[R-sig-Fedora] R 2.12.1 in Fedora Updates Testing

, and everyone will get it. Thanks in advance, Tom Callaway, Fedora/EPEL R maintainer ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] install warning on fedora 16

On 12/24/2011 10:39 PM, Mark Leeds wrote: Does anyone know what the problem might be ? Maybe a difference with gcc ? It's only a warning but it scares me a little because the variables should be getting used contrary to what the warning says. Thanks a lot for any hints/suggestions. Well, I

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R binaries for Fedora 17.

On 08/02/2013 06:01 AM, Rolf Turner wrote: I am currently (still) running Fedora 17 --- having not managed to screw my courage to the sticking place and upgrade. Even though we are now up to Fedora 20, I think. The traffic on the Fedora mailing list on the upgrading issue is a bit

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R with external BLAS fails regression test

On 07/07/2014 08:15 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote: Dear Tom, The change in the Fedora RPM from using R's internal BLAS to external BLAS means the Fedora R binary now fails one of R's regression tests, specifically: tests/reg-BLAS.R. You can run this code by hand to verify the issue. As noted

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] upquote.sty in Fedora 21

On 12/14/2014 03:56 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: My CMD check server started failing after upgrading to Fedora 21: LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! LaTeX Error: File `upquote.sty' not found. The problem was easily

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] upquote.sty in Fedora 21

On 12/22/2014 11:56 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: ‘qpdf’ is needed for checks on size reduction of PDFs Okay, I've added Requires: qpdf for R-core-devel. Not going to push an update for a WARNING in the test suite though, we'll just inherit this with the next update of R. ~tom == Red Hat attachment:

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Build rpm package for R-MKL

On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I > follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use > the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. > > I am left with this error: > > -- >

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] x11() hangs in R 3.2.1

On 09/15/2015 09:12 AM, Ashley Ford wrote: > Steven Backus writes: > >> >> I'm on RHEL 6.6, R version 3.2.1 Patched (2015-07-30 r68761) -- >> "World-Famous Astronaut". Issuing the x11() command hangs R and >> does not complete. A window is partially drawn then freezes. >> Does

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rgl.snapshot only captures a small portion what's visible in the RGL device window on CentOS 7

On 01/11/2016 05:13 PM, Wittner, Ben, Ph.D. wrote: > I followed the instructions in the link below, which allowed me to install > the nvidia driver, which fixed the original problem with rgl.snapshot. > > Thanks very much for all your help. > > I guess I'll file a bug in the CentOS Bug Tracker

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rgl.snapshot only captures a small portion what's visible in the RGL device window on CentOS 7

On 01/11/2016 03:52 PM, Wittner, Ben, Ph.D. wrote: > I started trying to do this, but I'm stuck. > I started with > http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/340.96/README/installdriver.html > , which led me to >

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

No, that's the correct fix. Another round of new packages will appear later this morning. The libraries it is referencing are linked statically into R, so they are not supposed to be present. ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org

[R-sig-Fedora] Fixed updates for EL5 / EL6

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Evan Cooch wrote: > Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I > was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update > those, and try again, but I've had mixed success in doing that in past. > Its easy enough to roll back to 3.2.5

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can > confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] redhat-hardened in CFLAGS

On 01/15/2016 11:14 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le vendredi 15 janvier 2016 à 14:48 +0100, Jeroen Ooms a écrit : >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Michael Smith >> wrote: >>> >>> dnf install redhat-rpm-config >> >> I used: >> >> yum install

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals

On 01/16/2016 05:24 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > All that being said, the question remains as to *why* R cannot find > "texinfo" when it is indeed present on my system. Rather than give you a lengthy discussion of how RPM building works and hacking the R spec, let's focus on this question instead

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals

Are you building from a source tarball or using the Fedora SRPM? I strongly advise you to rebuild the SRPM, because the resulting binary RPM will have all the necessary deps for building and installing. You might need to change the spec up a bit, since I assume building on Fedora means a modern

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

On 02/05/2016 09:58 AM, Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] wrote: > Did the following on my RHEL6 server: > [root@ping ~]# export > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/ > [root@ping ~]# /usr/bin/curl-config --libs > -L/usr/lib64 -lcurl I'm glad this worked, but you should

