Dear All,
Now I am running Qmail Toaster with new release but now I want to update my
ClamAV.How I am update it ? Just upgrade my RPM Packages only ? or there any
other way ?
Thanx for your attention to my question and your answer.
New clamav is being tested. it will be erleased tomorrow.
Erik
On 4/18/07, rendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Now I am running Qmail Toaster with new release but now I want to update my
ClamAV.How I am update it ? Just upgrade my RPM Packages only ? or there any
other way ?
Seems like it's not % but actually it count.
I have something like this:
Max Allow: 9741.0 Smtp (974.1%)
Average Allow: 8018.0 Smtp (801.8%)
Current Allow: 8038.0 Smtp (803.8%)
Max Deny: 6777.0 Smtp (677.7%)
Average Deny:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything out that that will allow me to log everything to one screen
or directory? I'm finding it difficult to look all over the server when
something goes wrong.
maybe you can use multilog,
I see it on qmt-iso, Jake create a script call watchall which
PakOgah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything out that that will allow me to log everything to
one screen or directory? I'm finding it difficult to look all over
the server when something goes wrong.
maybe you can use multilog,
I see it on qmt-iso, Jake create a script call
hello list is possible to use two (2) domaindefault in
/home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain?
Gracias
/
hola lista es posible utilizar dos (2) domaindefault en
/home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain?
Gracias
aledr wrote:
Well, I'm always commenting CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE and
CHKUSER_WRONGRCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE (lines 163 and 171
chkuser_settings.h) when compiling.
I think that this is not the best way, but at now is all that I can do.
I did the same thing, and set up catch all setting on
Hi to all. This is my first post
I'm trying to use qmailtoaster on Centos 5 x86_64.
SMTP_AUTH is enabled.
I got this error using Outlook:
Impossibile collegarsi al server della posta. La password non stata
accettata. Account: '192.168.1.21', Server: '192.168.1.21', Protocollo:
POP3,
Exists some possibility of I to use the RBL to check the POP?
Exists the possibility of users who if to legalize in the server leaving the
option marked in the email customer my server require authentication not
to check RBL when will be to send email?
Att,
2007/4/18, Jake Vickers [EMAIL
I've built quite a number of these QMT machines but lately, I'm having so many
problems, I need a starting point to get things working properly. While
installing, I get constant errors which I cannot resolve so wish to try
something different.
I saw an ISO of a pre-installed QMT somewhere but
I have noticed that the spamd service is not running, also I don't see
anything in the maillog about simscan scanning the mail. also I don't
see anything in the mail headers that shows that it was scanned is there
something wrong.. also I don't see the spamd folder in the supervise
directory
no. It's called defaultdomain, not defaultdomains.
On 4/19/07, Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello list is possible to use two (2) domaindefault in
/home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain?
Gracias
/
hola lista es posible utilizar dos (2) domaindefault en
/home/vpopmail/etc/defaultdomain?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've built quite a number of these QMT machines but lately, I'm having so many
problems, I need a starting point to get things working properly. While
installing, I get constant errors which I cannot resolve so wish to try
something different.
I saw an ISO of a
Rodrigo Morais wrote:
Exists some possibility of I to use the RBL to check the POP?
Exists the possibility of users who if to legalize in the server
leaving the option marked in the email customer my server require
authentication not to check RBL when will be to send email?
Why would you check
John Carlson wrote:
I have noticed that the spamd service is not running, also I don't see
anything in the maillog about simscan scanning the mail. also I don't
see anything in the mail headers that shows that it was scanned is
there something wrong.. also I don't see the spamd folder in the
Thanks for the reply,
I am running the newest version of qmailtoaster on a Fedora Core 6 box,
and I didn't see any kind of errors when I did the install. I used the
information from the qmailtoaster website to complete the installation.
the only thing I didn't do in the installation is I
FC6 - all current
Appears that there is an installation order issue?
qtp-newmodel- new linked sandbox - fails at:
Building control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 ...
Installing control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh failed for control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4
Hi Tim,
can we also create additional rule for SA if spf status = pass then the
score -1.0 just to make sure that if email will good spf should be trusted
header spf_pass Received-SPF =~ /pass/
score spf_pass -1.0
Rgds,
George Sweetnam wrote:
That's a very good idea Tim I'm going to do
Mike,
The existing QMT toaster works quite well for me. If the standard
installation fails because you're doing something wrong, then the
QMT-ISO install is also likely to fail. Maybe instead of deriding that
work, you should do the standard installation and figure out where
you're having
Dear all,
I am planning to change my ISP and hence the IP address of my server is
going to be changed.
