Hi,
I recently started looking into Review Board and I'm about to give it a try
with my team. A couple questions before I start:
It appears to be possible as an unauthenticated user to see all review
quests and the diffs. I need to prevent that and only let logged in users to
do so. A setting
I'm getting this error
http://pastebin.com/uEwh1vjR
Setup is:
reviewboard on same servers as bare git repo and cgit server.
path: /home/git/repositories/f.web.git
mirror path: g...@repo.f.com:f.web.git
raw file url mask:
http://localhost:7000/cgit/f.web/plain/filename?id2=revision
(i know i'm
Hi Leonel,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently started looking into Review Board and I'm about to give it a try
with my team. A couple questions before I start:
It appears to be possible as an unauthenticated user to see all review
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply here. Holidays and all..
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
o...@lindenlab.com wrote:
Our project uses Mercurial, and so there are a couple of things I'd like to
be able to have contributors post patches generated with 'hg export' (either
Can you plug in a filename and SHA1 into that raw URL mask and see if
it's actually fetching using the SHA1? If modifying the tip of origin
breaks things, I wonder if it's not actually making use of the SHA1 on
your copy of cgit. If things break with gtk+, maybe there is some
compatibility change.
On 2010-12-21 18:18, Christian Hammond wrote:
There's a --repository-url parameter for post-review that can specify
which repository you want to match on the server. It doesn't look like
the Mercurial support in post-review handles this parameter, but it
wouldn't take much to patch that if you
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
o...@lindenlab.com wrote:
On 2010-12-21 18:18, Christian Hammond wrote:
There's a --repository-url parameter for post-review that can specify
which repository you want to match on the server. It doesn't look like
the Mercurial
On 2010-12-21 20:07, Christian Hammond wrote:
First, there are two APIs today: the old Review Board 1.0 API, and the
new REST one in RB 1.5.
Today, post-review uses the RB 1.0 API only. I have a chance pending,
which needs some additional work done first, that will update
post-review to use
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
o...@lindenlab.com wrote:
Yes, a direct REST api that returned the url for a name would certainly be
helpful.
Do you plan to make it possible to require authentication for the REST apis
in 1.6? I'm currently running my server with
