"Manvendra Bhangui" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I convert from someother mail format to maildir format used by
qmail.
That depends on the "someother mail format".
Basically I am currently having mails being delivered as files
with each mail being a single unix file.
And these files are in
"Manvendra Bhangui" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could tell me how to convert from unix mbox format to maildir, that
would be helpful. I already have mail agents to handle maildir format
http://www.qmail.org/mbox2maildir
-Dave
"Collin B. McClendon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In light of my recent delivery issues, I was curious as to whether syslogd
may have anything to do with it? During a mail run of our mailing lists
syslogd is hitting 90% processor usage or more and staying there. Just
curious,
Why use syslog when
Stefan Laudat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately it's not like they (djb) says in commercials :)
Use the - prefix in syslog.conf on mail logging facility and
it won't commit sync() after each line appended.
That will improve syslog's performance, but it won't help the
security, reliability,
"Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue (ie given by
qmail-qstat) and I don't have as many qmail-remote processes as I've
defined (verified by chkspawn).
I answered this yesterday. Check the list archives.
-Dave
"Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue (ie given by
qmail-qstat) and I don't have as many qmail-remote processes as I've
defined (verified by chkspawn).
One obvious possibility is that the messages in the queue failed
temporarily on
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
Why use syslog when there's a more reliable, secure, efficient, and
functional alternative? (Hint: multilog)
Dave,
I use qmail and at qmail the logs are generated by splogger but
at tcpserver logs are created
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my /etc/rc2.d file the rc file for tcpserver has such
syntax:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Piotr Kasztelowicz, skrypt uruchamiajacy tcpserver i sshd
#
#
sleep 1
#
if [ -f /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -a -f /etc/tcp/tcp.ftp.cdb ]; then
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I have and it is *exactly* what I need, but if I did not misread the
docu, isoqlog uses syslog and I really would like to keep this away from
syslog.
Argh. You're right. I assumed it was based on multilog since syslog
sucks so bad...
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for updating qmail, I would be all for a new version of qmail with some
of the more useful (nearly mandatory) plugins already added. A couple I can
think of is the oversize DNS packet patch for qmail,
Nowhere near mandatory.
and possibly
qmail-scanner ( with the
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed qmail as described in LWQ. As I try to evaluate the logs
with qmail analog I run into trouble because multilog does not have the
timestamps needed by qmailanalog. Can I just replace any multilog entry
with splogger or is this no good idea?
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see exactly two patches which could be part of stock qmail: the AOL dns
patch and Russels qmtp/mxps-patch for qmail-remote.
Forget about the DNS mods, DJB has very clearly expressed disdain for
them. I'd vote for the MXPS and bigconcurrency mods.
-Dave
"Chris Garrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
patches are often released to fix bugs.
How about "addition" or "extension"?
I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
-Dave
"Keith Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I followed the directions to the T in Life with Qmail -
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html. At the end of the install,
chapter 2, I re-booted.
After my system booted I type ps and there was only 2 processes
running:
1) bash
2) ps
You're not seeing
Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am noticing all the mail going into the queue and maybe
10 qmail-remote processes whereas I have 250 set for
concurrencyremote!
You restarted qmail after you modified concurrencyremote? Grep for
"status:" in your qmail-send logs to verify that qmail-send
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
Ummm... Nope.
Nope what? Nope, I don't vote for "source code plug-ins"? Or nope,
"source code plug-ins" is not a good renam
"David L. Nicol" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that man page [dot-qmail] says:
WARNING: For security, qmail-local replaces any dots in ext with colons
before checking .qmail-ext. For convenience, qmail-local converts any
uppercase letters in ext to lowercase.
What exactly is the threat
Greg Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It also seems to me that one of the design traits of qmail is
simplicity of config files - I can't find the reference, but I thought
somewhere DJB said that having to parse complex config files is a cause of
problems.
See:
Ould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use IMAP in a simple manner as I use actually
pop3.
Huh? You're currently using POP3 but want to switch to IMAP?
I'm using strictly LWQ method of installation.
No you're not. The snippet you posted from your qmail script is
seriously bastardized.
All
Ould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oui...s'il vous plait! I wont to use now IMAP instead of
POP3 or using both (I want to let this choice to the end
client, but want to setup the two possiblity on my server).
