Re: NT Restore from a Mac

2000-02-02 Thread Welch, John C.

RTFM...it's in the manual and it works perfectly

john

 From: Nick Scalise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 14:29:59 -0600
 To: retro-talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: NT Restore from a Mac
 
 I saw it posted here a while back.
 
 Does anyone have the procedure for a complete NT restore from Retrospect
 Mac?
 
 -- 
 Nick Scalise
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Solstice

2000-02-02 Thread Welch, John C.

That's what I was talking about perfectly. We use legato for our Unix
backups, but it just blew on windows and the Macs. The unique thing about
Dantz, is that a lot of the folks their view *restoring* as Retrospect's
biggest priority. This makes sense, as if the restores are untenable, or
unreliable, what good is backing up? So a lot of the 'lack' of features in
Retrospect are due to this focus on restoration. Considering the garbage
that restoring requires with other products, I think Dantz has the right
idea.

john

 From: Pam Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:58:22 -0600
 To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Solstice
 
 the best way is to do a test with a test Mac running the legato client. Do a
 *complete* full backup, then wipe the drive and see how long it takes to
 restore it. I'm willing to bet that any glaring weaknesses in Legato will
 pop up wicked fast
 
 john
 
 It isn't the speed at which the restore on the client is performed but,
 instead, the accuracy with which it is done. When you do the Legato
 equivalent of a "restore entire disk", will Legato put everything back in
 its rightful place and leave the client as if nothing had happened? Will
 the restore leave the user feeling like she's sitting down at her machine
 and can start working right away or will she feel that she has to first
 install and configure everything before being able to work? I'd be
 willing to sacrifice some speed so long as accuracy and security and
 reliability are there.
 
 I've not used Legato so I can't speak to what its detailed functions are,
 but another good test would be to put a Legato client on a portable and
 then remove the portable from the network for a day or two. See how well
 Legato handles the portable's unattended backup **without user or
 administrative intervention** as it reattaches to the network the next
 day. 
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Pam
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Any comments on Veritas Netbackup?

2000-02-02 Thread Thomas Myers

Thanks to all for your response. Because of them Solstice has been put on hold. But of 
course our net admin now is looking at "veritas netbackup". If anyone has any 
experience with that I would love to "share" it with the net admin.

So far Retrospect has come up the winner, but it is only being used for Macs. I have 
proposed that he use it also on the Windows machines, but he hasn't bitten yet.

Tom
*
*   Apple Solution Expert Member*
*Apple Product Professional *
*  Apple Developer Connection Select Member *
* Thomas Myers,  | MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* ITA,Inc.   | http://www.itainc.com*
* 1250 Scottsville Road, Ste 2   | Phone: (716) 328-7380*
* Rochester, New York 14624-5757 | FAX:   (716) 328-8269*
*


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Backups via 802.11b

2000-02-02 Thread Andrew Philipoff

We are about to roll out wireless ethernet (AirPort) on all our 
PowerBooks via Lucent WaveLan PC cards and AirPort enabled G4 towers. 
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with AirPort in regards 
to how it interacts with Retrospect. We have been backing up these 
laptops via 10/100 without any problems. Any comments or feedback 
would be appreciated.

Andrew Philipoff
Computer Resource Specialist
Magnetic Resonance Science Center
University of California, San Francisco
415-476-1709
415-476-8809 fax
415-719-0067 pager


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: volume trashed

2000-02-02 Thread Matthew Tevenan

Ryan,

Error -60 is an Apple operating system error. Apple's own error code
documentation describes it as "bad master directory block." I'd say that
drive is having major problems (though "volume trashed" is rather
dramatic!).

Run disk utilities on the drive, including Disk First Aid, Apple Drive
Setup's "Test Disk" function (or the corresponding function of whatever
formatting utility you use), plus either Norton Utilities or Tech Tool Pro.
I'm positive one or more of these will find a major problem.

If you get no luck with these, please call us directly.

Regards,

Matthew Tevenan
Technical Support Specialist
Dantz Development Corporation
925.253.3050 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 From: Ryan La Riviere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 01:18:26 -0500
 To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: volume trashed
 
 All,
 
 What does this mean?
 
