Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:18, Wojciech Gabor napisał:
Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:10, Erik Espinoza napisał:
Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install all
of the dependencies from fdr6064-deps.sh?
Yes, all build process on this machine by
Looks like you're just missing krb5-libs
Erik
On 11/15/06, Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:18, Wojciech Gabor napisał:
Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:10, Erik Espinoza napisał:
Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install
Noone use Fedora Core 6 x86_64? No any idea to solve problem?
If any extra info needed I send it but what info?
In general, no! Most of the people on this list are using CentOS or
RHEL here. And as I don't have a 64 bit machine, I couldn't test my
FC6 x86_64 bit build.
I'v test this problem
Dnia środa, 15 listopada 2006 09:33, Erik Espinoza napisał:
Looks like you're just missing krb5-libs
code
# rpm -qa | grep krb | sort
krb5-auth-dialog-0.7-1
krb5-devel-1.5-7
krb5-devel-1.5-7
krb5-libs-1.5-7
krb5-libs-1.5-7
pam_krb5-2.2.11-1
/code
Packages are twice because is i386 and x86_64
Did I misinterpret some of the previous posts or is there an ungrade
option in qtp-menu. I don't see it, only backup, restore, spam,
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
There is one, it is the last option in the menu.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I misinterpret some of the previous posts or is there an ungrade
option in qtp-menu. I don't see it, only backup, restore, spam,
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I misinterpret some of the previous posts or is there an ungrade
option in qtp-menu. I don't see it, only backup, restore, spam,
You should uninstall v0.1 and install v0.2. See the wiki.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Cool, tobbe.
Will you post the name and contents of the /etc/*-release file from the
mdv2007 system so I can update the qtp-whatami script appropriately?
Ok here you have that for both 2006 and 2007
cat /etc/release
Mandriva Linux release
Hi Erik,
Just to inform you that I recompiled 1.3.8 and then ran again
/var/qmail/bin/dh_key, there is no more problem. I think upgrade direct
may not work. Need to initialize something.
Thanks.
Yeak Nai Siew wrote:
Hi Erik,
Had you tested qmail-toaster 1.3.8 release with SMTP AUTH and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Cool, tobbe.
Will you post the name and contents of the /etc/*-release file from the
mdv2007 system so I can update the qtp-whatami script appropriately?
Ok here you have that for both 2006 and 2007
cat /etc/release
Mandriva Linux release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes mandriva uses a lot of soft links
ls -al /etc/*release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 maj 11 2006 /etc/lsb-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrakelinux-release -
mandriva-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrake-release
Hey Tobbe,
You may want to send the patches directly to Nick. He'll be the one
implementing the Mandriva support.
Thanks,
Erik
On 11/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Cool, tobbe.
Will you post the name and contents of the
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin pointed the
problems, however I cannot find whats wrong with my install.
I've been using qmail-toaster on this domain for about a year now I
love it (good
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin pointed the
problems, however I cannot find whats wrong with my install.
I've been using qmail-toaster on this domain for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes mandriva uses a lot of soft links
ls -al /etc/*release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 maj 11 2006 /etc/lsb-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrakelinux-release -
mandriva-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes mandriva uses a lot of soft links
ls -al /etc/*release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 maj 11 2006 /etc/lsb-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrakelinux-release -
mandriva-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin pointed the
problems, however I cannot find whats wrong with my install.
New spamhaus dnsbl: http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
Q
- Begin forwarded message -
Subject: fyi: spamhaus' SBL-XBL dnsbl being replaced by ZEN
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:51:02 -0800
From: snowcrash+spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin pointed the
problems, however I cannot find whats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes mandriva uses a lot of soft links
ls -al /etc/*release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 maj 11 2006 /etc/lsb-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrakelinux-release
-
mandriva-release
lrwxrwxrwx
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I tried compiling usendmail on my RHEL 4 dev server but it failed. I have
posted the issue to the usendmail list.
Alternatively, I have heard good things about using new-inject instead of
qmail-inject, available in the mess822 package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes mandriva uses a lot of soft links
ls -al /etc/*release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 maj 11 2006 /etc/lsb-release
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 nov 10 04:58 /etc/mandrakelinux-release
-
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I tried compiling usendmail on my RHEL 4 dev server but it failed. I have
posted the issue to the usendmail list.
Alternatively, I have heard good things about using new-inject instead of
qmail-inject, available in the mess822 package.
http://cr.yp.to/mess822.html
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin
I thought about this, stopped thinking about it, now am thinking about it again.
In /etc/php.ini there is a config option:
sendmail_path =
Which can be set to a shell wrapper script:
#!/bin/sh
sed s/\r\n?/\n/g | qmail-inject
Which should work in all cases. Maybe. You would hope so.
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem.
Emails are
taking for ever to get to my
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I thought about this, stopped thinking about it, now am thinking about it
again.
In /etc/php.ini there is a config option:
sendmail_path =
Which can be set to a shell wrapper script:
#!/bin/sh
sed s/\r\n?/\n/g | qmail-inject
Which should work in all
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:06:00 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
I'm thinking you're on to something here. We should probably find the 'best'
sendmail/qmail-inject replacement available and include it in the toaster.
Are you volunteering?
I agree. I'm totally unqualified to make a call on this. I'll
Quinn Comendant wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:06:00 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
I'm thinking you're on to something here. We should probably find the 'best'
sendmail/qmail-inject replacement available and include it in the toaster.
Are you volunteering?
I agree. I'm totally unqualified to
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
On 11/15/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling
Nicolas Wegener wrote:
Hello all,
I have been polling my hair out trying to fix this problem. Emails are
taking for ever to get to my server, I believe I have pin pointed the
problems, however I cannot find whats wrong with my install.
I've been using qmail-toaster on this domain for
Hi Eric
Be For
00:00:02 runq-sz plist-sz ldavg-1 ldavg-5 ldavg-15
00:10:022 165 3.48 4.07 3.59
00:20:023 157 3.49 3.41 3.43
00:30:020 155 3.46 3.23 3.27
00:40:03
Ive built a new CentOS 4.4 server, and am trying the QTP install of the
toaster, using the batch switch. My log file keeps comming back with -
configure: error: pcre.h not found - install PCRE from www.pcre.org
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1738 (%prep)
RPM build errors:
Bad
Read the instructions on http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40
You need to run the dependencies script, which will install things
needed to perform the compilation.
Erik
On 11/15/06, Shelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive built a new CentOS 4.4 server, and am trying the QTP install of the
Some installs have the noexec option set for the /tmp partition, which causes
scripts to fail. Edit /etc/fstab and remove noexec if it is on the /tmp
partition and reboot.
This could also be fixed by calling the script with a specified shell
interpreter:
sh /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1738
Thanks Erik and Paul. Ive tried both, however the same problem is still
occuring. I will try to install the Toaster using the EZ QmailToaster Fresh
Install on CentOS 4.3 and see how if that returns the same problem. So would I
be incorrect in my assumption that QTP should or can be used for
Shelly wrote:
Thanks Erik and Paul. Ive tried both, however the same problem is
still occuring. I will try to install the Toaster using the EZ
QmailToaster Fresh Install on CentOS 4.3 and see how if that returns
the same problem. So would I be incorrect in my assumption that QTP
should or
38 matches
Mail list logo
