What's the easiest way to set up an "anonymous" mailing list? What I mean
is that the recipients do not know who the sender is. I want the "From:"
header to be the name of the list, etc.
--
Albert Hopkins
Sr. Systems Specialist
Dynacare, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, if you boast, ``I can build a Linux mail server in under
an hour,'' I might reply, ``So can't my mother.''
Which most of the English speaking world would interpret as "My mother
can't do that",
Perhaps. But who cares about ``most of the
echo "from" DIR/headerremove
echo "From: Listname" DIR/headeradd
ought to do it under ezmlm idx
Matthew B. Henniges
Axl.net Communications
http://www.axl.net
(203) 552-1714
-Original Message-
From: Albert Hopkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 2:41 PM
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 02:56:15PM -0500, Matthew B. Henniges wrote:
echo "from" DIR/headerremove
echo "From: Listname" DIR/headeradd
ought to do it under ezmlm idx
Better add sender, reply-to, return-path, return-receipt-to, and
errors-to, and possibly message-id and received to
I am having a problem with qmail sending the same messages to the same
person 3 or more times. The messages are not all being sent at the same
time and it does not happen to all the users. The logs show that it is the
same from, to and the same message ID..
Could anyone give some thoughts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Which most of the English speaking world would interpret as "My mother
can't do that", possibly with an implied "(but just about anyone else
can)". This type of idiom leads to ambiguity, and is a barrier to
communication--its only purpose is to be cute.
Hi List,
Sorry but I became a little lost here in following the gentle roasting
and the only reason I found was one of those if you
don't already know why not - don't do it variety which, since I do
*not* already know causes me to raise the question.
Is there any valid technical reason for
Dave Stites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
html
Hi List,br
br
Hi. brr It's cold here, too.
Sorry but I became a little lost here in following the gentle roasting
and the only quot;reasonquot; I found was one of those quot;if you
don't already know why not - don't do itquot; variety which, since I do
Reminder: I will be giving a two-day training session on qmail and
BIND in Oslo on February 14 and 15. That's a little under a month
now. I've decided to offer a 20% discount for three or more people
billed to the same address, and a 10% discount for payment received
prior to February 1.
I'm
Is it possible to use rblsmtpd to check more than one source at a
time? For example, I'd like to set it up to consult all of the above
services before accepting incoming mail. At the moment, I've got the
following in inetd.conf:
smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/sbin/tcpd \
For the List,
My apologies for inadvertently injecting HTML into this list. That will
*not* happen again
For Dave Sill,
Thank you for your response. It is now perfectly clear that for me to
install said patch would be very inadvisable. Also, THANK YOU, for "Life
with qmail" which
Hi,
I am trying to create user account in qmail using qmailadmin
and I am unable to create a user for example fb.
Why does this have so much restriction ? Can I create
it?
Regards
John
Hi,
I need to setup English and Japanese version of qmail. How do
I go about installing for Japanese version.
Your reply would be much appreciated.
Thanks Regards
John Francis
john wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create user account in qmail using qmailadmin and I am
unable to create a user for example fb.
Why does this have so much restriction ? Can I create it?
Regards
John
fb is not a valid user name. I think.
Ken Jones
Title: RE: Cannot creating user account with an in qmailadmin
never used qmailadmin, just use the shell.
to do this, create an alias like this :
useradd fb
passwd fb (set the passwd)
echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-fb
get your user to check mail on fb account,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 12:36:15PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
I've seen someone post a question like this but didnt get a decent answer.
I am looking into hosting a mailservice that will handle around 1-3
million SMTP transactions per day. What kind of hardware do I need to
manage that?
I am using RH6.0 with qmail server!
All other thing is OK, but
pop3 service?
I use Maildir format, I use maildirmake
Maildir:
drwx-- 2 sting
users 1024 Jan 20 21:18
curdrwx-- 2 sting
users 1024 Jan 21 00:21
newdrwx-- 2 sting
users 1024 Jan 21 00:21 tmp
Telnet result:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Jan 00, at 14:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ugh... two seeks? Stat() is sooo much nicer ;-)
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
#include sys/stat.h
#include sys/types.h
int main(void) {
struct stat st;
if (fstat(0, st) 0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Jan 00, at 10:41, Petr Novotny wrote:
Now I am trying to get rid of the mid-inserted
Delivered-To: alias-mailsize-something@somewhere
line. I wouldn't care about this line, but it matters for forwarding
One of my clients has an employee that travels quite a bit
with a notebook computer. That employee uses Windows 95 and
Eudora Pro email client software. That employee also uses
msn.com for his ISP.
My client runs qmail-1.03. The pop3 services works very well
for receiving email when the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Jose Pedro Pereira wrote:
Try /etc/skel ...
The name says it all...
hmm, there is nothing in this dir?
What should be there?
Could I be missing something?
