Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Vagrant, Am 19.07.2015 um 15:14 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian: On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote: All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can always decide to remove or move them later. I wi

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
Le dimanche 19 juillet 2015 à 17:47 +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit : > > There seem to be two solutions to this: > > * Including a script (e.g. the one from coreboot) to build the toolchain > > as part of the build process > > * Using native builds with visualization on the servers that run the > > b

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

2015-07-19 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 11:09 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ed Maste wrote this message on Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 16:48 -0400: > > These are used only as user-facing strings for the kern.version sysctl > > and reported by uname. An example kern.version string: > > FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #28 r280427+86d

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Not Serious!

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
[resend with the correct list address] Hi, for the record, Mattia reproduced this with a plain unstable pbuilder setup, not using our (=reproducible) modified toolchain packages. Colin, I'm still curious why you downgraded the original bug report to "minor". As I see it this is definitly at le

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Paul, On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > sorry for the late reply. > > No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either. > > I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we > came up with a nice way of doing things, using SOURCE_DATE

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#792867: FTCBFS: uses wrong architecture Python

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
clone 792867 -1 clone 792867 -2 retitle -1 bsdmainutils: unreproducible as current year is used while building retitle -2 bsdmainutils: jewish calendar unsuable, needs a rebuild user reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org usertag -2 + timestamps thanks Hi, I'll leave 792867 alone and just co

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > I *think* that actually makes u-boot build reproducibly with Debian's > > reproducible builds toolchain when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set, but I > > haven't tested it fully. I might have missed some other sources of > > non-determinism... > W

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
Le dimanche 19 juillet 2015 à 06:14 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit : > On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> > All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm > >> > very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can > >> > always decide to remove o

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
> sorry for the late reply. No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either. I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we came up with a nice way of doing things, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. > On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > you'

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792867: FTCBFS: uses wrong architecture Python

2015-07-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: bsdmainutils Version: 9.0.6 Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Dear bsdmainutils maintainers, While trying to cross build bsdmainutils, I noticed that it was installing the host architecture python and python-hdate. It then tries to execute that Python as a build t

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2015-07-19, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > All this said, if you send me patches, I will probably deploy them as I'm >> > very curious and more reproducibility efforts are good :-) We can can >> > always decide to remove or move them later. >> >> I wish to make all contributions upstream. What would

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Not Serious!

2015-07-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: severity -1 serious Dear Colin, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:31:56AM +0100, Colin Tuckley wrote: > This is *not* a severity serious bug. If you want it fixed as something > for the future then please provide a patch. This *IS* a serius bug. Your package is unbuildable on sid and stretch.

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Paul, sorry for the late reply. On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > you've seen https://reproducible.debian.net/u-boot ? > This seems very minimalistic, but it's good to see U-Boot was given some > attention already! :-) > > but maybe you can explain why u-boot needs mo

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792856: libsynthesis: please make the build reproducible

2015-07-19 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Source: libsynthesis Version: 3.4.0.47.4-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libsynthesis could

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#792838: sitemesh: fails to build properly _and_ silently, when LC_ALL is not set

2015-07-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Source: sitemesh Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, sitemesh builds differently in our setup, that is the installed size of ​ libsitemesh-​ja