RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread Charles Mumphrey Kc5ozh
Hello Repeater-Builder Group! IMHO, in the spirit of this GROUP, let's build some repeaters and send the "Wouxun handy/talkie Radio discussion over to a young, growing GROUP devoted to that radio: wouxun_kg-uvd1p-subscr...@yahoogroups.com '73 kc5ozh "It is not the class of license the Amateur hold

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread wd8chl
On 8/30/2010 11:50 PM, terry dalpoas wrote: > Thanks Steve, that answered my question. I did not mean to start such a big > discussion on this. The only reason I asked about the radio was some local > hams > said that they could not be used unless the radio is FCC approved. I told > them > tha

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread mwbesemer
rry wrote: Much the same on the base permit here in Au  but what do I know after 30+ years of yabering ___ To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com From: glennmaill...@bellsouth.net Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:09:42 -0400 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread Barry
:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio Well, some will be appliance operators, but a few will take an interest and become the future of ham radio. We need the "head count" to keep our hobby aliv

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread Joe
..@bellsouth.net Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:09:42 -0400 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio Welcome to the new hams that are taught the test and have no idea what the questions mean. 73 Glenn WB4UIV Ham of the old school. Had to draw schematics and understand what they were about to get my license.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-31 Thread MCH
Yes, it can run split tone/code. I tried it to confirm it. But, it will not run both tone *and* code at the same time. If you select one, it 'zeroes out' the other. Joe M. n...@no6b.com wrote: > I see from the manual that the TX & RX CTCSS frequency settings are > separate. I'm wondering if t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-30 Thread Glenn Little WB4UIV
Do not know the date. The serial number is J07-7405. I got mine a week ago. 73 Glenn WB4UIV At 09:25 AM 8/30/2010, you wrote: >Glen, >Seems that this may be dependent on the radios manufacture date >What is the production number of your Vhf/220 unit? > >Regards. >Steve > >--- In Repeater-Build

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-30 Thread no6b
I see from the manual that the TX & RX CTCSS frequency settings are separate. I'm wondering if this HT can really run "split tone" (encode & decode separate CTCSS freqs.). Simply having separate settings is by no means an indication that it can, since my Kenwood TM-G707 has separate settings

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-30 Thread Eric Lemmon
I can't speak for any Wouxun radio, but I have tested at least a dozen Puxing VHF radios, and none of them had reverse burst encode or decode. Besides, the CTCSS tones were sloppy and nothing like a pure sine wave one should expect in a "professional" radio. The Puxing PX777, in particular, sets t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Glenn Little WB4UIV
Mine will do 5.00, 6.25, 10.00, 12.50, 25.00, 50.00 and 100.00 KHz. 73 Glenn WB4UIV At 09:35 PM 8/29/2010, you wrote: >John (et all) - > >Is the 1.25M version capable of 20 kHz steps? The spec sheet makes >it look like it can only do 12.5 or 25 kHz steps. > >- JimF K6IYK > >At 8/29/2010 06:06

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Ralph Mowery
ke it easy.   From: James Lee To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, August 29, 2010 7:47:52 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio I had one in my hands last week at a Hamfest in Gainsville, Texas. They are quite impressive. I have a strong

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread James Lee
I had one in my hands last week at a Hamfest in Gainsville, Texas. They are quite impressive. I have a strong hunch they are "throw-away" in nature when they die. Time will tell. If I needed a dual bander for ham use, I would give one a try. Jim WB4GWX/AAV6UX

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread MCH
Oh, and they are also spec'ed for both 16K0F3E and 11K0F3E bandwidths. Joe M. MCH wrote: > That's the ID mine has on it, and if you look it up on the FCC website, > you will find that it is Part 90 accepted for 136-174 MHz, and 406.1-470 > MHz. Granted on 2/16/2010. > > For those who are specu

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread MCH
That's the ID mine has on it, and if you look it up on the FCC website, you will find that it is Part 90 accepted for 136-174 MHz, and 406.1-470 MHz. Granted on 2/16/2010. For those who are speculating about the legitimacy of the FCC ID, or the fact that it exists: It does exist, it is printed

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Doug Bade
Surely you do not mean to imply all of these models are type accepted under their certification grant under part 90?? as they are all KG-UV1DP The last 4 contain transmit frequencies that do not even come close to part 90 136-174&350-470 MHz (RX/TX) 136-174&400-480 MHz (RX/TX) 136-17

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Doug Hutchison
Yes but depends where you are and at what license levelworld wide thing! D On 29/08/2010 20:01:41, Glenn Little WB4UIV (glennmaill...@bellsouth.net) wrote: > What is it that these "licensed" hams do not understand about using > equipment in the ham bands??? > You can build your own equip

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Glenn Little WB4UIV
Amateur frequencies without any legal issues. But, the notion > that they may > > be used in Public Safety applications is disquieting. > > > > 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Repeater-Bu

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Doug Bade
: Sunday, August 29, 2010 9:11 AM > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio > > > > What I see is they type accepted a radio that looks like that one but the > type acceptance num

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Charles Mumphrey Kc5ozh
al Message Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio From: "Eric Lemmon" Date: Sun, August 29, 2010 10:54 am To: Phil, What FCC identification number did you use to find the Wouxun listing on the FCC site? I tried both the name and the model number, but came up with no listi

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Eric Lemmon
t: Sunday, August 29, 2010 9:11 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio What I see is they type accepted a radio that looks like that one but the type acceptance number issued does not necessarily mean the Ebay radios are unless they bear the t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Doug Bade
What I see is they type accepted a radio that looks like that one but the type acceptance number issued does not necessarily mean the Ebay radios are unless they bear the type acceptance label... There are many models and not all may be approved... However... in any case.. if you are the import

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio

2010-08-29 Thread Eric Lemmon
Phil, What FCC identification number did you use to find the Wouxun listing on the FCC site? I tried both the name and the model number, but came up with no listing at all. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoog