Hi,
there are two packages on the net fulfilling my needs - vmailmgr and the
inter7 suite.
Could one say that one of the two is "better"? So fare I use the "Bruce
Guenther way" for virtual mailusers but not his package (only "natural"
qmail) and I am really satisfied.
Now I need to choose one of
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 10:23:39AM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
[snip]
On 15 Sep 2000, at 10:15, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:51:27AM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
Doesn't mounting your queue with "nosync" have the same effect?
Nope.
Where's the difference? ... I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Sep 2000, at 11:32, Peter van Dijk wrote:
AFAIK, mounting 'sync' means any and all update-operations will go to
disk immediately, and the system call won't return until a write is
done. 'nosync' takes this guarantee away.
That's what
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Sep 2000, at 11:32, Peter van Dijk wrote:
AFAIK, mounting 'sync' means any and all update-operations will go to
disk immediately, and the system call won't return until a
qmail Digest 15 Sep 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1124
Topics (messages 48696 through 48776):
Forward on Bounce
48696 by: çééí äìôøï
48697 by: Brett Randall
48699 by: çééí äìôøï
48708 by: Dave Sill
48710 by: çééí äìôøï
48711 by: Dave Sill
Thus spake Gadoury ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
For some reason qmail-smtpd decided to stop recieving local mail delivered
from a remote host.
And here is the reason:
this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file:
:deny
^
You may want to have a :allow instead -- this will let any computer connect
to
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:25:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dears friends
Am I correct in asserting that you are asking two completely unrelated
questions in one message? [Ok, saves one set of headers' worth of band-
width...]
In sendmail when the user michael is downloading his emails
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Clemens Hermann wrote:
| Now I need to choose one of the two tools but I am not sure which would be
| the better choice for my purpose. It would be great if someone could give me
| a hint, I need the following things:
|
| virtual users
We do this currently, with vmailmgr.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 11:20:51AM +0200, Clemens Hermann wrote:
there are two packages on the net fulfilling my needs - vmailmgr and the
inter7 suite.
Could one say that one of the two is "better"? So fare I use the "Bruce
Guenther way" for virtual mailusers but not his package (only
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 11:20:51AM +0200, Clemens Hermann wrote:
Could one say that one of the two is "better"? So fare I use the "Bruce
Guenther way" for virtual mailusers but not his package (only "natural"
qmail) and I am really satisfied.
I don't know the vpopmail suite real good, so I
Hi,
I have some problems
usingqmail 1.03 with mysql-patch 0.6.6 over Redhat 6.2.
Pop3 service works fine, but qmail-getpw never gets
executed and all local messages get lost. If I use users/assign works fine, but
I need qmail-getpw working.
I think that the problem is related to
This message actually asks a couple of questions. I am running
qmail on Redhat 6.2. I have it up and working with no problems. I have to
add some stuff to it though and I am a little confused and hope that some of
you wondeful qmail gurus out there can help me.
I have qmail
It also happens to support SSL (TLS) secure connections out-of-the-box (so
to speak) if you have openssl installed.
- Original Message -
From: "Jamie Heilman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen F. Bosch wrote:
I am trying to set up SSL with a UW IMAP server. Before I bother the
list with
Thus spake Philip Tong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I got the virtual domain working, users in the virtual domain are able to
get mail as "user@virtualdomain". How do I stop the user from getting mail
assigned to "user@actualdomain"?
One way would be to make "actualdomain" a virtualdomain, too. You
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 11:20:51AM +0200, Clemens Hermann wrote:
there are two packages on the net fulfilling my needs - vmailmgr and
the inter7 suite. Could one say that one of the two is "better"? So
fare I use the "Bruce Guenther way" for virtual mailusers but not his
package (only
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 12:38:15AM -0400, Gadoury wrote:
Logging is already setup using multilog. I just haven't figured out how to
read them. I downloaded a couple of utilities for reading them but the
documentation is a bit vague.
The best program for making them clear and easier to
Hi,
I am tryint to get
http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch
to work - with little success. I downloaded qmail-1.03 from the
www.qmail.org site, and then the patch. One would assume a somewhat
sanitised work environment. This is the output of the patch process.
# patch -p0
I have been unable to find a fix or any suggestive information for a client
who is getting the following error message:
I need you to look at the following error message that keeps popping up
on my screen every few minutes.it looks like the password dialog
box with this message:
The server
First of all, nice to meet you. I'm the funny looking guy that rides
into the building every morning on a black and white bike with green
tires.
Second, when are they seeing this error? During a POP login or an SMTP
transaction? And it appears that the error has been truncated. Is this
how
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 14 September 2000 at 15:36:17 -0600
Dave -- your message was great. I would hope that there would be
more like it on the list in the future.
I'll add one thing to the list, if I may be so bold, is a little bit
about approaching problem
dG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 14 September 2000 at 17:50:33 -0500
My apologies. I should have included the original code in my email. The
method you suggested is the method employed in the script on Adam's page.
