ercurial version.
>> The drawback of this solution is that you can't protect SSH accesses with
>> the
>> hg-ssh script. You would have to use a different wrapper.
>>
>> Regards.
>> Gilles.
>>
>> On Thursday 19 May 2011 01:11:37 am Chris Toomey wrote:
>> &
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Chris Toomey
ctdisp-reviewbo...@yahoo.com wrote:
When I click on an anchor link (to a diff file) in the diff viewer in our
RB installation, it doesn't add that link to the browser history so that I
can use the back
When I click on an anchor link (to a diff file) in the diff viewer in our
RB installation, it doesn't add that link to the browser history so that I
can use the back button to get back to the index of diff files. This has
been a minor annoyance for me for a long time.
Today I tried out the
You should be able to do that by specifying the parent revision number
as the one just before the files were added and the revision number as
the one after they were added (or the one after the latest changes to
them if that's what you want).
Chris
On Aug 25, 10:52 am, ctooley ctoo...@gmail.com
Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post-
review? We've been using http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ReviewboardExtension
which is pretty good but doesn't support some of the features of post-
review like passing in a diff file. Plus it'd be better in general
for folks to
is that you can't protect SSH accesses with the
hg-ssh script. You would have to use a different wrapper.
Regards.
Gilles.
On Thursday 19 May 2011 01:11:37 am Chris Toomey wrote:
Thanks Giles. When I was trying to debug it I saw that it was running
hg serve remotely on the target host
that was started and not completed or was I
misinterpreting how it was trying to work?
Chris
On May 17, 10:27 pm, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 07:51:07 am Chris Toomey wrote:
Hi Christian,
It just has the info about the file/revision that it says
We're running ReviewBoard 1.5.3.1 with Mercurial and are using the hg
postreview extension to post reviews to the server. This works fine
for any repository that we've entered via the RB admin UI with a path
(URI) starting with http://, but the RB server replies with a 400
response reporting a
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Chris Toomey
ctdisp-reviewbo...@yahoo.comwrote:
We're running ReviewBoard 1.5.3.1 with Mercurial and are using the hg
postreview extension
. -http://www.vmware.com
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Chris Toomey ctdisp-reviewbo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/and other 1.5
documentation links are returning 404s. This was working fine as of
yesterday.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/ and other 1.5
documentation links are returning 404s. This was working fine as of
yesterday.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
11 matches
Mail list logo
