Error on adding repository to reviewboard
Hello, I have setup a review board on my Ubuntu machine (10.04). When I try to add a repository which is on perforce server, following error message gets flashed everytime : *[P4#run] Errors during command execution(p4 describe s1) [Error]: Client is too old to use this server. Please upgrade to a 2011.1 or later Perforce client.* However I have installed latest P4 client avaialble on perforce website. *p4 -V* output : Rev. P4/LINUX26X86/2012.1/459601 (2012/05/11) also* P4 info* gives following output: Server Version : P4D/Linux26X86_64/2011.1/428451 (2012/03/08) Minimum Client Level: 2011.1:70 What I understand is that I have version 2012.1 installed on my ubuntu machine and server to which I'm trying to connect allows 2011.1 or later client versions. On my Ubuntu machine I can successfully perform P4 sync commands. Can you please help me how to debug this problem or pint me where the problem could be. Thanks, Arvind -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error on adding repository to reviewboard
Hi Arvind, The P4PythonInstaller package we use to install the Perforce bindings may need to be updated. Try the following: 1) Download http://reviewboard.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/P4PythonInstaller/setup.py 2) Modify p4api_version in that file and set it to 12.2 3) Run: sudo python setup.py install See if that succeeds and if your problem goes away. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Arvind arwind.ku...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have setup a review board on my Ubuntu machine (10.04). When I try to add a repository which is on perforce server, following error message gets flashed everytime : *[P4#run] Errors during command execution(p4 describe s1) [Error]: Client is too old to use this server. Please upgrade to a 2011.1 or later Perforce client.* However I have installed latest P4 client avaialble on perforce website. *p4 -V* output : Rev. P4/LINUX26X86/2012.1/459601 (2012/05/11) also* P4 info* gives following output: Server Version : P4D/Linux26X86_64/2011.1/428451 (2012/03/08) Minimum Client Level: 2011.1:70 What I understand is that I have version 2012.1 installed on my ubuntu machine and server to which I'm trying to connect allows 2011.1 or later client versions. On my Ubuntu machine I can successfully perform P4 sync commands. Can you please help me how to debug this problem or pint me where the problem could be. Thanks, Arvind -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Error Log while installing Reviewboard.
[root@ip-10-28-87-177 logs]# cat error_log [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] module wsgi_module is already loaded, skipping [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: done [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2. [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/ 2.6.6. [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) mod_wsgi/3.2 Python/2.6.6 DAV/2 PHP/5.3.3 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75: DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use STATIC_URL instead. [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning) [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82: DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES instead. [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] DeprecationWarning [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod_wsgi (pid=5427): Exception occurred processing WSGI script '/var/www/html/ htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/ wsgi.py, line 219, in __call__, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] self.load_middleware(), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/ base.py, line 45, in load_middleware, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod = import_module(mw_module), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/utils/ importlib.py, line 35, in import_module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] __import__(name), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/middleware.py, line 22, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.admin.views import manual_updates_required, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/views.py, line 19, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.admin.forms import SSHSettingsForm, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/forms.py, line 47, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ scmtools/sshutils.py, line 6, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] import paramiko, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/ __init__.py, line 69, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from transport import SecurityOptions, Transport, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/ transport.py, line 32, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from paramiko import util, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/ util.py, line 32, in module, referer:
Error Log while installing Reviewboard.
While debugging ReviewBoard installation and configuration, we found following error in the error log. Can some one review this and let me know what is the issue here? Many thanks in advance. /etc/httpd/logs [root@ip-10-28-87-177 logs]# cat error_log [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] module wsgi_module is already loaded, skipping [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: done [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2. [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/ 2.6.6. [Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) mod_wsgi/3.2 Python/2.6.6 DAV/2 PHP/5.3.3 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75: DeprecationWarning: The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use STATIC_URL instead. [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] use STATIC_URL instead., DeprecationWarning) [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82: DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES instead. [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] DeprecationWarning [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod_wsgi (pid=5427): Exception occurred processing WSGI script '/var/www/html/ htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/ wsgi.py, line 219, in __call__, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] self.load_middleware(), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/ base.py, line 45, in load_middleware, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod = import_module(mw_module), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/utils/ importlib.py, line 35, in import_module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] __import__(name), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/middleware.py, line 22, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.admin.views import manual_updates_required, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/views.py, line 19, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.admin.forms import SSHSettingsForm, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ admin/forms.py, line 47, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/ scmtools/sshutils.py, line 6, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] import paramiko, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/ __init__.py, line 69, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from transport import SecurityOptions, Transport, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] File /usr/ lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/ transport.py, line 32, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/ [Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from paramiko import util, referer:
Reviewboard does not like big files?
