"Roger A. Faulkner" wrote:
> > "Roger A. Faulkner" wrote:
> > > > Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > > > This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
> > > > > (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
> > > > > build fails in libshell").
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]=The "fix" i
John Sonnenschein wrote:
> On 2-Mar-09, at 10:05 AM, Roger A. Faulkner wrote:
> >> Roland Mainz wrote:
[snip]
> > Nit:
> > Could you break the comment into more than one line,
> > to make it fit in 80-columns, something like:
> >
> >/*
> > * Allocate one extra array entry as workaro
"Roger A. Faulkner" wrote:
> > Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
> > > (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
> > > build fails in libshell").
> > >
> > > [1]=The "fix" is more a workaround since I don't know exactly how the
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:01:54AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> John Sonnenschein wrote:
> >Sorry to butt in here, but I was under the impression that code should
> >never make reference to the bug it fixes. Am I mistaken here?
>
> Normally yes. However in this case, I think since the "worka
Roland Mainz wrote:
> This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
> (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
> build fails in libshell").
>
> [1]=The "fix" is more a workaround since I don't know exactly how the
> ctf*-tools can be fixed.
>
> My contributor ID
Milan Jurik wrote:
> Roland Mainz pe v po 02. 03. 2009 v 05:38 +0100:
> > This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
> > (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
> > build fails in libshell").
> >
> > [1]=The "fix" is more a workaround since I don't know exa
to reference it.
- Garrett
>
> -JohnS
> On 2-Mar-09, at 10:05 AM, Roger A. Faulkner wrote:
>
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:20:44 +0100
>>> From: Roland Mainz
>>> Subject: Re: [request-sponsor] Requesting sponsor for CR #6799167
>>> (
JohnS> ... I was under the impression that code should
JohnS> never make reference to the bug it fixes. Am I mistaken here?
No, you are quite correct. Referring to an open bug e.g.:
/*
* Work around silly misfeature until 699 is fixed.
*/
is OK, but the comment pro
Re: [request-sponsor] Requesting sponsor for CR #6799167
>> ("real gcc
> build fails in libshell") ...
>> To: "request-sponsor at opensolaris.org" > >, Milan
> Jurik , ksh93-integration-discuss
>
>>
>> Roland Mainz wrote:
>>&
> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:17:31 +0100
> From: Roland Mainz
> Subject: Re: [request-sponsor] Requesting sponsor for CR #6799167 ("real gcc
build fails in libshell") ...
> To: "Roger A. Faulkner"
> Cc: Milan.Jurik at sun.com, ksh93-integration-discuss at o
> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:20:44 +0100
> From: Roland Mainz
> Subject: Re: [request-sponsor] Requesting sponsor for CR #6799167 ("real gcc
build fails in libshell") ...
> To: "request-sponsor at opensolaris.org" opensolaris.org>, Milan
Jurik , ksh93-inte
Hi,
I will sponsor it (if it's ksh93 issue).
Best regards,
Milan
Roland Mainz p??e v po 02. 03. 2009 v 05:38 +0100:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
> (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
> build fails in libshell").
>
> [
Hi!
This is a sponsor request to "fix" ([1]) CR #6799167
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799167 - "real gcc
build fails in libshell").
[1]=The "fix" is more a workaround since I don't know exactly how the
ctf*-tools can be fixed.
My contributor ID is "OS0025".
Webrev fol
13 matches
Mail list logo
