(RADIATOR) Setup for Cisco 2511

1999-08-29 Thread Brian Morris

Hi Folks,

I have 'aquired' a Cisco 2511 to play with but I am having some trouble
getting it to authenticate and connect successfully. Would anyone out there
like to donate a Cisco config file and Radiator check/reply items to an
overworked underpaid techo. ;)

TIA.  Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Blocking calls with no CLI

1999-09-16 Thread Brian Morris

Would it be possible to setup the access server to simply ignore the call if
it does not display the caller ID.  That way the 'customer' does not get
billed for the call.

I remember some discussion about this in the Aussie-ISP mailing list a few
months ago.

Regards,  Brian Morris



===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Authby RADIUS but store Accounting in SQL??

1999-10-06 Thread Brian Morris

Hi all,

I would like to authenticate users using RADIUS on another machine but
record the accounting data to an SQL database.

I'm sure this can be done with a continue until... or something but I'm
currently stumped.

Can anyone shine some light on this one?

Thanks,  Brian


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Feature Request... Colour!

1999-10-19 Thread Brian Morris

Dear Hugh and Co.

How difficult would it be to add colour to the various Trace messages going
to the console in Radiator?

For example - access rejects and other errors could be in red, accepts in
green.

It would make it easier to notice potential problems cropping up from time
to time. As well as to keep an eye out for things of interest.

Regards, Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Not able to trap passwords...

1999-11-02 Thread Brian Morris

Hi Folks,

I am trying to trap user passwords using PasswordLogFileName... but it is
not working, can anyone tell me why?  My config info appears below and any
assistance would be appreciated

Realm TrapPasswords
 # Strip the realm so we can auth with the bare user name
 # in the users file
 RewriteUsername s/^([^@]+).*/$1/
 PasswordLogFileName %D/passwords.txt
 AuthByPolicy ContinueWhileJustDoThemAllThanks
 AuthBy SQL
DBSource dbi:ODBC:RadiusLog
DBUsername radiusd
DBAuth mypassword
AuthSelect
AccountingStopsOnly
  AccountingTable ACRACCOUNTING
  AcctColumnDef USERNAME,User-Name
  AcctColumnDef TIMESTAMP,Timestamp,integer
... snip ...
  AcctColumnDef CALLERID,Calling-Station-Id
 /AuthBy
  AuthBy RADIUS
  Host whatever.com.au
  Secret mysecret
  /AuthBy
/Realm



===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Cisco 2511 - Not supplying allocated IP address to Radiator

1999-11-14 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I have setup some Cisco 2511's to authenticate with Radiator and they are
all working fine, users can get on etc without any troubles at all.

However, the 2511 does not report the IP address it allocated to the user
into Radiator at all.  Other NAS's are working fine, so I suspect it is
something in the cisco 2511 config.

Has anyone else had this problem?  How would I fix it?

Config details follow...

Regards,  Brian Morris.


IOS 11.1.24

aaa new-model
aaa authentication login TELNET-USERS local
aaa authentication login no_radius enable
aaa authentication login consoleport none
aaa authentication ppp default if-needed radius
aaa authorization network radius
aaa accounting exec start-stop radius
aaa accounting network start-stop radius
aaa accounting connection start-stop radius
aaa accounting system start-stop radius





===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Cisco 2511 - Not supplying allocated IP address toRadiator

1999-11-14 Thread Brian Morris

Thanks Aaron,

Yes, the alive packet does have the IP address, but unless I am mistaken
this does not get inserted into RADONLINE  which is what I would really
like.

Is there a way around this?



- Original Message -
From: Aaron Holtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Cisco 2511 - Not supplying allocated IP address
toRadiator


 Brian,

 Add:

 aaa accounting update newinfo

 You need 11.3 or higher if I'm not mistaken.  Cisco doesn't send the
 Framed-IP-Address in the Start packet like some others do - however,
 radiator will handle the Alive packet that the above command sends once
 the user has authenticated PPP and has a Framed address.

 --
 Aaron Holtz
 ComNet Inc.
 UNIX Systems Administration/Network Operations
 "It's not broken, it just lacks duct tape."
 --

 On Nov 15, Brian Morris molded the electrons to say

 Hi All,
 
 I have setup some Cisco 2511's to authenticate with Radiator and they are
 all working fine, users can get on etc without any troubles at all.
 
 However, the 2511 does not report the IP address it allocated to the user
 into Radiator at all.  Other NAS's are working fine, so I suspect it is
 something in the cisco 2511 config.
 
 Has anyone else had this problem?  How would I fix it?
 
 Config details follow...
 
 Regards,  Brian Morris.
 
 
 IOS 11.1.24
 
 aaa new-model
 aaa authentication login TELNET-USERS local
 aaa authentication login no_radius enable
 aaa authentication login consoleport none
 aaa authentication ppp default if-needed radius
 aaa authorization network radius
 aaa accounting exec start-stop radius
 aaa accounting network start-stop radius
 aaa accounting connection start-stop radius
 aaa accounting system start-stop radius
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 


 ===
 Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Cisco 2511 - Not supplying allocated IP address toRadiator

1999-11-15 Thread Brian Morris

I understand,  but I am still not getting them into my radonline database.

Could it be because I have "AccountingStopsOnly" for this realm??

Thanks for the feedback.

Brian

- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Aaron Holtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Cisco 2511 - Not supplying allocated IP address
toRadiator



 Hello Aaron and Brian -

 On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Aaron Holtz wrote:
  Yes, I believe that the radiator code looks for the Alive packet as well
  as a Start packet just for this case.  Be sure you are running a newer
  version of radiator - I believe that 2.13 and up should support it, but
  don't quote me on that.
 

 if ($status_type eq 'Start' || $status_type eq 'Alive')
 {
 # Some Ciscos dont send accounting-on, so we will
 # detect a reboot with the first session (ID 0001)
 $sessdb-clearNas($nas_id, $p)
 if $session_id eq '0001';

 # Ciscos sometimes sends Alive. Use them to make _sure_
 # there is an entry in the database
 $sessdb-add($original_username, $nas_id, $nas_port, $p);


 Aaron is quite correct, here's the relevant code from Handler.pm (Radiator
 2.14.1).

 cheers

 Hugh

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
 NT, Rhapsody



===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Re:

1999-11-30 Thread Brian Morris

Jeff,

I have a program (for Win NT) that will convert a log file into a
comma-delimited text file.  You can also select the dictionary attributes
you want collected / discard.

I wrote it a while ago before I changed over to SQL.  It works, but
recording to SQL works even better.

E-mail me if you would like a copy.

