Reworded re-post after off-list discussions.
I guess this is really a netscape issue rather than qmail, but related
to the qmail server at least. I'm running qmail-scanner and get into
problem areas when the scanner detects a virus in a message and sends
the bounce message to the originator and
--
I cannot get qmail to startup properly:
shutdown and error:
=
[root@mckenna bin]# /etc/init.d/qmailctl stop
Stopping qmail...
qmail-smtpd
svc: warning: unable to control /service/qmail-smtpd: file does not exist
qmail-send
svc: warning: unable
Uhmm,
something I don't get. When I run as root by hand:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.pop3.cdb -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup my.hostname.ext /bin/checkpassword \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1
I get:
[arjen@bami arjen]$ telnet my.hostname.ext 110
I've been reading through the source code of qmail-local to be sure
I'm telling the truth about what it does in the qmail book.
I see that if the first line of a .qmail file is blank, qmail-local
dies with a temporary failure code. Other blank lines are ignored,
but there's a specific test and a
Title: Re: qmail pop3d startup
i am a moron!
i am talking to myself...
from the qmail list archives==
Mike Jackson wrote:
>Hi,
> Box is Mandrake 8.0 final, kernel 2.4.3-20mdk. I get the
following
>error when trying to compile daemontools. It also happened to me
on a
>Redhat 7.1 box
I got the same thing... it *probibly* a header problem (not sure...
looked
good to me).
just comment out the lines and recompile... its not a critical program.
Just edit the tai64nlocal.c and put a double hash '//' (no quotes) on the
lines listed and it will compile install.
--
Paul Farber
Fa
i think my problem is that i did not install daemontools...
whoops...
so when i try to make daemontools:
[root@mckenna daemontools-0.70]# make
./compile tai64nlocal.c
tai64nlocal.c: In function `main':
tai64nlocal.c:54: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
tai64nlocal.c
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:45:32PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm running qmail and ezmlm-idx.
> Yesterday, the log start to say
>
> deferral: Connected_to_200.0.218.99_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/
>
> for each address with doamin siderar.com. The problem is that 74% of
> th
--
Hello all:
I followed LWQ's directions for setting up qmail-pop3d:
it wont start up and i get this in my messages log:
Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: Starting qmail: done
Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: qmail-pop3d service not running
Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: /etc/rc3.d/S80qmail: svo
Thank god we have you around Fenix to drag up a troll's thread that hasn't
been discussed in two days and is completely OT.
Whatever would this list do without you to jab at the ignorant to make
yourself feel so much bigger.
Now get the f*ck back on topic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus spake
I remember that I once read something about sorting bulk mail (different
mesg in each mail) by domain before sending them out is a bad idea.
Can't find it in the archive. Anyone can tell me why? Are we going to
saturate the qmail-remote (concurrencyremote) when the a particular
remote is busy or
Hi all.
I'm running qmail and ezmlm-idx.
Yesterday, the log start to say
deferral: Connected_to_200.0.218.99_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/
for each address with doamin siderar.com. The problem is that 74% of
the subscribers have this kind of addresses. How can I solve this
problem ???
thanks
Jamyn wrote:
>
> The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for
> 'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*)
>
> There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the
> web as well. Only the names, places, and dollar amoun
Thus spake Bill Luckett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Can someone point me to some documentation on using the substdio functions?
> Is there any?
substdio is obsolete and has been replaced with buffer.
Felix
Thus spake Henning Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > What's is the best OS for run Qmail (and/or Ezmlm)? What advantage and
> > disadvantage has each one? I'll need send two millions mails per day and
> > I don't know what hard can I buy? :)
> Kindly ignoring that this is dicussed a thousand times i
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 05:28:49PM -0500, Jamyn allegedly wrote:
> The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for
> 'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*)
>
> There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the
> web a
The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for
'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*)
There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the
web as well. Only the names, places, and dollar amounts are different in
that v
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> * ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010703 16:24]:
> > CHER MONSIEUR,
>
> Eh. Sexual harrassment. USD 6m waiting for me. C007!!!1 Anyway, darling,
> your request for steamed frog avec Cous-Cous has been taken. You'll be
> served a couple of
* ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010703 16:24]:
> CHER MONSIEUR,
Eh. Sexual harrassment. USD 6m waiting for me. C007!!!1 Anyway, darling,
your request for steamed frog avec Cous-Cous has been taken. You'll be
served a couple of PDF files shortly. You don't mind them coming in 1k
slic
ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA
TÉLÉPHONE: 873 762 357 297 (TÉLÉPHONE DE SATELITE)
EFAX: 775 796 0118
CHER MONSIEUR,
Je dois d'abord de tout implorer votre indulgence que cette
proposition
est sérieusement considérée comme pressante et strictement
confidentiel.