Hello, I am trying to use Reviewboard. On most cases it works fine but we have one file with around 5 line\2.5 MB - C#. Everytime I submit diff for this file, no matter how big or small the diff is, the swirlie never stops spinning and diff is NEVER displayed. Is this known problem and do we have resolution for this? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Final procedure for perforce integration?
Hmmm.. I completely misunderstood - I was under the impression that someone, namely you, were ready to work on change and needed help setup-wise. no matter. I will try to find time. In interest of saving time, do we have ANY kind of code documentation? basically what I am trying to do is to use logged in user's credentials to log in to perforce - I have seen perforce python class but I have no idea of code flow (sorry if I am sounding lazy - I am:)) Thanks in advance, -Neel. On Monday, 14 May 2012 04:25:00 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, The procedure to get it into Review Board? We'd need a patch developed that worked with p4 ticketing but without breaking user/pass access, and it'd need to be uploaded to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/. We can then review it, and once we're satisfied, put it into a release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Christian, What's the procedure? I will need to let organization I work for know that before going forward. Thanks, -Neel. On Thursday, 12 April 2012 20:33:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, We really need to land a patch for proper ticket-based auth. The problem is that the existing patches broke existing Perforce accounts, as the tickets were assumed to be used. I need someone with an actual setup to test this and fix up a patch. I'll happily work with them on getting it into a 1.6.x release. Christian On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:11, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I have been setting my ticket (p4 login -a -p) as password EVERY day; ticket expires after 24 hours in my organization. I wanted to know have any other way have been finalized other than creating a user that has non-expiring ticket? I have searched lot about this and there are few review requests for reviewboard to make it password based or ticket based without needing user intervention but nothing seemed to have shipped it yet. Also, reviewboard is in domain and\or user is using his active directory username in domain\user format, and that same username \password is valid for perforce, is there a way to reuse that (possibly using some hooks?)? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@ **googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error on adding repository to reviewboard
Hello Christian, Thanks for your input, I changed p4api_version to 12.1 in setup.py and I got rid of the error. (12.2 didn't work because there was no directory on ftp.performce.com ) However now I ran into another error : *[P4#run] Errors during command execution(p4 describe s1) [Error]: 'Unicode clients require a unicode enabled server'* Do I need to ask my server administrators to enable something? or still its a problem on my ubuntu installation of reviewboard? Thanks, Arvind On Thursday, 31 May 2012 10:19:39 UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Arvind, The P4PythonInstaller package we use to install the Perforce bindings may need to be updated. Try the following: 1) Download http://reviewboard.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/P4PythonInstaller/setup.py 2) Modify p4api_version in that file and set it to 12.2 3) Run: sudo python setup.py install See if that succeeds and if your problem goes away. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Arvind arwind.ku...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have setup a review board on my Ubuntu machine (10.04). When I try to add a repository which is on perforce server, following error message gets flashed everytime : *[P4#run] Errors during command execution(p4 describe s1) [Error]: Client is too old to use this server. Please upgrade to a 2011.1 or later Perforce client.* However I have installed latest P4 client avaialble on perforce website. *p4 -V* output : Rev. P4/LINUX26X86/2012.1/459601 (2012/05/11) also* P4 info* gives following output: Server Version : P4D/Linux26X86_64/2011.1/428451 (2012/03/08) Minimum Client Level: 2011.1:70 What I understand is that I have version 2012.1 installed on my ubuntu machine and server to which I'm trying to connect allows 2011.1 or later client versions. On my Ubuntu machine I can successfully perform P4 sync commands. Can you please help me how to debug this problem or pint me where the problem could be. Thanks, Arvind -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error Log while installing Reviewboard.
All, I deinstalled Django_evaluation 1.4 and reinstall 1.3.1 Performing migrations ... [root@ip-10-28-87-177 ~]# python; Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 12 2011, 14:03:14) [GCC 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import django print django.VERSION (1, 3, 1, 'final', 0) Then I tried to reinstall review board in the html directory.. I found following error. Can you please let me know what could be the possible error. rb-site install /var/www/html * Installing the site... Building site directories ... OK Building site configuration files ... OK Creating database ... Creating tables ... Creating table django_evolution There are unapplied evolutions for sessions. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... No fixtures found. Unable to load SCMTool svn = reviewboard.scmtools.svn:SVNTool: 'module' object has no attribute 'HAVE_DECL_MPZ_POWM_SEC' Unable to load SCMTool git = reviewboard.scmtools.git:GitTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool bzr = reviewboard.scmtools.bzr:BZRTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool cvs = reviewboard.scmtools.cvs:CVSTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool perforce = reviewboard.scmtools.perforce:PerforceTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool plastic = reviewboard.scmtools.plastic:PlasticTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool clearcase = reviewboard.scmtools.clearcase:ClearCaseTool: cannot import name OSRNG Unable to load SCMTool hg = reviewboard.scmtools.hg:HgTool: cannot import name OSRNG OK Error: Model 'accounts.Profile' already has a field named 'is_private' -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard does not like big files?
