hey all,
i was wondering if anyone knew of a package that did this, or perhaps
something qmail might allready have that will round robin messages to
different rcpt's, for example:
Hiya ...
I have written a program that does just this, we use it for our help@rucus
address. It round robins
On 03/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe smd. has written already a script which will create the proper
~/Maildir/ for every user in /etc/passwd ?
I would really be happy to get this one (:
My modified checkpassword does that... just rip off main() from
maildirmake.c and insert it
- RJP [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| G'Day.
| I have been sporadically trying to set up Qmail-1.03 for about 3 weeks
| now and keep running into:
|
| Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.166915 status: local 0/10
| remote 2/20
| Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.276501 delivery 4:
|
This is an extract from proftpd menual:
Has anyone managed to get proftpd to actually chroot?
Yes :-)
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 02:48:09PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
- torben fjerdingstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| At the same time I think it should be modified to be able to take
| multiple -r flags.
Would be
My question is, will there be any implications "Out_There" of suddenly
having a new IP and hostname for our mailserver, assuming we make the
appro DNS changes?
Maybe you could arrange it on your router via port forwarding? You set it
up to forward all conenction for ports 25 i 110 to first
Eric Dahnke wrote:
Hello List,
We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
a failure.
Our current thinking is:
- an identical qmail installation on a backup machine
- daily copy of /home
Andy Walden escribió:
- an identical qmail installation on a backup machine
- daily copy of /home /control and /alias to backup machine
- in the event of a massive failure unplug the ethernet from the main
server and plug into the backup machine.
(I realize we will lose the queue
Cris Daniluk escribió:
Eric Dahnke wrote:
Hello List,
We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
a failure.
Our current thinking is:
- an identical qmail installation on a backup
elite, thats exactly what i need. i was gonna take the code someone else
had posted and write my own ticketing system, but this is much cooler.
thanks to everyone.
-xs
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Guy Antony Halse wrote:
hey all,
i was wondering if anyone knew of a package that did this, or
Hi folks. I put my new qmail based MX into production yesterday and it
is working great. However, I have one problem and I am not sure which
end I should look to for the answer.
My setup is an external gateway machine running qmail (our MX),
forwarding mail for our domain to our internal mailhub
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 18:22:50 -0500, Justin Bell wrote:
but vacation messages shouldnt be replying to list email, right?
1. ezmlm lists can be set up via DIR/headeradd to contain "Precedence:
Bulk". Vacation programs should not respond to these. ezmlm-idx since
quite a while does this by
Sorry for the late reply, but this isn't a qmail problem, it's a unix file
permissions problem.
# groupadd shellusr
# vi /etc/group
# chown root.shellusr /bin/csh
# chmod 750 /bin/csh
# chown root.shellusr /bin/sh
# chmod 750 /bin/sh
# chown root.shellusr /bin/ksh
# chmod 750 /bin/ksh
etc.. Of
- Mark E Drummond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| My setup is an external gateway machine running qmail (our MX),
| forwarding mail for our domain to our internal mailhub running
| Netscape Messaging Server (NMS) which all our users access using
| IMAP.
|
| The problem is that mail to a non-existant or
Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
But it would fix in no way the problems in this thread.
Maybe it would be too much for the person who originally brought the
question, because users would be unable to do anything with their .qmail
while what the guy wanted was only to prevent them from
At 09:14 AM 3/16/99 +, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
Hi, I am currently using tcpserver on a Linux 2.0.36 box/RH 5.2 box
I have setup tcpserver with a limit of 5 connections via -c5 and
backlog of 1 with -b1
However, when I start up the 7th and subsequent connection, I
basically get held up
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is very easy to make users ftp in only to their ~home/public_html,
thus they will not be able to alter the .qmail files.
chroot() is broken on Solaris 2.5.1, which is running on the server. But
it doesn't matter anyway, since I made a patch for
I'm looking for a way to have qmail 1.03 deliver mail to Maildir's which all
have the same uid/gid. I'm have vchkpw-3.1.3 running, and I know I can
accomplish the task via this method, however I do not want to require 7.5k users
to change their mail settings to include the domain name in
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All you have to do is create it as root and make it readable by the mail
process for the user. They can read it, but they can't replace it.
Not true. If the user can write the directory, they can replace it.
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
What do you mean by hold all the messages?
Our mailserver does both smtp and pop, so therein lies the problem. Great, so
the MX rolls and the backup server accepts smtp for our domains. But what
about pop? When the primary server comes back up,
Joel Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All you have to do is create it as root and make it readable by the mail
process for the user. They can read it, but they can't replace it.
Not true. If the user can write
A test.
--
Two rules to success in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
-- Sassan Tat
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:03:23PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
A test.
Depending on what you're trying, I think it did :)
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk | mo|VERWEG stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mo|VERWEG dat is de levensvraag
|
Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:03:23PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
A test.
Depending on what you're trying, I think it did :)
g
I'm testing my mailing list -- newsgroup gateway.
I *think* I've just about got to the bottom of it, except the program I
use to re-write
"Adam D. McKenna" wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, but this isn't a qmail problem, it's a unix file
permissions problem.
# groupadd shellusr
# vi /etc/group
# chown root.shellusr /bin/csh
# chmod 750 /bin/csh
# chown root.shellusr /bin/sh
# chmod 750 /bin/sh
# chown root.shellusr
Eric Dahnke wrote:
Cris Daniluk escribió:
Eric Dahnke wrote:
Hello List,
We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
a failure.
Our current thinking is:
- an identical
From: Cris Daniluk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Isn't there a *real* way to do this? I swear there is...
By "real way", do you mean a way that's not already built into your operating
system?
--Adam
27 matches
Mail list logo
