Wow, that's gorgeous! I believe this is the same bike.
https://twitter.com/HartleyCycles/status/711492212308238336?s=19
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
I fell instantly in love with that bike when I saw it on the Blahg.
*That's* the kind of bike that could inspire me to go custom again.
Dave
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Wonder if it’s the same Erin who owns the Atlantis on the
previous Blug? If so, that’s a pair of gorgeous rides to have available.
Best,
Rich in ATL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
That was true for the first run. Now most of them have a socket lug and
straight stays, but the big one keeps the original with bent stays.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Mark, I believe the reason for the bent seat stays is because of the seat
lug, which is not custom for each size. Since the exit angle from the lug
is the same across several sizes, it means some need a bent stay for the
tube to connect from the seat cluster to the rear dropout (an
Meant to add, I like it because they echo the main swoop dee doop. Not
because of the obvious shock-absorbing and speed benefits.
On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 8:17:18 AM UTC-4, Mark Roland wrote:
>
>
> Speaking of Clem Ls, one thing I liked about my ver.1 Clementine was the
> swoopy seat
Pretty close. Mark @ Riv mentioned that the head lug has to be modified to get
90°; to my eye the TT/ST joint isn't quite 90.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Yes, pretty sure that's the "Huge Roscoe Mountain Mixte," which
differentiates it from the "Roscoe Mountain Mixte." (Not gonna link the
well-actually-that's-a-step-thru-discussion) Here's a group thread on
it:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rbw-owners-bunch/Qc-uqULjezA%5B1-25%5D
Glad to hear it...kind of assumed you did...I'd hate to see it ripped off.
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:55:09 AM UTC-6, panog wrote:
>
> @Ryan F.
>
> Yes, fortunate to have a very secure place to keep the bike at work. No
> bike lock needed.
>
> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 11:01:26 AM
@Ryan F.
Yes, fortunate to have a very secure place to keep the bike at work. No
bike lock needed.
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 11:01:26 AM UTC-5, Ryan Fleming wrote:
>
> Wow that is some build ..can't wait to see it. Obviously you have a very
> secure place at work to house such a treasure
Wow that is some build ..can't wait to see it. Obviously you have a very
secure place at work to house such a treasure
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 9:03:11 PM UTC-6, panog wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your kind words! Mark sent me a few pics yesterday and
> although I have not seen the bike
Thanks Patrick. I'll convey the message.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
I generally don't expend a lot of mental sweat on frame color, which is
good since I'm somewhat color blind, but generally I don't care for orange
(sorry Eddy). But I have to say that your wife's choice is pretty darned
nice; it certainly would tempt me away from my current fave of sage green
with
The last few days I have received a lot of compliments about the color
chosen; started with Joe, then Mark and went on and on. I must admit that
choosing the color proved for me to be the hardest part of putting the bike
together. I had all the bike features and mechanical bits figured out by
George,
As Keith mentioned, SH is the Saddle Height measured from the center of the
bottom bracket to the top of the saddle. The standover height measured from the
floor to the top of the top tube at around the middle of its span is 89.05cm
with 42mm tires. My PBH of 91.5cm + shoes (2 cm)
My '99 Joe and '3 Curt both have the same 44.5 cm stays. That length
certainly doesn't slow handling! (The bike is a very weirdly perfect
combination of quick turn-in and stable straight line movement.)
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
> My custom Riv from 1999 – JB
Ahh, thanks. I feel better now. We have so many acronyms and
abbreviations in this industry/blog that it's sometimes easy to get them
confused. Maybe I'll sleep better tonight...then again, maybe not since
I'm fighting a case of this flu that's been going around.
On Sunday, February 5, 2017
George,
By SH he means Saddle Height relative to the BB.
Keith
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I frequently have difficult sleeping all night; I wake up and then all
kinds of issues and problems of the day/week/era begin racing through my
mind and some of them bother me to the point where I can't get back to
sleep. Last night was no exception after having read through the threads
on
Pano
I used this equation2xCSLength + (F+R)/4 + 1, F & R are the large
ring/cog, 46 & 32 in your case.
John Hawrylak
Woodstown NJ
On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 8:59:47 AM UTC-5, panog wrote:
> @John H.
>
> Great! Not having to mend a chain would be convenient, John. It computes
> to
@John H.
Great! Not having to mend a chain would be convenient, John. It computes to 116
links for up to a 34t cog. Never actually sized a chain with the "equation
method" before. It would be interesting to see how it compares to the other
methods.
