Re: ReviewBoard now charmed for Juju

Hi Christian, On 12 June 2014 00:01, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Review Board 2.1 will have a new repository selector that will make it very easy to configure repositories on supported hosting services. Right now, I’m targeting GitHub for development, but we’ll bring

Re: rbt post using Mercurial

Are the hg svn errors normal? I'm also confused about another thing: Why does the reviewboard server needs to know where the main Mercurial repo is? What if one does not exist? In a distributed source control system, all the data is available to the rbt tool. It should be able to post a

Unable to use New Review Request to create requests with parent diffs

Most of our users use hg postreview to create review requests, but our windows users prefer to use the site's New Review Request upload tool. In RB 1.7.x, there was an option to upload both a diff and a parent diff. This is no longer an option. Is there still a way to use the web tool to create

Error on view diff

Hello guys, I'm facing a issue in review board: I'm running review board on a remote mac machine and I'm using rbt post to post a git file diff from windows machine. The request is generated successfully but I get error while view diff for modified files. But new diff diff is shown

Re: Requested revision does not exist, using Bazaar

Hi Brian, I am also facing same issue. So what is the solution or workaround for this problem ? Thanks Rahul On Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:28:29 AM UTC+5:30, Brian wrote: Following up on this... we found that the developer creating the diff had a different time zone on his machine than

Re: how to install plugins on review board

@Raja, I have also tried installing same abc extension, it was successful, but under Admin/Extension menu extension is not visible. Please help on this On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:46:21 PM UTC+5:30, Raja wrote: If Its installed successfully, you can go to the Administration menu and

Re: rbt post using Mercurial

The ‘hg svn’ errors are normal in debug output, if the appropriate extension is not installed or it’s not a hg svn repository. Review Board fetches the full contents of the files referenced in the diffs in order to generate a side-by-side diff viewer that can be analyzed and expanded. Because

Re: rbt post using Mercurial

Thanks for clearing that up. Is there any file/function I can put some debug statements in to see what the problem is? I have't had time to start tracing though the code yet. On Thursday, June 12, 2014 1:32:36 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote: The ‘hg svn’ errors are normal in debug output,

Re: rbt post using Mercurial

The thing I’d want to check first is that src/Message.h, revision 79c09fdfad23 is actually in the repository that Review Board is pointed to. Can you verify that? If that’s not the case, then either that repository doesn’t have the latest-and-greatest (which is important), or there’s some issue

Re: Requested revision does not exist, using Bazaar

Hi Brian, Can you go into more details on how the timestamps affect things? I’d love to find a way to fix/workaround this in RBTools and/or Review Board. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - 

Re: Requested revision does not exist, using Bazaar

I can tell you what we know so far. When we have this issue, I trace the bad revision back to what I can find in the Bazaar log for the file. We are UTC-7, and the timestamp is usually 7 hours off from a match. This may be the case for all files/revisions, I'm not sure yet. Most (if not all) of

Just updated to 2.0.1 and spell check no longer works

I never noticed what the last version had, but this version doesn't see to use textarea anymore. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at

Re: Just updated to 2.0.1 and spell check no longer works

We support Markdown input now, and for this, we use CodeMirror as the editor. Unfortunately, this came at the sacrifice of spell checking. Browsers don’t provide any standard API for spell checking, so there’s not much that can be done here. There are third-party plugins people have written to

Posting new topics here is BROKEN

You can't edit anything because you can't click anywhere with the mouse in FF 29. This is completely broken -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us

Re: Posting new topics here is BROKEN

Posting where? On Google Groups? We have no control over that, but you can always use e-mail. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 12, 2014 at 4:02:50 PM, Kyle Keating

Re: Just updated to 2.0.1 and spell check no longer works

^^^ I'm utterly dissapointed in this. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you

Re: Just updated to 2.0.1 and spell check no longer works

I’m very sorry to hear that. If CodeMirror or browser vendors figure out a solution to this, we’re happy to use it. It’s otherwise out of our control. I’m also happy to take a patch to allow a per-user option for whether they should get a textarea with spell checking or CodeMirror. Christian

Re: Posting new topics here is BROKEN

Ya, I know but I need to rant somewhere. You gotta admit, the only thing more frustrating than a textarea not working the way you expect is trying to explain that using a system that doesn't let you type into a text area :) Go figure this works perfectly on Chrome too. I wish you guys had a

Re: Just updated to 2.0.1 and spell check no longer works

Thank you Chris. If there is something you guys could add, I would greatly appreciate it. Spelling is not my strong suit and I will have to copy and paste my reviews in and out of the browser now into ms word. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign

Re: Upgrading from 1.7.26 to 2.0.1

Sorry, this is due to a change we made in 1.7.26 that hasn’t been reflected in 2.0.2 yet. We’re going to try to get a release out tonight or tomorrow of 2.0.2. Did you back up the database? Can you stay on 1.7.26 for now? Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board

Re: Upgrading from 1.7.26 to 2.0.1

I did not back up the database, since I was doing this to an old server I no longer care about. If I wait, will upgrading to 2.0.2 when it's released get me past this? Thanks! On Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:28:44 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry, this is due to a change we made in

Re: Upgrading from 1.7.26 to 2.0.1

It will, yes. It’s just new database schema that 1.7.26 introduced that 2.0.1 doesn’t know about. Our schema is managed carefully, so the upgrade failed when it saw something it didn’t understand. 2.0.2 will know how to update it. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com

Re: Upgrading from 1.7.26 to 2.0.1

Ok, great, thanks! I'll be on the lookout for 2.0.2! On Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:31:45 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: It will, yes. It’s just new database schema that 1.7.26 introduced that 2.0.1 doesn’t know about. Our schema is managed carefully, so the upgrade failed when it saw

Re: Unable to use New Review Request to create requests with parent diffs

Sara, Is the reluctance just that installing python stuff on Windows is hard, or are there other concerns? It might be nice to add parent diff support to the New Review Request page, but we'd need to do some redesign to fit it in with the new workflow, which is really designed to handle basic

Review Board 2.0.2 is released

Hey everyone, We just put out Review Board 2.0.2, which fixes a number of bugs reported on this list and in our tracker. See our announcement for info on the release: http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/06/12/review-board-2-0-2-released/ Christian --  Christian Hammond - 

Re: Issue 3409 in reviewboard: List of which commits that are reviewed/not reviewed

Comment #2 on issue 3409 by richard@gmail.com: List of which commits that are reviewed/not reviewed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3409 Correct. The icon is shown next to all commits having an associated review request. However I think it should be nice to also

Issue 3414 in reviewboard: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3414 by matthias...@gmail.com: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3414 What version are you running? ReviewBoard-2.0 RBTools-0.6.1 What's the URL of

Re: Issue 3414 in reviewboard: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv)

Comment #1 on issue 3414 by matthias...@gmail.com: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3414 Just discovered: There is an issue, that might be related: 3356 -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 3414 in reviewboard: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv)

Comment #2 on issue 3414 by matthias...@gmail.com: Diff view error after renaming a file (with git mv) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3414 Just discovered: There is an issue, that might be related. https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3356 -- You

Issue 3415 in reviewboard: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3415 by a...@brookmoor.com: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3415 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must

Re: Issue 3410 in reviewboard: perforce post-submit review fails using rbt post when the submitted change set contains branch actions

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3410 by trowb...@gmail.com: perforce post-submit review fails using rbt post when the submitted change set contains branch actions http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3410 Fixed in release-0.6.x (0e035e1). This will ship

Re: Issue 3401 in reviewboard: Repository listing shows commits not belonging to the chosen branch

Updates: Status: PendingReview Comment #6 on issue 3401 by chip...@gmail.com: Repository listing shows commits not belonging to the chosen branch http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3401 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3415 in reviewboard: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 3415 by trowb...@gmail.com: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3415 This is a long-standing bug, and nobody has been able to nail down

Re: Issue 3401 in reviewboard: Repository listing shows commits not belonging to the chosen branch

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 3401 by chip...@gmail.com: Repository listing shows commits not belonging to the chosen branch http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3401 Fixed on release-2.0.x (367fffe) This will be part of tonight's 2.0.2. -- You

Re: Issue 3314 in reviewboard: Unable to run setup-repo on Beanstalk svn repository

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3314 by trowb...@gmail.com: Unable to run setup-repo on Beanstalk svn repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3314 The new fuzzy matching in rbt should handle this case. -- You received this message because this

Re: Issue 3415 in reviewboard: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed

Comment #2 on issue 3415 by a...@brookmoor.com: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3415 Not sure how I got there either, but it suddenly showed up. It is a relatively new install (couple

Re: Issue 3415 in reviewboard: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed

Comment #3 on issue 3415 by trowb...@gmail.com: Incoming counts on left nav panel is different from no. of review requests displayed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3415 The problem is that those counts are maintained by incrementing/decrementing counters, rather than

Re: Issue 2184 in reviewboard: Mercurial rename support: Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did not apply cleanly

Comment #10 on issue 2184 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: Mercurial rename support: Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did not apply cleanly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2184 I wonder if there should be a note in the documentation