Kind regards
Kevin
Yap... This is the default directory for creating user
qmail Digest 20 Jan 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 886
Topics (messages 35708 through 35773):
How to implement different outgoing queues according to size
35708 by: Petr Novotny
35711 by: Anand Buddhdev
Qmail-Vpopmail-Qmailadmin Alias problem
35709 by: john
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:39:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my clients has an employee that travels quite a bit
with a notebook computer. That employee uses Windows 95 and
Eudora Pro email client software. That employee also uses
msn.com for his ISP.
My client runs
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 07:11:43PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
So what I am wondering is without having to recompile and re-install
the entire qmail package with various patches, is there a relatively
simple solution ? What are msn.com users doing with Eudora Pro that
allows them to
Some other people asked for my scripts, so I'm posting them to the list.
--
See complete headers for more info
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 06:42:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I'd like more details please.
OK. The basic idea is to allow relaying from a certain IP, after the
users
Hello all,
I'm using qmail with ezmlm(-idx) on Redhat 6.1. Works excellent and stuff
until a few days ago when I
added a few more pop-accounts. Sometimes the to: header is totally corrupt,
see below. This also happens
with local deliveries, mail sent from a local to user to a local user.
Anyone
Hi:
I use ezmlm+ezmlm-idx as our mailling lists server,I have a lot of mailing lists on my
server,some lists subscribe is over 3,I use this lists to send our news,I found
when I sent a message to the lists,the subscribe will take a long time to receive the
mail(over serveral hours),I have
Hi.
We are using qmail on Sun Solaris 7. When we are sending mails, the header
of them is looking like this:
--
Received: from a.b.c (mailsrvr [192.168.230.23])
by email.tiscon.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA03719
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:58:04 +0100
The employee and I tried setting the SMTP server to
msn.com in the outgoing SMTP server setting in Eudora
without success at sending out email. We then tried
email.msn.com and then smtp.email.msn.com and were also
not successful at sending out email.
So why don't you simply call
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Sam hath penned;
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when the employee in on the road and dials into msn.com
from various locations around the country, SMTP attempts at relaying
through my client's server and the result in a #553 message.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
why exactly does "forward" return a hard error when it finds no
DTLINE in the environment?
If forward is invoked from .qmail file, it probably means that
qmail-local is mis-patched - then a temporary error is enough
(admin notices and fixes,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Martin Renner wrote:
[...] qmail is setting the time
to "11:55:06 -".
Yes, qmail always uses UTC.
Mads
Hi all
Why could be the cause of the bounces "doesn't bounce"?;
I mean: all the bounces goes directly to ~alias/Mailbox without notify to
sender. (TEST.deliver #4 give me a "success", not a "__#5.1.1_/" error
message.
All the bounces goes with a "success" to ~alias/Mailbox
.qmail-mailer-daemon
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:07:18AM +, Abel Lucano wrote:
Maybe you have a ~alias/.qmail-default. That traps mail for all unknown
users.
Hi all
Why could be the cause of the bounces "doesn't bounce"?;
I mean: all the bounces goes directly to ~alias/Mailbox without notify to
sender.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:07:18AM +, Abel Lucano wrote:
Maybe you have a ~alias/.qmail-default. That traps mail for all unknown
users.
indeed!
that's the answer; sorry!
best regards
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Mads E Eilertsen wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Martin Renner wrote:
[...] qmail is setting the time
to "11:55:06 -".
Yes, qmail always uses UTC.
But there's a patch available that will use your local timezone
instead. Search on one the
"Haifeng Guo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use ezmlm+ezmlm-idx as our mailling lists server,I have a lot of
mailing lists on my server,some lists subscribe is over 3,I use
this lists to send our news,I found when I sent a message to the
lists,the subscribe will take a long time to receive the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using RH6.0 with qmail server!
All other thing is OK, but pop3 service?
I use Maildir format, I use maildirmake Maildir:
drwx-- 2 stingusers1024 Jan 20 21:18 cur
drwx-- 2 stingusers1024 Jan 21 00:21 new
drwx-- 2 sting
Walt Mankowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Mads E Eilertsen wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Martin Renner wrote:
[...] qmail is setting the time
to "11:55:06 -".
Yes, qmail always uses UTC.
But there's a patch available that will use your local
This is the first time qmail is giving me a headache
Mail sent to my qmail server from 1 person in norway get stuck somehow. I'm
sending along one of the replys this person got from qmail. But as I get it
the problem is "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Johansson=2C_G=F6ran?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" that should go
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Walt Mankowski wrote:
But there's a patch available that will use your local timezone
instead. [...]
Sure, but why tamper with qmail's approach? When tracking down
delivery problems it's easier for humans and programs to read the
Received:-lines when all time stamps are
But for Us European people EST stands for Eastern Summer Time and what is
UTC and where is the time zone for that ?
