The LUKS issue was all about getting a root shell as opposed to being
able to defeat LUKS or get the keys or decrypt the data. I know this was
a bit misreported in the press.
A bigger issue is if /boot is not encrypted. And with modern GRUB there
is no need for it not to be. Someone could then
I have seen much more systemd hates than proper arguments against systemd. But
if systemd is really wrong, this kind of debate does not contribute for
rejecting it.
>From security perspective in context of dom0, systemd is a process that
>interacts with local processes and maybe with few other
When you don't update, you will eventually have software full of known security
bugs. Known security bugs (if they aren't properly managed, like analyzing
their impact and mitigating them) are arguably worse than unknown security bugs
(ceteris paribus), because they are much cheaper to exploit.
On Thursday, 5 January 2017 11:38:52 UTC+11, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 7:37:42 PM UTC-5, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA512
> > >
> > >
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 7:37:42 PM UTC-5, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > pixel fairy:
> > > On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 6:32:41 PM UTC-7, ears...@gmail.com
>
On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> pixel fairy:
> > On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 6:32:41 PM UTC-7, ears...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >> We all know Fedora is a big name, but is it a good choice for a
> >>
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 02:19:20 UTC+11, Ronald Duncan wrote:
> This thread just sprung to life again.
>
> I had a quick look at
>
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/templates/
>
> And along with Debian which is installed by default both
>
> Arch and
> Ubuntu
>
> Are available...
But not
This thread just sprung to life again.
I had a quick look at
https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/templates/
And along with Debian which is installed by default both
Arch and
Ubuntu
Are available...
My personal preference in Ubuntu because it generally just works, and Arch
because it has the
Jeremy: That's all well and good (though without being specific, the criticism
doesn't really impress me, unless the unstated assumption is that 'stable'
software doesn't get security fixes), but (esp. in the case of Tor) you can
just as easily turn that around: precisely because of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
pixel fairy:
> On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 6:32:41 PM UTC-7, ears...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> We all know Fedora is a big name, but is it a good choice for a
>> Security Driven OS like QubeOS to be based around? What do others
>> here think?
>
>
On 12/26/2016 08:30 PM, Drew White wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 08:52:22 UTC+10, Mailbe User wrote:
I think the hardest problem here is people putting aside their distro war
differences.
Here I see Joanna mention this; 'it should have the latest Desktop Environment
and Xorg drivers
11 matches
Mail list logo
