Re: Shuting Down NT Apps

2000-05-17 Thread Robin Bateman
> From: Noah Eiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 19:35:25 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Shuting Down NT Apps > > Hello: > > I have FileMaker Pro "client" running on an NT server. The client > hosts several databases that a

Re: Shuting Down NT Apps

2000-05-17 Thread mark . maytum
Most apps (but not all I've found) respond to -q. So you can use the AT command scheduler (included in the NT Resource kit: Start Menu>Program Files>Resource Kit 4.0>Configuration>Command Scheduler) to make a command that specifies the path to filemaker and give it the -q command: c:\Program

Backup Server Questions

2000-05-17 Thread Julia Frizzell
I am testing using Retrospect as a backup server during the day, to back up our laptops so that those who use them won't have to leave them overnight (when our regular backup script goes into operation). We're testing it this week with a few of the laptop users, before trying to put it into fu

Re: Backup Server Questions

2000-05-17 Thread Matthew Tevenan
Julia, Backup Server saw the Zip disk. Removable disks such as Zip, Jaz, or DVD-RAM are counted when Retrospect resolves your client container. Therefore, in its normal polling of the network, it saw that a drive had been added, and wanted to back it up. Regards, Matthew Technical Support Speci

Re: Backup Server Questions

2000-05-17 Thread Luke Jaeger
At the server, you can set the prefs for each backup server script to tell it how long to wait before trying to back up the same user again. I think it's called the 'backup interval.' So that once a user is backed up, the backup server won't look at their machine again for X number of hours. Juli

Re: Backup Server Questions

2000-05-17 Thread Matthew Tevenan
While this is a good way to prevent redundant backups of the same client at short intervals, Retrospect is still constantly polling the network when Backup Server is active. This is how it's able to know when you've set your client to "Back Up ASAP." The "back up every..." setting applies to spec

Re: Backup and Compare Performance ... lots of small files

2000-05-17 Thread John F. Lambert
> >Anyone had similar experiences where the hierarchy of the data has a >dramatic effect on performance? > I find that Retrospect on a 10base T network, Backup Server on a Pentium II 233, Client on a PowerBook G3 266, (or even better, on Virtual PC on a PB G3 266) can achieve 60MB/min transfer

More on Backup Server and time shifts

2000-05-17 Thread John F. Lambert
The block on low-level interrupt and background activity is very profound when the Retrospect is asking my travan 20 tape drive to wind/rewind/load etc. Internet connections drop out, background tasks seize up etc. It's as if Retrospect manages to completely turn of the multi-tasking ability