[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-05-02 Thread Peter Dennis - Solaris Sustaining Engineering
Hello Rainer,

Thanks for submitting the request to revive the UltraSPARC I
support. Rather than integrating this into the ON consolidation
due to engineering constraints (see below), the best way forward
is for this support to be maintained either by yourself
and/or an interested team of OpenSolaris folks as an OpenSolaris
project. This would be hosted on the www.opensolaris.org website.
Have a read of http://www.opensolaris.org/os/communities/ as a
starting point for this; posting to the
 opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org
would be the point to start the ball rolling for the project.

Supporting old hardware from an engineering perspective is non
trivial. The reasons being that the older hardware may not actually
support the newer facilities within ON, for example the FMA
framework and dtrace or they may support it in some limited fashion
and thus cause exceptions within the code base. Having the older
hardware would increase the test matrix and as such increase the
time it takes for the tests to complete. Maintaining that many
old machines/systems may also prove to be unreasonable (thinking
about hardware failures here).

Cheers
pete

Assitant Tech Lead for Nevada



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-25 Thread Rainer Orth
Jan,

  Actually I've gotten quite good at the product/cat/subcat game. It
 just takes filing a bunch of bugs. Given the stream I've gotten from
 you (Rainer) in the past, I'm sure you'll be up to speed in no time.
 :)

probably :-)  E.g., I've tried to build the sfwnv consolidation inside a
local zone over the weekend and noticed a couple of problems, both generic
and related to building inside a zone.  Expect a new stream of CRs (and
patches) as soon as I find the time :-)

Rainer



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-24 Thread Rainer Orth
Valerie Anne Bubb writes:

[bugs.opensolaris.org categories/subcategories]

 This is often a problem internally as well! :(

So I'm not alone :-)

 We're working on at least making new categories  subcategories
 that come under the solaris umbrella to be more obvious
 and fixing things whenever that area is touched, but it's
 a big job to fix it all.

Understood, especially if you have to recategorize existings CRs in the
process.

Rainer

-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-21 Thread Rainer Orth
Two days ago, I opened a new CR on bugs.opensolaris.org

Revive UltraSPARC I support

Unlike the flurry of other reports I submitted at the same time, I haven't
received the CR id yet.  Anyway, this is a duplicate of

5004452 Should 64-bit UltraSPARC-I rise from the grave?

which was previously closed as wontfix.  I have a large part of the
(trivial/mechanical) fixes ready, but a couple of open questions remain
before I post the webrev.  So I'm looking for a sponsor to help with those
questions and guide me through the integration of this much-requested
change.

I've just received independent confirmation that an ufsboot built from the
patched snv 20060327 sources allowed an Enterprise 4000 with 4 167 MHz CPUs
to boot Solaris 10 successfully.

Regards.
Rainer

-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-21 Thread Rainer Orth
Karyn,

 Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867.

fine, thanks.

 It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, 
 which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org.

Ok.  I had some difficulty finding an appropriate category myself.  Btw.,
it would be useful to have a complete overview of the
categories/subcategories on b.o.o. somewhere and perhaps some guidelines
which ones to use.  Right now you have to try a couple of combinations
before you have even a chance to find the right one.

Rainer

-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-21 Thread Valerie Anne Bubb
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Rainer Orth wrote:

 Karyn,

 Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867.

 fine, thanks.

 It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet,
 which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org.

 Ok.  I had some difficulty finding an appropriate category myself.  Btw.,
 it would be useful to have a complete overview of the
 categories/subcategories on b.o.o. somewhere and perhaps some guidelines
 which ones to use.  Right now you have to try a couple of combinations
 before you have even a chance to find the right one.

This is often a problem internally as well! :(

We're working on at least making new categories  subcategories
that come under the solaris umbrella to be more obvious
and fixing things whenever that area is touched, but it's
a big job to fix it all.

Valerie
-- 
Sponsor me in the Breathe Easy 2 Rock Ride - 65 miles!
Money raised goes to the American Lung Association:
http://www.mrsnv.com/evt/e01/part.jsp?id=805acct=0273018478rid=0
I'll take care of the Sun matching gift for you! Easy!

Valerie Bubb, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva
Solaris Security Technologies,  Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025. 650-786-0461



[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-20 Thread Karyn Ritter
Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867.

It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, 
which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org.

- Karyn

Rainer Orth wrote:
 Two days ago, I opened a new CR on bugs.opensolaris.org
 
 Revive UltraSPARC I support
 
 Unlike the flurry of other reports I submitted at the same time, I haven't
 received the CR id yet.  Anyway, this is a duplicate of
 
 5004452 Should 64-bit UltraSPARC-I rise from the grave?
 
 which was previously closed as wontfix.  I have a large part of the
 (trivial/mechanical) fixes ready, but a couple of open questions remain
 before I post the webrev.  So I'm looking for a sponsor to help with those
 questions and guide me through the integration of this much-requested
 change.
 
 I've just received independent confirmation that an ufsboot built from the
 patched snv 20060327 sources allowed an Enterprise 4000 with 4 167 MHz CPUs
 to boot Solaris 10 successfully.
 
 Regards.
   Rainer
 
 -
 Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
 ___
 request-sponsor mailing list
 request-sponsor at opensolaris.org