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

On 02/03/2016 09:52 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Are you trying to build R and components for i686 rather than x86_64? Never mind. Your logs make it clear that you're building for x86_64. Can you share the output of: pkg-config --list-all |grep libcurl curl-config --libs rpm -V libcurl-de

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

On 02/03/2016 09:33 AM, Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] wrote: > I didn't have any libgfortran files in /usr/lib so I did that soft link. > Maybe something didn't fully install or configure. I have inherited this > machine from another admin and it is not a fresh installation. So, here's oddity number

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

On 02/01/2016 03:45 PM, Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] wrote: > Got past my libgfortran issue > ln -s /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so.3 /usr/lib/libgfortran.so Maybe to /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so ? You _should not_ need to do that though. I didn't need to. > Now if I could get RCurl and rstan installed.

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals

On 01/18/2016 08:50 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > Okay; tried this. The executive summary is: It didn't work. I normally would charge a modest fee of a good bottle of liquor or a six-pack of craft beer for the following lesson, but in the spirit of easing your suffering, I shall do it once more at

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals

On 01/19/2016 11:10 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: >> https://spot.fedorapeople.org/fedora17-R-deps/ > > Thank you for going to all this work. > > However (as usual) I'm still at a bit of a loss. I *think* that just a > few more words of instruction will get me to where I need to be. > > I went to the

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] html manual files nonfunctional

On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: > R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the “Manual” html links > are dead (although the “Reference” and “Miscellaneous Materials” html links > do work). I get a similar problem from within RStudio. > > > I’d like to get pointy-clicky

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] WARNING you cannot build info or html versions of the R manuals

Ah yes, those. Replace the rpm -Uvh with yum update and it should resolve the dependencies for you. If that fails, just pass all of those deps (in "") to yum install. Sorry about that! On Jan 20, 2016 2:34 AM, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 20/01/

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] html manual files nonfunctional

On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the “Manual” html links >> are dead (although the “Reference” and “Miscellaneous Materials” html links >> do work). I get a

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R-3.3.1 RPM release

Since I've gotten a few off-list replies, I feel like it's worth pointing out why people are having trouble building R from source on RHEL/CentOS 5 & 6. R has always depended on some third party libraries, specifically, zlib, bzip2, xz, pcre, and curl. Prior to R 3.3.0, R depended on much older

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rgl

On 01/12/2017 08:26 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: > EXACTLY!!! I use the NVidia drivers from their site, and that is exactly what > happened. I reinstalled mesa-libGL.x86_64 and that resolved the issue (though > not sure if that broke anything else on the workstation that relies on the > NVidia

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Getting R to work with Fedora 26

On 08/02/2017 03:09 PM, Jeff Trefftzs wrote: > I just installed Fedora 26 on my laptop, and R now fails to load. The > error message is missing libgfortran.so.3. Does anyone have a fix for > this? FC 26 comes with R-3.4.1 as an RPM, but it throws the error, as > does trying to compile R-3.4.1

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Installing R 3.4.0 on Red Hat 6

in /etc/yum.repos.d/ ? ~tom On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: > >> I am trying to in

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Installing R 3.4.0 on Red Hat 6

On 07/21/2017 11:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote: > I am trying to install R 3.4.0 on RHEL6. If I look here is it there: > > http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/fedora-epel/6/x86_64/ > > I did this: > > sudo subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-optional-rpms > sudo subscription-manager repos

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot install knitr

On 06/29/2017 06:04 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to install the package > > knitr > > but getting the following error: > > -- > Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : > unable to load shared object

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fail to install xgboost

On 05/15/2017 10:31 PM, Shu-Ju Tu wrote: > /dmlc-core/include/dmlc/./base.h:71: note: #pragma message: Will need > g++-4.6 or higher to compile allthe features in dmlc-core, compile > without c++0x, some features may be disabled This is the relevant error. The compiler in RHEL 6 is too old. ~tom

