Re: New user of review board here, I'm having trouble attaching diffs

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Review Board is configured to point to a repository though. I need details on that to be able to help further. Perhaps you can point your administrator to this thread? - Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - 

Re: Authentication - Subversion

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Upgrade to 2.0.6. It should fix this issue. Christian --  Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On July 14, 2014 at 4:21:32 PM, Kevin Norton (kevin.nor...@gmail.com) wrote: It might be because of

Re: problem with sending email in reviewboard 2.0.5

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Hammond
What mail server are you using? Can you check its log files? (You may have to bump up the logging level, depending on the server.) At this point, it’s going to be a mail server configuration issue rather than a Review Board issue, so there’s not a lot we can do to address the problem.

Re: Issue Migrating Database from 1.5.5 to 2.0.5 (model updates fail)

2014-08-21 Thread Zach Auclair
Hey Christian, Have you had a chance to look into this? Is there any other information I can get you? -Zach On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Zach Auclair zach...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Chris, The output of the list-evolutions command is actually included in my last paragraph in the

Re: Issue Migrating Database from 1.5.5 to 2.0.5 (model updates fail)

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Zach, Sorry, I haven’t had a chance yet. I just glanced through and the schema does look correct, as does the list of applied evolutions.  Can you get me the contents of your django_project_version and django_evolution tables? That’ll give me a better understanding of how Django Evolution

se linux blocking review board

2014-08-21 Thread Tyler Mace
To the professionals who work with Review Board I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out of the box. I have Fedora 20 installed, with RB 1.7.26 with httpd 2.4.10. I can only work ReviewBoard if I turn off selinux, i.e. setenforce off. We cannot do this on

Re: se linux blocking review board

2014-08-21 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2014-08-21 16:53, Tyler Mace wrote: I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out of the box. I have Fedora 20 installed, with RB 1.7.26 with httpd 2.4.10. I can only work ReviewBoard if I turn off selinux, i.e. setenforce off. We cannot do this on production.

Re: Warnings in server log

2014-08-21 Thread David Trowbridge
Greg, Sorry for the long lead time on this. Responses inline. 13:42:37 WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField Review.timestamp received a naive datetime (2014-07-17 00:00:00) while time

Re: Warnings in server log

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Hammond
On August 21, 2014 at 2:45:51 PM, David Trowbridge (trowb...@gmail.com) wrote: Greg, Sorry for the long lead time on this. Responses inline.  13:42:37 WARNING  - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.5-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning:

Re: Is there a way to only allow some LDAP users to authenticate?

2014-08-21 Thread Ian
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:39:04 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 08/19/2014 03:52 AM, Ian wrote: I really don't want my entire organization to be able to log into my Review Board server, I only want to allow a few LDAP groups to connect. Is there any way to set up Review Board

Is there a way to perform snapshot reviews?

2014-08-21 Thread Norbert Kiesel
Hi, I often get asked to perform a review after a project declares it's ready, which is potentially after weeks or even month of development. At this point, reviewing all the individual commits is not practical. Instead, I want to review the current snapshot/revision of the files. Is there

Issue 3540 in reviewboard: Add signals for when a draft is discarded, including a reason for why it was discarded

2014-08-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3540 by mike.d.c...@gmail.com: Add signals for when a draft is discarded, including a reason for why it was discarded http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3540 *** For customer support, please

Issue 3541 in reviewboard: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons

2014-08-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3541 by roopa...@gmail.com: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3541 What version are you running? 1.7.6 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if

Re: Issue 3541 in reviewboard: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons

2014-08-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: StudentProject Component-EMail Project-ReviewBoard Comment #1 on issue 3541 by trowb...@gmail.com: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3541 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3541 in reviewboard: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons

2014-08-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Medium -StudentProject Priority-Low Comment #2 on issue 3541 by chip...@gmail.com: Enable Gmail InApp action Buttons https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3541 I spent a bunch of time looking into this before. It's an awesome feature that

Re: Issue 3389 in reviewboard: 'rbt patch' should error out more gracefully if the patch doesn't apply cleanly.

2014-08-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: Milestone-RBTools-Release0.6.x Comment #2 on issue 3389 by chip...@gmail.com: 'rbt patch' should error out more gracefully if the patch doesn't apply cleanly.