As long as both servers (POP3 and IMAP) use the same mailboxes (format
and location), you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a very confusing thing I am trying to accomplish, but for
reasons outside of my control it must be done. I have a main domain name
of company..com in locals. I have a company.fi:alias-companyfi line in
virtualdomains. The alias file looks like this:
| forward
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I
have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for.
I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how
the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the
Jeremy Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ookay...mail being sent from users works just fine, however when a cgi
script or other server program tries to send mail, this happens:
- Transcript of session follows -
553 5.3.5 mail.mydarkness.com. config error: mail loops back to me (MX
[Please don't send the identical query to every qmail-related address
you can find.]
RAGHVENDRA SHUKLA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have followed the life with qmail for installing
the qmail . But after that i run the qmail by
qmail start -- following the script.
But it
Ould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use actually POP3 with tcpserver.
I Want to use IMAP4 in order to dump users message's.
I'm based on LWQ. But I don't know how to include togheter
POP3/IMAP4?
There's nothing to tricky about running POP3 and IMAP together. You
just have to install an IMAP daemon
Matt Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i put this line in /var/qmail/users/assign:
=joe:alias:81:81:/var/qmail/alias:-:joe:
but qmail-newu complains:
msg# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-newu
qmail-newu: fatal: bad format in users/assign
what am i doing wrong?
Did you forget to terminate "assign"
I'm taking a vacation from this list until the level of newbie
tolerance improves dramatically.
Sorry, I just can't take it any longer.
-Dave
"asantos" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or that XEmacs is not an operating system.
Actually, XEmacs is as much of an operating system--probably even
moreso--than early versions of Windows.
-Dave
QBA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I check if I have qmail-smtpd enabled on my host?
$ telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 sws5.ctd.ornl.gov ORNL/WS ESMTP
help
214 qmail home page: http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html
quit
221 sws5.ctd.ornl.gov ORNL/WS
"Barley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot get over this attitude. Can it really be that the majority of the
qmail community feels like old Felix here?
If I say "yes" can we kill this thread?
-Dave
Louis Mushandu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...cerebrally...sphincter...petulant...commensurate...intelligentsia...
Wow, Louis, you sure do use some purdy fancy words for a newbie.
-Dave
Jamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be out of line here. However, this is not the first time I've seen
snappy rude responses from people in response to others asking for help. I
am simply quoting this message as it is the most recent.
I'm not a big fan of newbie smackdowns, though a
Warren Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not tried to install using LWQ but I couldn't
help but notice some differences in the way things are installed using LWQ
versus the INSTALL files. Now which is right?
Question: Which of the following is the right way to remove a file
in the current
Jamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the statement you claim I made "the docs are all so bad because i
couldn't install qmail with
them", I did not say this. I simply stated that I was unsuccessfull in my
attempts to install qmail using them. I did not state they were bad, I even
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So my question is: Which patches should one not miss.
I don't install any patches unless I know I need them. Only two of the
dozens of qmails I've installed have been patched:
- my list server has the big-concurrency patch, and
- a pop/imap/smtp
"Neil Grant" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
went through Dave Sill's "Life with qmail" and have ended up with a very
non working qmail system
Sorry to hear that.
in /var/log/qmail/current:
@40003a22b5be2fde3044 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
That's normal.
in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current
Joao Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed qmail by following the steps that Dave Sill provides
in his web-site (http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html). Still, when
I try to start qmail I get the following error message continuously:
-n Starting qmail: svscan
/etc/init.d/qmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just re-installed qmail following the procedures in 'Life with qmail'.
When I use the command /usr/local/sbin/qmail start I get :-
Starting qmail: svscan.
:No such file or directory
:No such file or directory
:No such file or directory
:No such file or directory
Joao Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail stat
/var/qmail/supervise: does not exist
But obviously is does, since (1) everything is working, and (2) you
recently posted the output of "ls -lR /var/qmail/supervise". Sounds
like your /usr/local/sbin/qmail script is corrupt. You
Travis Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is happening to my server any clues.
Nov 19 13:53:49 mail inetd[516]: smtp/tcp server
failing (looping or being flooded) stopping service
for 10 minutes$
Your SMTP service is busy, either with legitimate traffic or some
illegitimate flood (an
"Dennis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm asking the question again...