--
You received this message because you
Pano
The 47cm CS and your gearing (46-32) computes to a CHAIN length of 57.5",
or rounding up to 58". This allows for the normal 116 link chain.
John Hawrylak
Woodstown NJ.
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 10:27:05 PM UTC-5, panog wrote:
> @John H.
>
> The 47cm chainstays were Grant's
“ stays.
Olof Stroh
Uppsala Sweden
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of panog
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 4:54 AM
To: RBW Owners Bunch
Subject: [RBW] Re: BLUG reveal of an incredible custom
@Don C.
I think the longer stays
@Don C.
I think the longer stays (47cm) are there to predominantly compliment the
intended performance of the bike and not just for tire (up to 42mm)
clearance. Looking at the RBW geo charts, the 63 AHH has 45cm CS and fits
up to 43mm tires while the 62 Hillborne CS is at 45.5cm and fits up to
@John H.
The 47cm chainstays were Grant's decision and seemingly one of the twists
he did on my Hilsen-like custom. The thinking is that there is no reason
for shorter than 47 considering also that my SH is at 80.5cm. The notion
here is being positioned less on top of the rear wheel which
Would his bike need the extra space for the larger tires and fenders? Just
a thought.
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 3:58:56 PM UTC-8, John Hawrylak wrote:
>
> Pano
>
> The 47cm CS seem 2 to 3cm longer than normal.Were longer CS
> a conscience decision
>
> John Hawrylak
> Woodstown NJ
/Where black is the color, where n plus one is the number//
//And I’ll tell it and think it and speak it and breathe it//
//And reflect it from the mountain so all souls can see it/
On 02/04/2017 06:54 PM, Joe Bernard wrote:
HA! "Or not" is the problem, Steve. I have a tendency to buy new
Pano
The 47cm CS seem 2 to 3cm longer than normal.Were longer CS
a conscience decision
John Hawrylak
Woodstown NJ
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 10:03:11 PM UTC-5, panog wrote:
>
> CS length 47cm
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Stopped by to pick up an order today and got a glimpse in person. Wow! Gorgeous
color, unbelievable lug work, and incredible attention to detail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
HA! "Or not" is the problem, Steve. I have a tendency to buy new bikes, then
"forget" to sell the old ones ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
You have the sequence of events reversed. First you order the new one;
when it comes, you sell the old one. Or not.
On 02/04/2017 06:14 PM, Joe Bernard wrote:
I really need to stop staring at your frame before I sell my Appaloosa and order a
custom. "Make it just like Pano's, but Candy
I really need to stop staring at your frame before I sell my Appaloosa and
order a custom. "Make it just like Pano's, but Candy Apple Red."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
So beautiful! I can't wait to see it built up.
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 6:17:26 PM UTC-5, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> Of all the Riv customs I've ever seen, the one shown on the BLUG today is
> the one I would be most likely to copy.
>
> WANT!
>
> Bill Lindsay
> El Cerrito, CA
>
--
You
Jiminy Christmas! What a beautiful bike. I too was surprised about some of
those features. I got the internal routing, seat stay pump peg and chain slap
guard on my custom MAP and really like all those features. I thought I was done
adding bikes for at least a couple of years but now I'm not so
Absolutely! Looking forward to it!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
Makes me want to recondition my Orange Rambouillet, erasing sixteen years
of beausage and adding a couple of braze-ons.
Andy Cheatham
Pittsburgh
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 6:17:26 PM UTC-5, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> Of all the Riv customs I've ever seen, the one shown on the BLUG today is
Wow, that geometry sounds perfect (and would fit me great). Please do post
pictures when you get it built up!
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 7:03:11 PM UTC-8, panog wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your kind words! Mark sent me a few pics yesterday and
> although I have not seen the bike in person
Reply to the question about the tubing used:
Discussed with Grant what the intended purpose of the bike is and trusted
him to do his thing. He did use what he called the Riv standard; 28.6 for
the TT and ST, 31.8 for the DT.
Frame geo stats on a prior post.
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at
Thank you all for your kind words! Mark sent me a few pics yesterday and
although I have not seen the bike in person yet, it looks from the pics
well balanced and every bit how I envisioned it.
The bike has been in the making for about 18 months now; the first six in
my mind, trying to justify
I am personal friends with Pano, and I will say he is a man of details. This
frame is beautiful. He has some beautiful bikes in his collection, but his
seams eager to get his new bike. After seeing the photo set of this frame, I
now know why! I am jealous of his new pony!
