Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 3 MacOSX

On Sunday, 15 May 2016 14:05:50 UTC+10, Jeremy Rand wrote: > > FWIW, I think a legal argument could be made that such license > agreements are anti-competitive and therefore unenforceable. However, > I am unaware of any specific precedent for this argument, so it would > indeed probably be

[qubes-users] Re: disable seamless mode Windows 7

I have not yet had any reply to this in the past 2 months, just wondering if it is being looked into or not. Just since it's a bug that needs to be resolved. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[qubes-users] Re: Restored win7 AppVM now w/ issues? shortcuts gone? qvm-sync-appmenus & start VM for WTI errors?

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:55:21 PM UTC-4, gaikokuji...@gmail.com wrote: > I had managed to get a nice win7 HVM working, updates and all so first thing > I did was backup that vm. I tried restoring it later and found that it again > (a problem I was having before) wasn't able to update and

[qubes-users] Creating a VPN VM using openvpn issues? (starting with no /rw/config/openvpn ?)

I started trying to create a VPN VM following the https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/vpn/ page. I checked if openvm was installed, it was (using fedora/ using the "firewall" for the allow networking option not mentioned in the VPN page). There was not a /rw/config/openvm dir so I tried making one

Re: [qubes-users] adding gresecurity to Qubes

On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 6:31:23 AM UTC+2, Sandy Harris wrote: > > It may not be necessary. There is a kernel hardening project > which is bringing some of the grsecurity & PaX stuff into the > mainline kernel. > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Kernel_Self_Protection_Project > May

[qubes-users] Re: MacBook Air 2012 and that ol' Broadcom chip

> Thank you *so* much for taking the time to write everything down in such > detail. There is a lot for me to go through (I should probably read the > Broadcom stuff that you ignored!), and I am going to try and find time this > weekend to have a bash at it. I'll try to keep an eye on the

Re: [qubes-users] Identifying label from within AppVM

On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 6:14:20 PM UTC-5, nicklaus...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 4:59:12 PM UTC-5, Unman wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:55:05PM -0700, nicklausmcclen...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Is there any mechanism to identify what label the AppVM has from with

[qubes-users] Re: MacBook Air 2012 and that ol' Broadcom chip

Thank you *so* much for taking the time to write everything down in such detail. There is a lot for me to go through (I should probably read the Broadcom stuff that you ignored!), and I am going to try and find time this weekend to have a bash at it. I'm really excited at the prospect of

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Updating Dom0, Qubes, grumbles, things that need to be fixed and not need to be fixed.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:52 AM, wrote: > So today must be the 1000th time in my life where I see a project shoots > down a good summary feedback, making sure the issues are broken out into > pieces and no discussion can take place on the future impacts, and that the >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Updating Dom0, Qubes, grumbles, things that need to be fixed and not need to be fixed.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-06-16 04:52, florian.he...@gmail.com wrote: > So today must be the 1000th time in my life where I see a project > shoots down a good summary feedback, making sure the issues are > broken out into pieces and no discussion can take place on

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Updating Dom0, Qubes, grumbles, things that need to be fixed and not need to be fixed.

On 06/16/2016 02:46 PM, Drew White wrote: > Firstly, Alex, hello, Hello to you =) > Initially I want to say that I appreciate your harassment of my feedback > and information provided. > > If you noticed in my initial opening statements I wished for the details > and information to NOT be taken

[qubes-users] Re: i3-configs?

I would share mine but it's pretty much the default. There's not really much to tinker with in i3 because it's pretty headless. I was going to write some scripts to place some VM info in the bar at the bottom but I haven't got round to it yet - I will no doubt post them in this group when I

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Updating Dom0, Qubes, grumbles, things that need to be fixed and not need to be fixed.

Firstly, Alex, hello, Initially I want to say that I appreciate your harassment of my feedback and information provided. If you noticed in my initial opening statements I wished for the details and information to NOT be taken the wrong way, which it appears that you have. On the subject of

Re: [qubes-users] no bootoption for windows 10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/16/2016 10:38 AM, stefan.goenit...@gmail.com wrote: > So you think any encryption will fail, when you spend enough time & > material? https://xkcd.com/538/ - -- Zrubi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: [qubes-users] no bootoption for windows 10

Thanks for that informations Alex. No I need encryption for my data on ssd. So when I get malware on windows it can affect other linux os? That sounds very dangerous, but eciting too. I don´t think that I´ve got enemies out there. I just want to change my online security/anonymity. So I try

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes-Cheatsheet user feedback request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/2016 04:35 PM, J. Eppler wrote: > Hello, > > what would you change or add to the Qubes Cheatsheet? You should update the qubes-hcl-report entry according to --help - -- Zrubi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2