Re: huge catalogs and slow snapshots

2001-01-04 Thread Michael Kennard
I'm actually the lone mac support in a large organisation. I would never give up my mac but the company uses PeeCees and I need to support that world as well. So I need to find the best solution for support without making it too obvious that I'm terribly biased. How many times have I said

Re: huge catalogs and slow snapshots

2001-01-03 Thread ilyes
Michael Kennard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I much prefer a Mac any day. Trust yr heart, Michael ... ;-) I started with a Tandy, was intimately familiar with DOS -- even Edlin -- in pre-Windows days ... but: the ease of troubleshooting a Mac, ease of installing/removing yr own RAM and cards

Re: huge catalogs and slow snapshots

2001-01-03 Thread Eric Ullman
Hi Michael, Most likely, these differences boil down to NTFS security permissions and registry data. This data is backed up during the snapshot phase. Both are stored with the snapshot, and the most recent snapshot from each volume is saved in the catalog. So your assumption is correct--there's

Re: huge catalogs and slow snapshots

2001-01-03 Thread Shawn Welter
The question I have is related to load. You stated there are issues with security permissions and registry data during comparison. Yet I have noticed that the load on the server and the client much larger when backing up a windows client than a mac client. This during the whole backup

huge catalogs and slow snapshots

2001-01-02 Thread Michael Kennard
I know this was discussed late last year but this still baffles me... The PC takes ages to do a snapshot whereas the mac doesn't take anytime. Shouldn't the PC gather all the information it needs at the start when it's reading the disk or does it change a flag on the files/folders to mark