ops i didnt observe that. Let me try to
figure it out when it occurs next time.
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> From: e...@shubes.net
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:15:55 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke - continuation
with my previous m
nicole thomson wrote:
thanks eric
most of them doesnt look legitimate,
example
@40004b266ef80d12a824 spamdyke[15042]: DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS from:
playmated...@sshard.com to: n...@mydomain.com origin_ip: 189.41.176.238
origin_rdns: 189-041-176-238.xd-dynamic.ctbcnetsuper.com.br auth: (un
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:34:10 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke
>
> nicole thomson wrote:
> > Eric
> >
> > Is there a way i can drop all bouncing mails? i know little about
> > maildrop, how best we can make use of it? any o
:55 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke - continuation
> with my previous mail
>
> nicole thomson wrote:
> > Thanks eric
> >
> > Now i increased the timeouts from 600 to 6000, let me wait and see does
> > it needs tobe increa
nicole thomson wrote:
Eric
Is there a way i can drop all bouncing mails? i know little about
maildrop, how best we can make use of it? any other ideas?
I don't think that simply dropping bounces is a good idea. Sometimes
they're legitimate. What's the nature of the bounces? Are they
backsca
nicole thomson wrote:
Thanks eric
Now i increased the timeouts from 600 to 6000, let me wait and see does
it needs tobe increased more, also i subscribed in spamdyke users
mailing list. Will update the happenings frequently
--Nic
6000 (1:20:00) seems excessive. I think that 600 (00:10:00
klist-file put these words :"
with RBL in place itself people are making life uncomfortable, without that how
it will be?
--Nic
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> From: e...@shubes.net
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:05:22 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmai
: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:50:28 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke - continuation with
> my previous mail
>
> nicole thomson wrote:
> >
> > also in smtp/current i could see lots of TIMEOUT
> >
> > @40004b21e0ca03ac2
nicole thomson wrote:
My present config is qmail-toaster+spamdyke
>Have you implemented a whitelist with all of your vendors?
yes i did this, whenever i see a mail is with DENIED_RBL_MATCH bounce,
but tracing them through the logs is bit a pain,
Have you tried something like:
# qmlog -g D
nicole thomson wrote:
also in smtp/current i could see lots of TIMEOUT
@40004b21e0ca03ac29a4 spamdyke[29507]: TIMEOUT from:
someu...@sixsigmaalchemy.com to: validuse...@mydomain.com origin_ip:
78.129.199.225 origin_rdns: mail1.arrowmail.co.uk auth: (unknown)
reason: TIMEOUT
You might n
+0530
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke
My present config is qmail-toaster+spamdyke
>Have you implemented a whitelist with all of your vendors?
yes i did this, whenever i see a mail is with DENIED_RBL_MATCH bounce, but
tracing them through the logs is bit a p
ugin::VBounce
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> From: e...@shubes.net
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:00:48 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke
>
> nicole thomson wrote:
> > Thanks Eric &
nicole thomson wrote:
Thanks Eric 'shubes'
Now most of the spam messages are getting blocking, along with that many
false positives too, sometimes it is tiresome. Is there any good
suggestions please?
-Nic
What is your present configuration? Are you still running spamdyke? If
so, what's i
2009 23:04:25 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke
>
> nicole thomson wrote:
> > Is there a way to send all these rejected emails to a particular account,
> > so that until we update the whitelist_senders, ip, it will be safe to
> > receive the ori
nicole thomson wrote:
Is there a way to send all these rejected emails to a particular account, so
that until we update the whitelist_senders, ip, it will be safe to receive the
original mails rather than rejecting them?
I don't think so, at least not that I'm aware of.
I think you'll have t
Is there a way to send all these rejected emails to a particular account, so
that until we update the whitelist_senders, ip, it will be safe to receive the
original mails rather than rejecting them?
qmlog can be helpful with this. It essentially greps through the logs
for you, and allows you to
nicole thomson wrote:
thanks eric
now i spent few hours in capturing those ip's and updated blacklist_ip,
the spam flow seems tobe low.
> .) What's in your /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns file? I'm curious to know
> what's causing the WARNING message.
in whitelist_rdns i did added .vendordo
thanks eric
now i spent few hours in capturing those ip's and updated blacklist_ip, the
spam flow seems tobe low.
> .) What's in your /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns file? I'm curious to know >
> what's causing the WARNING message.
in whitelist_rdns i did added .vendordomain1.com .vendordomain2.com
nicole thomson wrote:
Thanks to Eric's guidance
Now after doing qtp-install-spamdyke
SUCCESS: Running tests as user vpopmail(508), group vchkpw(503).
SUCCESS: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd appears to offer TLS support but
spamdyke will intercept and decrypt the TLS traffic so all of its
f
19 matches
Mail list logo