Unfortunately, svscan is not behaving the way the documentation says that it
Dears Friend
I need setup rules antispam on my mail-server
1. My users only can send e-mails only if they put [EMAIL PROTECTED]
into of From header. They can't put other domain, for example:
user@any-server-spam-com
2. I have users than send a lot of e-mails spam, I have users spam.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote:
Doug White wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote:
Sep 13 17:12:21 etosha /kernel: pid 3197 (qmail-remote), uid 1008:
exited on signal 11
I'll bet you it's bad memory. Get your
Hello again,
first of all, thanks once again to all of you who provided me with a large
variety of very helpful information yestarday.
At the moment I am looking at quite a hand full of qmail patches I would
like to use. May there occur problems combinig different patches which run
great if
We are taking over a domain and their users.
i put their domain in virtualdomains as:
ifreedom.com:if
and ifreedom.com was added to rcpthosts
so any mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will go to if-joejoe and be delivered locally.
in /var/qmail/users/assign i've placed
We have been telling people to do
su - alias
before setting up a list under ~alias. But under RH 6.1-2, you cannot
do this anymore unless you specify a "real" shell for alias. So the
usual entry
alias:x:104:502::/var/qmail/alias:/bin/true
will not work anymore. What is the reason? Could
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:04:50PM -0700, Phil Blecker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 03:58:15PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
alias:x:104:502::/var/qmail/alias:/bin/true
^
That is the name of the shell program to run for alias. But, its not a
shell.
Hi friends...
Please help me
I am using Qmail and Vpopmail with 50,000 user
but qmail is very slow for the receive of messages.
When I send a message from www.mixmail.com, www.latinmail.com
and www.netaddress.com I recieve the message later of 8 hours aprox.
Why?
I don't Know ...
I don't
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not understand this comment at all. Under RH 5.2, after doing
su - alias
the output of whoami was `alias'. Now it is still root. Why do I
need a valid shell to be able to do this?
I don't know if Red Hat is weird, but under most operating
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:36:39PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not understand this comment at all. Under RH 5.2, after doing
su - alias
the output of whoami was `alias'. Now it is still root. Why do I
need a valid shell to be able to do
Is it possible to use qmailadmin on a 'default' domain of /etc/passwd
authenticated users? Currently I provide shells to various users, and they
all need pop3 email access. However, I also want to use qmailadmin to
configure and set-up ezmlm on that same host (mystica.cx) as well as
Hrmm, I am having the same problem I have a bunch of '@#' files...
I know the numbers are the microsecounds and thats all fine and dandy but
qmail does not seem to be crunching these into a permanet log file.. Hrmmm,
am I mising something here?
--JT
- Original Message -
From:
Thanks, I guess I misunderstood the way in which tcpserver workes.
David
Ah, but your rcpthosts file is empty, which make qmail default back to
relaying for everyone. The RELAYCLIENT variable in your tcprules only
serves to tell it to ignore rcpthosts for certain IPs. Here, I can
prove
Jamie Heilman wrote:
We got your first message just fine, no need to keep sending it over and
over again.
I only sent it once. Did you get two?
To setup an SSL wrapper around UW's IMAP server I suggest you go to
stunnel.org and read the documentation.
It is, ofcourse, probably worth
hi,
i have a big problem with qmailanalog, because i never get an output.
i have one mail-logfile in /var/log/mail. i piped this thru matchup
and i.e. thru zoverall, but i never get an output. zoverall i.e. says
"completed messages:0" although my system logs hundreds of mail a day.
any idea
hi,
i have a big problem with qmailanalog, because i never get an output.
i have one mail-logfile in /var/log/mail. i piped this thru matchup
and i.e. thru zoverall, but i never get an output. zoverall i.e. says
"completed messages:0" although my system logs hundreds of mails a day.
any idea
Check the logs, is the message actually received 8 hours later? if so its
the sending servers fault, or possibly DNS problems.
What do you mean by qmail-send went down? there should be a message in the
logs as to why it "just went down"
Need more details PLEASE if you want help.
-- Tim
-
"French, Michael" wrote:
I have qmail setup with one domain name foo.com (names changed of
course), but my company wants to add its mail for its domain name to the
system. The domain for my company is company.com and it is being hosted by
Infi.net so the domain name company.com is
OK Start by looking at Life With Qmail and setting up your logging using
multilog. Also, you may want to look at using qmail-mrtg as well since it
provides nice pretty graphs that show change in time quite well or where
specific problems/bottlenecks occur. When using in parallel with mrtg graphs
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:48:08PM -0700, Tim Hunter wrote:
What do you mean by qmail-send went down? there should be a message in the
logs as to why it "just went down"
Actually, it's "want down." I was a bit surprised that svstat was saying this,
but I looked in the svstat source, and sure
Hi,
I'm not an experienced programmer nor a kernel hacker so
I thought I should ask all you gurus before I proceed,
or if I should't proceed at all ;)
SITUATION:
My compile session stops when setting the conf-spawn to
1000 (after applying the big-todo and big-concurrency
patches,
Stephen Bosch wrote:
I only sent it once. Did you get two?
yup, take a look at
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/09/threads.html
(try doing a case sensitive search for OT)
its there twice
Is this still the case? I don't know of any known vulnerabilities with
the
I have been trying to get Mailman to work with qmail for a couple of
weeks now and I can't seem to make the final connection. I
researched the archives and I have dutifully read this list for over
1000 messages.
Mailman is able to send messages just fine. My problem is that I
can't seem to
43 matches
Mail list logo
