On 12/18/2012 08:41 AM, Amit wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I’m facing a issue with blackberry issue. They are receiving mail with
the delay of 20-30 min.
My IMAP server is Dovecot. Do anyone noticed the same?
*Amit Dalia**
*
Are you using spamdyke graylisting?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
No. I had disable gray listing.
Amit
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Delay in receiving mail
On 12/18/2012 08:41 AM, Amit wrote:
Hi Everyone
Hi,
We have noticed that the delay seems happens during peak hours. I.O. usage on
the Server during peak hours is normal and sending emails between local
accounts are received normally. Do you think this could be a Internet bandwidth
issue, coz as per checking our Leased line MRTG it seems
Possibly, but I would doubt it. Check the smtp logs. Are you seeing
timeouts that correspond to earlier attempts to transmit the message?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 06/28/2011 03:30 AM, mr...@cladding.com wrote:
Hi,
We have noticed that the delay seems happens during peak hours. I.O. usage on
the
No. The linux kernel will (smartly) use any/most available memory to
cache disk i/o, so all linux systems tend to show very little available
memory. This is normal (and a good thing). FWIW, the free and top
commands show memory usage, and this cached i/o shows up as 'cached',
which hopefully
On 06/23/2011 01:35 PM, Sue Jones wrote:
We have also noticed the same thing happening on our qmailtoaster
server. Some mail comes through with a delay varying from minutes to a
few days.
I usually use the squirrelmail webmail to view the mail and it shows the
message was delayed because it
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my
toaster the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to
the same mail server. These
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to djbdns.
Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote:
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster
the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart
Peter,
Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised?
CJ
Peter Tan wrote:
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to
djbdns. Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
Some additional
CJ,
Check system log to see if there were unknown logins, like user id 'admqd'.
I also received complaints from other sites that my server was sending SPAM.
Didn't have time to check other problems, users were screaming...
Just switched to djbdns and problem solved.
Peter
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009
I don't know off hand.
Hey Jake, what do you know about this? (I'm guessing quite a bit!)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I think I am getting it sorted. Here is a snip of my named.conf file.
Do I need to allow-query;? Also do I need the forwarders, ISP's DNS
servers since the db.cache is
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't know off hand.
Hey Jake, what do you know about this? (I'm guessing quite a bit!)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I think I am getting it sorted. Here is a snip of my named.conf
file. Do I need to allow-query;? Also do I need the forwarders,
ISP's DNS servers
Thanks Jake,
That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how
I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink
my entire rack configuration. I have been trying to simplify this and
it only seems to be getting more complex.
Is it OK to see entries
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to the
same mail server. These used to be virtually simultaneous.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: r...@area510.net
Delivered-To:
Anyone get this yesterday?
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1 to the top of the list.
When you say smtp log what log are you talking about /var/log/maillog?
I am
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Anyone get this yesterday?
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1 to the top of the list.
What does your /etc/resolv.conf look like now?
Those
I moved the DNS entries as suggested. This did not work. With
127.0.0.1 first on the list it failed. I don't have the error message,
but I put it back and it worked. I will put only my ISP's DNS entries
in and see what happens.
[r...@laetitia ~]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I moved the DNS entries as suggested. This did not work. With
127.0.0.1 first on the list it failed.
Then your caching nameserver isn't working. Did you install bind or djbdns?
I don't have the error message,
but I put it back and it worked. I will put only my ISP's
I have bind installed and it's running. It is mainly a slave server for
my main DNS server. It turns out there was no 127 address like there
should be. I fixed that and put my 127.0.0.1 in the first position.
I'll report back.
Thanks for all your help guys.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell
Should I be seeing constant entries in my /var/log/messages file like
this? I don't recall this ever doing this.
Sep 22 12:14:14 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'serix.com/MX/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
Sep 22 12:14:14
Only if they're there. ;)
Your named has a problem.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Should I be seeing constant entries in my /var/log/messages file like
this? I don't recall this ever doing this.
Sep 22 12:14:14 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'serix.com/MX/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
I am not entirely clear on what this is supposed to do. Any place I can
read up on this?
I am still having a delay, but noticed if I stop and
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS server(s) before it in the
list are handling the requests, so it never gets to
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS server(s) before it in the
list are handling the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS server(s) before it in the
list
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just
Eric,
I think I found part of my problem. It was an entry in the forwards of
my DNS server. This should really improve performance. I am not sure
how it even worked.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there
OK, heres the dig
[r...@laetitia ~]# dig @127.0.0.1 google.com
; DiG 9.3.4-P1 @127.0.0.1 google.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 51283
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 0
;;
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's
ok.
Cool. Let us know.
I've heard that some people like to set up their caching nameserver
(resolver) to forward to their ISP's resolvers. I haven't reached a
conclusion myself as to whether that's a good or bad thing. As usual, I
expect that one size does not fit all.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now experiencing delays of several minutes and sometimes
15 or so. What is the cause of this and how can it be resolved. Is
this traffic on the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now experiencing delays of several minutes and sometimes
15 or so. What is the cause of this and how can it be resolved.
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight in the
members of this list, I knew someone has had, is having or can offer
info on where to look.
No on the Spamdyke.
[r...@laetitia tmp]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 206.13.30.12
nameserver 206.13.28.12
nameserver
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight in the
members of this list, I knew someone has had, is having or can offer
info on where to look.
No on the Spamdyke.
[r...@laetitia tmp]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 206.13.30.12
nameserver
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1 to the top of the list.
When you say smtp log what log are you talking about /var/log/maillog?
I am pretty certain that's not the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1 to the top of the list.
When you say smtp log what log are you talking about /var/log/maillog?
I am
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1 to the top of the list.
When you say smtp log what log are you talking about /var/log/maillog?
I am pretty certain that's not the
39 matches
Mail list logo
