Re: rbdemo extension

2015-05-21 Thread Christian Hammond
rbdemo is what powers demo.reviewboard.org. It keeps the database in a
consistent state, and provides auto-generated guest users. We have it
available so people can learn from its source. It's not useful for any
other server, really.

Christian


On Wednesday, May 20, 2015, Sri Ram Kannan sriram.ss...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Anyone tried rbdemo extension before ?

 I donot know how to play around with it.

 For your information, the reviewboard that I use is linked with Active
 directory therefore I assume the authentication back end is based on LDAP.

 Now how to test and understand the workflow of rbdemo extension..

 Please guide me.

 Regards,
 Sri.

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');
 .
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: why does rbt post have to fetch SCM credentials from RB and not just my client m/c

2015-05-21 Thread unknown
So after the review request is uploaded, when a user views the diff, the 
files are brought from the repo and then displayed? 
Or is the entire file content saved in the database, which is fetched and 
displayed?

On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:

 That error is coming from the server (the server is trying to log in--it's 
 not downloading credentials to the client). It can't use your credentials 
 from the client because it also needs to communicate with the repository 
 when people view the diff.

 -David
 On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:04 PM unknown karthi...@gmail.com javascript: 
 wrote:

  When i give the worng credentials in RB repository page and try to post 
 from cmd promt (i.e. rbt post) , it fails as shown :

 http://localhost:8080/reviewboard/api/review-requests/180/diffs/
 ERROR: Error uploading diff


 One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105)

 path: [P4#run] Errors during command execution( p4 login )

 [Error]: Access for user 'wrong_userid' has not been enabled by 
 'p4 protect'.
 

 Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.

 http://localhost:8080/reviewboard/r/180/

 So it tries to log into SCM using ReviewBoard repository login details, 
 right ?
 why cant it just take it from my local machine ?


 On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 4:18:26 PM UTC+5:30, unknown wrote:

 Hi

 why does rbt post have to fetch SCM credentials from RB and not just my 
 client m/c

 rbt diff takes perforce login details from client machine and why cant 
 rbt post do the same?

 And where exactly is the function where it fetches the login from Review 
 Board site ?

 Tnx

  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RB migrate and upgrade from 1.6.16 to 2.0.15

2015-05-21 Thread John McGowan
Hi,

I've been trying to upgrade a RB instance that got to 1.6.16 to 2.0.15 on 
another node (RH6.3 vs RH6.6). 
I've the prereq packages on:

# pip freeze
Beaker==1.3.1
cas==0.15
cups==1.0
cupshelpers==1.0
decorator==3.0.1
Django==1.6.11
django-evolution==0.7.5
django-haystack==2.3.1
django-pipeline==1.3.27
Djblets==0.6.28
docutils==0.12
ecdsa==0.13
ethtool==0.6
feedparser==5.2.0
firstboot==1.110
freeipa==2.0.0a0
futures==2.2.0
glusterfs-api==3.6.0.28
iniparse==0.3.1
iotop==0.3.2
ipapython==3.0.0
iwlib==1.0
kerberos==1.1
lxml==2.2.3
M2Crypto==0.20.2
Magic-file-extensions==0.1
Mako==0.3.4
Markdown==2.4.1
MarkupSafe==0.9.2
matplotlib==0.99.1.1
mercurial==3.4
mimeparse==0.1.3
MySQL-python==1.2.5
netaddr==0.7.5
nose==0.10.4
numpy==1.4.1
p4python==2014.1.925900
paramiko==1.15.2
PIL==1.1.7
Pillow==2.8.1
pillowfight==0.2
policycoreutils-default-encoding==0.1
pycrypto==2.6.1
pycurl==7.19.0
Pygments==2.0.2
pygpgme==0.1
pyOpenSSL==0.10
python-dateutil==1.5
python-default-encoding==0.1
python-dmidecode==3.10.13
python-ldap==2.3.10
python-meh==0.11
python-memcached==1.54
python-nss==0.13
pytz===2010h
pyxdg==0.18
recaptcha-client==1.0.6
ReviewBoard==2.0.15
rhnlib==2.5.22
rhsm==1.12.5
scdate==1.9.60
sckdump==2.0.5
scservices==0.99.45
scservices.dbus==0.99.45
setools==1.0
six==1.9.0
slip==0.2.20
slip.dbus==0.2.20
slip.gtk==0.2.20
smbc==1.0
SSSDConfig==1.11.6
suds==0.4.1
urlgrabber==3.9.1
virtinst==0.600.0
Whoosh==2.7.0
yum-metadata-parser==1.1.2

D/B setup exactly as the old node with the same d/b|user|pass etc.