Regards,  Brian Morris

- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 9:24 AM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Re:



 Hello Jeff -

 On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Jeff Baldwin wrote:
  %_I was wondering if you know of any software that would be good
  for reading the radius logfile.   I need two do two things.
  one i need to count origional logins by realm and two i need to record
  time online from sertain clients for example the user may log in from
radius
  client one but that is part of their account but client two is a bonus
or
  maybee like 800 dialup so i need to track the users time online only
from that
  client. any help with a good way to get this info would be helpful.
 

 In all honesty, there is no good way to do this from the logfile - my
advice
 would be to use an SQL database for your accounting records.

 hth

 Hugh

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
 NT, Rhapsody

 ===
 Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator testing

1999-12-02 Thread Brian Morris

Ray,

The message occurs when you telnet into the PM3 - it sends an accounting
message to Radiator, however because you are telnetting in, it doesn't have
any NASPORT information to pass to Radonline - hence the error.  It is
complaining about NASPORT=(blank)

Regards,

Brian Morris


- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ray Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Radiator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator testing



 Hello Ray -

 On Fri, 03 Dec 1999, Ray Carpenter wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I'm doing evaluation testing with Radiator with 2 pm3 nas boxes and I
have
  started getting these errors in the RadLog table.  I am using
AuthbyEmerald.
  Can anyone explain why these are occurring?  Is anyone using Radiator
with
  pm3's running 3.9b22 and doing simultaneous use checking?  While I'm at
it
  is anyone using Radiator with pm4's running 4.1c1?
 
  do failed for 'delete from RADONLINE where
NASIDENTIFIER='167.206.131.11'
  and NASPORT=': Server message number=170 severity=15 state=1 line=1
  server=signup text=Line 1: Incorrect syntax near '='.
 

 If you are using Emerald - have you configured an additional RADONLINE
table?

 And could you please send me your configuration file (no secrets) and a
more
 complete debug trace?

 thanks

 Hugh

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
 NT, Rhapsody

 ===
 Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Oh Dear - Possible Authentication Bug

2000-04-21 Thread Brian Morris

I have not investigated this too far yet but I thought it important enough
to alert others of it now...

I have discovered a fault in the setup of /our/ Radiator configuration where
users may successfully authenticate to our SQL database with an INVALID
username.

The error occurs when the user places an apostrophy somewhere in their
username - even though there is not one in their user record on our system,
Radiator will still let them in.  (eg:  Username johnsmith logs in as
johnsmit'h )

The accounting record is written as johnsmit'h so effectively the user does
not get billed for their usage.

We use the standard rewriteusername to strip the realm (RewriteUsername
s/^([^@]+).*/$1/  ) so something could be put into there to strip
apostrophies as well but this is not really a 'solution' (Anyone want to
supply one for now anyway?)

For reference our authselect looks something like this ...  AuthSelect
select PASSWORD from SUBSCRIBERS where USERNAME='%n'

I thought that others may also want to know about this.

Happy Easter!

Brian Morris




===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use - Using ping test

2000-05-17 Thread Brian Morris

Just a thought...

If the IP address was re-allocated later on wouldn't there be two entries in
RADONLINE for it?

You could possibly check for the IP address in radonline as well, if it is
allocated twice - blow away the oldest one!

Regards,

Brian Morris


- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Clement [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Simultaneous use - Using ping test



 Hi Clement -

 On Thu, 18 May 2000, Clement wrote:
  We are renting some ports from another ISP who does not allow us to do
  SNMP checking if a user is still on-line.  Occassionally, an account
  close packet is lost and users will be locked out because Radiator
  "believes" the previous session is still on-line.
 
  Can Radiator, in addition to SNMP and finger tests, add a ping test
  option to check if the previous session is still on-line?  That can fix
  the problem to a large extent.
 

 This is quite a good idea, albeit with one significant drawback, which is
that
 the address could have been re-allocated between the time that the session
in
 question finished (and the stop packet lost) and the user trying to
reconnect.

 I have posted this to the list too, in the expectation that other Radiator
 users might have some thoughts on this.

 It would be relatively simple to add a Nas-Type of "Ping", so my question
to
 the list is how many people out there would find this useful? I am
thinking
 specifically of the somewhat frequent case of different NAS-Port reporting
in
 radius packets compared to SNMP results. This isn't a perfect solution,
but it
 may be useful nonetheless.

 Comments?

 regards

 Hugh

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, Interbiller, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc, etc.
 Available on Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.



 ===
 Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Upgrade 2.14.1 to 2.15 helps

2000-05-25 Thread Brian Morris

Folks,

Just some feedback... we upgraded from Radiator v2.14.1 to 2.15 (with
patches) last week and since then we have hardly had any 'duplicate request
id xxx ignored' messages appear in our logfile.  I assume something has
changed to fix the problem we were having with duplicate requests - I
thought it was a problem with our network.

We were constantly receiving these messages in our logfiles (often hundreds
a day) - now we receive no more than 5.

We also seem to have either eliminated or significantly reduced the number
of duplicate 'stop' records in our accounting files as well.

My conclusion is that if you're considering updating to v2.15 then go for
it.  It has certainly helped us.

Well done guys!

Regards,

Brian Morris

PS:  I was hoping that v2.15 would have more info in a trace level 3 though.
I would love to know/record the NAS and Callerid for 'Bad Password' and 'No
such user' messages - it would /really/ help with hacker investigations.





===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Handlers and Realms (101)

2000-09-04 Thread Brian Morris

Hello All,

We would like to add a facility to our existing radiator install where a
user can dial-in to our access server using a different telephone number and
receive different access permissions  (eg: maximum session time)

As they will be connecting to the same access server I figure we need to
setup a handler based on the number they are dialling in to - as the default
realm for the access server is already being used.

My question is : can I setup a handler just for the called station ID and
keep the existing realm whatever or must I change everything to be handled
by a handler?

Thanks in advance.

Brian Morris




===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) PPPOE Authentication / Accounting

2001-03-20 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

We require the ability to authenticate clients using PPPoE  as well as
account for their traffic.  Our regular dial-in NAS (PM3 for modem
customers) does both auth and accounting just fine however we are new to
PPPoE and I am not sure how to monitor traffic.

Can anyone offer any suggestions as to the best way to do accounting
(Time/Mb) using PPPoE.

Any help would be appreciated.

Regards,  Brian Morris



===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) PPPOE Authentication / Accounting

2001-03-21 Thread Brian Morris

Hugh,

Is a NAS-like device required for PPPoE?  If so, can you (or anyone) suggest
one?

