68080...miracle could happen?:-)
I am using mainly the Q60 with Peter solution on a modern LCD using the
new PLCC developped by him (1024x512 leaving the lower part of the
screen black).
I am also playing time by time with Q68 and Mister, for the QL (used
rarely) i used a standard VGA
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:20:16 +0100, pgraf--- via Ql-Users wrote:
> If the OSSC wasn't such an expensive, clumsy setup, I would also just
> say: Issue solved. Period.
All what matters for me is that it plain works and secures the usage
of my Q60 in the future. "Clumsy" or not, the fact the OSSC
On 16 Jan 2020 at 0:43, Thierry Godefroy via Ql-Users wrote:
> > Those are small PLDs, optimized almost to the last gate, not FPGAs,
> > and 800x600 is not doable.
>
> Surprising, since it's "just" a change in divisors/counters/
> frequencies, but if you say so (I'm certainly no expert in
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:07:53 +0100, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
> Those are small PLDs, optimized almost to the last gate, not FPGAs,
> and 800x600 is not doable.
Surprising, since it's "just" a change in divisors/counters/
frequencies, but if you say so (I'm certainly no expert in PLD/FPGA
Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>> Besides lack of time and the BGA soldering issue, I remain unsure if
>> such a massive board modification is appropriate for a historic computer.
>>
>> A lot depends on the question, what do we actually prefer today: Keeping
>> the historic machine alive, or any 68060
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:40:26 +0100, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
> Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> > In fact, I found out today that by increasing the sample rate to 1260 (from
> > the 1200 I used so far) on the OSSC, I could get it to output a 1024x512
> > (without scan doubling) or 2048x1024 (with
Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> In fact, I found out today that by increasing the sample rate to 1260 (from
> the 1200 I used so far) on the OSSC, I could get it to output a 1024x512
> (without scan doubling) or 2048x1024 (with it) resolution in the 480p HDMI
> signal format... and the good news is that
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 01:16:14 +0100, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
> Many thanks for taking a highres picture. It is nice to get the screen
> filled, still single pixels can not be distinguished in every area. The
> picture is significantly clearer on my 1024x768 monitor using the "black
> bar"