Dear Sir/Madam,
I have read the Life With Qmail in the web. I have found it very
interested and i have set up my mail server using Qmail and i found it is
very great!!
I have a problem here about Qmail, would you please kindly help me to find
out the answer..??
I have set up my qmail
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:24:47PM +0800, Alex Tsang wrote:
Do any one have some documents talking about creating virtual domain?
It's described in Bernsteins FAQ[1]
Jörgen
[1] http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/incominghost.html#virtual
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:42:55PM +0800, Raymond Hui wrote:
[snip]
I need to configure the qmail server which can automatically keep a copy
of in and out mail of some specified address in some domains.
[snip]
For incoming email, i think it can easily handled by .qmail files.
However, for
Hi!
I'm using Qmail with vpopmail as pop3-server, but
most of the time when clients connect to the server, it takes like forever
before they are allowed to check for mail. Both external and internal.
Internally I thought I had solved it, by putting my local hosts into the
/etc/hosts file,
Dave Sill([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.18 16:20:49 +:
Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HUPing only makes qmail reread locals and virtualdomains. (And there is no
process called qmail, so killall -HUP qmail won't do anything on
any system.)
Except possibly on Solaris:
..and AIX
Virginia Chism([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.18 15:34:10 +:
But I don't think BSDi knows the killall command.
That is exactly correct. I was able to find the PID and restart the
qmail-send. Thanks to all who responded.
I am working on the Unix books, but find some of them are
My mail user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) partecipate in many mailing list...
I want automatically redirect the msgs in right folder and no in INBOX
folder (for example the msgs of qmail mailing list MUST go in qmail
folder, the msgs of sqwebmail in sqwebmail folder..and so on...)
How can I do ??? (Can
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:31:42AM +0200, Massimo Quintini wrote:
My mail user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) partecipate in many mailing list...
I want automatically redirect the msgs in right folder and no in INBOX
folder (for example the msgs of qmail mailing list MUST go in qmail
folder, the msgs
Massimo Quintini writes:
My mail user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) partecipate in many mailing list...
I want automatically redirect the msgs in right folder and no in INBOX
folder (for example the msgs of qmail mailing list MUST go in qmail
folder, the msgs of sqwebmail in sqwebmail folder..and
Thomas Rokamp writes:
Hi!
I'm using Qmail with vpopmail as pop3-server, but most of the time when clients
connect to the server, it takes like forever before they are allowed to check for
mail. Both external and internal. Internally I thought I had solved it, by putting my
local hosts
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:55:35AM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote:
For example:
$ echo ./Maildir-qmail/ ~/.qmail-qmail
and change your adress on the qmail list to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I forgot...
$ maildirmake ~/Maildir-qmail/
Jörgen
Massimo Quintini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can I do ??? (Can I use condredirect program with 822mess
package...but how???)
It's a job for maildrop or procmail.
You will find maildrop here:
http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop/
Regards, Frank
Hello everyone,
We're going to install a new production server with the lastest linux kernel
(2.4.5) and ReiserFS.
Is there any issue regarding qmail?
I have done some research and I found a Qmail and ReiserFS integration and
optimization HOWTO in http://www.jedi.claranet.fr
How accurate is
I could not find this problem in the FAQ or in
the mailing list:
SMTPD behaves differently from the inside network
and from the internet.
INSIDE:
$ telnet mail.netsecurity.fr 25
Trying 172.16.3.4...
Connected to nss0501510sr.netsecurity.fr.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:53:32PM +0200, Sebastien Monassa wrote:
I could not find this problem in the FAQ or in
the mailing list:
SMTPD behaves differently from the inside network
and from the internet.
You've got some kind of SMTP proxy between the MTA and the internet
(most probably a
* Sebastien Monassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 07:53]:
I could not find this problem in the FAQ or in
the mailing list:
SMTPD behaves differently from the inside network
and from the internet.
Is this actually causing a problem?