Due to limited resources, I can't setup another server while switching over
to the new IP. My server has around 60 users. I plan to:
1. Shorten the refresh time of my MX record to 900 (15
This isn't bad. Only thing I would do differently is possible setting both
IPs in your MX records, the new one having a lower priority, before you do
the IP change. This can only be done though, if you know the new IP address.
domain IN MX 10 old.ip.add.ress
IN MX 20 new.ip.add.ress
Hi,
increasing the memory limit in the corresponding run file could help.
Regards,
Johannes Weberhofer
Domenico Fortunato schrieb:
Hi to all. This is my first post
I'm trying to use qmailtoaster on Centos 5 x86_64.
SMTP_AUTH is enabled.
I got this error using Outlook:
Impossibile
Dear Jared,
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Bill
On 4/20/07, Jared Markell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't bad. Only thing I would do differently is possible setting
both IPs in your MX records, the new one having a lower priority, before you
do the IP change. This can only be done
isn't using 2 isps in parallel an option?
I have done it like this twice.
works /w 0 downtime.
Bill Kwok wrote:
Dear Jared,
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Bill
On 4/20/07, *Jared Markell* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't bad. Only thing I would
The existing QMT toaster works quite well for me. If the standard
installation fails because you're doing something wrong, then the
QMT-ISO install is also likely to fail.
I didn't say it fails, I said there are problems. I didn't get into the
problems because they aren't that big. I asked if
Anyone know of an ISO which does in fact work well?
I obviously worded this incorrectly. That'll teach me to write and run :).
I make the only ISO for the QMT package. Not sure which version you had
downloaded prior, but there's a new version with some more features out now:
Guys,
in /etc/mail/mailfilter line 163 written
cc |sa-learn --spam
but dont you think the spam database owned by vpopmail ??
# ls -ail /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/
total 2380
14385296 drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 16384 Apr 20 02:36 .
14385153 drwx-- 9 vpopmail vchkpw4096 Jan 24
Hi All,
Does qmaltoaster support Sender Address Verification?
This is when mail server keeps e-mail in some inbound queue after
receiving it while checking sender's address via outbound SMTP.
I was told this is very effective against spam on low-volume sites.
Thank you!
Sergey
Hi,
No it does not (yet).
I did have intent of making this, but shortage of time got in the way.
So far I did not see any other requests about this also.
It is also effective on high volume servers, as long as there is some sort
of caching.
Many large ISP's are using this technique.
JP
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
_
From: System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Russ X
Subject: Undeliverable: NETMA Notes
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know of an ISO which does in fact work well?
I obviously worded this incorrectly. That'll teach me to write and run :).
I make the only ISO for the QMT package. Not sure which version you had
downloaded prior, but there's a new version with some
PakOgah wrote:
Guys,
in /etc/mail/mailfilter line 163 written
cc |sa-learn --spam
but dont you think the spam database owned by vpopmail ??
# ls -ail /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/
total 2380
14385296 drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 16384 Apr 20 02:36 .
14385153 drwx-- 9 vpopmail vchkpw
You reached the max number of recipients according to chkuser.
On 4/19/07, Michael H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
_
From: System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Russ X
Michael H wrote:
anyone have any idea why these are happening?
571 sorry, reached maximum number of recipients for one
session (#5.7.1 - chkuser)
571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1
- chkuser)
You put to many recipients in the To: or
Jake Vickers wrote:
You put to many recipients in the To: or CC: fields. That is defined in
your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file. You'll see:
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
M
Michael H wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
You put to many recipients in the To: or CC: fields. That is defined
in your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file. You'll see:
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email
Jake Vickers wrote:
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
Did you qmailctl cdb after making those changes?
well, I did a service restart qmail, nearly the same thing, right?
Michael H wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
okay, but my RCPTLIMIT was 100 and WRONG was 25, but I only sent to
about 30 email addys ... ?
Did you qmailctl cdb after making those changes?
well, I did a service restart qmail, nearly the same thing, right?
Nope. qmailctl cdb rebuilds all the .cdb
Dear Janno,
Thank you for the recommendation.
Although my server has only 1 NIC right now, your suggestion is very
attractive. May be I should add anohter NIC when it's possible. I've also
heard from the list that qmail will always use the last eth interface.
Would you show me how to run
Absolutely.
-Original Message-
From: PakOgah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:08 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Hi Tim,
can we also create additional rule for SA if spf status = pass then the
Hi,
I have this error as following when I tried to install on RHEL 5
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking pcre.h usability... no
checking pcre.h presence... no
checking for pcre.h... no
checking
I used this: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html howto
to route multiple uplinks. At first i configured the first one (old one)
to be default gateway. Then i got another uplink then i changed script
to reflect that. And it worked flawlessly.
This is needed for your qmail box
42 matches
Mail list logo
