with mailman
I meen
Mailman have webinterface with archive
Ezml not have a webinterface with archive
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 3:47 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot?
On 03/07/2011 02:14 AM
Yes ezml has archive via mail I I reed correct
-Original Message-
From: Pak Ogah [mailto:pako...@pala.bo-tak.info]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:26 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot?
ezmlm do have archive system
from ezmlm developer
how come the service script is differs from
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Replacing_Courier_IMAP_with_Dovecot_IMAP#Building_the_services
just curious??
On 04-Mar-11 23:41, Eric Broch wrote:
Nigel,
Here are the 'cat' of dovecot and dovecot loggin I use...
for dovecot...
Hi Eric B.
What OS are You using ?
(sniffing around there seems to be many libraries that needs to be
updated in Centos5.5 (both 32 64 bit) if Dovecot 2.X will compile)
Regards,
Finn
On 03-03-2011 20:01, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/3/2011 11:39 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric
I built 2.0.9 on 64 bit yesterday. Used the spec from Fedora14 updates
repo. I did have a few hurdles, but I got over them all. Big one is that
vpopmail needs to be installed (as there's no -devel pkg) in order to
build dovecot with vpopmail support. Then, since I was building as a
normal user
Hey Finn,
My test system is running CentOS 5.5. I didn't seem to have any problems
compiling. The compile (make) did not error out.
It is also up to date.
I did 'make' dovecot-2.0.9 again to examine the output and found no
errors, just warnings.
Here's what I did on my test machine...
# cd
Hi Eric B.
Thanks for the reply - I will fire up my testbox later tonight and then
see what happens.
Cheers,
Finn
On 04-03-2011 14:55, Eric Broch wrote:
Hey Finn,
My test system is running CentOS 5.5. I didn't seem to have any
problems compiling. The compile (make) did not error out.
It
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 8:34:53 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot upgrade
Hi Eric B.
Thanks for the reply - I will fire up my testbox later tonight and then see
what happens.
Cheers,
Finn
On 04-03-2011 14:55, Eric Broch wrote:
Hey Finn,
My test system
*From:* Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) f...@kirstineslund.dk
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Sent:* Fri, March 4, 2011 8:34:53 AM
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot upgrade
Hi Eric B.
Thanks for the reply
8:34:53 AM
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: dovecot upgrade
Hi Eric B.
Thanks for the reply - I will fire up my testbox later tonight and
then see what happens.
Cheers,
Finn
On 04-03-2011 14:55, Eric Broch wrote:
Hey Finn,
My test system is running CentOS 5.5. I didn't seem to have any
I had a little difficulty with keeping dovecot up at first. It's very
sensitive to time, and I'm running VMs. I think I got the time situation
under control, but I keep this script running as a cron job every minute
just in case:
[root@tacs-mail ~]# cat /usr/local/bin/monitor_dovecot
#!/bin/sh
On 3/4/2011 10:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I had a little difficulty with keeping dovecot up at first. It's very
sensitive to time, and I'm running VMs. I think I got the time
situation under control, but I keep this script running as a cron job
every minute just in case:
[root@tacs-mail ~]#
On 3/4/2011 10:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I had a little difficulty with keeping dovecot up at first. It's very
sensitive to time, and I'm running VMs. I think I got the time
situation under control, but I keep this script running as a cron job
every minute just in case:
[root@tacs-mail ~]#
On 03/04/2011 11:28 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/4/2011 10:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I had a little difficulty with keeping dovecot up at first. It's very
sensitive to time, and I'm running VMs. I think I got the time
situation under control, but I keep this script running as a cron job
every
On 03/04/2011 11:37 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/4/2011 10:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I had a little difficulty with keeping dovecot up at first. It's very
sensitive to time, and I'm running VMs. I think I got the time
situation under control, but I keep this script running as a cron job
every
Hi Eric B.
I'll give You my init.d/dovecot ! (rel 1.2.10) the logging is done by
dovecot (set log path in dovecot.conf)
Remember to make changes according to Your paths in the init file
#!/bin/bash
#
# /etc/rc.d/init.d/dovecot
#
# Starts the dovecot daemon
#
# chkconfig: - 65 35
#
On 03/02/2011 10:15 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 8:37 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 7:48 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to implement shared folders in dovecot and have received some
help on the dovecot mailing list.
Hi Eric.
What about the 'dovenull' user that is required now or have You changed
the default_login_user ?
