[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That is quite amazing, a bug found out by a Greek QL user who was using a=
> n old Spectrum emulator, reported to the Italian author and solved in Ger=
> man by the author of a QL emulator for Windows... everything in less than=
> 24h!!
>
And when the film/movie is mad
That is quite amazing, a bug found out by a Greek QL user who was using an old
Spectrum emulator, reported to the Italian author and solved in German by the
author of a QL emulator for Windows... everything in less than 24h!!
Ciao
Davide
> Davide Santachiara wrote:
> > --8<---
Davide Santachiara wrote:
> --8<-8<---8<--
> I am a registered user of Zm128 emulator on Ql I want to ask you if it
> is incompatible with QPC2 v 3.30 because I tries the simple program
> 10 for i=1 to 10
> 20 print i
> 30 next i
OK, fixed it
Την Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:36:08 -0400,ο(η) Davide Santachiara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
Davide,
would you mind forwarding to me the greek user's email via private email?
I hunt the greek users down so I can get them organised :-)
Cheers,
Phoebus
--
Χρησιμοποιώ το επαναστατικό πρόγραμμα α
Davide Santachiara wrote:
> I am a registered user of Zm128 emulator on Ql I want to ask you if it
> is incompatible with QPC2 v 3.30 because I tries the simple program
> 10 for i=1 to 10
> 20 print i
> 30 next i
Very strange, I'll have a look.
Marcel
Dear Marcel (and everybody in the list),
I have received an interesting email from a Greek QL user. He says:
--8<-8<---8<--
I am a registered user of Zm128 emulator on Ql I want to ask you if it
is incompatible with QPC2 v 3.30 because I tr
PROTECTED] Tel. 41227581410
>-- Message original --
>Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:13:57 +
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Roy wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
>Cc:
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Uhlig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Am Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:49:15 +0100 hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> geschrieben:
Hi Wolfgang
When I try to run this in QPC, setenv is refused (not recognised). I must
be missing something in my boot program? Any ideas?
Regards, Ian
Ian writes:
> When I try to run this in QPC, setenv is refused (not recognised). I must
> be missing something in my boot program? Any ideas?
Make sure youre loading ENV_BIN before using SETENV
Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk
Am Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:49:15 +0100 hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> geschrieben:
Hi Wolfgang
When I try to run this in QPC, setenv is refused (not recognised). I must
be missing something in my boot program? Any ideas?
Regards, Ian
I am not the Wolfgang you are addressing to, but nevertheless...
IIRC you h
Hi Wolfgang
When I try to run this in QPC, setenv is refused (not recognised). I must
be missing something in my boot program? Any ideas?
Regards, Ian
>-- Message original --
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
>Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:58:17 +0100
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Davide Santachiara wrote:
Sorry if I am a bit late but I went a few days in Barcelona and now
I am back with some three hundred message to read...
Ah, I already wondered what took you so long :-)
The speed increase on my Inte
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 10:58:03, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Also in order to install a third-party HDD (usually a Seagate ST-251-0)
>you had to literally use a can opener (for the shielding inside) and
>chop a couple of millimetres from the faceplate.
I had no problems with
ÎÎÎ Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:35:54 +,Î(Î) Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÎÎÏÎÏÎ/wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 10:09:25, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:58:32 +,() Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 14:46:07, Ma
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 10:09:25, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:58:32 +,() Tony Firshman
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 14:46:07, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
>> (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>>
>>> Davide Santachiara wrote:
>>
ÎÎÎ Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:58:32 +,Î(Î) Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÎÎÏÎÏÎ/wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 14:46:07, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Davide Santachiara wrote:
Sorry if I am a bit late but I went a few days in Barcelona and now
I am back with some three hundr
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 at 14:46:07, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Davide Santachiara wrote:
>> Sorry if I am a bit late but I went a few days in Barcelona and now
>> I am back with some three hundred message to read...
>
>Ah, I already wondered what took you so long :-)
>
>> The s
Davide Santachiara wrote:
> Sorry if I am a bit late but I went a few days in Barcelona and now
> I am back with some three hundred message to read...