Why? If you didn't like the first answers, you should say why.
Is there a formal way of backing up IMAP Maildir's ?
There's nothing magic about maildirs. Your normal backup utilities
(tar, dump, etc.) will handle them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:42:13PM +0530, Kiran wrote:
The following are the files present in the /var/qmail/control
directory and their contents:
concurrencyincoming:20
Bogus file. concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote are the real files.
Ould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I Installed in my LAN qmail server, but I want that this server access
to internet
via another qmail server installed in an DMZ zone. Can you explain what
I must on
this server to relaying sendin/receiving mails to my local qmail server?
Sure, just put something
Ould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
works fine.
But my problem Is about haw to include:
"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 21 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
setuser qmaill cyclog \
Joao Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should the service directory have any file? My service directory has
none.
/var/qmail/supervise should have qmail-send and qmail-smtpd
subdirectories.
-Dave
Joao Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed qmail by following the steps that Dave Sill provides
in his web-site (http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html). Still, when
I try to start qmail I get the following error message continuously:
-n Starting qmail: svscan
/etc/init.d/qmail: /var
Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure you actually understand how unix works. All the folders
in /home shouldn't be accessible to other users anyhow.
I'm not sure you're aware of how systems are actually configured. All
the user directories on my systems are world
Oliver Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if my server's domain is domain.com, and I try to send
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from my own local account (ie:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]), qmail complaints that in the
MX list for domain.com, the first MX record points back to the original
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duplicate delivery:
Nov 15 21:24:27 mail qmail: 974341467.158027 delivery 34992: success:
did_0+0+2/
Single delivery:
Nov 15 21:24:28 mail qmail: 974341468.155358 delivery 34993: success:
did_0+0+1/
See the difference? The +2 vs. +1? That is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the instructures given on Life with qmail, I am trying to
install qmail using the source codes. So far I a have downloaded qmail
and the two add-ons (daemontools and ucspi-tcp), and followed the steps
up to building (Section 2.5.5 in Life with qmail).
In the
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. And what if there is not a .qmail- for each user???
There's *always* a .qmail file, even if it's just the one specified on
the qmail-start command line. I don't know exactly how vpopmail sets
things up, but there's some difference between the
martin langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pd: what distro are you using that sets users directories to 755?
Solaris, IRIX, TRU64 UNIX, etc.
755 is traditional for UNIX.
-Dave
Jamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it stands currently I've been stuck at testing local delivery. Every
test message I tried would result in a bounce. In the bounced message I
could see that for some reason qmail was adding additional information to
the addresses. For example if I
"Expert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My .qmail-default have the line: | /var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d
/etc/aliases.cdb. The /etc/aliases have the line: MAILER-DAEMON: admin . I'm
receiving a lot of emails from someone trying to spam me but, the accounts
that the spamer is trying to spam
wolfgang zeikat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can i make qmail accept mails for
user@[123.123.123.123] when the machine 123.123.123.123 forwards all mails
to our qmail server?
Put 123.123.123.123 in control/locals and control/rcpthosts.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd upgraded my daemontools on qmail from version 0.53 to 0.7.
The file size for both /var/qmail/control/locals and rcpthosts exceeds
1M (this incl. around 65000 cobrands).
However using the new daemontool with svscan somehow prevent qmail from
running
with big locals
"Kiran" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I am able to send receive mails, but i need to start qmail manually
even though i have written the init scripts.
This is the error i get in the nohup.out which is created when starting
qmail file : nonup env - PATH="$PATH" svscan
./run: Can't reopen pipe
Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the maildir in their home folder? Then that is all that
matters.
Nope. The mode on the home directory matters, too.
Set the numbers to whatever you like (777 if you really want
to). Since the parent folder ($HOME) is readable only by the owner (if
you
"James T. Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would like to do is this:
host1 - primary MX for incoming and outgoing
host2 - outgoing only
host1 will be used for "regular" email traffic, with
legit user accounts, while host2 will be mainly used
for pumping out big loads of outgoing email
"suresh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any knows what is automaildirmake
No, but but I'm sure if you keep asking about it, someone will.