Regards,
Finn
On 03-03-2011 06:15, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 8:37 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 7:48 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/3/2011 7:41 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 10:15 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 8:37 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 7:48 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to implement shared folders in dovecot and have
On 03/03/2011 08:36 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric.
What about the 'dovenull' user that is required now or have You changed
the default_login_user ?
Regards,
Finn
Finn,
Nice to have you chiming in here, thanks.
You're running Dovecot v2 I take it? 2.0.9, or earlier?
Are you
Hi Eric.
I have been running 1.2.10 for some time now, but have looked at 2.0.8
for a while without installing yet (now I will go to 2.0.9) but as an
ol' habit I'm always looking around to see what may have changed and the
dovenull is on the top of the 'changes from 1.2 - 2X' list at the
On 3/3/2011 8:54 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/03/2011 08:36 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric.
What about the 'dovenull' user that is required now or have You changed
the default_login_user ?
Regards,
Finn
Finn,
Nice to have you chiming in here, thanks.
You're running
Thanks Finn. I expect the dovecot fail2ban doc will come in very handy
for whoever writes that up. Probably should include a link to it on the
QMT wiki page.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 03/03/2011 09:14 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric.
I have been running 1.2.10 for some time now,
Hi Eric.
I think You're okay doing the change in dovecot.conf but I have inserted
the text from dovecot.org below just in case
* *Just like with dovecot user, dovenull doesn't need a
password, home directory or anything else (but it's good to give
it its own private dovenull
On 3/3/2011 9:33 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric.
I think You're okay doing the change in dovecot.conf but I have
inserted the text from dovecot.org below just in case
* *Just like with dovecot user, dovenull doesn't need a
password, home directory or anything else
On 3/3/2011 9:33 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric.
I think You're okay doing the change in dovecot.conf but I have
inserted the text from dovecot.org below just in case
* *Just like with dovecot user, dovenull doesn't need a
password, home directory or anything else
Hi Eric B.
I am a bit suprised - You started out some 12 hours ago telling that You
did not know how to do this upgrade !!
And now You're on top of it and has the most dovecot 'tuned' toaster
seen on this site 8-) .
Great work and thanks for the help.
/Finn
On 03-03-2011 18:53, Eric
On 3/3/2011 11:39 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Eric B.
I am a bit suprised - You started out some 12 hours ago telling that
You did not know how to do this upgrade !!
And now You're on top of it and has the most dovecot 'tuned' toaster
seen on this site 8-) .
Great work and
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to implement shared folders in dovecot and have received some
help on the dovecot mailing list. I've been told that I should upgrade
to the most recent version of dovecot. Has anyone on the
qmailtoaster-list upgraded to dovecot
On 3/2/2011 7:48 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to implement shared folders in dovecot and have received some
help on the dovecot mailing list. I've been told that I should upgrade
to the most recent version of dovecot. Has anyone
On 3/2/2011 8:37 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
On 3/2/2011 7:48 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:34 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to implement shared folders in dovecot and have received some
help on the dovecot mailing list. I've been told that I should upgrade
to the
# cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
:allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
Do you know how:
,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue,NOP0FCHEC=1
came to be missing from the end of your :allow line?
You really need them both.
If they're missing in some source package somewhere, that really needs
to be fixed.
You might want/need them on the localhost (127.) line as
I never touched the tcp.smtp file before, not that I remember. I had to
locate it to know where it was :P
Both of my servers have the same tcp.smtp and they were installed on
november 2010 and january 2011 so it might be missing on some source file.
I'm adding the text you said and I'll report
D'oh nothing =(
Return-Path: wi...@xxx.com
Delivered-To: de...@geekzone.com.uy
Received: (qmail 22442 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2011 01:25:23 -
Received: from unknown (HELO xxx.com) (208.110.83.154)
by mx.xen30.node01001 with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 22 Jan
2011 01:25:23
Let me see if I can alleviate some confusion.
simscan is a scanning controller of sorts. It controls invoking clamav
and spamassassin to do the actual scanning. Once the scanning is
complete, if the message is marked as spam (tagged by spamassassin)
*and* the spam score is not less than
Let me see if I've got this straight. Simcontrol instigates a primary
scan if it passes that then spamassassin scans it based on the hits
number in the local.cf file?
