Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 17:11, Roger D Carney wrote: > For agenda 1.a we will be making the decision on how works > (command or object level), so for those that have an opinion on this > topic, this will be the last time to discuss before the document is > updated. I will probably not be

Re: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018, at 14:51, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > * I have mixed feelings about section 10. > > It is copy-and-paste for RFC 5910, which is on the standards track. You are not the first one giving me that explanation when I do a review. I think however this is a weak argument. Even

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I'm unfortunately not going to be able to make it due to a scheduling conflict. Scott From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 11:11 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite Good

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-06.txt

Pieter, I believe the confusion is that a poll message is in the form of an EPP response that is triggered by a poll command. An example is the use of the domain transfer query response for domain transfer poll message, where it is technically a domain transfer query response with message

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-06.txt

After some iterations of reading your reply and the draft I think I start to get it :-) The extension is to be used only in a response of an EPP info command. The whole poll thing confused me, because, how I interpret RFC 5730, an EPP poll response is the response to the epp:poll command (with

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Andy, Roger and I are currently working on an Internet Draft that is based on the Verisign proprietary Registry Mapping extension at https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_registry_v01.html. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

What is this? Is there an I-D on it? -andy On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Roger D Carney wrote: > > Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I plan on attending. — JG [id:image001.png@01D255E2.EB933A30] James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: regext on behalf of Jody Kolker

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I will also be there. Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-294-3933 (office) 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Moninder Jheeta (mjhe...@godaddy.com) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the

[regext] Registration Protocols Extensions (regext) WG Virtual Meeting: 2018-01-10

The Registration Protocols Extensions (regext) Working Group will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2018-01-10 from 19:00 to 20:00 UTC. Agenda: Agenda 1. Fee a. Discuss appropriate level for , at the object level or level b. Discuss WG Last Call 2. Registry Mappings a. Introduce

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

I will attend too. But so far the chairs seem to be the only attendants? Are there any more people that will attend? I was waiting for some more respondents before scheduling the meeting. I just submitted the official meeting request, but that would be a late notice for the secretariat. Roger,

Re: [regext] org extensions for transfer requirement

Patrick, My responses to your feedback are embedded below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 1/7/18, 8:35 PM, "regext on behalf of Patrick Mevzek"

Re: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?

On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 08:26:46AM -0500, John Levine wrote a message of 20 lines which said: > It can coexist with anything other than CNAME, NS/DS, or another > DNAME, and you need A, , and MX records at the DNAME to do what > many people wrongly believe that DNAME

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-06.txt

Pieter, Thank you for your review and feedback. The extension is a command / response EPP extension of any object (e.g., domain, host, contact) that the server needs to inform the client of changes via a poll message that is an extension of the object’s info response. A poll response is a

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-06.txt

Just a small note... Shouldn't section 3.1.2 be renamed to EPP Command? I think the purpose of the extension is to extend poll messages, no? Moreover, the draft talks about Example poll response I think that's an error. Poll info does not exist. It should be poll req Pieter On 05 Jan