Keith
--
You
when I bought my first 2 rivs , they sent you a diagram with frame angles
and tube specs... I think they may have been scans of Grant's design
drawings with shorthand for the tubing. I didn't get something like that
this time. I thought the info was kind of neat and interesting and I don't
Groan. Every time something like this comes along it's in a frame size
about twice too big for me. It's a beauty all right - kinda reminds me of
some of those frames Waterford makes. Wait! OTOH, maybe it's a good thing
that it's too big or else I'd be trying to add yet another bike to my
Very beautiful. Is there any info about the tubing specs and the frame
geometry?
John Hawrylak
Woodstown NJ
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Wait, WHAT? internal brake cable routing?
She is a beauty.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Is pretty much perfect, all the way down to the color.
Jeff Hagedorn
Los Angeles, CA USA
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
on the other hand I am very happy with how my mixte turned out and looking
forward to riding it in the spring.
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:22:47 PM UTC-6, Ryan Fleming wrote:
>
> it's a beauty, eh?
>
> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:17:26 PM UTC-6, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>>
>> Of all the
it's a beauty, eh?
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 5:17:26 PM UTC-6, Bill Lindsay wrote:
>
> Of all the Riv customs I've ever seen, the one shown on the BLUG today is
> the one I would be most likely to copy.
>
> WANT!
>
> Bill Lindsay
> El Cerrito, CA
>
--
You received this message because
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 4:48:44 PM UTC-5, LBleriot wrote:
>
> Okay, I'm not seeing the BLUG link on Riv's new website. What am I
> missing?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 1:42:33 PM UTC-5, masmojo wrote:
>
> I had the same problem I think it's falling off the edge of my screen?
Now there's BLUG and Grant's Blahg...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To
I had the same problem I think it's falling off the edge of my screen?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On my phone it's in the upper left menu now. Yesterday it was a subhead under
Reading, but now it's Blog.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I see a "Blog" link on the upper right of the rivbike.com site, which links
me to the BLUG.
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 1:48:44 PM UTC-8, LBleriot wrote:
>
> Okay, I'm not seeing the BLUG link on Riv's new website. What am I
> missing?
>
--
You received this message because you are
Party on, Garth.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
H, Love is The Greatest
For Love needs no reason, no belief, no rationale , no acts , no his-story
. . . . Love makes no demands . . . nor denials . . . nor changes
Love is the Greatest for Love is the One and only , the only " I " that
ever is .
--
You received this
I would commit apostasy if I were to agree with Grant’s credo, and so would
millions of others of various faiths.
With abandon,
Patrick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
me/
informal
exclamation
1. 1.
expressing a lack of interest or enthusiasm.
"Meh. I'm not impressed so far"
adjective
1. 1.
uninspiring; unexceptional.
"a lot of his movies are … meh"
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 6:43:51 AM UTC-8, Kellie wrote:
>
> and Daniel, that
#imwithhim
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 4:48:48 AM UTC-8, Olof Stroh wrote:
>
> Just went to the new site and read Grants blug 24 hours after. Enough to
> make me support Riv. As that should be necessary.
>
>
>
> Olof Stroh
>
> Uppsala Sweden
>
--
You received this message because you
Whether you agree 100% or not, it takes great courage for a "small
business" person to share their perspective on any potentially divisive
issues (Perceived or otherwise). He deserves great kudos and support in
that respect.
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 7:48:48 AM UTC-5, Olof Stroh
Grant, what I also took from your posting was that it's a stand against
indifference.
There is a very famous man who makes fun of the handicapped. Millions of people
appear to be indifferent to that. He became president even though we know that
about him.
In the face of strong evidence for
Thanks for reading it--that's it, as intended, 100 percent, Eamon. As the
world gets more crowded, there's a need for more tolerance.
There's an out of print book (it's Amazon-usedbookable) called The Human
Zoo, written by Desmond Morris. His take on what goes on in a crowded world
that doesn't
and Daniel, that means what exactly?
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 5:58:39 PM UTC-8, Daniel D. wrote:
>
> meh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Fathoms to fathom!
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 1:06:47 AM UTC-5, Joe Bernard wrote:
>
> Stay away from Twitter if you don't want to fathom this. There's a great
> deal to fathom there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
Thanks Olof for the heads up. Interesting take on things; I do enjoy my
Riv's.
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 7:48:48 AM UTC-5, Olof Stroh wrote:
>
> Just went to the new site and read Grants blug 24 hours after. Enough to
> make me support Riv. As that should be necessary.
