Hey, the missing mail just showed up!
Looking at the mail headers, it appears that the mail sat for
two days on the server "d1-sfbay-10.sun.com". Maybe you should
complain to someone.
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Brian Utterback wrote:
>
>> Hey, you went from 57 to 59! What about #58? Did I
>> forget
Yes, I've been having mail problems for a week. Thanks for this and
sorry for the mess up. :) I'm following up ...
Jim
Brian Utterback wrote:
> Hey, the missing mail just showed up!
>
> Looking at the mail headers, it appears that the mail sat for
> two days on the server "d1-sfbay-10.sun.com".
This is a sponsor request for CR 6422494 - VIM should be in WOS and
installed as /usr/bin/vim.
See below for more background.
Eric Boutilier
--
From: Eric Boutilier
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:37:14 -0500 (CDT)
To: Keith M W
Hi Eric,
Who is the external contributor requesting a sponsor for this fix?
Thanks.
Bonnie
Eric Boutilier wrote On 05/24/06 11:40,:
> This is a sponsor request for CR 6422494 - VIM should be in WOS and
> installed as /usr/bin/vim.
>
> See below for more background.
>
> Eric Boutilier
>
> ---
Eric Boutilier wrote:
> This is a sponsor request for CR 6422494 - VIM should be in WOS and
> installed as /usr/bin/vim.
As I just noted in the original thread, watch for duplication or conflicts
with the /usr/bin/gvim being installed by LSARC 2006/280 (Sun Studio
integration into /usr/bin).
--
Dear Mr, Ms,
I have submitted a Bug (see below) by using the "Report a Bug" form on
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/
Could somebody assist me through the initial development process?
Thanks a lot
Best regards,
Ivan
- Original Message -
From: "Linda Bernal"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006
Hi Ivan,
There are two options.
You can work on the bug and request a sponsor once you have a fix
developed. The sponsor will help get the fix reviewed and ready for
integration into the source gate.
Or you can request a sponsor before you start work if you would like to
talk to someone about p
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> I'm going to start drafting a proposal for this. (Bug ID 6422494)
>
> /usr/bin/gvim is already ARC approved and delivering RSN, so you
> should make sure you're neither duplicating or conflicting with
> that. (It's part of LS
I think that asking the studio folks if they could remove their gvim and
simply depend on the one delivered by the WOS. This would only apply for
Nevada and forward -- they could continue to ship gvim in their S10 DVD.
You'd probably need to compile in certain options (they ship gvim netbeans-
rea