INTERNET:
# telnet mail.netsecurity.fr 25
Trying
Your host is probably behind a Cisco PIX firewall
with fixup protocol smtp 25 enabled.
J.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Monassa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange SMTPd behaviour
I could not
I am attempting to figure out the best way to set up an auto-response
(bounce, in a manner of speaking) triggered by sender domain, in order to
facilitate not just rejecting specific domains, but auto-answering mail from
them.
The situation is as follows: My company receives mail from vary
Thanks a lot to you all. Disabling the command
fixed it. I didn't know about that proxying
feature of the firewall.
I have to check wether it's worth or not leaving
it enabled. I read in the smtp paper of DJB that
some smtpd may not send mail to a host refusing
the VRFY command. Though, I would
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Sebastien Monassa wrote:
Thanks a lot to you all. Disabling the command
fixed it. I didn't know about that proxying
feature of the firewall.
I have to check wether it's worth or not leaving
it enabled. I read in the smtp paper of DJB that
some
We
have a couple of Qmail servers in a cluster (LVS), co-existing with Sendmail.
The qmail servers take half and one minute each for establishing the connection
with client when connecting thru the LVS. The tcpserver option I am using is R
and t 0 with which, direct connection happens with
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mailer-Daemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NDN: Slow Connection with LVS
Importance: High
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
test
* Mehul Choksi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 09:35]:
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
lesoleil.com's mail servers suck rocks. Their admins seem unresponsive to
fix the problem. Feel free to block 'em with your tcpserver rules.
/pg
--
Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC :
Thanks a lot to you all. Disabling the command
fixed it. I didn't know about that proxying
feature of the firewall.
I have to check wether it's worth or not leaving
it enabled. I read in the smtp paper of DJB that
some smtpd may not send mail to a host refusing
the VRFY command.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:38:18AM -0400, Mehul Choksi wrote:
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
lesoleil.com's mailserver is broken. It's been discussed about 20
times over the past few months. Check the archives.
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex!
peter green writes:
* Mehul Choksi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 09:35]:
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
lesoleil.com's mail servers suck rocks. Their admins seem unresponsive to
fix the problem. Feel free to block 'em with your tcpserver rules.
Wouldn't it be easier if Dan
Raymond Hui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to configure the qmail server which can automatically keep a copy of
in and out mail of some specified address in some domains.
This is in the author's FAQ. Please read it.
Charles
--
* Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 10:06]:
peter green writes:
* Mehul Choksi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 09:35]:
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
lesoleil.com's mail servers suck rocks. Their admins seem unresponsive to
fix the problem. Feel free to block 'em
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
peter green writes:
* Mehul Choksi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010619 09:35]:
Why do I get this message? Any suggestions?
lesoleil.com's mail servers suck rocks. Their admins seem unresponsive to
fix the problem. Feel free
After some thought, perhaps I shoud clarify what I am trying to do. I have
looked and looked, and seems most every feature for filtering relies on
.qmail files, or something like procmail. I would like to determine if there
is a way to avoid both of these. Since the machines in question
Mike Culbertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be great would be to have qmail-smtpd catch the HELO or MAIL FROM
address the sender gives (a la badmailfrom) and do something, like perhaps
dump the mail to a local account for further processing, or initiate a
bounce, anything other
Roger Walker wrote:
You Wrote:
Please let know if you find a way to block all of the domains you mentioned.
Also do you think someone like arin.net would have there blocks of ips on
file and then we can just block them ?
I believe IANA has the master list of IP blocks that
Any
suggestions / further reading?
Posting this
again since our internet link was down this morning and in the mean time if
some one has (hopefully ..!!) responded, might be bounced.
Thanks,
Mehul.
-Original
Message-
From: Mehul Choksi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Greg Moeller wrote
Hmmm, ok, what would a good split be for 7-10 in the queue?
BTW...
I wonder if there are any limits on how many files can be in the queue
besides inodes and disk size?
--
Bernhard Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello All,
I am having difficulty checking a domain to see if it is receiving email
from outside on the Internet.
