Re: (RADIATOR) Sendmail & Radiator

1999-08-08 Thread Valentin Tumarkin
I think your problem is that your 'system' does not know of your users existence. Having configured PAM is not enough, you need to make your unix 'system' aware of your users via Name Service. Example: If you are using LDAP, you can install the nss_ldap module from http://www.padl.co

Re: (RADIATOR) Client, NAS-Type and Handler

1999-08-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Neale - On Sun, 08 Aug 1999, Neale Banks wrote: > I looked in the docs, but this one's not mentioned either way. If I > specify a Client: > > > NasType=vendor > . > DefaultRealm foo.bar > > > 1. Are there any side-effects of NAS-Type if I don't specify any > Simu

Re: (RADIATOR) Sendmail & Radiator

1999-08-08 Thread Paul Black
This sounds interesting. Does the NSS/LDAP module support PAM, ie, can it be made to authenticate via Radiator? I'm trying to setup a system where the Radiator database is the source of customer authentication information. Thanks for your help. Regards. Paul Valentin Tumarkin wrote: > > I

Re: (RADIATOR) Sendmail & Radiator

1999-08-08 Thread Valentin Tumarkin
No. PAM is a library for authentication. PAM takes information from NSS, and not vice-versa. To make it simple: it's not enough to have your users in the radius database, you should also put them in /etc/passwd or NIS or LDAP database+nss_ldap modules. About NSS from Solaris 2.6 nsswitch.con

(RADIATOR) Running as NT Service Success

1999-08-08 Thread Michael Jaworski
Thought I might share this as I was having a problem running Radiator as an NT service using the current instructions. I was finally able to make things work using the following modified directions which I integrated from the Srvany instructions. It basically breaks down the single command line in

(RADIATOR) Blocking Time not working (v. 2.13)?

1999-08-08 Thread Ricardo Freire
Hi Mike and all,   Our production radiator server is still with 2.13. It always worked, but recently we set up some time restrictions, and it isn't working. Users are still connected even when they're in Linux "business" group. My USERS file has the following DEFAULTs:   DEFAULT Auth-Type = S

Re: (RADIATOR) Blocking Time not working (v. 2.13)?

1999-08-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Ricardo - On Mon, 09 Aug 1999, Ricardo Freire wrote: > >%_Hi Mike and all, > > Our production radiator server is still with 2.13. > It always worked, but recently we set up some time restrictions, and it isn't >working. > Users are still connected even when they're in Linux "business" gr

(RADIATOR) EncryptedPassword Problem.

1999-08-08 Thread Cameron Andrews
Hi guys, Got a small problem, below is my AuthSQL with my AuthSelect in it, but for some reason the encrypted passwords dont appear to be working, people can login supplying anything for their password, could someone please show me what to do to fix this little problem, thanx.. AuthSelec

Re: (RADIATOR) EncryptedPassword Problem.

1999-08-08 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hi Cameron - On Mon, 09 Aug 1999, Cameron Andrews wrote: > Hi guys, > Got a small problem, below is my AuthSQL with my AuthSelect in it, but > for some reason the encrypted passwords dont appear to be working, people can > login supplying anything for their password, could someone please

RE: (RADIATOR) Allow All

1999-08-08 Thread Ingvar Berg (ERA)
I think this is what you will get with AuthByTEST /Ingvar > -Original Message- > From: Greg Kornatowsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > We want to setup radiator so that all users get authenticated > regrdless of > what password or username they enter. We also want to accounting. So >