Review Board 1.0 RC2 released

2009-05-08 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi everyone, I just put out Review Board 1.0 RC2, which should take care of the major issues people hit with RC1. Please give it a try and report a bug if any major issues are hit. Full release information is up at http://review-board.org/news/2009/05/08/review-board-10-rc2-released/ Christian

Install Issue on Windows

2009-05-08 Thread Chris
I've tried to hunt around but cant seem find a simple answer to this problem. Im trying to install review board on windows and the guide seemed half written, i.e. i installed all the dependancies then it just says once you've finished getting review board installed you will want to create a

Re: Install Issue on Windows

2009-05-08 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Chris, You need to grab RC2, which was released tonight. It fixes this issue. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Chris c.d.whitco...@gmail.com wrote: I've

Re: perforce visual client tool

2009-05-08 Thread Markus Knittig
On 05/08/2009 10:48 PM, tom wrote: So, I've put together a python based tool for submitting reviews via perforce visual client's context menu - a wxwidgets based thing for launching postreview, basically. Would anyone be interested? Yes, I was recently thinking about hacking some simple GUI

Re: perforce visual client tool

2009-05-08 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Tom, Yep, the API has the ability to show you the list of groups and users. I haven't personally tried this, but you might want to look at wxpostreview in our SVN tree and see if it suits your needs, or if it would work as a base for what you want to do. Christian -- Christian Hammond -

Re: Install Issue on Windows

2009-05-08 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Chris, We definitely want to improve the Windows install. The issue is that a lot of what we depend on isn't made to easily install on Windows. Plus we're really Linux guys and most of our users are installing on Linux. However, I know that better instructions would help with this, and I'll

Issue 1112 in reviewboard: AD Logins Silently Failing

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chipx86 Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Component-Accounts Comment #1 on issue 1112 by chipx86: AD Logins Silently Failing http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1112 Fixed in r1959. -- You received this message

Issue 1111 in reviewboard: Sample apache configuration doesn't handle spaces in installed path.

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-Deployment Comment #1 on issue by chipx86: Sample apache configuration doesn't handle spaces in installed path. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id= Fixed in r1962.

Issue 1110 in reviewboard: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 OpSys-Windows Comment #3 on issue 1110 by chipx86: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1110 I'll have

Issue 1114 in reviewboard: Incorrect email address generation for AD based authentication.

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 1114 by RDubrawski: Incorrect email address generation for AD based authentication. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1114 Verified fixed. Thanks -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Issue 1110 in reviewboard: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 1110 by chipx86: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1110 Fixed in r1967. A rb-site.exe will be provided in RC3, or in tonight's nightly. -- You

Issue 1109 in reviewboard: Draft for outgoing review request found which I never posted.

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1109 by chipx86: Draft for outgoing review request found which I never posted. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1109 Not being at IronPort, I can't investigate this at all. You'll need to talk to your administrator

Issue 1107 in reviewboard: Changes in review requests sometimes show up as occuring 7 hours earlier than the actually do

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1107 by chipx86: Changes in review requests sometimes show up as occuring 7 hours earlier than the actually do http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1107 From what I can tell, that looks completely correct. The second one

Issue 1105 in reviewboard: Time shown in dashboard does not match timezone

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1105 by chipx86: Time shown in dashboard does not match timezone http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1105 What OS/distro are you using? What web server? Just to make sure, did you restart your web server after upgrading

Issue 1110 in reviewboard: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 1110 by javier.ortiz.78: Review board installation doesn't create windows-friendly entries in Scripts http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1110 1084 is a duplicate of this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Issue 1105 in reviewboard: Time shown in dashboard does not match timezone

2009-05-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1105 by onkarshinde: Time shown in dashboard does not match timezone http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1105 I am using Ubuntu 8.04 and apache server. I restarted the web server multiple times. -- You received this message because you are listed in