A file that large is just too large for anyone to review and for a browser to render. It really should be split up. We won't be able to optimize for a file that size, mostly because a browser just won't handle it and generating a diff from it would just take too long. Christian On May 31, 2012, at 4:27, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to use Reviewboard. On most cases it works fine but we have one file with around 5 line\2.5 MB - C#. Everytime I submit diff for this file, no matter how big or small the diff is, the swirlie never stops spinning and diff is NEVER displayed. Is this known problem and do we have resolution for this? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error Log while installing Reviewboard.
Christian, I could able to solve all the issues with your help. I installed reviewboard successfully. Thank you for all the help. I really appreciate. Thanks, Soumen www.snapstech.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard does not like big files?
One thing that may help is turning off syntax highlighting. - David On May 31, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote: A file that large is just too large for anyone to review and for a browser to render. It really should be split up. We won't be able to optimize for a file that size, mostly because a browser just won't handle it and generating a diff from it would just take too long. Christian On May 31, 2012, at 4:27, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to use Reviewboard. On most cases it works fine but we have one file with around 5 line\2.5 MB - C#. Everytime I submit diff for this file, no matter how big or small the diff is, the swirlie never stops spinning and diff is NEVER displayed. Is this known problem and do we have resolution for this? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
How to find out the whitespace difference
Hi, It becomes quite often when I look at the diff view, some lines are highlighed, but as far as the text goes, there is no difference. It is either there is a tab or some extra space characters somewhere, but the diff view only shows the whole line. I am wondering if I can easily identify where the whitespace is? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
ssh login
Hello, I am having some frustrations in the setup of the reviewboard tool. It has to do with the login to an git server over SSH. Within the web interface, I add the correct git path, however when outputting debug information, I can see that it tries to login with root, a user I did not setup. I have installed version 1.6.6 *** reviewboard.log *** 2012-05-31 14:19:37,865 - DEBUG - Ciphers agreed: local=aes128-ctr, remote=aes128-ctr 2012-05-31 14:19:37,865 - DEBUG - using kex diffie-hellman-group1-sha1; server key type ssh-rsa; cipher: local aes128-ctr, remote aes128-ctr; mac: local hmac-sha1, remote hmac-sha1; compression: local none, remote none 2012-05-31 14:19:37,931 - DEBUG - Switch to new keys ... 2012-05-31 14:19:37,973 - DEBUG - userauth is OK 2012-05-31 14:19:37,989 - INFO - Authentication (password) successful! 2012-05-31 14:19:38,089 - DEBUG - EOF in transport thread 2012-05-31 14:19:38,415 - ERROR - Git: Failed to find valid repository ssh://git.mynet/git/buildroot/buildroot.git: Error connecting to server: No authentication methods available (USERNAME=root PASSWORD=None) fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly NOTE: I have added the username and password output to rbssh.py so see what user the reviewboard uses (root is shown 2nd line from last). The entries I have entered in the web interface are not as above. * rbssh.log * 05-31 14:28 root DEBUG['/usr/bin/rbssh', 'git.mynet', git-upload-pack '/git/buildroot/buildroot.git'] 05-31 14:28 root DEBUGPID 4332 05-31 14:28 root DEBUG!!! git.ttnet, root, [git-upload-pack '/git/buildroot/buildroot.git'] 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGstarting thread (client mode): 0xa6e542cL 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport INFO Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_4.3) 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGkex algos:['diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1', 'diffie-hellman-group14-sha1', 'diffie-hellman-group1-sha1'] server key:['ssh-rsa', 'ssh-dss'] client encrypt:['aes128-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes256-ctr', 'arcfour256', 'arcfour128', 'aes128-cbc', '3des-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', 'cast128-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes256-cbc', 'arcfour', 'rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se'] server encrypt:['aes128-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes256-ctr', 'arcfour256', 'arcfour128', 'aes128-cbc', '3des-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', 'cast128-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes256-cbc', 'arcfour', 'rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se'] client mac:['hmac-md5', 'hmac-sha1', 'hmac-ripemd160', 'hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com', 'hmac-sha1-96', 'hmac-md5-96'] server mac:['hmac-md5', 'hmac-sha1', 'hmac-ripemd160', 'hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com', 'hmac-sha1-96', 'hmac-md5-96'] client compress:['none', 'z...@openssh.com'] server compress:['none', 'z...