On 01/20/2011 07:40 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Let me see if I can alleviate some confusion.
simscan is a scanning controller
No. simscan does no scanning. It simply takes action (rejects some
messages) based on the result of scanners that in invokes (clamav and
spamassassin).
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 01/20/2011 10:00 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
Let me see if I've got this straight. Simcontrol instigates a primary
scan if
That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based
on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that
spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct?
Basically Simscan is a gatekeeper/bouncer. If you don't get past
Simscan you
On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
That's what I meant. When Simscan is run it starts spamd to scan based
on the hits number in the simcontrol file and then if it passes that
spamassassin scans it again using the local .cf file. Is that correct?
No. spamassassin only scans once.
Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if
the file has already been scanned? If spamassassin rejects it at 5
what would Simscan ever do when it's set to 12?
On 01/20/2011 09:51 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/20/2011 10:39 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
That's what I
Read carefully. Simscan is the software encharged to call spamassassin and
clamav to scan each email.
Spamassassin does not delete or reject any emails, it scans it and mark as
spam depending on the score required by local.cf.
Then Simscan does what you specify at its own config file.
On Thu,
On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if
the file has already been scanned?
Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other
scanners. The other scanners report back to simscan what the results
On 01/20/2011 10:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/20/2011 11:27 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
Now, I'm thoroughly confused. What is the purpose of Simscan then if
the file has already been scanned?
Simscan does not itself do any scanning. It simply invokes other
scanners.
I got this
I just realized the received mails are not being scaned by spamassasin and
reading other mails I found spamdyke might be my problem. I'm also not
receiving some mails because of RDNS checks.
How can I disable or remove Spamdyke until I can set everything right?
Bruno.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at
# cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp
# ln -sf run.dist run
# service qmail restart
This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with
run.spamdyke.
You may need to tweak spamdyke's configuration a little to get it
working ideally in your environment. Sometimes you need to
Great! Thanks Eric!
Bruno
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
# cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp
# ln -sf run.dist run
# service qmail restart
This will disactivate spamdyke. To reactivate it, replace run.dist with
run.spamdyke.
You may need to tweak
I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable it
again when I can make the configurations for it right.
What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or
clamav. I'm looking to the first test emails I sent when I finished
installing both servers and I
did you rebuild your cdb?
On 01/20/2011 04:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote:
I disabled spamdyke and messages are arriving as before. I'll enable
it again when I can make the configurations for it right.
What worries me is that mails are not being scanned by spamassassin or
clamav. I'm looking to
Yes I did rebuild, reload and just in case restart.
Before I had the original spam_hits=12 and other banned attachments but it
was the same.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. c...@yother.com wrote:
did you rebuild your cdb?
On 01/20/2011 04:12 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote:
Hi Eric, thanks a lot for your answer. It helped me a lot!
I'm back from my vacations so hands to my servers again... About quotas and
displaying it at the webmail it is not that important. If it works great, if
not, is not that necessary... After solving other issues I'll have a look
at the new
Bruno,
The spam threshold can be found in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
You'll need to restart spamassassin after modifying.
Roundcube looks nice, but has had some security issues. Not sure it's
ready for primetime yet.
CJ
On 01/19/2011 02:40 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote:
Hi Eric, thanks a
Well that explains why when I changed it nothing appeared to happen. I
read that and thought that the local.cf was the appropriate file. So
is the /var/qmail/simcontrol spamhits setting the setting that needs to
be lower than the local.cf file?
On 01/19/2011 04:34 PM, Bruno De Leone wrote:
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol is like this:
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif
Anyone knows what this does exactly? Is it the spam_hits the spam score
needed to drop mails by the simscan?
CJ, there is no appropriate file. It depends in what you are trying to do.
Bruno
Well actually there is. By appropriate file I mean which file is
processed first, hence which file should have the lower setting. In
reading this page it's more clear on how it works.
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Simscan This includes this
snippet answering
On 12/24/2010 04:51 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello List,
After upgrading one of my servers from courier to dovecot I ran into a
couple very minor issues that I had questions about.
1) Concerning /var/qmail/supervise/dovecot/log/run
The downloaded script is as follows:
VQ=/var/qmail
exec env -
On 1/8/2011 8:36 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 12/24/2010 04:51 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Hello List,
After upgrading one of my servers from courier to dovecot I ran into a
couple very minor issues that I had questions about.