Could someone please send a test email to the following 2 addresses, so
I can check that they are receiving mail properly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL
Since it is difficult to see whether you'd like us to flood them or not, I
would suggest if you need an outside test, to use hotmail or some other free
email service and send a message.
Hank Wethington
Information Logistics
Hi list,
I've got qmail running, healthy on a 7.1 RH box. However, no matter what I
try, I can't get the aliases to work right. I've got the user alias and if
you run qmail-getpw alias it points to his home dir, however, if you run
qmail-getpw info (or whatever alias you wanted to use) you get
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:13:42PM +0200, Bernhard Graf allegedly wrote:
Greg Moeller wrote
Hmmm, ok, what would a good split be for 7-10 in the queue?
BTW...
I wonder if there are any limits on how many files can be in the queue
besides inodes and disk size?
Memory.
Read
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...stuff concerning Solaris killall command]
(I haven't tried it to see what it does with unexpected options and an
invalid signal name.)
It still kills everything, including init. I made this mistake when I was
a Solaris newbie. My users were not pleased.
Jeffrey Austin Collop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@40003b2f84460273a1d4 delivery 134: deferral:
Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file._
(#4.2.1)/
@40003b2f84a202a82724 delivery 135: deferral:
Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file._
(#4.2.1)/
Dave,
Thanks for the help! Yes that was an obvious fix, but I'm new to qmail and
getting it working and healthy all in one day (yesterday) must have fried my
little brain!
RTFM is great but sometimes you need some help :)
Jeff
Jeffrey Austin Collop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave can probably give a more detailed answer to this, but you don't
symbolicly link the directories into /service until you're ready to run
them.
And even then, svscan won't start them until you do a svc -u (or -o)
/service/servicename .
Everything I've read about svscan says that once
I looked at the new version of Life with qmail for the first time today,
so forgive me if this is a little late. I didn't see anything in the
archive to suggest it had already been talked aobut.
Since the new LWQ sets up svscan to run independently of the qmail control
script, would it not be a
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave can probably give a more detailed answer to this, but you don't
symbolicly link the directories into /service until you're ready to run them.
That's not how LWQ's qmailctl works. The links in /service are
permanent.
And even then, svscan won't
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And even then, svscan won't start them until you do a svc -u (or -o)
/service/servicename .
Sure it will, unless there's a down file.
Of course, I received several corrections immediately after sending this. Mea
culpa.
Charles
--
I wrote:
Since the new LWQ sets up svscan to run independently of the qmail
control
script, would it not be a wise idea to include a down file in each
supervise directory, so that qmail and any other services would not
start
up when svscan is run?
Dave Sill replied:
That was my original
On Tue 19 Jun, 2001, Mark Jefferys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:56:13PM +0100, James R Grinter wrote:
Go look at timeoutread(), which *is* in your path. The select is in
the line right before where you wedge.
sorry, yes. You're right.
It doesn't. (Don't know about other
Jeffrey Austin Collop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Don't post new subjects by replying to an existing thread. It screws up the
threading in our MUAs and in the list archives. It's also considered rude.
@40003b2f84460273a1d4 delivery 134: deferral:
I've also noticed these sypmtoms
with Oversize DNS packets.
there is a few patches that address this issue
:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#patches
Nick
- Original Message -
From:
Thomas Rokamp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:20
AM
onsdagen den 20 juni 2001 01:02 skrev Nick:
I've also noticed these sypmtoms with Oversize DNS packets.
there is a few patches that address this issue :
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#patches
Nick
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Rokamp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paco Gracia wrote:
I have done some research and I found a Qmail and ReiserFS integration and
optimization HOWTO in http://www.jedi.claranet.fr
How accurate is the information on that web?
Anything else to take care of?
Thanks in advance
===
Paco Gracia
Hi,
I just installed qmail, daemontools, ucspi-tcp.
Many strange things were cleared with help of qmail lists.
