Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.what configuration issues
Hola, Jorge!
On Thursday January 15, 2009 03:28:43 Jorge Vargas wrote:
bugs in the docs
- the sample code is wrong, as BaseAuthPlugin isn't an authenticator.
Right, I've just fixed this in trunk. Thanks!
- setting it as a form_identifies other than having a wrong name add
nothing to the log output of repoze.what
form_identifies is not used for that (and it's a boolean):
http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/docs/main/Auth/Customization.html#customizing-authentication-settings
http://code.gustavonarea.net/repoze.what.plugins.sql/Quickstart.html#repoze.what.plugins.quickstart.setup_sql_auth
I currently added the following to my app_cfg.py file
base_config.sa_auth.form_plugin = None
http_auth = BasicAuthPlugin('my cool site')
base_config.sa_auth.form_identifies = [('http_auth', http_auth)]
Try this:
http_auth = BasicAuthPlugin('my cool site')
base_config.sa_auth.form_plugin = [('http_auth', http_auth)]
In this case, the form_plugin (a challenger) is also an identifier,
so it's not necessary to set form_identifies=True because that's
the default value.
HTH.
--
Gustavo Narea http://gustavonarea.net/.
Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware:
http://www.getgnulinux.org/
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.what configuration issues
On Thursday January 15, 2009 15:52:26 Gustavo Narea wrote:
base_config.sa_auth.form_plugin = [('http_auth', http_auth)]
BTW, it should be:
base_config.sa_auth.form_plugin = http_auth
Cheers.
--
Gustavo Narea http://gustavonarea.net/.
Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware:
http://www.getgnulinux.org/
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Question regarding repoze.who +sql / repoze.who.plugins.sa
Hello, Mathieu. On Wednesday January 14, 2009 00:03:52 you wrote: I had to change the username field in the database to: user_name even if the parameter user_name_translation was set to something else but this is minor. Can you please paste the translation line? The key is user_name, not user_name_translation, by the way. Now, the issue I have is that when I am logging in or out, the url is not redirected to the referer but to the actual login form. When I am looking at the log, the plugin forms was asked twice to be identified. I can understand that the referer is set the the form after the second passage but is it normal? I didn't understand this very well. The normal behavior is: - when you visit a restricted area in your website, you'll get the login form and after you login, you'll get redirected to the restricted page above. - if you visit the login page voluntarily, then you'll get redirected to the home page after login. - if you visit the logout page, you'll get redirected to the previous page. Is this the behavior you've noticed? Do you think maybe my who.ini was not properly set up? Here is the last part: [identifiers] plugins = redirform auth_tkt [authenticators] plugins = sa_auth [challengers] plugins = redirform That seems right, but it may also be useful to know how you're defining redirform. Cheers! - Gustavo. Thank you, Mathieu 2009/1/13 Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net Hello, Mathieu et al. On Thursday January 8, 2009 00:12:28 you wrote: I would like to ask you a simple question, feel free to let me know if you don't have time. I decided to just stick with a basic db authentication, and I am using an external who.ini conf file. The problem is the it seems that repoze tries to open its own session with the database. I would prefer using the one that is already defined inside pylons to avoid redundancies and many db connections. Do you have a clue how it could be done? I guess I wouldn't be able to use the setup file but instead the middleware configuration (even that way, I am not sure how to do it). Hmmm, repoze.who.plugins.sa doesn't start a new session, instead it always uses the one you specified. In your case, if you have the following line in your who.ini file: dbsession = youapp.whatever:DBSession repoze.who.plugins.sa will use youapp.whatever.DBSession as the SQLAlchemy session, the way you will find here (see SQLAlchemyAuthenticatorPlugin): http://repoze.org/viewcvs/whoplugins/whoalchemy/trunk/repoze/who/plugins/ sa.py?rev=3125view=markup Cheers! -- Gustavo Narea http://gustavonarea.net/. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ -- Gustavo Narea http://gustavonarea.net/. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Question regarding repoze.who +sql / repoze.who.plugins.sa
I didn't understand this very well. The normal behavior is: - when you visit a restricted area in your website, you'll get the login form and after you login, you'll get redirected to the restricted page above. - if you visit the login page voluntarily, then you'll get redirected to the home page after login. - if you visit the logout page, you'll get redirected to the previous page. Is this the behavior you've noticed? Hi Gustavo, I do not get redirected to the restricted page (ex. test.html), I do get redirected to the same form again (ex. loginform.html) after entering a valid user/pass. I do look if I am authenticated after I filled the form and I do. Based on the logs, the authentication process seems to be called twice and it is why the came_from is changed from test.html to loginform.html. Hope it is clear. Thank you, Mathieu ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
[Repoze-dev] bfg and google app engine
First I like bfg and wanna use it with google app engine. I saw bfg is removing some zope 3 dependcies these days. Any plan to make bfg will support google app engine now? What is the remaining problems? Can we help to do that? thanks. Pan Junyong ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg and google app engine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Junyong Pan wrote: First I like bfg and wanna use it with google app engine. I saw bfg is removing some zope 3 dependcies these days. Any plan to make bfg will support google app engine now? What is the remaining problems? Can we help to do that? Kapil Thangevalu has done some of the work to make it possible to do minimal Zope3 apps on GAE. He blogged about it: - http://blog.kapilt.com/2008/05/28/17/ - http://blog.kapilt.com/2008/05/27/16/ and has the app running at: - http://zope3.appspot.com/ What would be helpful is to have somebody try to get a minimal BFG app run on top of Kapil's forked packages probably using the GAE-emulation environment, and tell us what breaks. Once we know it is possible, then packaging BFG and its full dependency set into a ZIP file would be the next step. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJb8z3+gerLs4ltQ4RArDeAKCTED3VTF7xwJ+86cPr0Xk/BxK7TgCfdtkO pZpZ5yLv8LZcXXM2uPJP6Xk= =EX5m -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
