Tobias
> Am 27.12.2017 um 17:20 schrieb François Van Emelen via Ql-Users
> :
>
> Op 26/12/2017 om 18:31 schreef pjwitte via Ql-Users:
>> If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following -
>> without
Op 26/12/2017 om 18:31 schreef pjwitte via Ql-Users:
If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following
- without saving your work first:
1 x% = 32000
2 y% = x%
3 z% = 1600
4 t = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!!
5 PRINT "-- Im dead!"
The above crashes SMSQ/E 3.32 on QPC2 an
If you want a really miserable Christmas, you could try the following
- without saving your work first:
1 x% = 32000
2 y% = x%
3 z% = 1600
4 t = x% * y% * z%: REMark Kabm!!!
5 PRINT "-- Im dead!"
The above crashes SMSQ/E 3.32 on QPC2 and SMSQmulator! Even the
four-finger reset wont work.
19 matches
Mail list logo