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 3.4.0 RPMS

Thanks. I've been traveling almost non stop for the last several months. I appreciate your help here. On May 12, 2017 10:25 AM, "José Abílio Matos" wrote: > On Thursday, 11 May 2017 17.37.41 WEST Martyn Plummer wrote: > > Dear Tom, > > > > I see that RPMS for R 3.4.0 are not

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot install igraph package

On 10/09/2017 11:16 AM, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to install > > igraph package > > but getting the following error: > > -- > make: *** [/usr/lib64/R/etc/Makeconf:159: foreign-graphml.o] Error 1 > ERROR: compilation failed for package ‘igraph’ > * removing

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] No rule to make target all.R, needed by compiler.rdb building R 3.4.1 from source, Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon)

On 08/18/2017 01:12 PM, Jaime Alvarez Benayas wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build R from source on Scientific Linux release 6.9 > (Carbon), Linux version 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 (Red Hat 4.4.7-18). Before debugging this too far, is there a reason you're building from source as opposed

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] No rule to make target all.R, needed by compiler.rdb building R 3.4.1 from source, Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon)

On 08/18/2017 01:12 PM, Jaime Alvarez Benayas wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build R from source on Scientific Linux release 6.9 > (Carbon), Linux version 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 (Red Hat 4.4.7-18). Okay, so the versions of zlib, bzip2, xz, curl, and pcre are too old on Scientific Linux

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] No rule to make target all.R, needed by compiler.rdb building R 3.4.1 from source, Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon)

iling > > Recommended packages: yes > > > > I haven't seen the JIT message but will give a try at the glibc-devel: > > > Here is the whole log from the configure command > https://www.dropbox.com/s/m4g2w1hrr2uqldr/configure%20result%20R.txt?dl=0 > > > >

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] No rule to make target all.R, needed by compiler.rdb building R 3.4.1 from source, Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon)

On 08/23/2017 03:58 PM, Jaime Alvarez Benayas wrote: > ../../lib/libR.so: undefined reference to `pcre_assign_jit_stack' > ../../lib/libR.so: undefined reference to `pcre_jit_stack_alloc' > ../../lib/libR.so: undefined reference to `pcre_free_study' This is the error. Your PCRE is being built

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] CentOS 7 issues with pdf manual / tex conversion

On 05/29/2018 04:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I noticed it with a local, not-public package -- but it appears to apply with > any source package. I replicated with pkgKitten straight off CRAN and after > checking that it has a six page manual there. I'm having trouble reproducing this one.

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot install broom package

On 03/22/2018 05:11 PM, xb...@posteo.de wrote: > Hello, > > I've problems installing several packages in my R on Fedora 27 64 bit. I > found out that it has to do something with a missing  compiler > (libgfortran.so.3, see below). > It works if I downgrade the current version of libgfortran to

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R package RPMs for Fedora

Thanks Marc. We appreciate it. Tom On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:28 AM Marc Schwartz wrote: > Hi Iñaki, > > I don't want to presume to speak for Martyn, but do know from R Foundation > interactions, that between his move back to the UK and other things, he has > been very busy. > > I am copying

[R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0

Hi folks, As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break in compatibility for R packages. From the NEWS entry for 4.0.0: Packages need to be (re-)installed under this version (4.0.0) of R. This has two impacts on Fedora/EPEL. 1. Users who update to 4.0.0 will need to rebuild

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0

Okay, I'm convinced. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/R-rpm-macros/pull/1 Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:48 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 16:29, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > Hmmm. That seems like a rather heavy dependency, given that I think

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0

) ? Tom On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 5:32 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 05:46, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > Thinking out loud here... do we want to have some macro magic to embed a > > dependency on an R(ABI) provides? Where R 4.0.0 would provide R(ABI) = 4 > &g

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0

packages but not updating R is low, but I wanted to throw it out there. Tom On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:31 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 19:15, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > As expected of a new major release of R, there is a break i

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Rebuild against FlexiBLAS

I'm on it. Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Hi, > > R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R > packages that need to be rebuilt: > > R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 > R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 > R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 >

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Rebuild against FlexiBLAS

These should all be finished now. Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:05 AM Tom Callaway wrote: > I'm on it. > > Thanks, > Tom > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM Iñaki Ucar > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1,