>
>
>
> Olof
I agree with a lot of what Grant writes, but it's not 100%, not even this
time. I am glad I finally have a Riv, though.
Tim
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Austin ^ wrote:
> +1 it made me glad I have a pair of rivs and that I just sent some
> currency their way for
+1 it made me glad I have a pair of rivs and that I just sent some currency
their way for a few things. I don't usually find myself fully in agreement
with Grant's perspective but this time 100%.
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 4:48:47 AM UTC-8, Olof Stroh wrote:
>
> Just went to the new
Yes thanks for posting Olaf. Grant managed a nice modesty in his response
which is admirable too.
Once there I found myself reading some of his other how-to cycling essays
on the riv site. I always appreciate how his perspective can remind me
riding a bike doesn't have to be some form of
In the USA we believe in taking turns, 8 years of Ds
then the Rs get a chance. A continuing snake dance
of progress. We had 8 years of Clinton, then 8 Bush II
then 8 Obama. Fair is fair.
As Mao said, "Let a hundred flowers bloom"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
meh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Simple, good thoughts that seem obvious to me, and just common sense from a
humanity-moving-forward standpoint. We need stuff like that right now.
Thanks, Grant.
dougP
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 4:48:48 AM UTC-8, Olof Stroh wrote:
>
> Just went to the new site and read Grants blug 24
One of the beauties of Riv is knowing there is a community of people who to
a very large extent share values. I appreciate Grant not just for what he
has said in this Blog post but what he says everyday through the Riv
ecology!
Steve Cole
Arlington, VA
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 at
It says 57 now
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 11:29:04 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:
>
> The Mar 2 BLUG entry on the new demo Roadeo at RBW WHQ says the frame is a
> 55.
> The head tube looks significantly longer than the one on Mark's 55 Roadeo
> in the staff bikes section.
> Am I cross eyed? Is
Shimano 11 speed does shift like a dreamand I love and use friction
shifting too, but thems the facts.
That Roadeo is awesome looking; it's a very striking color and perfect for
a fast bike like the Roadeo. After I sell my Roadeo I might have to get the
Legolas in that color.
On
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:18 PM
*To:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [RBW] Re: Blug on long chainstays
I had an '85 Trek 650. Stays for days. I'm scrounging for a photo
right now, but I can't lay my hands on one. I do believe that with a
wheelbase *that* long
together an
extra-long chain out of extra links from a second chain.
*From:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com]
*On Behalf Of *Andrew Marchant-Shapiro
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:18 PM
*To:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [RBW] Re: Blug on long
:
*Subject:* [RBW] Re: Blug on long chainstays
I had an '85 Trek 650. Stays for days. I'm scrounging for a photo right
now, but I can't lay my hands on one. I do believe that with a wheelbase
*that* long, there may have been some slight compromise in handling. But
nothing
I ride nice bikes all the way across this spectrum, so while sitting out a
stormy day, I measured them. Stays first, rounded nearest:
46cm stable, smooth, fun down single-track - 49cm Schwinn Sierra -1987
43cm responsive, easy uphill/slow speed handling - 55cm Bstone MB-1 - 1990
46cm feels
I had an '85 Trek 850 (Hugh now has it) w/ sper long chain stays. It
was (is I'm sure) a great fun bike. I also ride a Yuba Mundo, which has
extremely long stays. It's a necessity as I carry two children on the back,
but I'm always amazed how the bike rides. We got in a good 40 miles today
It would be interesting to ride two bikes that are identical except for
maybe 8-10cm difference in chainstay length.
My Devil has forward facing dropouts and I can change the CS length from
about 43.5 to 45 and I can feel a difference. I prefer the way the bike
rides at 45cm. My Trek has
Of Andrew Marchant-Shapiro
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:18 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: Blug on long chainstays
I had an '85 Trek 650. Stays for days. I'm scrounging for a photo right now,
but I can't lay my hands on one. I do believe that with a wheelbase
My wee 46cm Appaloosa custom has l chainstays, especially for
its size, and goodness that bike can go anywhere over any terrain
regardless of my skill. And comfortable as all get-out. Long time Blug
readers will have already seen these, but just in case, photos can be found
here:
That Clementine in the photo on the blug is a really nice looking bike. All
those curves and whatnot. And shiny black paint. Beaut.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
I've certainly followed Grant's progression to longer stays with much
interest. My most recent bicycle purchase was a longtail cargo bike
http://handlebarchronicles.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-bike-that-rides-like-car.html,
and the utility of it aside, I really do love the way it feels to ride.