Method:
# rb-site installpath
Then going in and dropping the d/b and creating the empty d/b again (I've 
tried it without dropping the newly created one as well).
Taking the latest dump.sql from the old server and loading it into the new 
d/b
Taking the latest htdocs/media/uploaded content to the new server from old
# rb-site upgrade path

and getting these errors which I've seen mentioned around the web but 
unsure how to correct and unsure how to read the evolve --hint to fix:

Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.

The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs.
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
There are unapplied evolutions for site.
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.

Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
required.

The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
The application markup has been deleted
In model scmtools.Repository:
Field 'hosting_account' has been added
Field 'extra_data' has been added
CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot 
resolve automatically.


# rb-site manage path list-evolutions
Applied evolutions for 'sessions':
session_expire_date_db_index

Applied evolutions for 'accounts':
is_private

Applied evolutions for 'changedescs':
fields_changed_longtext

Applied evolutions for 'diffviewer':
add_parent_diffs
filediff_filenames_1024_chars
diffset_basedir
filediff_status

Applied evolutions for 'reviews':
change_descriptions
last_review_timestamp
shipit_count
default_reviewer_repositories
null_repository
localsite
group_incoming_request_count
group_invite_only
group_visible
default_reviewer_local_site
add_issues_to_comments
file_attachments

Applied evolutions for 'scmtools':
bugzilla_url_charfield
repository_raw_file_url
repository_visible
repository_path_length_255
localsite
repository_access_control
group_site
repository_hosting_accounts
repository_extra_data_null


Thanks in advance for any pointers in this.

- John 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


evolve.hint
Description: Binary data


User Authentication Credential for SVN authentication?

2015-05-21 Thread Francois
Our current setup involves a number of SVN/git repositories, where only a 
sub-group of users have access to each repos, and no single shared login 
has access to all of them. This means that for each new repos, we currently 
have to pick an arbitrary user who happens to have access and ask him to 
come type in his password in the Change repository admin panel...(which 
isn't always possible since we have remote users - for those we'd give them 
temporary admin acess so they can log into the admin panel themselves) and 
if for whatever reason that user leaves the company (or is taken off the 
project and no longer has access to that repo), the setup will break for 
everyone else.

Is there no way, when setting up the repository in reviewboard, to have it 
use the currently-logged-in user's credentials to access the repos (and 
display diffs, etc) instead of having to enter a single login/password for 
the repos as part of the admin configuration?

Thanks!
F.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Power Pack 1.2 is released: TFS support, flexible licensing, and free for up to 2 users

2015-05-21 Thread Cormick Nugent
Wow, thank you David. Appreciate sorting the license.

Cormick.

On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 19:49:13 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Cormick,

 That's definitely an oversight, and I'll be fixing up the documentation 
 ASAP. In the meantime I'll clear your existing license out of the system so 
 you can request a new trial when you do upgrade to 2013.

 -David




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: What if I move my repositories?

2015-05-21 Thread David Trowbridge
The items shown in RBTools Setup shouldn't include the repository URL (it
has the Review Board server URL as configured in the General settings
page, and the name of the repository).

-David

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:27 AM Eric Johnson e...@tibco.com wrote:

 Hopefully a quick question.

 What do I do if I move a Subversion repository? (Running ReviewBoard
 2.0.15)

 I went into the admin/db/scmtools/repository/ UI, and changed the URL.

 Yet, if I immediately click on the [RBTools Setup] button, I get shown
 the old URL. Restarting both the server, and memcached didn't change the
 result.

 Also, I'm worried that previous review requests will now be broken.

 Please advise

 Eric.

