Any news on this?
On Apr 20, 11:51 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
I'm working every day on it. There's a bit to do. However, I think by this
weekend I'll at the very least have a patch up for review that you can try
out, if you want to be an early tester. I'm
Nothing new from GitHub on the API tokens yet, but from our side I've made
significant progress. However, it'd still not finished. This isn't a quick fix
sort of thing, but rather something that has to be designed and tested
carefully.
I was hoping to have a patch up by today, but there were
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 03:22 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.6.5 is out. It has a couple bug fixes, but mainly fixes
installation issues now that Django 1.4 is out.
See
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/03/30/review-board-165-released/
for more info.
Can you point out
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 03:22 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.6.5 is out. It has a couple bug fixes, but mainly fixes
installation issues now that Django 1.4 is out.
See
Hi there,
I have just upgraded the client side subversion (Windows) to 1.7.4 and RBtools
to 0.4.1.
After the upgrade post-review did not function anymore. The problem was that
the diff.exe program of the CollabNet installation messed with my GNU diff.exe.
I sorted that and it is working now.
I thought it might be worth bumping this thread again, given Christian's
comments in the thread Focus and Priorities. I would like to hear some
thoughts on my suggested approach here.
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:51 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I just thought I might mention this email again,
I'm getting the following error while trying to upgrade my 1.5.7 install
to the newer 1.6.5 package during 'rb-site upgrade'.
I am using django_evolution 0.6.7. This error is resulting in an outage
situation, so I could really use some help quickly :(
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
Hi Stephen,
Hmm, that's concerning. My upgrade simulations aren't reproducing that.
The same issue should be hit for any 1.6 release.
Is this for the packages or FedoraHosted?
It almost sounds like the syncdb didn't set up the site app. We're there any
warnings? Do you see those in the
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:25 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Hmm, that's concerning. My upgrade simulations aren't reproducing that.
The same issue should be hit for any 1.6 release.
Is this for the packages or FedoraHosted?
This is happening from the RPMs I created for EPEL
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for bumping this thread. I've been giving this functionality some
thought lately, and here's what I'm currently leaning toward:
1) Give Review Board support for attaching multiple diffs (not just one) in any
given update. It would work like today in that a user would run
It's your settings_local. Overriding that entirely is a recipe for disaster, as
we add to that. If things are missing (the site app among a few in this case),
things will blow up.
You probably should just dynamically take what's in there, convert to a list,
and insert your models at one index
Maybe I'm getting mixed up between 1.6.x and 1.7. It could be that we only
added site in 1.6.
We can get that change into 1.6.x. I was hesitant to make too many more
changes to 1.6.x, but we'll be doing a larger 1.6.x release hopefully this
week, so I'll try to remember to slip that one in.
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:01 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Maybe I'm getting mixed up between 1.6.x and 1.7. It could be that we
only added site in 1.6.
We can get that change into 1.6.x. I was hesitant to make too many
more changes to 1.6.x, but we'll be doing a larger 1.6.x release
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:01 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Maybe I'm getting mixed up between 1.6.x and 1.7. It could be that we
only added site in 1.6.
We can get that change into 1.6.x. I was
Hi Christian,
I am still stuck with RB 1.5.7 on my new CenOs server. Our production
sever is running 1.5 on Gentoo and I'd like to move to CentOs 6.2 ga.
Seems everything works except adding screenshot. I have compared the
permission between the new old server and changed the necessary
Hey,
So, I have a patch up for review (http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3073/)
that works with the v3 API, but at the moment this patch only applies
cleanly against the 1.7.x branch, and a couple things need to be fixed.
However, I just heard from GitHub that there's a new API introduced that
Hey,
Sorry, I missed the original e-mail that you sent.
This sounds more like a PIL (Python Imaging Library) issue than a
permissions issue. Do you know how this was compiled, or if you got it from
a package?
What type of image file is it? Do others work?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 13:34 -0700, TaoSun wrote:
Hi Christian,
I am still stuck with RB 1.5.7 on my new CenOs server. Our production
sever is running 1.5 on Gentoo and I'd like to move to CentOs 6.2 ga.
Seems everything works except adding screenshot. I have compared the
permission between
I don't see anything on the Github page indicating API tokens... Just
the previous oAuth stuff.
On Apr 23, 3:14 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hey,
So, I have a patch up for review (http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3073/)
that works with the v3 API, but at the moment this
Right, the API tokens aren't listed. They have an API that will return a
token. So, we're going to have to wire up a button for getting that token,
given your credentials. Easier change, and quicker to get in.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
Hey Florian,
I have a workaround for you, if you're on Linux or otherwise have curl.
Simply do:
curl -u github_username https://api.github.com/legacy/token
Enter your GitHub password. It should spit out an API token, and you should
be set.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
Awesome it worked - thanks so much!
Do you know how long they'll be supporting this version now?
On Apr 23, 7:05 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hey Florian,
I have a workaround for you, if you're on Linux or otherwise have curl.
Simply do:
curl -u
I asked for June 1st, and they said they'll keep the bits we need around
until at least then.
That's more than enough time for us to test this new work, get a release
out, and get people migrated.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2577 by spjayasi...@gmail.com: Email Notification Not Working in
Review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2577
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need
Comment #1 on issue 2577 by spjayasi...@gmail.com: Email Notification Not
Working in Review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2577
Kindly do the needful
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to
Comment #5 on issue 2364 by bachirta...@gmail.com: WSGI exception
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2364
Thanks andrew ;-) works fine for me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send
Updates:
Status: SetupIssue
Comment #2 on issue 2577 by trowb...@gmail.com: Email Notification Not
Working in Review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2577
The issue is that SMTP AUTH extension not supported by server. Perhaps
you specified a username/password
27 matches
Mail list logo