Regards,  Brian Morris



- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) PPPOE Authentication / Accounting



 Hello Brian -

 Whatever NAS-like device you use to terminate your PPPoE sessions looks to
 Radiator like any other NAS. If the device reports packets in/out and
bytes
 in/out in accounting records you will record them just the same as with
any
 other NAS.

 hth

 Hugh

 On Wednesday 21 March 2001 15:33, Brian Morris wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  We require the ability to authenticate clients using PPPoE  as well as
  account for their traffic.  Our regular dial-in NAS (PM3 for modem
  customers) does both auth and accounting just fine however we are new to
  PPPoE and I am not sure how to monitor traffic.
 
  Can anyone offer any suggestions as to the best way to do accounting
  (Time/Mb) using PPPoE.
 
  Any help would be appreciated.
 
  Regards,  Brian Morris
 
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

 ===
 Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Attribute to return DNS addresses

2001-04-03 Thread Brian Morris

Hi Folks,

I would like to assign a new name server/s to a dial-in account but I can
not find the attribute I need to return to setup the client with the primary
and alternate DNS addresses.  I have looked in both the standard dictionary
and the livingston dictionary to no avail. (I am using a Portmaster 3)

I am sure it is something simple but I just can't find it.

Any help would be appreciated!

Regards,  Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Attribute to return DNS addresses

2001-04-03 Thread Brian Morris

Hugh,

I assumed that, but the livingston dictionary (PM3) does not have an entry
in there for a DNS setting.  Do you know of one?

Regards,  Brian Morris



- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Irvine" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Brian Morris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Attribute to return DNS addresses



 Hello Brian -

 I am afraid you are going to search in vain, as there is no standard
 attribute to do this. You will have to use whatever vendor-specific
 is supported by your NAS equipment.

 hth

 Hugh



 At 10:29 +1000 01/4/4, Brian Morris wrote:
 Hi Folks,
 
 I would like to assign a new name server/s to a dial-in account but I can
 not find the attribute I need to return to setup the client with the
primary
 and alternate DNS addresses.  I have looked in both the standard
dictionary
 and the livingston dictionary to no avail. (I am using a Portmaster 3)
 
 I am sure it is something simple but I just can't find it.
 
 Any help would be appreciated!
 
 Regards,  Brian Morris
 
 
 ===
 Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

 --

 NB: I am travelling this week, so there may be delays in our
correspondence.

 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, Interbiller, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc, etc.
 Available on Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.

 ===
 Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator V 2.17 Could not bind authentication socket

2001-04-26 Thread Brian Morris

Hi Alex,

This happened to me on Nt 2000 - it was because I was running one of the
Internet security / authentication services which used the same ports as
radius.

You need to remove or stop the service and (possibly) restart Windows for
radiator to work properly.

Regards,

Brian Morris



- Original Message -
From: Alex Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Radiator V 2.17 Could not bind authentication socket


 Hi All,

 If I try to restart the server it returns with the following error:

 Could not bind to authentication socket: Unknown  error at radiusd line
339

 does anyone have a solution for this or a config file for NT which will
 authenticate off the NT Groups

 Thanks,
 Alex Green


 ===
 Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Attribute Number 55 (vendor) - not defined

2001-05-10 Thread Brian Morris

Greetings all,

We are receiving the following error in Radiator Attribute Number 55
(vendor) is not defined in your dictionary

It is using an ERX Broadband Concentrator (Unisphere attributes)

Does anyone know what Attribute 55 would be so I can add it to my
dictionary.

Thanks in advance.

Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Want to force a logoff at the end of a month

2001-08-08 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

If possible, I would like to return a max session time attribute to certain
customers to force them to logoff at the end of a calendar month (say at
23:59 on the last day of each month) this is so I can close off our
accounting files for billing purposes.

Is there a way I can configure radiator to dynamically set this attribute to
return the end of the current month?

Regards,  Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Missing Attributes

2001-08-15 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I am receiving the following error in our log file :

ERR: Attribute number 87 (vendor ) is not defined in your dictionary

Can anyone tell me what this attribute is and (ideally) the line to put into
our dictionary file to stop these errors.

We are using a Unisphere ERX for our ADSL 'NAS'.

Thank you and regards,

Brian Morris

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Accounting-Response - While we're on the topic...

2001-09-04 Thread Brian Morris


We have configured our sql servers accounting table to reject duplicate
accounting records by setting the username+acctsessionid+sessiontime to be
the primary key (no duplicates permitted)

When the NAS sends a duplicate accounting record, sql/radiator spits out an
error and does not write the packet to the SQL database (this part is good).

My questions is - what does radiator then do with the Accounting Reply to
the NAS - does it send back an acknowledgement or does it do nothing
therefore making the NAS send the Acct packet again, and again, and
again(that would be bad)

Kind regards,

Brian Morris

PS:  Does anyone have a better way to prevent duplicate accounting records?


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Attributes 52 and 53

2001-09-05 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I am getting error messages Attribute 52 (vendor) not defined in
dictionary  (and 53)

Can anyone tell me where to find them so I can add them to our dictionary
file.

Thanks and regards,

Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Framed Route Question

2001-11-15 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I have a client who I wants two non-contiguous c-class networks routed to
them (say 203.1.1.0 and 202.2.2.0)

Can anyone please tell me the framed-route reply command I would need to
return to them.

Currently, I return ...

Idle-Timeout=0,Framed-IP-Address=203.n.n.n,Framed-Route=202.1.1.0
255.255.255.0 203.n.n.n 1

This works for the 203.1.1.0 range, However, I am not sure how I would add
the second framed-route for the second range - is it simply an additional
framed-route reply or do I incorporate it into the first reply??

Thanks in advance,

Brian.







===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Possible Gotcha in Radiator RADONLINE

2001-12-18 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I thought I would share something that had me very confused for a couple of
hours this morning.  It is not really a bug, rather my poor implementation
of reporting the contents of Radonlne.  But it may help some others on the
list.

This relates to NAS's that send interim 'Alive' packets in addition to start
and stop packets.  (For people in Australia - Comindico do this)

It appears that whichever module manages the Radonline table takes this
packet and adds or replaces the current radonline details with these updated
details including specifically the timestamp field.

I have an inhouse web page we use to report active users using the radonline
database.  This page calculates the time a user has been online as the time
difference between 'now' and the value in the radonline record 'timestamp'.
This works fine for NAS's that don't send alive packets, but it reports
incorrect information for those that do - it reports the time since the last
alive packet instead of the time since login.

After reading the doco the solution I found is to change the default
RADONLINE table and create a custom AddQuery to also insert acctsessiontime
values into radonline.  I then had to adjust my web page to calculate and
report based on both the timestamp and the interim acctsessiontime.