Ah, I already wondered what took you so long :-)
> The speed increase on my Intel Centrino 1,6 Mhz notebook is
> impressive. Here are the figures:
Hello Marcel,
Sorry if I am a bit late but I went a few days in Barcelona and now I am
back with some three hundred message to read...
The speed increase on my Intel Centrino 1,6 Mhz notebook is impressive. Here
are the figures:
Pre 3.2x QPC2 QSI: 2460 (24,6 times wrt Gold Card)
On 2 Feb 2005 at 11:15, jms1 wrote:
>
> What about other QL owners & SMSQE?
> Can you run this command on an expanded QL, QXL, Auroa, Q40 & Q60
It hasn't anything to do with SMSQE.
It's a sernet (midinet et al) facility.
Wolfgang
> ___
> QL-Users Maili
jms1 schrieb:
- Original Message -
From: "- Aucun -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
Roy,
You were tired yesterday, weren't you? (I never resist to this formula as
it
is the o
- Original Message -
From: "- Aucun -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
> Roy,
>
> You were tired yesterday, weren't you? (I never resist to this formula as
it
&
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> qlwIP will support UDP so the same will be obtainable natively as well
> AFAIK
If and only if it will ever see the light of day.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
ÎÎÎ Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:51:30 +0100,Î(Î) Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÎÎÏÎÏÎ/wrote:
Roy wood wrote:
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines running
QPC2 and connected by ethernet why not just map the drives so they have
a letter and then use that letter as one of the
ÎÎÎ Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:28:06 +0100,Î(Î) Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ÎÎÏÎÏÎ/wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
What does UDP stand for - obviously a Protocol ?
1) Short for User Datagram Protocol.
AKA unreliable datagram protocol. Unlike TCP packets UDP data is not
guaranteed to arrive at the o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 at 11:25:05, - Aucun - wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Roy,
You were tired yesterday, weren't you?
we had an alcoholic government minister in the 70s called George Brown.
Private Eye (a satirical mag an
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 at 11:25:05, - Aucun - wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Roy,
>
>You were tired yesterday, weren't you?
we had an alcoholic government minister in the 70s called George Brown.
Private Eye (a satirical mag and still going strong) coined the phrase
'tired and emotional' for his
- Aucun - writes:
<>
> I understand and believe that in your situation EX WIN6_myprog_exe
executes
> myprog on your local machine, but EX "n1_*win1_myprog_exe" executes myprog
on
> the remote machine, provided QPC runs there as well, I suppose (and WIN6_
on
> you local QPC is WIN1_ on your remote
Roy,
You were tired yesterday, weren't you? (I never resist to this formula as it
is the one that we learn during the first hour of english learning).
I understand and believe that in your situation EX WIN6_myprog_exe executes
myprog on your local machine, but EX "n1_*win1_myprog_exe" executes
Roy wood writes:
<>
> I believe Marcel has even made it possible
> for two machines to access the same file although I have not tried it.
Not the same QL file, but the same QXL.win file, yes. This works a treat.
You can even have more than one instance of QPC2 running off the same set of
drives,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wolfgang mühlegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
If you mapped the qxl.win file on the other machine to be win6_ ,say
you could then do:
EX WIN6_myprog_exe
no difference. I do this all the time here to
wrong
because it runs on the other machine!
Oh no it doesn't.
Maybe if you want to write a game that can be run on the two QPC2's
and would play against each other - like DiRen did with their ship
game - can't remember the name and never got to play it alas...
Hmm - maybe Robin should re-release that game, so we can start
playing it against each other
Roy wood schrieb:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wolfgang mühlegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
Roy wood schrieb:
<--->
2 computers connected with ethernet, running QPC2
(at the moment it only works with 2)
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines
running QPC2 and connec
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 30 Jan 2005 at 17:43, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
What does UDP stand for - obviously a Protocol ?
1) Short for User Datagram Protocol.