 ---
 *Error*
 
 Volume "Network Clients:Desktop - Workstation:IAE Lab Manager:System"
 completed with error -60: volume trashed.
 ---
 
 Considering it's the users System Folder volume, it has me a little concerned.
 -- 
 
 Ryan La Riviere
 
 Lab Services Coordinator; Drexel University
 215.895.6010
 ICQ: 11747071, 44292959
 http://staff.tdec.drexel.edu/larz
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Backups via 802.11b

2000-02-02 Thread mark . maytum

Andrew,

Only issue we've had is that we don't see very good backup speeds over 
802.11.  Best we ever get is 30mb/min over TCP/IP.  And this is under 
"ideal" conditions - only 1 laptop on the wireless segment, 20ft away from 
the basestation.  But other than the speed issue, things work great.  I've 
never had a backup fail or had any other problems.

Our backup server is a 233 beige G3, AIT changer on a 100mbit switched 
port.  Our iBooks and WaveLan enabled PC  Mac laptops all connect to 
Lucent WavePoint base stations (so we're not exactly talking "apples to 
apples" here since we don't use Airport bases).  Each WavePoint has its 
own 100mbit switched port on the same switch as the Retrospect server.  I 
know, I know, it seems a waste of good bandwidth to plug a WavePoint into 
a 100mbit switched port but it just makes me *feel* better to have those 
things on their own segments! =)

HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation





Andrew Philipoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/02/00 11:43 AM
Please respond to "retro-talk"

 
To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Backups via 802.11b

We are about to roll out wireless ethernet (AirPort) on all our 
PowerBooks via Lucent WaveLan PC cards and AirPort enabled G4 towers. 
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with AirPort in regards 
to how it interacts with Retrospect. We have been backing up these 
laptops via 10/100 without any problems. Any comments or feedback 
would be appreciated.

Andrew Philipoff
Computer Resource Specialist
Magnetic Resonance Science Center
University of California, San Francisco
415-476-1709
415-476-8809 fax
415-719-0067 pager


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NT Restore from a Mac

2000-02-02 Thread Welch, John C.

It's worked perfectly for me in around 10 cases out of 10 tries

 From: Chris Freemesser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:17:27 -0500
 To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: NT Restore from a Mac
 
 I saw it posted here a while back.
 
 Does anyone have the procedure for a complete NT restore from Retrospect
 Mac?
 
 --
 Nick Scalise
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Here's what you need to do:
 
 1) Format the PC's hard drive
 2) Install a fresh copy of NT to a temporary directory (like C:\WINTEMP)
 3) Install the Retrospect Client software to your temporary directory
 4) Activate the client software from your backup server
 5) Restore the contents of the hard drive back to the PC.  Be sure to
 do a "Restore entire disk", and tell it to overwrite existing files.
 Do NOT reboot when done.
 6) Use the Registry Backup Manager from your TEMPORARY Windows
 install to restore the Registry.  Set the destination to be the
 RESTORED Windows NT folder.
 
 In theory, the backup will restore the computer to the way it was
 before, and upon reboot, the system will boot from the restored
 Windows directory.  In that case, you can delete the temporary
 Windows installation.
 
 I'll also add that I've never been able to get this to work with NT.
 I fault NT for this, not Retrospect.  Seems that if you don't have
 one of those idiotic Windows NT information disks you're supposed to
 make from time to time, the restored NT can't be made to boot.
 
 Chris
 
 
 _
 Chris Freemesser, University of Rochester
 Department of Brain  Cognitive Sciences /
 Center for Visual Science
 Meliora Hall, Room 244
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone:  (716)275-0786
 _
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Backups via 802.11b

2000-02-02 Thread Ryan La Riviere

On 02/02/2000 somewhere around the time of 08:43 -0800, Andrew Philipoff spoke about 
"Backups via 802.11b":


We are about to roll out wireless ethernet (AirPort) on all our PowerBooks via Lucent 
WaveLan PC cards and AirPort enabled G4 towers. I was wondering if anyone has any 
experience with AirPort in regards to how it interacts with Retrospect. We have been 
backing up these laptops via 10/100 without any problems. Any comments or feedback 
would be appreciated.

I have also had very good experiences with wireless and backing up (other than the 
speed issues Mark had brought up).  But I'm speaking from using a 2MB Lucent card with 
a 8MB card in a WaveLan access point.  The 11MB cards are, for all intends, are the 
same as the Apple cards.  Especially now that you can use the Apple Airport software 
with the 11MB Lucent cards.
-- 

Ryan La Riviere

Lab Services Coordinator; Drexel University
215.895.6010
ICQ: 11747071, 44292959
http://staff.tdec.drexel.edu/larz


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: volume trashed

2000-02-02 Thread Ryan La Riviere

On 02/02/2000 somewhere around the time of 08:18 -0800, Matthew Tevenan spoke about 
"Re: volume trashed":


Error -60 is an Apple operating system error. Apple's own error code
documentation describes it as "bad master directory block." I'd say that
drive is having major problems (though "volume trashed" is rather
dramatic!).

Thanks.  I was hoping it was just something like as "bad master directory block" since 
he's still using the machine as opposed to a problem with Retro having a problem 
accessing the client or some such.
-- 

Ryan La Riviere

Lab Services Coordinator; Drexel University
215.895.6010
ICQ: 11747071, 44292959
http://staff.tdec.drexel.edu/larz


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NT Restore from a Mac

2000-02-02 Thread Nick Scalise

After RTFM (thanks John), I was successful in getting a complete restore
from my Mac to NT.

The secret is to have RegCopy turned on and copying the registry immediately
before the backup begins. This will give a pristine snapshot of the state of
the computer. 

Then be sure to run RegCopy from the temp NT install to install the Registry
back to it's rightful place after the restore.


on 02/02/2000 1:12 PM, Welch, John C. wrote:

 It's worked perfectly for me in around 10 cases out of 10 tries
 
-- 
Nick Scalise
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Seagate discontinues AIT

2000-02-02 Thread Larry Acosta Wong

I was all set to buy another AIT drive and discovered that Seagate 
has discontinued them. They no longer list any AIT drives on their 
web page. I put a call into Seagate Pre-Sales Support and the guy 
said that they have decided to stop licensing the technology from 
Sony and instead are focusing on the upcoming Linear Tape-Open 
Technology (LTO). Anyone else hear of this?


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Solstice

2000-02-02 Thread Thone, Bradley A (Sbcsi)

I'll second that emotion.

It is darn near a *daily* battle to keep my BackupExec backups running on my
NT servers. From BackupExec hanging to it not liking the tapes I just erased
for the night's round of backups, it's a pain.

Retrospect is a little better. I created the scripts a long time ago. I
erase the tapes each day before the night's backup. The servers (BW
G3-450's) have run without a restart for weeks and months. I rebooted them
last week just because it's a good idea. Retrospect requires no
hand-holding. Just plug and go play.

Brad.

-Original Message-
From: Welch, John C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 7:52 AM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Solstice


That's what I was talking about perfectly. We use legato for our Unix
backups, but it just blew on windows and the Macs. The unique thing about
Dantz, is that a lot of the folks their view *restoring* as Retrospect's
biggest priority. This makes sense, as if the restores are untenable, or
unreliable, what good is backing up? So a lot of the 'lack' of features in
Retrospect are due to this focus on restoration. Considering the garbage
that restoring requires with other products, I think Dantz has the right
idea.

john

 From: Pam Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:58:22 -0600
 To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Solstice
 
 the best way is to do a test with a test Mac running the legato client.
Do a
 *complete* full backup, then wipe the drive and see how long it takes to
 restore it. I'm willing to bet that any glaring weaknesses in Legato will
 pop up wicked fast
 
 john
 
 It isn't the speed at which the restore on the client is performed but,
 instead, the accuracy with which it is done. When you do the Legato
 equivalent of a "restore entire disk", will Legato put everything back in
 its rightful place and leave the client as if nothing had happened? Will
 the restore leave the user feeling like she's sitting down at her machine
 and can start working right away or will she feel that she has to first
 install and configure everything before being able to work? I'd be
 willing to sacrifice some speed so long as accuracy and security and
 reliability are there.
 
 I've not used Legato so I can't speak to what its detailed functions are,
 but another good test would be to put a Legato client on a portable and
 then remove the portable from the network for a day or two. See how well
 Legato handles the portable's unattended backup **without user or
 administrative intervention** as it reattaches to the network the next
 day. 
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Pam
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]