Je suis M. Abdulkareem Kasereka,
> Note that in this day of MIME and multipart messages, attachments, digitally
> signed email, encrypted email, and everything else, it is generally a very bad
> idea to try to append an arbitrary block of text to any message -- even an
> innocuous footer. For this reason, we ask that you conside
Jeff Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add an email
> disclaimer.
As Peter noted, this is not necessarily the case -- instead, people are always
asking how to accomplish various things like this, such as adding standard
headers or f
* Jeff Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010703 15:46]:
> The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add
> an email disclaimer.
I don't think so. The archive indicates many people ask the list how to add
an email disclaimer to outgoing mail. They are generally, as is proper,
shunned or
The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add
an email disclaimer. Does anyone have sample scripts they are
willing to share with me?
Cheers,
--
Jeff Newton
Jared Hoskinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have installed qmail from source on a RH 7 box. I followed lwq which was
> very helpful.
Unfortunately, you appear to not have followed it very well.
> Here is my problem, qmail starts ok add allows connections on port 25 and
> accepts mail, howe
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>
> > Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do
> > it now.
> >Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers.
> also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache
> environments - a
* John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010703 13:51]:
> also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache
> environments - all such security issues can be resolved in an m$ iis
> environment (with application of the current corrections, patches,
> fixes and updates
Ahhh... you're t
> Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do
> it now.
>Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers.
not to be rude, but don't even go there... for our customers who want
frontpage as their primary web-authoring interface (especially in an
enterprise environ
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:34:18PM -0500, Jared Hoskinson wrote:
> /service/qmail-send: up (pid 27094) 0 seconds
That's the problem, qmail-send isn't even running.
> > qmial-start ./Maildir/
> >alert: cannot start: unable to open mutex
Go back to your source dir and type "make setup check" agai
>switch to ezmlm ;-)
ditto...
>installation on qmail systems is quite straightforward
>http://www.ezmlm.org/
the mysql support is awesome - very powerful :-)
- hogan
>/k
>
>balaji adhimoolam([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.03 08:10:21 +:
> > hi all,
> > i have a problem with majordom
I have installed qmail from source on a RH 7 box. I followed lwq which was
very helpful. Here is my problem, qmail starts ok add allows connections
on port 25 and accepts mail, however the mail just sits in the queue and
is never delivered, the defaultdelivery is ./Maildir/ and I have the
.qmail
Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do it now.
Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers.
Also there seems to be a lot of autoresponders out there. I took one of the
original ones and revised it with a few fixes and some additions. I have
attached
>Hi Constantine,
>... Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that
>comes with qmail. E.g., "maildirmake ~/Maildir".
>...
>
>THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE
>and what is SKELETON?
no why. I have installed qmail with real life users
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:24:42PM +0300, Constantine Koulis wrote:
[...]
> Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't create
> them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that
> comes with qmail. E.g., "maildirmake ~/Maildir". Be sure to r
At 6:24 PM +0300 7/3/01, Constantine Koulis wrote:
>THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE
>and what is SKELETON?
Not at all. It means you have to create a Maildir in /etc/skel, which
is the "reference" directory for useradd to create new user
directories. Then, ev
Constantine Koulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the LWQ is says the following :
>
> Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't
> create them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake
> program that comes with qmail. E.g., "maildirmake ~/Maildir"
i think it's the mail tool on the "tv box" which breaks the RFC's and not qmail
get a computer and everything is fine
At 12:47 03.07.2001 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello friends
>
> i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days
>
>i have received a complain f
switch to ezmlm ;-)
installation on qmail systems is quite straightforward
http://www.ezmlm.org/
/k
balaji adhimoolam([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.03 08:10:21 +:
> hi all,
> i have a problem with majordomo..i have
> succesfuly installed majordomo and iam able to send
> mails to it frm
Hi all.
i am instaling for the 20th time the LINUX 7.0 +qmail+courier-imap+vmailmgr
but dont want to make mistakes again so i followed the maildirmake HOWTO
that is in the /doc/ directory but i have a question.