I hope this helps others.  It had me convinced that a NAS 'upgrade' was
causing users to drop off after 15 minutes (ie the time between 'alive'
packets)

Regards,  Brian Morris





===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Session-Timeout Maximum Value

2002-01-23 Thread Brian Morris

Hehehe ...

According to the RFC, the value (in seconds) is a 32bit unsigned integer!
This equates conservatively (30 bits) to a tad over 34 years :-))

Even with all other things being suitable for an accurate test, I don't
think I have enough time to live to fully test the true upper limit of this
parameter!

Cheers,  Brian.


- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Session-Timeout Maximum Value



 Hello Brian -

 Check the RFC for details (doc/rfc2865.txt).

 However you are correct in that the only real way to be sure is to do some
 experiments with your NAS (we have seen problems with large numbers).

 regards

 Hugh


 On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:34, Brian Morris wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Session-Timeout is defined as an integer in the dictionary file.  Does
  anyone know what the maximum value that can be set for this is?
 
  I guess it would be dependant on individual NAS implementations for an
  integer, but has anyone had any success with setting it to a high value
(eg
 
  : 604800 - the number of seconds in a week)?  I am thinking that this
will
 
  work but would I be pushing my luck to set it at 18 million odd?  (~the
  number of seconds in a month)
 
  The reason is that we have some VISP ports on an AS5300 that we can not
  directly control to manually disconnect a user, therefore we would like
to
  ensure that they do not login for what we consider to be way too long.
 
  Thanks and regards,  Brian.
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.
 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Freaky AuthBy DynAddress Problem

2002-02-03 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

Apologies for the long message...

I have discovered a freaky problem in Radiator - this is not Radiators fault
but it causes problems.

The situation I have found is as follows :

We use Authby DyanAddress to allocate IP addresses to broadband users -
radius requests are sent to our radiator from a proxy radius at the vendor
end.  A routing mess-up meant that reply information was not getting back to
the vendors proxy radius therefore users could not successfully
authenticate.

However, the proxy radius kept on sending the requests (as it should) and
users kept on trying to connect (as they do).

Radiator kept on receiving these requests and processing them as usual - and
one of the steps was to allocate an IP address from the RADPOOL table -
However, since multiple requests were coming through (due to no response
being received) Radiator kept on allocating IP addresses from RADPOOL an not
clearing the old ones it had previously allocated to the users last request.
Pretty soon our RADPOOL table ran out of available IP addresses and even
though routing was finally fixed, users could still not connect because
there were no more available IP addresses.

Now I know that the sessiontimeout paramater will eventually clear this up
(after 24 hours though) but is there any other way that this can be checked
for or prevented in the first place.  Perhaps some checking like is done in
RADONLINE where the users entry is cleared before being added again??

I know this is a very unusual problem that many peole will never encounter
but I hope someone else will benefit from my experiences.

I suspect that this problem may also occur on a highly congested (slow) link
where a NAS resends an auth request after a timeout.

Regards,

Brian Morris







===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Freaky AuthBy DynAddress Problem

2002-02-03 Thread Brian Morris

Agreed,

However, I notice that Radiator removes any 'freaky' entry from the
RADONLINE table along the lines of:

Delete from radonline where nasidentifier = 'whatever' and nasport =
'whatever'

prior to adding the new entry to the RADONLINE table.

Couldn't a similar sanity check be used for RADPOOL?

Regards,  Brian Morris






- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Freaky AuthBy DynAddress Problem



 Hello Brian -

 As you say - this is not a Radiator problem - and it is difficult to see
how
 Radiator can be made to deal with a network routing issue. Depending on
the
 exact contents of the radius requests that you are receiving, it may be
 possible to set up a session database and use session limiting, however I
am
 not optimistic and you may introduce more problems than you solve.

 regards

 Hugh


 On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:59, Brian Morris wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  Apologies for the long message...
 
  I have discovered a freaky problem in Radiator - this is not Radiators
  fault but it causes problems.
 
  The situation I have found is as follows :
 
  We use Authby DyanAddress to allocate IP addresses to broadband users -
  radius requests are sent to our radiator from a proxy radius at the
vendor
  end.  A routing mess-up meant that reply information was not getting
back
  to the vendors proxy radius therefore users could not successfully
  authenticate.
 
  However, the proxy radius kept on sending the requests (as it should)
and
  users kept on trying to connect (as they do).
 
  Radiator kept on receiving these requests and processing them as usual -
  and one of the steps was to allocate an IP address from the RADPOOL
table -
  However, since multiple requests were coming through (due to no response
  being received) Radiator kept on allocating IP addresses from RADPOOL an
  not clearing the old ones it had previously allocated to the users last
  request. Pretty soon our RADPOOL table ran out of available IP addresses
  and even though routing was finally fixed, users could still not connect
  because there were no more available IP addresses.
 
  Now I know that the sessiontimeout paramater will eventually clear this
up
  (after 24 hours though) but is there any other way that this can be
checked
  for or prevented in the first place.  Perhaps some checking like is done
in
  RADONLINE where the users entry is cleared before being added again??
 
  I know this is a very unusual problem that many peole will never
encounter
  but I hope someone else will benefit from my experiences.
 
  I suspect that this problem may also occur on a highly congested (slow)
  link where a NAS resends an auth request after a timeout.
 
  Regards,
 
  Brian Morris
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Current Logged in Users

2002-02-10 Thread Brian Morris



If you are using an SQL back-end database, the 
RADONLINE table contains a fairly accurate list of all users currently 
online.

When I say 'fairly accurate' - if your NAS fails to 
deliver a STOP record to radiator, the user will not be removed from the online 
users database.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shane 
  Malden 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:59 
  PM
  Subject: (RADIATOR) Current Logged in 
  Users
  
  Does anyone know any simple way of seeing who is 
  logged on, using the logs from Radiator? We do receive start and stops from 
  our gear. We are running ver 2.19 on a NT Server. Any help would be 
  appreciated.
  
  Regards,
  Shane


Re: (RADIATOR) Current Logged in Users

2002-02-11 Thread Brian Morris



Hi Shane - 

Just add this code to the bottom of your radius.cfg 
file (or whatever you call yours)

SessionDatabase SQL 
DBSourcedbi:ODBC:RadiusLog 
DBUsernameradiususer 
DBAuthradiususerpassword/SessionDatabase

Where :
- RadiusLog is your ODBC datasource setup for 
Radiator (you probably already have this for authentication and accounting - use 
the same one)
- radiususer is the SQL user account with access to 
the above datasource
- radiususerpassword is the above users password 
for accessing the SQL datasource

You should have/create a table within the above 
database calledRADONLINE its structure and details can be found in the 
goodies section. Use the suggested structure for now (that way you can 
accept the defaults) but you can add to it to record additional helpful info 
later if you want.