Regards
Paul T
-Original Message-
From: Mads E Eilertsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Timezone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Paul Trippett wrote:
But for Us European people EST stands for Eastern Summer Time
and what is UTC and where is the time zone for that ?
OIC, JIC, I use UTP at work at UPC which is in CET, ETC.
I thought UTC was GMT... is that not
On 15 Jan 2000, Russ Allbery wrote:
RARussell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RA
RA Because every such installation I've ever seen has used NFS. I'm not
RA talking about what's good, or what's right. I'm talking about what's
RA possible to do tomorrow. Yes, it might be that a specialized
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 08:57:08AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Paul Trippett wrote:
But for Us European people EST stands for Eastern Summer Time
and what is UTC and where is the time zone for that ?
OIC, JIC, I use UTP at work
"Scott D. Yelich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought UTC was GMT... is that not correct?
Ah, two of my favorite peeves...and so concisely combined.
First, UTC is not GMT. There're close, but not the same. See various
net resources, if you're piqued.
Second, the phrase "is that not correct",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
So my point is, unless you like reading silly analyses of grammatical
constructs in the qmail list, you should be careful to express
yourself unambiguously. -Dave
Oh, puhleeze do teach me how to be a pedantic asshole!
Hi,
Sorry by lammer question, but I need setup my qmail to change the outgoing
FROM field to another mail, I'm using a simple announce list with .qmail, I
use this:
# begin .qmail file
|/usr/bin/grep '^From:.*@osite.net' || (/usr/local/tools/nopost.pl; exit
100)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
"Scott D. Yelich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, puhleeze do teach me how to be a pedantic asshole!
Looks like I'm halfway there already.
ps: I book marked the url on writing good code. I want to see
how much if the rules qmail breaks.
The one Craig posted? It's pretty high-level; not like a
Mark Delany writes:
I walk around http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/world.html
might be instructive.
Instructive, yes, but it says nothing about TAI. TAI is simply a
counting of seconds, without UTC being taken into account. TAI + leap
seconds == UTC. Unix machines claim to run on UTC
Heh, great message about expressing yourself unambiguously.
Now if only you could teach us (well, me ;-) how to do so
*tersely*. ;-)
tq vm, (burley)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heh, great message about expressing yourself unambiguously.
Now if only you could teach us (well, me ;-) how to do so
*tersely*. ;-)
Easy.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, great message about expressing yourself unambiguously.
Now if only you could teach us (well, me ;-) how to do so
*tersely*. ;-)
Simplify, but don't oversimplify.
-Dave
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 01:32:53PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
From: Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:22:56 -0500 (EST)
Mark Delany writes:
I walk around http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/world.html
might be instructive.
Instructive,
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:42:49 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why? POSIX says 2000 is not a leap year :)
What makes you say that?
POSIX is incorrect because it says that 2100 is a leap year (just in
case you were worried that there wouldn't be a Y2.1K problem). POSIX
does not say
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
From: Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:22:56 -0500 (EST)
Mark Delany writes:
I walk around http://physics.nist.gov/GenInt/Time/world.html
might be instructive.
Instructive, yes, but it says nothing about
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UTC is GMT, right?
Since the assertion is false, the answer is clearly negative ("no" or
"wrong"). Throwing the "not" before the assertion reverses it:
UTC is GMT, not right?
You are being pedantic, are you not? Yes--and you're mistaken. This
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 01:48:35PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:42:49 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why? POSIX says 2000 is not a leap year :)
What makes you say that?
I read something along those lines somewhere..
POSIX is incorrect because it says
Hi,
What bit of code was that?
My checpassword still seems to take user and pass form commandline, which
results in:
parsing arguments: POP username is '/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d'
parsing arguments: POP password is 'Maildir'
I use tcpserver for pop3:
tcpserver -v 0 pop3
For those of you that have missed this. I asked a simple question about UTC
and where it comes from and where now into POSIX not being Y2.1K Compliant,
and there is also a variant about Negatives in Grammar.
Don't you love it when this happens :)
Regards,
Paul Trippett
-Original
"Len Budney" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are being pedantic, are you not? Yes--and you're mistaken.
I was clearly being pedantic. Next time I'll use a pedantic tag.
This particular use of 'not' is purely idiomatic.
Just because a particular grammatical butchery is in wide use and fits
the
Andrzej Szydlo wrote:
Hi,
What bit of code was that?
My checpassword still seems to take user and pass form commandline, which
results in:
parsing arguments: POP username is '/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d'
parsing arguments: POP password is 'Maildir'
I use tcpserver for pop3:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 02:23:54PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
"Len Budney" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are being pedantic, are you not? Yes--and you're mistaken.
I was clearly being pedantic. Next time I'll use a pedantic tag.
This particular use of 'not' is purely idiomatic.
Just
63 matches
Mail list logo