In the LWQ is says the following :
Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir ma
At 12:00 03/07/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am using the .qmail-file to forward messages to another
>email-address.
>But I want to keep the mails in original Maildir also.
Which "original Maildir"? You have to specify a username.
>My .qmail-file:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>./Maildir/
hi all,
i have a problem with majordomo..i have
succesfuly installed majordomo and iam able to send
mails to it frm qmail..the problem is that when i
create lists..i have to have corresponding .qmail
files in the aliases..here for list test
.qmail-test i have
|/usr/local/majordomo/wrapper
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it
> seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong:
>
> Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:
> Home_di
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:39:15AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> How on earth is FrontPage relevant? Why is a pseudo-HTML-editor trying to
> send mail? And unless I'm mistaken, FrontPage doesn't run on Unix, so it can
> hardly be calling qmail-inject.
I totally second your frontpage opinion,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote:
> I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it
> seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong:
>
> Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:
> Home_directory_is_s
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote:
[snip]
> Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:
> Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file.
I think it spells 'deferral'. Next time, be sure to copy verbatim.
Sometimes these small differ
Hello,
I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it
seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong:
Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:
Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file.
This is quite strange t
Zak Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When ever someone uses a form to submit an email to a email address it works
> fine. but if they submit it to a auto-responder it doesn't work. It
> doesn't put the correct field in the FROM address so the responder doesn't
> know who to respond to.
Guys/Gals,
I'm having a small problem with qmail. When ever someone uses a form to
submit an email to a email address it works fine. but if they submit it to
a auto-responder it doesn't work. It doesn't put the correct field in the
FROM address so the responder doesn't know who to res
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)
>
> What is wrong?
You're using vpopmail, which seems to have its own interpretation of .qmail
files. Switch to vmailmgr (where you can override the default behaviour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days
> i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to
> send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is
> getting an error "conne
Petter Sundlöf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably
> > unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs.
>
> But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not,
> that's just insane.
Sure, it works fine within t
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:47:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello friends
>
> i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days
>
> i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to
> send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:47:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> i myself has tested this tool(mail client for tv for broadband network)
> with other ISP's , other mail servers on internet but its working with all
> those accept out mail server ,
> so please suggest how to debug/res
preface:
qmail 1.03 with big-concurrency
multilog
need:
link to information (or information) on producing more verbose,
or detailed information in qmail logs for error messages like #4.4.1 or
#5.1.1
would like to see the email address the error is talking
Hello friends
i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days
i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to
send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is
getting an error "connection timeout/reset" etc errors whi
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:45:09PM +, Jost Krieger wrote:
[snip]
> I thought it would be better to take a number about the square root of the
> top queue size, which minimizes search length on a classical file system.
>
> For 23000 your on the order of 151, which happens to look prime.
Searc
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:59:00PM +0700, adi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote:
> > > How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do have
> > > 192.168.1.15 in /etc/hosts, with a name...
> >
> > Are you using tcpserver?? Does it ask for reverse lo
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:11:33AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:37:03AM +0200, Xavier Pegenaute wrote:
> > Hi all..
> >
> > i can try any prime number for hashing ..? ( is limited?)
>
> You can try any number, but anything over 1/1000th of your queuesize
> is overkil
ftp cr.yp.to/daemontools
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> use files: /usr/local/bin/softlimit , /usr/local/bin/multilog
> Wher can I find those files? I have qmail-1.03, checkpassword-0.90
/* Regards,
Jason Kawaja, UF-ECE Sys Admin */
Hello friends
i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days
i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to
send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is
getting an error "connection timeout/reset" etc errors while
Hi all.
In lifewithqmail, the script for start/stop qmail-pop3d
use files: /usr/local/bin/softlimit , /usr/local/bin/multilog
Wher can I find those files? I have qmail-1.03, checkpassword-0.90
ucspi-tcp-0.88 but I haven't got softlimit and multilog.
thanks
--yapedu
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:46:12AM +0200, J?rgen Persson wrote:
> > But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not,
> > that's just insane.
> >
> > How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do have
> > 192.168.1.15 in /etc/hosts, with a name...
>
> Are you using
Hi Peter,
Thanks again for your patience.
I will do that. I will send the mails after the config and
Hope that atleast my Linux Kernel will not crash ;)
I will let you and the list know on the performance I get.
Thanks a lot to all... Finally with all your help I am ready
for it and waiting f
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:55:59PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks again for your reply
>
> I am actually trying to send 200,000 mails and
> not 1 mail to 200,000 people... !!!