Regards, Brian Morris




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shane 
  Malden 
  To: Brian Morris 
  Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 4:10 
  PM
  Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Current Logged in 
  Users
  
  Thanks for this. Do you use NT and SQL yourself 
  or just know Radiator fairly well?? Do you have any sample code on how 
  so get Radiator to log this information??
  
  Regards,
  Shane
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Brian 
Morris 
To: Shane Malden ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:22 
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Current Logged 
in Users

If you are using an SQL back-end database, the 
RADONLINE table contains a fairly accurate list of all users currently 
online.

When I say 'fairly accurate' - if your NAS 
fails to deliver a STOP record to radiator, the user will not be removed 
from the online users database.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Shane 
  Malden 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:59 
  PM
  Subject: (RADIATOR) Current Logged in 
  Users
  
  Does anyone know any simple way of seeing who 
  is logged on, using the logs from Radiator? We do receive start and stops 
  from our gear. We are running ver 2.19 on a NT Server. Any help would be 
  appreciated.
  
  Regards,
  Shane


(RADIATOR) Recording Disconnect causes

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Morris

Hi all,

We are currently recording the Acct-Terminate-Cause in our stop records
which is very useful for diagnosing problems.  We now have another NAS which
is sending us Ascend-Disconnect-Cause instead of Acct-Terminate-Cause in
the Stop record.

Is there any way of configuring Radiator to write two attributes to the same
field in the stop record (accounting) table?

Thanks in advance.

Brian.


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Radiator performance on various platforms.

2002-07-08 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

We are looking at upgrading our radiator / radius server and are considering
the various platform options available to us.

The radiator reference manual cites various performance measurements using
versions of hardware and operating systems which are now several generations
out of date.

Does anyone have any performance information on radiator running on the
likes of Solaris 8/9, Redhat 7 or NT 2000 with modern hardware?  If so would
they like to share their experiences?

Thanks in advance,

Brian.



===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator performance on various platforms.

2002-07-08 Thread Brian Morris

From: Karl Gaissmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 you should tell us what Authentication schemes you wil be using. I think
 the performance is only comparable using the same auth schemes.
 We have radiator running under Solaris 9.

Charly,

I am hoping to use Solaris 9 / MySql to authenticate around 20,000 users on
a Sun Enterprise 250 (2x400Mhz UltraSparc CPU's with 2Gb RAM)

We currently run on 2000 Server with MSSQL7 and 512Mb RAM. The current
accounting database is around 2Gb in size.  Performance is currently fine,
but I have doubts about it handling anticipated growth over the next 12
months.

Regards,  Brian.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) OT: Unix / Radius time to Wall Clock Time

2002-08-15 Thread Brian Morris

Hi All,

I need to be able to convert Epoch time to a date/time value - does anyone
have a formula or program to do his?

Ideally I want to pass in an epoch (Unix) timestamp and get back the
Calendar date/time

I am sure this has been done a million times before so any help / pointers
would be appreciated.

Regards,  Brian.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod

2002-08-19 Thread Brian Morris



I think in the case of DSL clients though this is 
not quite correct.

We have several 000's of DSL clients but only about 
25% of them are online at any one time. Sure they CAN be permanent, but 
they usually are not.

It is a waste of IP space to allocate a static IP 
to all of them. In some business cases it is even desirous not to allocate 
them a static IP - but rather make itan 'additional' purchase ;-) 


We have sometimes run into a problem where if the 
NAS fails, or the customers DSL router messes up and tries to login hundreds of 
times a minute we soon run out of available IP addresses in RADPOOL - upon 
inspection of RADPOOL it shows that the same user has dozens or more ip 
addresses allocated to them with a state of (1).

It would be good if there was some method of 
clearing these up - currently, we run a script which sets the state of all but 
the most receint allocation to (0) for any user with more than one entry in 
RADPOOL. (We don't allow simultaneous logins on our DSL 
service)

Has anyone else has similar problems and/or found a 
solution?

Regards, Brian.



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Hugh Irvine 

  To: Ayotunde Itayemi 
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:48 
  PM
  Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: 
  DefaultLeasePeriod
  Hello Tunde -By definition a customer with a 
  permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.You should 
  allocate such users static addresses 
instead.regardsHugh


Re: (RADIATOR) Session-Timeout = until nnnn ??

2002-08-25 Thread Brian Morris

 I remember playing with that reply value and I remember making it work..
 have you tried using  the value  as a time instead of as an integer..
 something like  02:50 instead of 0250?

Yep,

Also tried single quotes and permutations of 02:50 2:50 0250 and 250 all
with the same error as a result.

I'm still working on it though.

Regards,  Brian.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Unisphere ERX Vendor 4874 Attribute 24

2002-08-26 Thread Brian Morris

Unisphere ERX Vendor 4874 Attribute 24

Hi All,

This attribute number (24) does not appear in the latest dictionary file.
Does anyone know what it should be - we only just started receiveing them
after an ERX upgrade.

Regards,

Brian Morris
NetSpeed.


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Answer : Unisphere ERX Vendor 4874 Attribute 24

2002-08-26 Thread Brian Morris

Thanks to Chris Patterson at TransACT for this...

VENDORATTR 4874 Unisphere-Pppoe-Description 24 string

Regards,  Brian.




- Original Message - 
From: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Unisphere ERX Vendor 4874 Attribute 24


 Unisphere ERX Vendor 4874 Attribute 24
 
 Hi All,
 
 This attribute number (24) does not appear in the latest dictionary file.
 Does anyone know what it should be - we only just started receiveing them
 after an ERX upgrade.
 
 Regards,
 
 Brian Morris
 NetSpeed.
 
 
 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Multiple Items in the same AcctColumnDef

2002-12-08 Thread Brian Morris
Hi All,

We receive session info from a few different NAS's but I would like to store
all the connection specific information in a single table element.  EG:  I
would like to store the Ascend-Disconnect-Cause as well as the standard
Account-Terminate-Cause into the same table column.

Is this possible to do?  If so, what is the syntax for the ACCTCOLUMNDEF
entry?

Thanks in advance.

Brian Morris


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) Multiple Items in the same AcctColumnDef

2002-12-08 Thread Brian Morris
Thanks Hugh,

Just one further question - if one of the NAS's does not return one of the
attributes, will it cause an error?

Regards,  Brian.

- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Multiple Items in the same AcctColumnDef



 Hello Brian -

 Yes this is possible, simply specify the AcctColumnDef twice.

 Ie:

 .
 AcctColumnDef TERMINATECAUSE, Ascend-Disconnect-Cause
 AcctColumnDef TERMINATECAUSE, Acct-Terminate-Cause
 .

 regards

 Hugh


 On Monday, Dec 9, 2002, at 18:38 Australia/Melbourne, Brian Morris
 wrote:

  Hi All,
 
  We receive session info from a few different NAS's but I would like to
  store
  all the connection specific information in a single table element.
  EG:  I
  would like to store the Ascend-Disconnect-Cause as well as the standard
  Account-Terminate-Cause into the same table column.
 
  Is this possible to do?  If so, what is the syntax for the
  ACCTCOLUMNDEF
  entry?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Brian Morris
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 
 

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Oops!... Multiple Items in the same AcctColumnDef

2002-12-09 Thread Brian Morris
Oops.. This didn't work quite right..

I added the following line to my radiator cfg file :

  AcctColumnDef ACCTTERMINATECAUSE,Acct-Terminate-Cause
  AcctColumnDef ACCTTERMINATECAUSE,Ascend-Disconnect-Cause
  AcctColumnDef ACCTTERMINATECAUSE,LE-Terminate-Detail

Started up and got the following error...

Mon Dec  9 18:56:59 2002: ERR: do failed for 'insert into ACCOUNTING
  (USERNAME, TIMESTAMP, ACCTSTATUSTYPE, ACCTDELAYTIME, ACCTINPUTOCTETS,
ACCTOUTPUTOCTETS, ACCTSESSIONID, ACCTSESSIONTIME, ACCTTERMINATECAUSE,
ACCTTERMINATECAUSE, NASIDENTIFIER, NASPORT, FRAMEDIPADDRESS, CONNECTINFO)
  values
  ('', 1039420619, 'Stop', 0, 8024, 160863, '4A00DCC7', 219,
'User-Request', 'User Request - PPP Term Req', '203.xx.xx.xx', '17',
'203.xx.xx.xx', '42666 LAPM/V42BIS')':
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Column name
'ACCTTERMINATECAUSE' appears more than once in the result column list.
(SQL-37000)
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be
prepared. (SQL-37000)(DBD: st_prepare/SQLPrepare err=-1)

It appears that if Radiator receives two or more of the ACCTTERMINATECAUSE
attributes in a stop record it tries to insert it twice (or more) in the
same insert statement.

Is there a work around for this?  Ideally to get it to concatenate them all
into a single ACCTTERMINATECAUSE value.  Perhaps something like the
timestamp / formatted date parameters

Thanks in advance..

Brian.







- Original Message -
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Multiple Items in the same AcctColumnDef



 Hello Brian -

 Yes this is possible, simply specify the AcctColumnDef twice.

 Ie:

 .
 AcctColumnDef TERMINATECAUSE, Ascend-Disconnect-Cause
 AcctColumnDef TERMINATECAUSE, Acct-Terminate-Cause
 .

 regards

 Hugh


 On Monday, Dec 9, 2002, at 18:38 Australia/Melbourne, Brian Morris
 wrote:

  Hi All,
 
  We receive session info from a few different NAS's but I would like to
  store
  all the connection specific information in a single table element.
  EG:  I
  would like to store the Ascend-Disconnect-Cause as well as the standard
  Account-Terminate-Cause into the same table column.
 
  Is this possible to do?  If so, what is the syntax for the
  ACCTCOLUMNDEF
  entry?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Brian Morris
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 
 

 --
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Session-Timeout options

2003-01-20 Thread Brian Morris
Hi All,

Is it possible to set a session timeout to the lesser of (say) 4 hours or
[TimeRemaining]

Where [TimeRemaining] is however much time credit the customer has remaining
on teir account.  I know you can set it to one OR the other, but how about
the lesser of the two?

Regards,

Brian Morris
(In smokey downtown Canberra)

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) Writing Radius 'Alive' packets to a different table

2003-02-25 Thread Brian Morris
Hi All,

I would like to be able to record radius 'alive' packet data to a seperate
SQL table to that which records accounting 'Stops'.

Is this possible, and if so how??

Regards,  Brian.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


(RADIATOR) Dicionary Entries needed for Redback

2003-03-19 Thread Brian Morris
Hi All,

I am installing a RedBack SMS and I think I need to get the updated
dictionary entries for (vendor 2352) attributes 128-150

Are they in the latest dictionary?  I have V3.1 and they dont appear to be
on there.

Thanks in advance.

Brian Morris

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


Re: (RADIATOR) Dictionary Entries needed for Redback - FOUND

2003-03-19 Thread Brian Morris
Ignore that - I found them!

Sorry to waste bandwidth - it's been a long day.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator as a Windows Service

2003-03-29 Thread Brian Morris
Hi Mike,

The ability to run Radiator as an NT service is excellent and I would like
to say well done indeed!

Personally, I very much like the ability to monitor a users ability (or more
importantly their inability) to login in real time.  Running Radiator in a
command window allows me to view the log file as it happens - much like a
tail -f would do in a Unix environment.

Is their any way to view the logfile in real time (or close to real time)
when running Radiator as a service on NT?

Regards,

Brian Morris




- Original Message -
From: Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:40 PM
Subject: (RADIATOR) Radiator as a Windows Service


 Hello all,

 Up until now, users wishing to run Radiator as a Service on Windows were
 required to install and configure a Service program such as SRVANY or
 FireDaemon.

 We have recently uploaded patches to the Radiator 3.5 patches area that
allow
 Radiator to install and run itself as a Windows Service. This has also
 involved some restructuring of some of the internals of radiusd. These
 patches will appear in the next release of Radiator but in the meantime we
 would welcome any comments on its use.

 Now, on Windows,  radiusd supports some new command line arguments:

 -service
 Tells Radiator to run as a Windows Service. Requires Win32::Daemon, and
 requires that the service have been previously installed with the
 -installservice flag. Requires Win32::Daemon.

 -installservice
 On Windows, installs or reinstalls Radiator to run as a Windows Service.
The
 service will be configured to run Radiator with all the same arguments as
was
 passed with -installservice, and it will add the -service flag. After
this,
 the Radiator service will appear in the Windows Service list as `Radiator
 Radius Server'. The Service will automatically start next time the host is
 booted. Requires Win32::Daemon.

 -uninstallservice
 On Windows, removes Radiator from Running as a Windows Service. Ensure the
 service is stopped before uninstalling it. Requires Win32::Daemon.