@openssh.com'] client lang:[''] server lang:[''] kex follows?False 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGCiphers agreed: local=aes128-ctr, remote=aes128-ctr 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGusing kex diffie-hellman-group1-sha1; server key type ssh-rsa; cipher: local aes128-ctr, remote aes128-ctr; mac: local hmac-sha1, remote hmac-sha1; compression: local none, remote none 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGSwitch to new keys ... 05-31 14:28 root ERRORError connecting to server: No authentication methods available (USERNAME=root PASSWORD=None) 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGEOF in transport thread Why does it use root user? When I was using local files as the backend, it works fine... Help?? BTW, really cool tool! /Ryan -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ssh login
If no SSH key is available, it will try to use the user invoking the tool (in this case, root), much like standard ssh does. Do you have an SSH key configured on Review Board, and does that key have permission to access the Git repository? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Ryan Raasch ryan.raa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am having some frustrations in the setup of the reviewboard tool. It has to do with the login to an git server over SSH. Within the web interface, I add the correct git path, however when outputting debug information, I can see that it tries to login with root, a user I did not setup. I have installed version 1.6.6 *** reviewboard.log *** 2012-05-31 14:19:37,865 - DEBUG - Ciphers agreed: local=aes128-ctr, remote=aes128-ctr 2012-05-31 14:19:37,865 - DEBUG - using kex diffie-hellman-group1-sha1; server key type ssh-rsa; cipher: local aes128-ctr, remote aes128-ctr; mac: local hmac-sha1, remote hmac-sha1; compression: local none, remote none 2012-05-31 14:19:37,931 - DEBUG - Switch to new keys ... 2012-05-31 14:19:37,973 - DEBUG - userauth is OK 2012-05-31 14:19:37,989 - INFO - Authentication (password) successful! 2012-05-31 14:19:38,089 - DEBUG - EOF in transport thread 2012-05-31 14:19:38,415 - ERROR - Git: Failed to find valid repository ssh://git.mynet/git/buildroot/buildroot.git: Error connecting to server: No authentication methods available (USERNAME=root PASSWORD=None) fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly NOTE: I have added the username and password output to rbssh.py so see what user the reviewboard uses (root is shown 2nd line from last). The entries I have entered in the web interface are not as above. * rbssh.log * 05-31 14:28 root DEBUG['/usr/bin/rbssh', 'git.mynet', git-upload-pack '/git/buildroot/buildroot.git'] 05-31 14:28 root DEBUGPID 4332 05-31 14:28 root DEBUG!!! git.ttnet, root, [git-upload-pack '/git/buildroot/buildroot.git'] 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGstarting thread (client mode): 0xa6e542cL 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport INFO Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_4.3) 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGkex algos:['diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1', 'diffie-hellman-group14-sha1', 'diffie-hellman-group1-sha1'] server key:['ssh-rsa', 'ssh-dss'] client encrypt:['aes128-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes256-ctr', 'arcfour256', 'arcfour128', 'aes128-cbc', '3des-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', 'cast128-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes256-cbc', 'arcfour', 'rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se'] server encrypt:['aes128-ctr', 'aes192-ctr', 'aes256-ctr', 'arcfour256', 'arcfour128', 'aes128-cbc', '3des-cbc', 'blowfish-cbc', 'cast128-cbc', 'aes192-cbc', 'aes256-cbc', 'arcfour', 'rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se'] client mac:['hmac-md5', 'hmac-sha1', 'hmac-ripemd160', ' hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com', 'hmac-sha1-96', 'hmac-md5-96'] server mac:['hmac-md5', 'hmac-sha1', 'hmac-ripemd160', ' hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com', 'hmac-sha1-96', 'hmac-md5-96'] client compress:['none', 'z...@openssh.com'] server compress:['none', ' z...@openssh.com'] client lang:[''] server lang:[''] kex follows?False 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGCiphers agreed: local=aes128-ctr, remote=aes128-ctr 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGusing kex diffie-hellman-group1-sha1; server key type ssh-rsa; cipher: local aes128-ctr, remote aes128-ctr; mac: local hmac-sha1, remote hmac-sha1; compression: local none, remote none 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGSwitch to new keys ... 05-31 14:28 root ERRORError connecting to server: No authentication methods available (USERNAME=root PASSWORD=None) 05-31 14:28 paramiko.transport DEBUGEOF in transport thread Why does it use root user? When I was using local files as the backend, it works fine... Help?? BTW, really cool tool! /Ryan -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2616 in reviewboard: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2616 by karsten@gmail.com: post-review cannot post utf-8 in
summary or description
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2616
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please contact*
* reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *
What version are you running?