>
> PL suggest me on what parameters should I use ...
Then set your conf-split to somewhere near 200. A
Hi Peter,
Thanks again for your reply
I am actually trying to send 200,000 mails and
not 1 mail to 200,000 people... !!!
PL suggest me on what parameters should I use ...
Cheers,
rajesh.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tues
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:27:21PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
[snip]
> >conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with
> >the default 23?
>
> I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000
> messages *in the queue* . I guess this does not happen even
Hi Henning / Peter,
Thanks a lot for your responses..
I'm really very sorry..about the typo mistake
conf-split is 17
>conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with
>the default 23?
I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000
mes
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:22:43AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> i installed the .deb binary packages (very nervously) and i think that
> has fixed the problem *knocks wood*
>
> thanks to everyone who responded. one other little question. is there
> anywhere else i should check permissions of b
Hello,
I am using the .qmail-file to forward messages to another email-address.
But I want to keep the mails in original Maildir also.
My .qmail-file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
./Maildir/
Postmaster receives following error:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mydomain.com
I'm afraid I wasn't able
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
> conf-split --- 15
Congratulations. Nobody knew that 15 was a prime until today.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a
i installed the .deb binary packages (very nervously) and i think that
has fixed the problem *knocks wood*
thanks to everyone who responded. one other little question. is there
anywhere else i should check permissions of besides /var/qmail/ ? i had
to change the uids and gids of some system u
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote:
>
> Is there any special capital like ":" for dots
> to use "-" in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name)
>
Use ''-'' for aliases with ''-'', ie:
if .qmail-user-name-name is located under ~alias it recieves mail
for but if it's
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
[snip]
> My qmail parameters are as follows on a redhat Linux 6.2
> kernel 2.2.14 :-
Upgrade to the most recent. Now.
> qmail + DNS patch + big - todo patch + big - concurrency patch
> silent concurrency --- 1000
> conf-split --- 15
con
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Is there any special capital like ":" for dots
> to use "-" in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name)
No, "-" works just fine. Only dot is special.
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en
Hi All,
Sorry, to bother all even though the subject says SUCCESS.
Just to Thank all
I have gone through the qmail - mailing archives and finally
succeeded in applying big-concurrency patch.
The archives were simply great with all the help. I have found the
solution for the FD_SET error
Hi !
Is there any special capital like ":" for dots
to use "-" in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name)
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote:
> > It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is
> > probably unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs.
> >
> > Greetz, Peter
>
> But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not,
> that's
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:02:31AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> sweet thanks for pointing this out. sorry to be so obtuse, but can
> you explain how it should be?
The server I'm currently on looks like this:
total 12
drwxr-x---2 qmailq qmail4096 Jul 1 2000 .
drwxr-x--- 11
> It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably
> unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs.
>
> Greetz, Peter
But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not,
that's just insane.
How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do ha
Hi.
I just moved my QMail-based box (QMail for SMTP, UW-imapd for IMAP) to a
new place, with a new IP and connection and all.
Strangely though, at first it wouldn't work at all... couldn't log in to
IMAP. I had set up all the network stuff correctly -- it at least
worked.
After a reboot or two
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote:
[snip]
> Any ideas? Could this be DNS problems? Shouldn't be, as everything else
> in that regard seems to be working in the server.
It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably
unable to resolve the reverse
sweet thanks for pointing this out. sorry to be so obtuse, but can
you explain how it should be?
make check didn't fix it (although it did notice that there was a
problem).
i also tried:
make trigger
zugzug# make trigger
cc trigger.o -o trigger
/usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':
/us
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:36:51AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> zugzug# ll
> total 16
> drwxr-x---2 qmailq qmail4096 Mar 30 2000 ./
> drwxr-x--- 11 qmailq qmail4096 Mar 30 2000 ../
> -rw---1 qmails qmail 0 Mar 30 2000 sendmutex
> -rw-r--r--1 qma
yeah but there is barely anything there. we don't send out very much
mail at all (the machine is only for internal use). in fact the entire
/var/qmail/queue directory tree is pretty much empty, as is
/var/spool/qmail
this is why it's perplexing... i think it must be a problem with the
install o
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> Jörgen Persson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:25:20AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > > i've heard from a couple people that the qmail-send process is
> > > supposed to take up all the avail cpu when nothing else is using i
85 matches
Mail list logo