(2) Short for Usenet Death Penalty
Umm ... I figured it would be harmful to humans ... :-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wolfgang mühlegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
Roy wood schrieb:
<--->
2 computers connected with ethernet, running QPC2
(at the moment it only works with 2)
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines
running QPC2 and connected by ethernet why
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>> What does UDP stand for - obviously a Protocol ?
> 1) Short for User Datagram Protocol.
AKA unreliable datagram protocol. Unlike TCP packets UDP data is not
guaranteed to arrive at the other end, the higher up protocol must
therefore cater for data loss and data re-sendin
On 30 Jan 2005 at 17:43, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> What does UDP stand for - obviously a Protocol ?
1) Short for User Datagram Protocol.
(2) Short for Usenet Death Penalty
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Roy wood wrote:
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines running
QPC2 and connected by ethernet why not just map the drives so they have
a letter and then use that letter as one of the QXL.WIN files ?
Roy wood wrote:
> Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines running
> QPC2 and connected by ethernet why not just map the drives so they have
> a letter and then use that letter as one of the QXL.WIN files ? I have
> done it like this for ages. I believe Marcel has even made i
Rich Mellor schrieb:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:17:05 +, Roy wood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<>
what you need is ask marcel for the udprext.zip
plus
2 computers connected with ethernet, running QPC2
(at the moment it only works with 2)
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machi
Roy wood schrieb:
<--->
2 computers connected with ethernet, running QPC2
(at the moment it only works with 2)
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines running
QPC2 and connected by ethernet why not just map the drives so they have
a letter and then use that letter as one o
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:17:05 +, Roy wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
<>
what you need is ask marcel for the udprext.zip
plus
2 computers connected with ethernet, running QPC2
(at the moment it only works with 2)
Not sure I understand the point here. If you have two machines running
QPC2 an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wolfgang mühlegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
P Witte schrieb:
wolfgang mühlegger writes:
P Witte schrieb:
How do you make this work?
marcel hacked sernet to work 'over udp'
and it's working great!
I think I got that part of your earlier message ;) What do you nee
Rich Mellor schrieb:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:33:07 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Mellor wrote:
Thanks Marcel - the only thing is that the Help function does not work -
some files missing??
Yes, the help files...
Well yes I guessed that - we need to include them in the pack
Rich Mellor wrote:
> Well yes I guessed that - we need to include them in the package
My package is a quick demonstration on how to set it up so that it
runs. Nothing more, nothing less. Anybody is welcome to enhance, it of
course.
Marcel
___
QL-Users
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:33:07 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Mellor wrote:
Thanks Marcel - the only thing is that the Help function does not work -
some files missing??
Yes, the help files...
Well yes I guessed that - we need to include them in the package, or are
these on
Rich Mellor wrote:
> Thanks Marcel - the only thing is that the Help function does not work -
> some files missing??
Yes, the help files...
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:18:25 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Mellor wrote:
Dilwyn seems to have got this running - seems to be the best bet (lets
give Marcel a rest)
That's music in my ears. But anyway, as more people will probably have
problem settings this up, get http://w
P Witte schrieb:
wolfgang mühlegger writes:
P Witte schrieb:
How do you make this work?
marcel hacked sernet to work 'over udp'
and it's working great!
I think I got that part of your earlier message ;) What do you need to
connect and how do you make it work?
Per
_
wolfgang mühlegger writes:
> P Witte schrieb:
> >
> > How do you make this work?
> >
>
> marcel hacked sernet to work 'over udp'
> and it's working great!
I think I got that part of your earlier message ;) What do you need to
connect and how do you make it work?
Per
P Witte schrieb:
How do you make this work?
marcel hacked sernet to work 'over udp'
and it's working great!
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
wolfgang mühlegger writes:
<>
> to me the most exiting thing has not been mentioned by a word:
> marcel has modified sernet to udpnet.
> so ql-networking is MUCH faster now and easier too - you do not have to
> deal with baud rates, cables ...
How do you make this work?
> thx marcel ..