1) Concerning /var/qmail/supervise/dovecot/log/run
The downloaded script
On 12/30/2010 11:36 AM, Bruno De Leone wrote:
Hi all!
Hey Bruno. Welcome to the QMT community.
I'm kind of new with qmailtoaster and it has been a great experience so
far. I installed it firstly on a large server with 1000 mail accounts
and it works perfectly. I had at the begining some
Martin Waschbuesch wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a good way to gather IMAP traffic statistics for dovecot?
Ideally per domain... ;-)
Martin
--
I expect someone on the Dovecot list might.
dove...@dovecot.org
gmane.mail.imap.dovecot
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Rajesh M wrote:
hi all
my machine
dual xeon dual 5140 processor, with 4 gb ram, centos linux with qmailtoaster
i had setup a qmail tap account which backups up data for a client of mine
mailbox size over 30 gb
setup dovecot with squirrelmail and logged in
it had over one hundred and thirty
hi
just clarify i was using the change_pass plugin which used work with
poppassd daemon
i need a similar solution in dovecot please
secondly
i have several domains already using courier imap. do i need to convert
mailboxes as mentioned here
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
just clarify i was using the change_pass plugin which used work with
poppassd daemon
i need a similar solution in dovecot please
I'm not familiar off hand with this plugin, or how it works. I'm a
little surprised that it would quit working with dovecot though. I don't
Hi Rajesh,
If you are talking about the squirrelmail plugin to change passwords, that
would not talk to the IMAP server as far as I recall. It would either use
vpopmails command line tools to change the password or else write in the DB
directly?
In any case, while I am sure you can use an MAP
Rajesh M wrote:
hi eric
i want to replace only courier imap with dovecot
i had three questions on this please
1) is it possible to simply down only courier and the continue to use
pop3 with the existing qmailtoaster (they work pretty fine and i dont want
to disturb those) ?
Yes. That's what
You don't need to remove courier, it just needs to be stopped so that
the imap port frees up (two processes can't share the same port).
Issue these commands:
# touch /var/qmail/supervise/imap4/down
# touch /var/qmail/supervise/imap4/log/down
# touch /var/qmail/supervise/imap4-ssl/down
# touch
I'm not up to the 1.2 version yet, so someone else will need to chime in
on this. Anyone?
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
the first thing i did was to remove courier imap
if you have the dovecot.conf file please upload it here or email me directly
i checked the earlier patch posted on the forum but i do
Rajesh M wrote:
hi
i followed the instructions as posted by mr amit
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg25551.html
i downloaded the rpm from
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-1.2.11-3_108.src.rpm
and put it in /usr/src/qtms-install
rpm -i dovecot*.src.rpm
it
I'm glad to hear this. Nice job, Phil.
I'm wondering, has anyone used dovecot for anything beyond imap? I have not.
I know that it also has pop3, which I expect would be a pretty simple
replacement of qmail-pop3d-toaster, but I'm not sure.
There is also deliver and sieve, which I believe
Dnia 2010-05-13, czw o godzinie 21:43 -0700, Eric Shubert pisze:
I'm wondering, has anyone used dovecot for anything beyond imap? I
have not.
I know that it also has pop3, which I expect would be a pretty simple
replacement of qmail-pop3d-toaster, but I'm not sure.
Dovecot pop3 and pop3s
Bill Holt wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadły wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dnia 2009-11-24, o godz. 20:08:27
amit IKF a...@ikf.co.in napisał(a):
Thanks Aleksander.
Now second step is I download source rpm i.e.
wget http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-1.2.8-0_103.src.rpm
Now
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort in
the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32 and 64
bit environments. How are other packages handling this? We typically
don't/shouldn't need to change a configuration file for
Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort in
the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32 and
64 bit environments. How are other packages handling this? We
typically don't/shouldn't need to change a
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort in
the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32 and
64 bit environments. How are other packages handling this? We
typically don't/shouldn't
W dniu 30.10.2009 17:42, Eric Shubert pisze:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort in
the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32 and
64 bit environments. How are other packages handling this? We
typically
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 30.10.2009 17:42, Eric Shubert pisze:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort in
the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32 and
64 bit environments. How are other packages handling this?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort
in the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32
and 64 bit environments. How are other packages handling this? We
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks, Aleksander.
I wonder if there isn't some way to specify a variable of some sort
in the dovecot.conf file that will pick up the difference between 32
and 64 bit environments. How are other packages
101 - 177 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