RBTools VERSION = (0, 3, 4, 'final', 0, True)
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
post-review --guess-summary --guess-description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. post-review --summary ሴ
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected output: success
seen output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.3.4', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rbtools/postreview.py, line 4029,
in main
submit_as=options.submit_as)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rbtools/postreview.py, line 3628,
in tempt_fate
options.summary)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rbtools/postreview.py, line 759,
in set_review_request_field
field: value,
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rbtools/postreview.py, line 1081,
in api_put
return self.process_json(self.http_put(path, fields))
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rbtools/postreview.py, line 1027,
in http_put
data = urllib2.urlopen(r).read()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 126, in urlopen
return _opener.open(url, data, timeout)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 400, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 418, in _open
'_open', req)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 378, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 1215, in https_open
return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPSConnection, req)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/urllib2.py, line 1174, in do_open
h.request(req.get_method(), req.get_selector(), req.data, headers)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py, line 958, in request
self._send_request(method, url, body, headers)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py, line 992, in _send_request
self.endheaders(body)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py, line 954, in endheaders
self._send_output(message_body)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py, line 812, in _send_output
msg += message_body
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe1 in position 91:
ordinal not in range(128)
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Ubuntu Linux 12.04
Please provide any additional information below.
A possible patch is to add the following lines to def http_put():
try:
+if isinstance(url, unicode):
+url = url.encode('utf-8')
+if isinstance(body, unicode):
+body = body.encode('utf-8')
r = HTTPRequest(url, body, headers, method='PUT')
data = urllib2.urlopen(r).read()
self.cookie_jar.save(self.cookie_file)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2616 in reviewboard: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description
Comment #1 on issue 2616 by karsten@gmail.com: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2616 Actually body does not need to be converted. The problem is that body is a type 'str' url is of type 'unicode Somewhere in the urllib2 package something happens like: url + body To do unicode + str, the str is converted to unicode. However bytes 128 cannot be represented in unicode, hence the exception. eg: u'www.reviewboard.com' + \x81 = error The solution: str(u'www.reviewboard.com') + \x81 = 'www.reviewboard.com\x81' It seems the str() patch is already in place for the http_post function, but not for http_put. So can you please update http_put similar to http_post? try: -r = HTTPRequest(url, body, headers, method='PUT') +r = HTTPRequest(str(url), body, headers, method='PUT') data = urllib2.urlopen(r).read() self.cookie_jar.save(self.cookie_file) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2616 in reviewboard: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description
Comment #2 on issue 2616 by karsten@gmail.com: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2616 Patch submitted as review 3133 (http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3133/) Attachments: ttt 542 bytes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2616 in reviewboard: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description
Comment #3 on issue 2616 by karsten@gmail.com: post-review cannot post utf-8 in summary or description http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2616 Patch submitted as review 3133 (http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3133/) Attachments: patch 542 bytes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2617 in reviewboard: Broken link to user page in review page auto update feature
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2617 by andrewsa...@gmail.com: Broken link to user page in review page auto update feature http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2617 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? 1.6.4.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? /reviewboard/r/XXX What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Go to a review 2. Update the review in another window (add a comment) 3. In the original window, the notification box pops up at the bottom of the page saying New reply by John Doe Update page | Ignore 4. Click on 'John Doe' What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expect to be taken to the user page for John Doe. Instead, get taken to 404 error page. The href for the John Doe link is '/users/jdoe' when it should be '/reviewboard/users/jdoe' What operating system are you using? What browser? Windows XP, Chrome Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2359 in reviewboard: Review creation fails with patches created with Subversion 1.7.x if they include a property change.
Comment #20 on issue 2359 by ben.mar...@gmail.com: Review creation fails with patches created with Subversion 1.7.x if they include a property change. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2359 My development team uses 'feature branches' so almost every time we generate a diff for review it contains svn:mergeinfo property changes. We have to manually strip these out of the diff and it makes the post-review tool unusable. This is probably the biggest usability issue that we have. I recommend making this issue a high priority. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