Yes. A l
wolfgang mühlegger wrote:
> to me the most exiting thing has not been mentioned by a word:
> marcel has modified sernet to udpnet.
> so ql-networking is MUCH faster now and easier too - you do not have to
> deal with baud rates, cables ...
Right, totally forgot about this. I will release it when I
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the Lynx boot program which I managed to copy and run. But the
ex_lynx line makes a window for a second then closes. I am not wise
enough on how to do better.
Sorry, I can't help you directly.
Perhaps try to download the whole package, with which everything runs fine
on m
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
> It's different here:
> 132 times faster for QPC 3.20
> 101 times faster for QPC 3.30
> WHA??
Never heard a case where it got slower. Did the benchs take place
under *exactly* the same conditions? This includes colour mode, full
screen or not and of course whether ot
Rich Mellor wrote:
> Dilwyn seems to have got this running - seems to be the best bet (lets
> give Marcel a rest)
That's music in my ears. But anyway, as more people will probably have
problem settings this up, get http://www.kilgus.net/soft/lynx.zip
and start QPC with the lynx.win file as WIN1_.
Rich Mellor wrote:
> Thanks Marcel - guess the biggest comment which is missing from this
> announcement is the fact that the full IP support means that QPC2
> can at last access the internet directly
Ah yes, of course. I can see that not everybody might understand it
this way.
> - just a shame L
itzerland
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. 41227581410
-- Message original --
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:58:17 +0100
From: "Wolfgang Uhlig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:01:19
] Tel. 41227581410
>-- Message original --
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
>Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:58:17 +0100
>From: "Wolfgang Uhlig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc:
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Am Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:01:19 +01
Marcel Kilgus schrieb:
After months of development and beta testing I'm proud to announce
that QPC2 version 3.30 officially went live. As usual the update is
free for all users of QPC2 version 3. Get it from
http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/
Main changes are a much faster emulation core and uQLx compatibl
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
Thank you, Marcel.
Thanks from me, too :)
Now the next project will be EasyPtr, I hope ;)))
So do I.
Test909_obj returns
80 times faster than QL for QPC 3.20
98 times faster than QL for QPC 3.30
François Van Emelen
It's different here:
132 times faster for QPC 3.20
101
Thank you, Marcel.
Thanks from me, too :)
Now the next project will be EasyPtr, I hope ;)))
Test909_obj returns
80 times faster than QL for QPC 3.20
98 times faster than QL for QPC 3.30
François Van Emelen
It's different here:
132 times faster for QPC 3.20
101 times faster for QPC 3.30
WHATTT
Am Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:01:19 +0100 hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> geschrieben:
I have QLynx in WIN1_ but executing it does not get me anywhere.
Hi Ian,
I got some files of a friend of mine and a "Lynx_boot", where there are the
following lines:
110 LRESPR win1_sigext30_rext
120 SETENV "TERM=qdos"
130 SETE
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
After months of development and beta testing I'm proud to announce
that QPC2 version 3.30 officially went live. As usual the update is
free for all users of QPC2 version 3. Get it from
http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/
Thank you, Marcel.
Test909_obj returns
80 times faster than QL
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:01:19 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rich
I have QLynx in WIN1_ but executing it does not get me anywhere. I have
UQLX-010601.tbz
in DOS1_ but it will not transfer to WIN1_
Can you guide me?
Thanks,
Unfortunately no - I have not tried QPC v3.30 as yet
Dilwyn seems
age original --
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2 v3.30
>Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:32:06 -
>From: "Rich Mellor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc:
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:26:56 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
><[EMAIL
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:26:56 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After months of development and beta testing I'm proud to announce
that QPC2 version 3.30 officially went live. As usual the update is
free for all users of QPC2 version 3. Get it from
http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/
Main ch
After months of development and beta testing I'm proud to announce
that QPC2 version 3.30 officially went live. As usual the update is
free for all users of QPC2 version 3. Get it from
http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/
Main changes are a much faster emulation core and uQLx compatible
TCP/IP functionality
68 matches
Mail list logo
