Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference

2018-06-12 Thread Oliver Eichler

Hi John

 

no worries. I took the time for an answer as this is kind of a topic that constantly pops up and needs detailed explanation.

 

Regarding your track. You can double click on the track in the list. Or you select "Track Profile" from the menu (right click on the item in the list). Or you select "Track Profile" from the tool buttons when you click on the track in the map view.

 

The double click will also zoom the view to fit your track.

 

With Menu->View->Ext. Profile (crtl+e) you can toggle the profile widget between the small version (link in QLGT) or a window version that can be placed and scaled as needed. and you can select ranges in that extended profile. If the small version is active you can click on it to enter the track edit dialog.

 

HTH

 

Oliver

 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 um 04:20 Uhr
Von: John 
An: "Oliver Eichler" 
Betreff: Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference



Thank you Oliver.

Thank you for going to the trouble of writing a detailed reply.  My email was intended to compliment you for both QLGT and QMS.  All users owe you a debt of gratitude beyond measure.  Thank you again.

At the risk of being a nuisance, can you comment on the way QLGT displays a high lighted track, and whether this could be an option in QMS?

--






 





Cheers

JohnG
___
using LINUX :: an operating system immune to Windose viruses

 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users


Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference

2018-06-11 Thread Oliver Eichler
f view QMapShack solves many problems I ran into  when using QLandkarte. From time to time I have to launch QLandkarte for support or to see how I solved stuff. Every time it's a small shock. There is a lot of difference. And yes, sometimes it's also a bit more confortable as there are less clicks used for some fuctions. However if QLankdarte would have evolved as QMapShack did, this simplicity would have been gone sooner or later.

 

Up to now there is no effort to remove QLGT completely. Everyone is free to choose whatever software seems to be fit. And I do not see any reason to change that in the close future. Therefore if you do not like QMapShack keep on using QLandkarte. Never touch a running system if you do not have to.

 

Oliver

 



Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2018 um 08:03 Uhr
Von: John 
An: qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference



Thank you Wolfgang and Oliver for the replies.

My ignorance, I was setting up the Grid and not the Map View coordinates, so everything is now square.  I don't have trouble zooming QMS, however, when unzooming the the topo map disappears when the scale is 3.00km or more, which is a nuisance.

May I comment on QMS v QLGT

I have used QLGT for a very long time, and have monitored the development of QMS from the beginning.  I am not a coder, and appreciate the enormous amount of work that Oliver and others have devoted to QMS.  Virtually every demand has been catered for, and QMS has become the "Swiss Army Knife" of mapping.  On the other hand I feel QLGT also has a place for those who do not need the sofistication of QMS.  All some need is to do the things that QLGT does well, like simply look at a gpx file to see where they had been, or to plot a course using the Distance Polyline.  QLGT does this without multiple windows and options.  A QLGT feature I much prefer is the way QLGT draws a highlighted track, showing individual gps points which can be easily inspected or deleted to tidy up the track.  The QLGT gui is simple and user friendly, no need to open/close windows, no need for projects, etc.  For simple people like me, QLGT is more than adeqate.  If QLGT is allowed to die, may be the gui could live on as an option for QMS(?).
 
 






 

Cheers

JohnG
 
-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Qlandkartegt-users mailing list Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users

 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users


Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference

2018-06-10 Thread John


Thank you Wolfgang and Oliver for the replies.

My ignorance, I was setting up the Grid and not 
the Map View coordinates, so everything is now 
square.  I don't have trouble zooming QMS, 
however, when unzooming the the topo map 
disappears when the scale is 3.00km or more, which 
is a nuisance.