 Win32::Daemon can be installed on Windows with:
 ppm install http://www.roth.net/perl/packages/win32-daemon.ppd

 None of these changes are expected to effect the ability to run Radiator
as a
 service under SRVANY or FireDaemon, or as a daemon on Unix.

 Furthermore, on Windows, the command
 perl Makefile.PL install
 now also creates a folder C:\Program Files\Radiator and installs sample
 configuration, users and dictionary files (if they are not already there).
 This is expected to improve the installation process for Windows users.

 Test and comments direct to me are welcome.
 Cheers.


 --
 Mike McCauley   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Open System Consultants Pty. LtdUnix, Perl, Motif, C++, WWW
 24 Bateman St Hampton, VIC 3188 Australia   http://www.open.com.au
 Phone +61 3 9598-0985   Fax   +61 3 9598-0955

 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
 Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS,
 TTLS, PEAP etc on Unix, Windows, MacOS etc.

 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator as a Windows Service

2003-03-30 Thread Brian Morris
Hi Mike,

I am glad to say that Radiator has never once failed in the three or four
years we have been using it.  Your product rocks!

Regards,

Brian Morris
NetSpeed.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


(RADIATOR) Wireless Access Points that can do Radius Authentication

2003-06-18 Thread Brian Morris
Hi All,

Has anyone compiled a list of wireless access points that do radius
authentication?

If so, would they like to share it??

If not, can anyone offer some advice as to those that do and work with
Radiator.

Thanks in advance,

Brian.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


(RADIATOR) Wildcards in Handler Clause

2003-07-21 Thread Brian Morris



Hi All,

Is it possible to have wildcards in 
handlers?

I would like to have a situation where a handler 
'handles' everything for a particular domain level regardles of its 
subdomains.

For example...

Handler realm=*foo.com.au

This would handle actions for [EMAIL PROTECTED]as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Is such a thing possible? or is there another 
way apart from explicitly defining every possible realm?

Cheers, Brian Morris



Re: (RADIATOR) Wildcards in Handler Clause

2003-07-21 Thread Brian Morris



Thanks Hugh,

It works exactly as desired.

For reference I used Handler 
Realm=/foo.com.au$/ and it works correctly.

I opted against using Handler 
Username=/foo.com.au$/ as some users log in without a realm and the 
(default realm) client clause adds it for them.

Thanks again,

Brian Morris



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Hugh Irvine 

  To: Brian Morris 
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:44 PM
  Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Wildcards in 
  Handler Clause
  Hello Brian -You can do something like 
  this:Handler User-Name = 
  /foo.com.au$//HandlerBTW - as always you 
  should test thoroughly to verify correct 
  operation.regardsHughOn Monday, Jul 21, 2003, at 
  18:14 Australia/Melbourne, Brian Morris wrote:
  Hi All,Is 
it possible to have wildcards in 
handlers?I 
would like to have a situation where a handler 'handles' everything for a 
particular domain level regardles of its subdomains.For 
example...Handler 
realm=*foo.com.auThis 
would handle actions for [EMAIL PROTECTED]as well 
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Is 
such a thing possible? or is there another way apart from explicitly 
defining every possible realm?Cheers, 
Brian MorrisNB: 
  have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets), together 
  with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?-- Radiator: the 
  most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS serveranywhere. Available 
  on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.-Nets: internetwork 
  inventory and management - graphical, extensible,flexible with hardware, 
  software, platform and database independence.


Re: (RADIATOR) radiator server under high load problem

2003-07-22 Thread Brian Morris
Hi Hugh / Steve,

We also experienced a similar sort of problem under load and are currently
still investigating the problem although it now appears to be corrected...

Running Radiator (as Proxy) on Sun /Solaris which sends requests to another
Radiator server running on Win2k with the database on a separate SQL Server
box again.  Plenty of RAM / CPU / etc etc everywhere.

At trace level 3 we found that we would receive a request (start / stop /
alive) from the Sun box to the Win2K box, which would authenticate and reply
within a second back to the Sun box but the Sun box would send a second
request 5 or less seconds later (retry was set to 5).

Note - we are still investigating but have made the following changes

(a) replace the Win2k server hardware completely - no change
(b) replace the SQL Server hardware completely - no change

but

(c) Force all NICs to 100Mbs FULL DUPLEX (not auto detect)
(d) Increase the speed of the link between the two radius servers (was
traffic shaped to 256k)

The number of timeout errors has almost been eliminated since making changes
c+d.

I hope this helps.  I will post further information if I find the exact
cause / solution :-)

Regards,  Brian.


- Original Message - 
From: Hugh Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Radiator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) radiator server under high load problem



 Hello Steve -

 Thanks for your mail - this topic comes up fairly frequently on the
 list.

 I don't really have enough information to give you definitive answers,
 but in my experience performance problems are almost always due to
 back-end services such as SQL databases and/or LDAP servers. I suggest
 you use the LogMicroseconds parameter in your logging (requires
 Time-HiRes from CPAN) so you can see exactly how much time is being
 used for each processing step. You can also use our companion product
 Radar to connect to a running Radiator instance which will give you a
 wide range of statistics together with fine-grained debugging and
 logging facilities. (BTW - you can also connect to the same Monitor
 port that supports Radar and issue commands manually, but I recommend
 Radar).

 You can also run two instances of Radiator - one for authentication and
 one for accounting.

 It may also be that you are seeing a problem with radius Identifiers
 when doing a lot of proxying, and if this is the case I recommend
 upgrading to the latest Radiator 3.6 (plus patches) and using the
 UseExtendedIds parameter in the AuthBy RADIUS clauses.

 If you have any further questions, please send me a copy of the
 Radiator configuration file (no secrets) and an example trace 4 or 5
 debug with LogMicroseconds turned on and I will take a look.

 regards

 Hugh


 On Tuesday, Jul 22, 2003, at 20:37 Australia/Melbourne, Steve Wilson
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  We are currently in the process of migrating about 5 icradius servers
  into 1
  system, we are currently at the stage where everything (about 10
  NAS's) use
  our a central radiator server to authenticate, this then sends the
  request
  to the correct icradius server based on the realm. As this is under
  testing
  I'm currently running radiator at debug level 5 to be able to diagnose
  any
  problems immediately. A serious problem arose overnight where this
  morning
  there were approx 2000 users all trying to authenticate at the same
  time.
  This left the machine under high load and it was then discovered that
  radiator was no seeing the return radius accept packets, but tcpdump
  saw
  them returning to the machine.
 