Now ps shows following things.
$ ps ax |grep svscan
299 ?S 0:00 svscan
4558 ttyp0S 0:00 grep svscan
$ ps ax |grep qmail
315 ?S 0:00 supervise
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:15:11PM +, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure on the statement that qmail is unreliable under Linux due to
its assumptiopn that link is a synchronous operation. I've never read
anything about it. Anyone else?
This is true. I'm not sure, however, if
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
I am not sure about the recommendation to lower the conf-split, since,
again, I am not in any way familiar with ReiserFS's operation. Generally
you want a large split since filesystems perform better with many
directories with a couple of files
Mike Culbertson wrote:
Therefore, I would like to maintain a list of domains a la
badmailfrom, but rather than doing an smtp reject, an autoreponse would
result (your mail has been reject because blah, please contact blah etc.
etc. ). This way, legitimate users on banned domains would have
Hello.
I received a fortune cookie today some here may like:
It is harder to ask the right questions than
to find answers for the wrong questions.
Lucky # 6,8,38,40,45
A perceived problem I am trying to solve is that sending mail from
eudora win 4.3 or 5.1 with AUTH enabled to a qmail
joc wrote:
There it is. any wise thoughts here?
Thanks
John
Encourage your customers to use non-broken MUA. Our company refuses to
support anything other than Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, and our
own web-based e-mailing service. You might try that: promoting a
web-based e-mail
I have had to change from reverse lookup to host file entries and back and I
can tell you from today's experiment that a host file lookup on my RH system
is slower then the reverse DNS lookup method. Try a local DNS server, W2K
has a easy one preinstalled with it if you don't like bind.
Good
I just installed qmail, ucspi-tcp, and daemontaols under directions
of lwq.
Now the system shows 100% of CPU usage on the window of wmcube (a small
display application in WindowMaker, which shows the CPU rate.)
And the load average is also full on the window of wmload (WindowMaker App.).
I
You have something seriously wrong for it to be taking that many resources
on my FreeBSD boxes i still have yet to reach 2% of my cpu usage. Lose the
stupid app and open a console and use the top command instead it wont lie to
you.
Just my .02
jps
From: YOON, Joo-Yung [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
YOON, Joo-Yung writes:
I just installed qmail, ucspi-tcp, and daemontaols under directions
of lwq.
Now the system shows 100% of CPU usage on the window of wmcube (a small
display application in WindowMaker, which shows the CPU rate.)
And the load average is also full on the window
We are running Qmail on Reiser and have been very happy. You can see one
thread in this list from me where we got intermittent errors from qmail when
doing a lot of mailings at a time. We discovered that the qmail patch for
Reiser caused the error. Look for 'qmail-inject error' from me in the
Dear russ,
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, my 'current' says
@40003b301aa6292e9c34 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
(I got this from /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current.)
I do not understand why it makes this warning because there are no other
mailers, and there is only
Hello,
I installed qmail by following LWQ to the very letter,
and sendmail is disabled. However, on a new server
(getting prepared but not serving web pages or sending
or more than 20 emails a day yet) having dual p3 800
and 1 gig ram, I get the following load average:
*VIA
I just installed qmail and I have everything I would like working except
receiving mail. My main interest is to get pop functions working on the
machine. I can check mail and receive bounced messages but I cannot send a
message without it getting bounced. The return email always says:
Sorry.
Dear Netter,
I use FreeBSD 4.3
Qmail 1.03
Checkpassword
and tcpserver.
How to make my SMTP cannot access form outside.
Right now, I use tcpserver
202.171.1.0,allow,RELAYCLIENT=
and I try to relay my SMTP from outside and work.
How to block it, so only my user can use this SMTP...
Please
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:45:34PM +0900, YOON, Joo-Yung wrote:
Yes, my 'current' says
@40003b301aa6292e9c34 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address
already used
(I got this from /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current.)
I do not understand why it makes this warning because there are no
68 matches
Mail list logo