  --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: RB migrate and upgrade from 1.6.16 to 2.0.15

2015-05-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi John,

This looks like some state is a bit messed up in the database for the
evolution history. Can you attach an SQL dump of the contents of the
django_project_version and django_evolution tables?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:24 AM, John McGowan john.mcgow...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 I've been trying to upgrade a RB instance that got to 1.6.16 to 2.0.15 on
 another node (RH6.3 vs RH6.6).
 I've the prereq packages on:

 # pip freeze
 Beaker==1.3.1
 cas==0.15
 cups==1.0
 cupshelpers==1.0
 decorator==3.0.1
 Django==1.6.11
 django-evolution==0.7.5
 django-haystack==2.3.1
 django-pipeline==1.3.27
 Djblets==0.6.28
 docutils==0.12
 ecdsa==0.13
 ethtool==0.6
 feedparser==5.2.0
 firstboot==1.110
 freeipa==2.0.0a0
 futures==2.2.0
 glusterfs-api==3.6.0.28
 iniparse==0.3.1
 iotop==0.3.2
 ipapython==3.0.0
 iwlib==1.0
 kerberos==1.1
 lxml==2.2.3
 M2Crypto==0.20.2
 Magic-file-extensions==0.1
 Mako==0.3.4
 Markdown==2.4.1
 MarkupSafe==0.9.2
 matplotlib==0.99.1.1
 mercurial==3.4
 mimeparse==0.1.3
 MySQL-python==1.2.5
 netaddr==0.7.5
 nose==0.10.4
 numpy==1.4.1
 p4python==2014.1.925900
 paramiko==1.15.2
 PIL==1.1.7
 Pillow==2.8.1
 pillowfight==0.2
 policycoreutils-default-encoding==0.1
 pycrypto==2.6.1
 pycurl==7.19.0
 Pygments==2.0.2
 pygpgme==0.1
 pyOpenSSL==0.10
 python-dateutil==1.5
 python-default-encoding==0.1
 python-dmidecode==3.10.13
 python-ldap==2.3.10
 python-meh==0.11
 python-memcached==1.54
 python-nss==0.13
 pytz===2010h
 pyxdg==0.18
 recaptcha-client==1.0.6
 ReviewBoard==2.0.15
 rhnlib==2.5.22
 rhsm==1.12.5
 scdate==1.9.60
 sckdump==2.0.5
 scservices==0.99.45
 scservices.dbus==0.99.45
 setools==1.0
 six==1.9.0
 slip==0.2.20
 slip.dbus==0.2.20
 slip.gtk==0.2.20
 smbc==1.0
 SSSDConfig==1.11.6
 suds==0.4.1
 urlgrabber==3.9.1
 virtinst==0.600.0
 Whoosh==2.7.0
 yum-metadata-parser==1.1.2

 D/B setup exactly as the old node with the same d/b|user|pass etc.

 Method:
 # rb-site installpath
 Then going in and dropping the d/b and creating the empty d/b again (I've
 tried it without dropping the newly created one as well).
 Taking the latest dump.sql from the old server and loading it into the new
 d/b
 Taking the latest htdocs/media/uploaded content to the new server from old
 # rb-site upgrade path

 and getting these errors which I've seen mentioned around the web but
 unsure how to correct and unsure how to read the evolve --hint to fix:

 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.

 The log output below, including warnings and errors,
 can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

 -- begin log output --
 Creating tables ...
 There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
 There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes.
 There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
 There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
 There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
 There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
 There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs.
 There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
 There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
 There are unapplied evolutions for site.
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.

 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes
 required.

 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 The application markup has been deleted
 In model scmtools.Repository:
 Field 'hosting_account' has been added
 Field 'extra_data' has been added
 CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot
 resolve automatically.


 # rb-site manage path list-evolutions
 Applied evolutions for 'sessions':
 session_expire_date_db_index

 Applied evolutions for 'accounts':
 is_private

 Applied evolutions for 'changedescs':
 fields_changed_longtext

 Applied evolutions for 'diffviewer':
 add_parent_diffs
 filediff_filenames_1024_chars
 diffset_basedir
 filediff_status

 Applied evolutions for 'reviews':
 change_descriptions
 last_review_timestamp
 shipit_count
 default_reviewer_repositories
 null_repository
 localsite
 group_incoming_request_count
 group_invite_only
 group_visible
 default_reviewer_local_site
 add_issues_to_comments
 file_attachments

 Applied evolutions for 'scmtools':
 bugzilla_url_charfield
 repository_raw_file_url
 repository_visible
 repository_path_length_255
 localsite
 repository_access_control
 group_site
 repository_hosting_accounts
 repository_extra_data_null


 Thanks in advance for any pointers in this.