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R package RPMs for Fedora

Nice work. Tom On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, 9:05 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > FYI, the CRAN page has been updated. Now, we have: > > https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora > https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/redhat > > The second one is just a symlink to the first one. > > Iñaki > > > On Mon, 4 May

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the las

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

At this point, I simply don't have the time. Tom On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

There are a few of those, but not many. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:31 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I�aki Ucar wrote: > > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > > release version and send builds to that side tag *in

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

This work is already complete in rawhide. Tom On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 1:12 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.44.14 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the > > requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. > > For that

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

I'm inclined to agree. Users are expecting that things they install manually will override the system default (if any). Tom On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 11:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users'

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Normalize latex path

Seems reasonable. ~spot On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:15 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > Hi, > due to an unrelated bug report in maxima I found out that some packages > install latex packages in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex. Instead of using the > prefix %{_datadir}/texmf we can use the canonical

[R-sig-Fedora] new packages needed

Hi friends, As the 4.1.0 rebuild progresses, I've identified one set of new dependencies that several packages (DT, covr) need in order to upgrade: bslib \sass \jquerylib If someone here wanted to package them and get them into Fedora, it would be helpful. I'd be happy to do the review, but

[R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: new packages needed

because it is already one of those days and i didn't hit reply all. :/ ~spot -- Forwarded message - From: Tom Callaway Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] new packages needed To: Iñaki Ucar shiny (not covr, that was my brain spitting out the wrong

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

I have started the R 4.1.0 build process in rawhide. The side tag is f35-build-side-42293. I'm tracking things using a Google Sheet, if anyone wants access, just let me know. ~spot On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 at 20:12, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > I've

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

The R 4.1 rawhide rebuild is complete, and waiting for bodhi to push it: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e7a89430cd ~spot [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

I don't think so. If Fedora 34 users want R 4.1, they can install it from rawhide. Or someone that isn't me can spend another two weeks doing it. :) ~spot On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, 6:50 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Nice! Plans for F34? :)) > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 00:45, Tom Callaw

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

run -r 35 rstudio >> # rstudio opens >> >> Remember to install any additional repos and/or system dependencies >> you may need (e.g., to install R packages from source) *inside* your >> toolbox. Hope it helps. >> >> [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build order? :) ~spot On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade < quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: > >> Is there a way to know which R

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. ~spot On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > what should be our plan

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Installing R on CentOS 8

Best guess, something to do with repo prioritization? ~spot On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:43 PM Roger Bos wrote: > FYI: I used wget to download the newer version of openblas and > openblas-threads. I was then able to install them and then install R. Not > sure why the repo wasn't giving me the

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] dependencies for building R

sudo dnf --enablerepo="*-source" builddep R This will look at the Fedora R source package (from the Fedora source repositories, normally disabled) and install all the BuildRequires it specifies. I can't remember off hand if the "builddep" plug-in automatically enables the source repos these

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Installing R from source in Fedora -- "minimal package list"

The Requires on R-core-devel are not in any way intended to prep an environment to build R (they are intended to provide the minimum requirements for the R header files to work). To do what you want, your best bet is to pull down the R.spec file:

[R-sig-Fedora] New deps for R-gh

Hi friends, R-gh's latest version grew a dependency on httr2 (which has a suggests for %check on docopt), so I made two new packages for Fedora. They're both noarch and simple, should be quick reviews for someone. Any help here is appreciated. R-docopt:

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

Hmm, that's a weird one. Is SELinux on and enforcing on that setup? ~spot On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 6:55 AM Alexandre Courtiol < alexandre.court...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Fedora-R enthusiasts, > > We are experiencing some issues with the binary releases of R 4.3 for > Fedora 37 & 38 when running

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

at 9:12 AM Alexandre Courtiol < alexandre.court...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the tip but nope: SELinux is off on that system... > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 13:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 13:19, Tom Callaway wrote: >> > >>

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

t; "can you provide the specific mount options for the cifs share?" > -> > sec=krb5,multiuser,mfsymlinks,user=smbuser,domain=localdomain,_netdev,noauto,x-systemd.automount > > ++ > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:11, Tom Callaway wrote: > >> Okay, so if it's not