Repository options are configured as follows:
- Hosting Service: None - Custom Repository
- Repository Type: Git
- Path: git@myserver:mygroup/myproject.git
- Raw file URL
mask: http://myserver/mygroup/myproject/raw/develop/filename
For our repository:
- GitLab (7.4.3)
-
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:49 AM James Knight james.d.kni...@live.com
wrote:
Repository options are configured as follows:
- Hosting Service: None - Custom Repository
- Repository Type: Git
- Path: git@myserver:mygroup/myproject.git
- Raw file URL mask:
For my test suite, I create a perforce repo using the api this way:
from rbtools.api.client import RBClient
client = RBClient(http://localhost;)
client.login(sallan, sallan)
root = client.get_root()
root.get_repositories().create(name='perforce', tool=Perforce,
path=localhost:1492)
--Steve
Hi,
RBTools doesn't fetch credentials from Review Board, and credentials aren't
exposed in the API (unless they were added to a URL instead of using the
username/password fields). Can you elaborate on what you're seeing?
Christian
On Thursday, April 23, 2015, XYZ karthikut...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m investigating the Review Board to use it.
We are using the IBM Rational ClearCase for the version control system.
And we only have one VOB remotely.
So I'm using the ClearCase Remote Client on my development environment.
Can we just install the ClearCase Remote Client on hosting machine
Hi Steve,
I can confirm this. Let me see what I can see, and I'll get back to you.
(You'll definitely need the patch number for ReviewBoard.)
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Thu, Apr
Yeah, the raw file URL needs to have the revision in there somewhere. Since
you're using GitLab, you should just choose GitLab instead of None -
Custom Repository
-David
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:52 AM Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:49 AM James
Our current servers are on CentOS 6.6 running RB 1.7.28. I'm preparing to
upgrade to 2.0 or 2.5, so I want to test out the migration. To do that,
I'm trying to install 1.7.28 on a fresh CentOS6.6 VM. After installing the
pre-reqs, I ran
easy_install ReviewBoard==1.7.28
It fails with this
Yup, it's all good now. Thanks!
--Steve
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 12:37:07 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Steve,
Give it a try now. Looks like a recent migration of the django_evolution
packages resulted in that file being truncated. I've fixed this and tested
the
Hi Steve,
We shouldn't need that dependency. I remember seeing this somewhere
recently, and think it had to do with the version of Django, maybe? Can you
just verify what version you're running?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Weird.
I just checked the source of Django, Review Board, and Django Evolution.
The only references to importlib in any of those are Django's bundled
version (django.utils.importlib), so that shouldn't be happening, unless
there's some other module involved somewhere in the process that's causing
I've installed RB 1.7.28 on a new CentOS 6.6. VM which has python 2.6.6.
When I run
rb-site install /var/www/rb
I get this error:
* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
Creating database ...
[!] Unable to execute the manager
easy_install importlib
fixes the problem, but it looks like a dependency is missing in the rb
installer.
--Steve
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote:
I've installed RB 1.7.28 on a new CentOS 6.6. VM which has python 2.6.6.
When I run
rb-site install /var/www/rb
First of all, thanks for the replies; I appreciate the help.
@Stephen Gallagher
I think this is were I am failing to communicate. I'm not trying to have my
Git repository or web viewer to represent the file hashes as I haven't
pushed anything to a remote Git repository. I'm hoping to avoid this
Here's what got installed:
[root@localhost site-packages]# ls -d *jan*
Django-1.4.20-py2.6.egg django_evolution-0.6.9-py2.6.egg
django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg
--steve
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:33:12 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Steve,
We shouldn't need that dependency.
You're missing the point though. You still have to have an addressable hash
from the repo in order to establish a baseline or else none of the parent
diffs will have anything to compare against.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:23 PM James Knight james.d.kni...@live.com
wrote:
First of all, thanks for
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3794 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Rendering issue when
viewing All Review Requests with Diff Size column enabled
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3794
The fix for this issue has landed on the Djblets 0.9.x and master
When i give the worng credentials in RB repository page and try to post
from cmd promt (i.e. rbt post) , it fails as shown :
http://localhost:8080/reviewboard/api/review-requests/180/diffs/
ERROR: Error uploading diff
One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105)
path: [P4#run]
Hi Steve,
Give it a try now. Looks like a recent migration of the django_evolution
packages resulted in that file being truncated. I've fixed this and tested
the installation locally.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
Hello Review Board users / developers,
What is the recommended approach for reconstructing a work copy of the
changes in a review request?
I am most specifically interested in Git where branching may occur.
It seems that an approach would be to
1. Checkout the repo with the base revision
Sorry, I don't understand.
My root patch has an addressable hash from the repository. When I initially
showed the following diagram, the intent was to show that my local and
ReviewBoard-watched remote repository are in sync.
{ReviewBoard}
/\
Thanks for the reply Christian. As far as our requests related to
repositories is concerned, it’s only about adding (not updating) Name,
Repository type, Path and Mirror path.
I checked the API link for repository resource. Although I could find
fields for Name, Path and Mirror path, i
Hi
why does rbt post have to fetch SCM credentials from RB and not just my
client m/c
rbt diff takes perforce login details from client machine and why cant rbt
post do the same?
And where exactly is the function where it fetches the login from Review
Board site ?
Tnx
--
Supercharge your
Hey James,
The problem really has to do with the limitations we're under when talking
to a Git repository. Let me go into that and then I'll go into how that
relates to what you're dealing with.
The reason that raw file URL field exists is because, with Git, it's not
possible to request a given
Yes, it's working now. And I checked my current 1.7.28 production servers
and they all have importlib installed, but I don't know how or when it was
installed.
--Steve
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:55:52 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Weird.
I just checked the source of Django,
Ah, completely understand now. Sorry for the trouble folks.
Thanks Christian (and of course David and Stephen as well).
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 8:22:42 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey James,
The problem really has to do with the limitations we're under when talking
to a Git
26 matches
Mail list logo