Makes me wanna pick up a cheviot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
Dear Jeremy,
He's brought back the Klunker MTB geometry for his cruiser bikes!
Mr. Petersen was a vocal advocate of shorter chainstays in the mid-1980's
when Bridgestone popularized the NORBA mtb geometry. He brought out bikes
with short-ish chainstays (42-43cm), steep seat (73-73.5deg) and
Dear Jeremy,
RE: long chainstays. He's brought back the Klunker MTB geometry!
Mr. Petersen was a vocal advocate of shorter chainstays in the mid-1980's
when Bridgestone popularized the NORBA mtb geometry. He brought out bikes
with short-ish chainstays (42-43cm), steep seat (73-73.5deg) and
Yes, one does need to cobble together bits from a second chain for these
54-55cm chain stays . This is the case with the custom and with Erin's cheviot
and with, I assume, the Clem's.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To
Just read the BLUG but haven't followed this thread, so forgive me if this
has already been mentioned.
Another advantage to longer chainstays is clearance with panniers. There
is more freedom of choice in baggage because you're not fighting for space
for your heels. In addition, more of the
I did my longest tour (West Coast to Lake Michigan coast - basically the
Adventure Cycling Northern Tier - then the Lake Michigan paths down
Wisconsin into Northern Illinois) on this Trek 728
http://cyclofiend.com/cc/2008/cc484-joelmatthews0508.html. Probably not
the bike one would want a
they call them 30' yachts. Schooner is specific to the rigging - flip the
masts it's a ketch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I tend to favor shorter stays for climbing on singletrack. My weight stays
over the wheel better and I don't spin out like I do with longer says.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Marchant-Shapiro
marchantshap...@gmail.com wrote:
I had an '85 Trek 650. Stays for days. I'm scrounging
I had an '85 Trek 650. Stays for days. I'm scrounging for a photo right
now, but I can't lay my hands on one. I do believe that with a wheelbase
*that* long, there may have been some slight compromise in handling. But
nothing significant. And it was a joy to ride with rear panniers
I think this was mentioned somewhere when I was preparing to buy my frame,
couldn't find any mention of it on the present day hillborne page. Hasn't
failed yet. I love my bike.
-Kai
Brooklyn NY
On Monday, September 22, 2014 9:54:23 AM UTC-4, Bill Lindsay wrote:
My Sam Hillborne's tig welded.
Possibly correct, but completely beside the point of this topic.
The Blug post in question appears to state tubes which in other Rivs are
joined with lugs will be Tig welded.
While there may be an outlier somewhere, dropouts typically are not joined
to the chainstay with lugs. I am aware of
Soma San Marcos has lugged dropouts on the rear. You can see the sockets
in the 2nd and 3rd pictures on rivbike.com.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Matthew J matthewj...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly correct, but completely beside the point of this topic.
The Blug post in question appears to
Yeah, Kai, I bit on your comment My Sam Hillborne's tig welded. If you
had said I think the rear dropout on my Sam Hillborne might be tig welded
I wouldn't have bit. It's kind of hard to tell from your phone-photo, but
it looks like your MUSA-Sam has the same rear dropouts as my Hilsen, which
My favorite rides are a couple of Bridgestones. Like many other non-Riv
owners I read this group every day - enjoying the vibe and learning as I go
along. If I keep the Bridgestones, sell the other bikes and save a few
dollars, then a Clem might be the bike for me. If Grant wants to spread the
This thread seems to have started as a holy crap! Rivendell might introduce
tig welding on their bikes!!. Nowhere did I see any statement to the effect
that they may have already in the past. And I'm just saying that I thought I
might have noticed a mention of it as a way to keep the cost down
I don't think you sullied anything. I just misunderstood your original
post. I apologize for misunderstanding it. Tig welding is awesome. My
(Waterford) Gunnar is tig welded at all the frame tubing joints and is
awesome. Your (Waterford) Sam might feature tig welds at the dropouts and
is
All hail nonconsumable electrodes!! For real. Tig welds can be done right,
or not. I myself only make bad ones.
Thanks Bill, I never thought your misunderstanding was wrong, I'm often
ununderstandable, sometimes on purpose, sometimes not. Specifically, I
thought Mr J's Possibly correct, but
On 09/25/2014 12:25 PM, Kainalu wrote:
All hail nonconsumable electrodes!! For real. Tig welds can be done
right, or not. I myself only make bad ones.
Thanks Bill, I never thought your misunderstanding was wrong, I'm
often ununderstandable, sometimes on purpose, sometimes not.
Are you doing
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo