I apologize for reopening a dead thread on the list, but I just
wanted to share.
Running Retrospect 4.2 on a Quadra 950 with 40 MB RAM over built-in
ethernet to our ASIP server, I get 13-16 MB/min.
Having moved Retrospect and the tape drive over to the server* (after
addressing stability conc
on 17/8/2000 4:27 AM, Matt Barkdull wrote:
> Using the built in 10BaseT- 62MB/min
> Using an Asante 10/100 at 100 - 112MB/min.
I wish I could get anywhere near this, mine tops out of about 40Mb/min even
an a G4, mind you it's only a 2606 SCSI card with DDS3 drives, even with
built-in SCSI o
Sara said:
All three drives are using the same SCSI card, on the same controller. The
boot drive is IDE, however, not included in these backups speeds.
>>> third. All three volumes on server. What would cause the difference in
the
>>> speed?
My guess - file fragmentation or retries/errors ca
All three drives are using the same SCSI card, on the same controller. The
boot drive is IDE, however, not included in these backups speeds.
--
>From: Jon Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Retro Speed
>Date: Wed, Aug 1
>>1999, Power Mac G3/300 (blue), AIT, shared 10Base-T ethernet, 59.2
>>MB/min. backing up an iMac, 229 MB/min. backing up the server
>>
>>2000, Power Mac G3/300, AIT, switched 10/100 ethernet, 347.6 MB/min best
>>throughput, 207 MB/min. backing up the server
>>
>>Dan Knight, information systems ma
on 8/16/2000 3:06 PM, Matt Barkdull at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Back up rates differ using: G4/ 400, DDS-4, shared 10Base-T Ethernet. 80
>> MB/min on first volume, 187 MB/min on second volume, and 93 MB/ min on
>> third. All three volumes on server. What would cause the difference in the
>>
>Back up rates differ using: G4/ 400, DDS-4, shared 10Base-T Ethernet. 80
>MB/min on first volume, 187 MB/min on second volume, and 93 MB/ min on
>third. All three volumes on server. What would cause the difference in the
>speed?
80 to 93 is not much, but the 187 would almost indicate that you
t;To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Retro Speed
>Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2000, 3:08 PM
>
>>1999, Power Mac G3/300 (blue), AIT, shared 10Base-T ethernet, 59.2
>>MB/min. backing up an iMac, 229 MB/min. backing up the server
>>
>>2000, Power
>1999, Power Mac G3/300 (blue), AIT, shared 10Base-T ethernet, 59.2
>MB/min. backing up an iMac, 229 MB/min. backing up the server
>
>2000, Power Mac G3/300, AIT, switched 10/100 ethernet, 347.6 MB/min best
>throughput, 207 MB/min. backing up the server
>
>Dan Knight, information systems manager
I keep all my information in databases. It's kinda fun looking back like
this.
1995, Workgroup Server 80 (Quadra 800), DAT, shared 10Base-T ethernet,
best throughput 13.9 MB/min. (14.0 MB/min. backing up the server itself)
1996, Power Mac 6100/66, DAT, shared 10Base-T ethernet, 18.8 MB/min.
(
>Either will probably cost more than the computer is worth. Set up the
>6100 as is to see where the bottleneck is. If it's the network, 10Base-T
>tops out at about 60-70 MB/min. througput. If you're not getting close to
>that (I think we averaged about 40 MB/min.
This is interesting to me. I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