-Dave
"David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan is probably right that no special permissions are needed to make
normal uses of his code (which is what he says on his web pages), but
if the corporate lawyer isn't in agreement with him, he's going to say
"no". That's a corporate lawyer's job,
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think "select few" as you have used it needs clarification -- even if only
one half of one percent of all advanced C programmers are part of the "select
few", that's still hundreds or thousands of people, and many of those people
are part of the open
Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a case could be made that the charming and personable way qmail
has been represented in various public fora makes this audit-by-fire
even better: at this point, there are enough people around the world
who hate djb's guts and would never touch anything
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:21:40PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
An audit by some random "security
firm" might not mean anything, but an audit by a recognized authority
would.
It might. It also might not, because even the best auditors could miss
Shakaib Sayyid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to resend all the incoming mail for an account to all the
receipents in the header having a specific domain. For instance
if I have the following in the header:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to resend mail
"James T. Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering whether to include host2 also as an MX in the
dns records although host1 is the only MX handling incoming and
part of outgoing (none from host2).
No, only SMTP servers should be listed in MX's.
If I'm correct, I don't need an MX entry
"RamKumar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would like to know what qmail-qmqpd and qmail-qmtpd are used for? and
where i could get more information about the same.
QMQP is the Quick Mail Queueing Protocol.
QMTP is the Quick Mail Transfer Protocol.
QMQP is used by clients of smart hosts to pawn off
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am reading this book by B. Schneier, in particular, the section
`Cracking and hacking contests'. He thinks that contests (like
offering $1000 for finding a security hole in a product) are bad for
four main reasons, the first reason being that the contests
"Mark Lo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 3 messages in remote queue and 1 message in local queue. I
would like to know how to send out those messages immediately ?
Send qmail-send and ALRM signal. If that doesn't work, check your
logs.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
with TEST.receive
...
Everything worked fine at the shell but I couldn't find the test email in
the gast Mailbox ? Why could be the reason ?
Most likely, you're looking in the wrong place. But
"Jack Barnett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard you could do secure smtp, which would SSL the connection and ALLOW
relaying, provided the username/password passed is correct, is this true?
Yes.
If so anyone got a pointer to some info on this?
See www.qmail.org. Look for "starttls".
Also is
Ruprecht Helms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed the qmail via the Tutorial life with qmail.
OK.
Qmail have I started using the /var/boot/home by copying into
/var/qmail and renamed to rc.
What does this mean? An LWQ installation doesn't need or suggest
anything like this.
What have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm usign qmail on one of my mail server.
I need an information about pop3 daemons.
Now i'm using qmail-pop3d for delivering in Maildir, but there was another
pop3 daemons fast and efficent workings with maildir?
Any idea?
Solid, which handles both maildirs and mboxes:
"Tony Ennis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My /var/qmail/users/assign file looks like this:
+gv-:fred:1000:1003:/usr/local/squid/bin:-:gv:
.
Note that the 'gv-' line is a wildcard - I understand this to mean that any
email received for any address that begins with 'gv-' will be processed by
this
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rest of Courier is great too - fully ESMTP support for DSN, TLS/SSL,
AUTH along with all the goodies of Qmail we've come to love.
But as the docs state - it's not the number-crunching monster Qmail is - it
can't beat Qmail on throughput - but for site
"Kiran" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I am not able to telnet to port 25,though i am able to send
mails. I belive this can be configured in one of the files.
qmail-smtpd is not properly configured. How did you install qmail?
2. I want it to support other domains too. But the virtualdomains
"Pierre-Yves Deslandes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created some users recently with good passwords, with good directories
e.g.~user/.qmail ./Maildir (like others users for whom it works)
and a maildirmake Maildir (too)
a qmail restart
And when i send them mails,
Paulo Correia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get all mail in the form xypattern@maydomain.com to be handled
by a .qmail-default file.
I've managed to get all mails starting with xy to be processed by that same
.qmail-default, but imagine I would only want to catch the mails starting with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting all (most needde parts) into a well
documented one would be a great thing.. imho :)
That won't happen.
-Dave
Sam Varshavchik has released his MTA, which is called Courier. See:
http://courier.sourceforge.net
(Is sourceforge always this slow?)
Sam is the author of maildrop, courier-imap, and sqwebmail.