  What I need to know is what can be upgraded/improved to allow heavy
  debugging while users are rapidly connecting, the current machine spec
  is
  2x2G Pentium III ( 256k L2 cache ),1G RAM, 36G raid5 (adaptec i2o).
  This machine is running linux (kernel 2.4.19-16mdksecure SMP) and
  version
  3.3.1-1 rpm version of Radiator.
 
  Any advice appreciated ;)
 
  In the future the 5 backend radius servers will turn into ldap
  auths, is
  this the best option ? Everything will be doubled so we have
  redundancy too.
 
  Regards
 
  Steve Wilson
 
  Senior Systems Administrator
  Legend Internet Ltd.
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 
 

 NB: have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets),
 together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?

 -- 
 Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
 anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
 -
 Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
 flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL 

Re: (RADIATOR) Issue with Duplicate Key when Adding a Session

2003-07-24 Thread Brian Morris
Hmm... What are the implications of an Insert Ignore?

Will it override the primary key constraint thus giving you two rows with
the same primary key or will it simply not do the insert?

Regards,  Brian.

(The reason I ask is that I get them too)



- Original Message - 
From: Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Issue with Duplicate Key when Adding a Session


 I would recommend using an INSERT IGNORE instead of an INSERT.

 This is a mysql issue, it means that you have a unique key (primary key)
 defined in
 your mysql table and your are trying to add another entry with the same
 unique key.

 ***
 Brandon Mullenberg
 Dialup USA, Inc.
 Tel: 888-460-2286 ext 202
 Fax: 866-627-8808
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 **

 - Original Message - 
 From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:49 PM
 Subject: (RADIATOR) Issue with Duplicate Key when Adding a Session


  Hi All,
 
  We are using Radiator 3.6 with latest patches but we are seeing an issue
  when a new session is added. We're getting Duplicate key which appears
to
 be
  coming from the internal handler code rather than MySQL itself. Below is
 the
  error when it occurs. We've modified our delete from RADONLINE query
to
  match the details more accurately and we don't appear to be having any
  problems with this, it's just Adding session for %s is where it seems
to
  go astray.
 
  Thu Jul 24 20:57:37 2003: DEBUG:  Adding session for [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  1.2.3.4, 6256
 
  Thu Jul 24 20:57:37 2003: DEBUG: do query is: 'delete from RADONLINE
where
  NASIDENTIFIER='1.2.3.4' and NASPORT=6256 and ACCTSESSIONID =
'00062398'':
 
  Thu Jul 24 20:57:37 2003: DEBUG: do query is: 'INSERT INTO RADONLINE
  (USERNAME, NASIDENTIFIER, ACCTSESSIONID, TIME_STAMP, FRAMEDIPADDRESS,
  NASPORT, NASPORTTYPE, SERVICETYPE, DNIS, PHONENO, SESSIONKEY,
  ACCTSESSIONTIME, INPUTOCTETS, OUTPUTOCTETS, POPID,targetid,
DOWNLOADRATE,
  UPLOADRATE, ORIGUSER)
 

VALUES('myuser','1.2.3.4','00062398','1059044257','5.6.7.8','6256','Async','
  Framed-User','0312345678','03912345678', '6F419DF2',
  '2185','346903','2410144','61', '15', '45333', '26400',
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')':
 
  Thu Jul 24 20:57:37 2003: ERR: do failed for 'INSERT INTO RADONLINE
  (USERNAME, NASIDENTIFIER, ACCTSESSIONID, TIME_STAMP, FRAMEDIPADDRESS,
  NASPORT, NASPORTTYPE, SERVICETYPE, DNIS, PHONENO, SESSIONKEY,
  ACCTSESSIONTIME, INPUTOCTETS, OUTPUTOCTETS, POPID, targetid,
DOWNLOADRATE,
  UPLOADRATE, ORIGUSER)
 

VALUES('myuser','1.2.3.4','00062398','1059044257','5.6.7.8','6256','Async','
  Framed-User','0312345678','03912345678', '6F419DF2',
  '2185','346903','2410144','61', '15', '45333', '26400',
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')':
  Duplicate entry '1.2.3.4-6256' for key 1
 
  If you have any ideas that'd be great. Thanks
 
  Regards,
 
  Paul Rivoli
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  K B S   I N T E R N E T
 
 
 
  ===
  Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
  Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
  'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 

 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


(RADIATOR) Something for the Wish List

2003-08-28 Thread Brian Morris
Hi folks,

I would like to propose a 'feature' to add to the Radiator wishlist.

How about a feature where, if a customer is not permitted more than one
simultaneous login, that the system allows the second connection to connect,
but also drops the first connection.

This will have two benefits to my specific case...

1.  If a subscriber was logged in at work then went home but forgot to
disconnect from work, he can still connect when he gets home without having
to get us to drop his other connection. (less support requests = happy
customer = happy support staff = happy manager!)

2.  'Leechers' who buy unlimited access accounts then share them with
friends will be booted off whenever they break the rules. (less leechers =
got the bastards = more profit = happy manager!!)

Perhaps a post-auth hook or something could do this.  The actual disconnect
process would be NAS dependant but I am sure it could be done.

Regards,

Brian Morris
(somewhat happy) Manager,
NetSpeed


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


Re: (RADIATOR) Something for the Wish List

2003-08-28 Thread Brian Morris

I don't see how (but I would love to find out)

If they must first authenticate successfully before we boot the other one
off then I can't see how it would cause a DOS.  If I am missing something
please correct me - It wouldn't be the first time :-)

Regards,  Brian



- Original Message - 
From: Bret Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Something for the Wish List


 That would open a really bad DOS attack.

 Bret

 Brian Morris wrote:

 Hi folks,
 
 I would like to propose a 'feature' to add to the Radiator wishlist.
 
 How about a feature where, if a customer is not permitted more than one
 simultaneous login, that the system allows the second connection to
connect,
 but also drops the first connection.
 
 This will have two benefits to my specific case...
 
 1.  If a subscriber was logged in at work then went home but forgot to
 disconnect from work, he can still connect when he gets home without
having
 to get us to drop his other connection. (less support requests = happy
 customer = happy support staff = happy manager!)
 
 2.  'Leechers' who buy unlimited access accounts then share them with
 friends will be booted off whenever they break the rules. (less leechers
=
 got the bastards = more profit = happy manager!!)
 
 Perhaps a post-auth hook or something could do this.  The actual
disconnect
 process would be NAS dependant but I am sure it could be done.
 
 Regards,
 
 Brian Morris
 (somewhat happy) Manager,
 NetSpeed
 
 
 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
 
 

 -- 
 ~~~
 Bret Jordan   Dean's Office
 Computer Administrator   College of Engineering
 801.585.3765 University of Utah
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ~~~





===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.