May I comment on QMS v QLGT

I have used QLGT for a very long time, and have 
monitored the development of QMS from the 
beginning.  I am not a coder, and appreciate the 
enormous amount of work that Oliver and others 
have devoted to QMS.  Virtually every demand has 
been catered for, and QMS has become the "Swiss 
Army Knife" of mapping.  On the other hand I feel 
QLGT also has a place for those who do not need 
the sofistication of QMS.  All some need is to do 
the things that QLGT does well, like simply look 
at a gpx file to see where they had been, or to 
plot a course using the Distance Polyline.  QLGT 
does this without multiple windows and options.  A 
QLGT feature I much prefer is the way QLGT draws a 
highlighted track, showing individual gps points 
which can be easily inspected or deleted to tidy 
up the track.  The QLGT gui is simple and user 
friendly, no need to open/close windows, no need 
for projects, etc.  For simple people like me, 
QLGT is more than adeqate.  If QLGT is allowed to 
die, may be the gui could live on as an option for 
QMS(?).


signature-mini

Cheers

*JohnG*

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users


Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference

2018-06-10 Thread Oliver Eichler
Hi 

the map view of QLandkarte GT always uses the projection of the loaded map. In 
QMapShack on the other hand side you can define a projection for the map view 
as Wolfgang is pointing out. All maps and the grid are reprojected on-the-fly 
into the view's projection.

The default projection of a view is Mercator. And your grid projection is 
Transversal Mercator which results into a slight rotation. But together with 
your grid your map should be rotated to, if the map has also a Transversal 
Mercator projection. 

Thus if you compare QLGT and QMS with a track everything should fit the map on 
both applications. The only difference should be that map, grid and track are 
a bit rotated in QMS. If that is the case everything is fine. If not there is 
a problem.

As Wolfgang suggested you can change the view's projection to match your grid 
and map. But keep in mind that zooming into locations outside the given zone 
might end up into a totally weird screen.

With Mercator projection you can have a TMS world map as basic layer and load 
your topographic maps on top of this layer. By that you have your details from 
the topographic map where it is available and for all other regions you have 
the TMS map. Using several different maps at a time is the big advantage of 
QMapShack compared to QLandkarte. 

HTH

Oliver

Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2018, 09:30:33 CEST schrieb WT:
> Am 09.06.2018 um 01:18 schrieb John:
> > When I use the projection below in QlandkarteGT, the grid is parallel
> > with the sides of map window, ie longitudes are vertical. The same
> > projection in Qmapshack causes the grid to be rotated 3-4degrees counter
> > clockwise.
> > 
> > +proj=tmerc +lat_0=0 +lon_0=173 +k=0.9996 +x_0=160 +y_0=1000
> > +ellps=GRS80 +units=m +no_defs
> > 
> > Why would that be, and how do I correct the Qmapshack display?
> > 
> > I am using NZ Topo50 geotiff map sources.
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> using QMS 1.11.1 on Windows 10 and setting both the grid and the map
> projections to your value I can't confirm your observation. In my case
> the grid lines are parallel to the edges of the screen. Rotating a
> snapshot of the map by 3 degrees with Gimp confirms my obervation. Could
> it be that the QMS map projection is different to the grid projection in
> your case?
> 
> 
> Please have also a look at the QMS Wiki page
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/maproom/qmapshack/wiki/AdvMapDetails
> 
> Regards
> 
> WolfgangTh
> 
> 
> -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
> Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users





--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users


Re: [Qlandkartegt-users] projection difference

2018-06-10 Thread WT

Am 09.06.2018 um 01:18 schrieb John:


When I use the projection below in QlandkarteGT, the grid is parallel 
with the sides of map window, ie longitudes are vertical. The same 
projection in Qmapshack causes the grid to be rotated 3-4degrees counter 
clockwise.


+proj=tmerc +lat_0=0 +lon_0=173 +k=0.9996 +x_0=160 +y_0=1000 
+ellps=GRS80 +units=m +no_defs


Why would that be, and how do I correct the Qmapshack display?

I am using NZ Topo50 geotiff map sources.





Hi John,

using QMS 1.11.1 on Windows 10 and setting both the grid and the map 
projections to your value I can't confirm your observation. In my case 
the grid lines are parallel to the edges of the screen. Rotating a 
snapshot of the map by 3 degrees with Gimp confirms my obervation. Could 
it be that the QMS map projection is different to the grid projection in 
your case?



Please have also a look at the QMS Wiki page

https://bitbucket.org/maproom/qmapshack/wiki/AdvMapDetails

Regards

WolfgangTh

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
Qlandkartegt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users