 - John

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review 

submitter has left company; how to change

2015-05-21 Thread David Carson
We have had some recent employee departures, leaving a few open requests 
owned by submitters who are no longer at the company.

I don't see any way -- short of changing the underlying database -- to 
reassign these requests to another user.  Is there any such admin function?

If not, and I do change the underlying database, what other fields might 
have to be adjusted as well?  I can think of the open count, which I 
haven't quite found in the db yet, but I'm sure is there.  Anything else?

Thanks,
David

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


What if I move my repositories?

2015-05-21 Thread Eric Johnson
Hopefully a quick question.

What do I do if I move a Subversion repository? (Running ReviewBoard 2.0.15)

I went into the admin/db/scmtools/repository/ UI, and changed the URL.

Yet, if I immediately click on the [RBTools Setup] button, I get shown
the old URL. Restarting both the server, and memcached didn't change the
result.

Also, I'm worried that previous review requests will now be broken.

Please advise

Eric.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


problem adding bitbucket private repo

2015-05-21 Thread Colin Freas
I'm trying to setup our 2.0.11 install of Review Board with a private
Bitbucket git repository and can't seem to get it working.

When I initially add a repo, it is successfully added.  However, when I go
to add a review, it doesn't pull in any commit history.

If I delete the repo and re-add it, I then get the following error:

A repository with this name was not found.

Again, the first time it works; remove it; add it again, and always get
that error.  Tried with a few different repos.

Also, not seeing anything in the RB server log that shows anything about
the connection attempt.  Sysadmin on our RB box says nothing should be in
place preventing communication with Bitbucket.com.

Has anyone successfully added a private Bitbucket repo to Review Board
recently?

Any help much appreciated!

-Colin

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: why does rbt post have to fetch SCM credentials from RB and not just my client m/c

2015-05-21 Thread David Trowbridge
The former (files are fetched on demand to keep the dub size down, and
cached for a while to make things fast).

-David
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:21 AM unknown karthikut...@gmail.com wrote:

 So after the review request is uploaded, when a user views the diff, the
 files are brought from the repo and then displayed?
 Or is the entire file content saved in the database, which is fetched and
 displayed?


 On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:

 That error is coming from the server (the server is trying to log
 in--it's not downloading credentials to the client). It can't use your
 credentials from the client because it also needs to communicate with the
 repository when people view the diff.

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:04 PM unknown karthi...@gmail.com wrote:

  When i give the worng credentials in RB repository page and try to post
 from cmd promt (i.e. rbt post) , it fails as shown :

 http://localhost:8080/reviewboard/api/review-requests/180/diffs/
 ERROR: Error uploading diff


 One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105)

 path: [P4#run] Errors during command execution( p4 login )

 [Error]: Access for user 'wrong_userid' has not been enabled by
 'p4 protect'.
 

 Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.

 http://localhost:8080/reviewboard/r/180/

 So it tries to log into SCM using ReviewBoard repository login details,
 right ?
 why cant it just take it from my local machine ?


 On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 4:18:26 PM UTC+5:30, unknown wrote:

 Hi

 why does rbt post have to fetch SCM credentials from RB and not just my
 client m/c

 rbt diff takes perforce login details from client machine and why cant
 rbt post do the same?

 And where exactly is the function where it fetches the login from
 Review Board site ?

 Tnx

  --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups reviewboard group.

 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.


 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: User Authentication Credential for SVN authentication?

2015-05-21 Thread David Trowbridge
No, there is no way to do this. Most people create a new read-only user to
use for Review Board.

-David
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:29 AM Francois francois.chardavo...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Our current setup involves a number of SVN/git repositories, where only a
 sub-group of users have access to each repos, and no single shared login
 has access to all of them. This means that for each new repos, we currently
 have to pick an arbitrary user who happens to have access and ask him to
 come type in his password in the Change repository admin panel...(which
 isn't always possible since we have remote users - for those we'd give them
 temporary admin acess so they can log into the admin panel themselves) and
 if for whatever reason that user leaves the company (or is taken off the
 project and no longer has access to that repo), the setup will break for
 everyone else.

 Is there no way, when setting up the repository in reviewboard, to have it
 use the currently-logged-in user's credentials to access the repos (and
 display diffs, etc) instead of having to enter a single login/password for
 the repos as part of the admin configuration?

 Thanks!
 F.

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.