Courier is still prerelease--though I don't know whether it's
considered alpha or beta--but it
"McGillicuddy, Dennis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been burnt again. This is the second list that I have subscibed to
and it just so happens that it is also the second list I have had trouble
unsubscribing from. Perhaps one of you knows the secret of how to do this
and will be kind enough to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I followed the documentation "life with Qmail" but can not start the qmail
Batch ( qmail start). I get a syntax error
although I copied the Qmail file exactly as it is. This syntax error is:
"unexpected end of file".
Here is the Qmail Batch:
(See attached file:
"Alex Khanin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lets say my mail server is mailserver.domain.com, and i am an MX record
for subdomain.anotherdomain.com. I am wondering how would I set up
a bounce rule so that *@subdomain.anotherdomain.com will bounce to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't want ANY mail to go
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. So everything has been going along fine until this morning. All of a
sudden I noticed that our new qmail server stopped responding. I went to
the qmail server and noticed that there was a kernel panic message on the
screen and then something about
Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:35:07 MDT, Andy Bradford wrote:
thenewdawn.com:thenewdawn
I think I made a mistake... I believe it should be:
thenewdawn.com:alias-thenewdawn
If "thenewdawn" is a user, the former is what you need.
If "thenewdawn" is an alias,
Cyril Bitterich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO /var/qmail/users/assign only works for mailadresses that are nor
equal to the username.
Whether or not qmail-users overrides users is a matter of fact, not a
matter of opinion. In fact, qmail-users (users/assign) *does* override
normal delivery to
Goran Blazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When issuing the following command:
echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
I get a response like this:
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject: Subject:: command not found
Hmm. I can't see where that "Subject:" is coming from. Do you have a
wrapper
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SMTP is not secure. That's just the way it is. There is no reason to run
SSL on your SMTP port.
How about privacy? It's not as good as end-to-end, e.g. using PGP, but
it's better than nothing.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to change the FROM header in mails with a special FROM.
For example: The FROM header is postmaster@localhost and I
want to change it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] while it is
delivered to a users Maildir. Is it possible with a .qmail file?
The preferred way to adjust
"Don Johnson-freeuk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if it has always been so, but it appears that when we address
items to eachother within the company, e-mails are sent to our ISP and back
again to reach the recipient. Although this does work, it seems very
wasteful and time-consuming,
Greg Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to set up a filter that reads incoming mail. I wrote the
filter, tested it at the command line, then installed it in my
.qmail-default file in my home directory:
# .qmail-default
|/bin/python mailfilter.py
./Maildir/
When I send mail to myself
"Barley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am managing a mail server for a company that has two domain names serving
the same site. They want people to be able to send them mail at either
domain but have all mail forwarded to the first domain, one account per
user. Is there a way to configure qmail so
"Barley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a given domain, if the system recieves mail to a username it does not
know, I want that mail to be forwarded to a catch-all mail address.
For local domains (control/locals), the catch-all is
~alias/.qmail-default. For virtual domains, the catch-all is
"Yamin Prabudy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ORBS sez:
... As ! is
a standard network addressing indicator, this can only be charitably
described as yet another Qmail bug.
qmail's handling of !'s in not in violation of any of the mail RFC's.
Qmail is extremely network unfriendly
and has been known
"ROD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you wildcards in virtualdomains
Yes. See the qmail-send man page.
-Dave
"ROD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to forward everything for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately I'm rather confused as how to do this! I can't create a
'.qmail' file in alias because both of them would need to be .qmail-info.
How
Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RBL
Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First I did this setup and it did not work .
tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 21
"wheatly" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why do i receive the same two letter sometimes?
Could be you're listed more than once on the envelope. Could also be
that you have a .qmail file that generates duplicates.
Closely examining the headers of a pair of duplicates should provide
the necessary
"ROD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read qmail-send but still i'm still a bit unclear to how to
doit.
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#man-pages
Would
info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test
send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test?
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No,
Jennifer Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have set up Postgres on our server and under /var/qmail/alias i placed a
.qmail-postgres (the user account for postgreSQL is postgres), I then
forward all mail to postgres to root
.qmail-postgres contains
root
all root mail is aliased to our two
301 - 400 of 1816 matches
Mail list logo
