Hi
I have a problem with reviewboard setting up on windows XP sp3. When
i try to create site with the command rb-site install, it says rb-
site' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file. (I didnt find any rb-site.exe in any
of the folders in the
How did you install Review Board on that system? Can you list the steps you
performed?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:00 AM, dmpub...@gmail.com
Hi,
I am running my reviewboard server/webserver of a non standard port, 8080.
In all email notifications send out, the port number is not included in the
URL.
I have tried to change the Domain Name in Admin - Database - Sites, to
http://my.server.com:8080 but that did not make any difference.
Responding to my self.
Restarting of the webserver did the trick.
I think it could be worth looking into which settings that needs a webserver
restart to become active, and see if we can remove the restart dependency.
cheers,
lars
2009/8/4 Lars Olsson lars.olsso...@gmail.com
Hi,
I am
Hi.
Thanks for great tool and I happy to hear about new release which
support Mercurial 1.3.
I wonder is there any guide how to migrate from 1.0 to 1.0.1 without
losing already submitted reviews?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Hi,
I've installed Review Board 1.0.1 and added ClearCase repository. To
test Review Board, I've prepared fake diff file:
Index: configurations/demo/toolbox.jsp
===
--- configurations/demo/toolbox.jsp (label )
+++
Hi,
I've installed Review Board 1.0.1 and added ClearCase repository. To
test Review Board, I've prepared fake diff file:
Index: configurations/demo/toolbox.jsp
===
--- configurations/demo/toolbox.jsp (label )
+++
Hi Sergius,
Just follow the upgrade steps in our docs, and you'll be fine. You won't
lose anything in the database.
It can be summed up to doing:
1) easy_install -U ReviewBoard
2) rb-site upgrade /path/to/your/site
3) Restart the web server
If you feel more comfortable, go ahead and do a
Can you provide more information? I need to see the full error log.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:34 AM, MiZhKa miz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've installed
Hi Rupert,
While we don't have support for generating a mod_wsgi config file out of the
box, it's something we could add (patches are always welcome). However, you
should be able to generate a FastCGI config file and then change it to
resemble the config files you referenced below. I believe you
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:58 AM, gbjbaanb andy.bolstri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone.
I'm a very new user of ReviewBoard, I've just set it up, and as you
asked for information on how I intend to use it, and suggestion for
improvement... I'd thought I'd post now while my initial
On 5 авг, 00:27, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
...
4. LDAP support. I access active directory from a linux box, no
problem with that except that the corporate AD doesn't allow anonymous
reads. Most other sites I use from my linux server (eg wikipedia,
mantis) allow you
Hi Joyjit,
Are you talking about comments that precede the actual diff in the
patch? This is a problem for git patches, and a bug 1229 is open for
it. I looked into the issue a bit and I think it can be resolved by
maintaining the extra info as part of the diff set. Right now, RB
splits the diff
Check that your pythonXX/Scripts directory is in your path. This is
not added by default.
Dan
On Aug 4, 4:24 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
How did you install Review Board on that system? Can you list the steps you
performed?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
Clearcase support only officially works through post-review since it
needs to do some tricks to generate the diff. How did you create this
fake diff? Can you try following the steps I provided in this thread
and see if you are able to get it to work?
Yes, I am referring to the comments that preced the actual diff in the patch.
Reviewboard throws them away, which makes it a kind of severe limitation for
us to use in our workflow (which uses git).
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Dan Savilonisd...@n-cube.org wrote:
Hi Joyjit,
Are
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1254 by gmcelhoe: Delta times in the review are incorrect
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1254
What version are you running?
Where can I tell?
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1255 by yerges: Traceback viewing diff for Mercurial 1.3
repository
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1255
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you running?
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1254 by chipx86: Delta times in the review are incorrect
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1254
Can you shift-reload the page and tell me if it fixes itself? It could be a
browser
caching issue.
--
You received this
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1257 by grossag: Screenshot caption is erased in certain cases
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1257
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you running?
Comment #2 on issue 1257 by grossag: Screenshot caption is erased in
certain cases
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1257
Hmm nevermind, maybe this is a dupe of 1142.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Comment #3 on issue 1257 by chipx86: Screenshot caption is erased in
certain cases
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1257
It's slightly different. Enough so that I'm willing to have two bugs open.
That one's
more about not auto-saving those files, since we trigger a
22 matches
Mail list logo
