easy_install rbtools on py26?

2009-10-29 Thread Pv
I had ActivePython 2.6 installed and installed ezsetup for py26 (on a x64 Windows 2K8 Server). I then tried easy_install rbtools and it failed when installing the simplejson egg. easy_install simplejson also fails with the same error. The simplejson site says that py26 includes json and that

RBTools 0.2beta2 halts/fails outputting Cannot display: file marked as a binary type

2009-10-29 Thread Pv
I am doing a post-commit review on a teammate's checked in C# code on an SVN server. I run: post-review -d --revision-range=24506 And I get the following output: svn info repository info: Path: svn://devsrvsea01/svnroot, Base path: /trunk/StopProcess, Supports changesets: False svn propget

Re: RBTools 0.2beta2 halts/fails outputting Cannot display: file marked as a binary type

2009-10-29 Thread Pv
Duh! This is a diff problem that I ran in to before...fixing now. Pv On Oct 29, 10:43 am, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote: I am doing a post-commit review on a teammate's checked in C# code on an SVN server. I run: post-review -d --revision-range=24506 And I get the following output: svn info

Erorr with git ScmTool

2009-10-29 Thread Bhupesh Bansal @ Linkedin
Hey folks, I am trying to setup a git repository and keep getting this error every time I try to create a new review as a normal user ERROR:root:Error loading SCMTool for repository voldemort (ID 1): Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: Successful upgrade from Reviewboard 0.9 to 1.0.5.1

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Yep, post-review updates are important :) Our version at VMware was quite stale for a long time too. We're probably due for an upgrade actually, but maybe after the next release. That's weird about the last updated time. Can't really think of what may have happened there. Definitely odd that it's

Re: Erorr with git ScmTool

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
You'll generally hit that if git isn't in the path. Are you pointing at a local git repository on the filesystem, or a remote Git repository? The latter is only supported in Review Board 1.1 alpha 2, and actually requires something like gitweb, cgit, etc. for the remote fetching of files.

Re: RBTools 0.2beta2 halts/fails outputting Cannot display: file marked as a binary type

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Glad you figured it out. We need to check for that and fail gracefully. Would you mind filing a bug so we can track it for the release? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at

Re: RBTools 0.2beta2 halts/fails outputting Cannot display: file marked as a binary type

2009-10-29 Thread Pv
Opened 1378 Pv On Oct 29, 11:34 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Glad you figured it out. We need to check for that and fail gracefully. Would you mind filing a bug so we can track it for the release? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board

How to post-commit review a first time checkin?

2009-10-29 Thread Pv
I am using the following command to do a post-commit review on a first time checkin: post-review -d --revision-range=24506 Obviously, I am not specifying a from:to range, but since this is a first time checking any earlier from svn rev # wouldn't exist in the newly created path. The [debug]

Re: Erorr with git ScmTool

2009-10-29 Thread Bhupesh Bansal @ Linkedin
I am pointing at a local .git repo for now, the path is correct and is owned by same user as apache2 is running as Best Bhupesh On Oct 29, 11:32 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: You'll generally hit that if git isn't in the path. Are you pointing at a local git repository on

Re: Erorr with git ScmTool

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Looking at the code, the exact thing that it's trying to do is: git --git-dir=/path/to/your/git/tree config core.repositoryformatversion See what happens when you try that. If that fails, then you'll see that ImportError (there's a much better, human-readable error in the upcoming 1.1). Also,

Re: Existing Reviews not visible after rb-site upgrade

2009-10-29 Thread Kunjal
Chirs, The old install was done by someone else. I see the folders created on 4th Aug, 2008. I am not sure whether rb-site was used or not. Do I need to perform commands like /.manage.py evolve after rb-site upgrade? At this point I am really stuck...!! On Oct 28, 2:38 pm, Kunjal

Re: Existing Reviews not visible after rb-site upgrade

2009-10-29 Thread Kunjal
I found the Version of the Reviewboard we have. /* Define to the address where bug reports for this package should be sent. */ #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/ entry /* Define to the full name of this package. */ #define PACKAGE_NAME Review Board /* Define

Re: Existing Reviews not visible after rb-site upgrade

2009-10-29 Thread Kunjal
Chirs, Sorry for all this email but I found this. In the older installation, there are few dir. which are not present in 1.0.3 installation. Did I miss installing something? The dir. I do not see in RB 1.0.3 installation are: djblets iphone m3 The files I do not see in RB 1.0.3 instllation

Re: Existing Reviews not visible after rb-site upgrade

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Wow, this is ancient. Definitely pre-rb-site. Okay, so you'll need to do the following: 1) Copy over the database. 2) Go through the rb-site install process for the new site, creating a brand new site directory. Specify the existing database information during the process. 3) Run rb-site upgrade

Re: Existing Reviews not visible after rb-site upgrade

2009-10-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Yeah, those files were removed long ago. Much has changed since that version. That was essentially a pre-alpha. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Kunjal

Issue 1374 in reviewboard: Installation/configuration issue

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 1374 by pmuralidharan: Installation/configuration issue http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1374 Now i got the page to view the following contents. But no one is accessible. I mean if i click Register URL goes to rft-test/account/register but there is no

Issue 1374 in reviewboard: Installation/configuration issue

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1374 by pmuralidharan: Installation/configuration issue http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1374 Now i got the page to view the following contents. But no one is accessible. I mean if i click Register link then the URL goes to rft-test/account/register

Issue 1376 in reviewboard: post-review: --repository-url pointing to a file doesn't work

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1376 by niko...@prokoschenko.de: post-review: --repository-url pointing to a file doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1376 What version are you running? 1.1a2 What steps will reproduce the

Issue 1374 in reviewboard: Installation/configuration issue

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #3 on issue 1374 by chipx86: Installation/configuration issue http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1374 These are support issues, and should be on the mailing list instead of the bug tracker. Can you post to the mailing list

Issue 1376 in reviewboard: post-review: --repository-url pointing to a file doesn't work

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1376 by niko...@prokoschenko.de: post-review: --repository-url pointing to a file doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1376 It makes perfect sense to me. A little explanation might be in order :) Use case: I've got a developer who'd like to

Comment on ReviewBoardAPI in reviewboard

2009-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by p...@swooby.com: Python example: import simplejson import sys import urllib class ReviewBoard: def __init__(self, server, username, password): self.server = server self.username = username self.password = password def Run(self, command, params=None,